<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Dish Network, AMC dispute could see the network's channels dropped this summer]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/dich-network-amc-dispute-could-see-the-networks-channels-dropp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/dich-network-amc-dispute-could-see-the-networks-channels-dropp/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/dich-network-amc-dispute-could-see-the-networks-channels-dropp/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/mad-men-logo.jpg" style="width: 410px; height: 308px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></p><p> It wasn't that long ago that Dish Network was proudly <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/20/dish-network-has-amc-hd-now-casually-points-out-directv-still-d/">offering AMC HD to its customers</a> (especially since DirecTV didn't, which has <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/02/directv-adds-amc-hd-next-week-too-bad-mad-men-is-still-six-mont/">since been rectified</a>) but now the company is willing to let the network's contract expire this summer, taking new episodes of Mad Men, Breaking Bad and The Walking Dead away from subscribers. The source of the sudden animosity, according to a press release from AMC, is continuing litigation between it and Dish Network <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/03/voom-hd-claims-over-1-billion-from-dish-network-drop/">over dropping the Voom HD channels back in 2008</a>, leading to them going dark <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/20/voom-hd-networks-going-kaput-in-america/">soon after</a>. The <i>LA Times</i> reports Dish Network claims the denial of its appeal on a decision in the case has nothing to do with its sudden change of heart is solely about AMC's high renewal cost for a relatively low viewership. Whatever you believe, the sniping and threats will likely continue right up until the contract runs out June 30th, which is at least long enough for this season of Mad Men to finish on its own.</p><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/dich-network-amc-dispute-could-see-the-networks-channels-dropp/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dish Network, AMC dispute could see the network's channels dropped this summer</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/dich-network-amc-dispute-could-see-the-networks-channels-dropp/">Dish Network, AMC dispute could see the network's channels dropped this summer</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 04 May 2012 19:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/dich-network-amc-dispute-could-see-the-networks-channels-dropp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20231524/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/dich-network-amc-dispute-could-see-the-networks-channels-dropp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amc</category><category>breaking bad</category><category>BreakingBad</category><category>carriage</category><category>carriage dispute</category><category>CarriageDispute</category><category>contract</category><category>dih</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>hdpostmini</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>mad men</category><category>MadMen</category><category>pay tv</category><category>PayTv</category><category>satellite tv</category><category>SatelliteTv</category><category>the walking dead</category><category>TheWalkingDead</category><category>voom</category><category>voom hd</category><category>VoomHd</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 19:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cablevision and Viacom settle lawsuit over live TV on iPad]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/10/cablevision-and-viacom-settle-lawsuit-over-live-tv-on-ipad/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/10/cablevision-and-viacom-settle-lawsuit-over-live-tv-on-ipad/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/10/cablevision-and-viacom-settle-lawsuit-over-live-tv-on-ipad/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/10/cablevision-and-viacom-settle-lawsuit-over-live-tv-on-ipad/"><img border="1" hspace="4"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/08/cablevisionoptimumipad080911.jpg" vspace="4" /></a></div>
Well, that was anticlimactic. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/23/viacom-sues-cablevision-over-its-tv-streaming-optimum-for-ipad-a/">Viacom quickly sued Cablevision</a> after the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/02/cablevision-optimum-for-ipad-app-now-available-streams-hundreds/">Optimum for iPad</a> (now <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/09/cablevisions-optimum-app-hits-2-0-brings-cable-tv-streaming-to/">on iPhone and iPod Touch</a>) app launched and allowed cable customers to stream the entire channel lineup on their tablets, but now they've resolved that and "an unrelated business matter". Viacom's case against Time Warner's similar offering <a href="http://hd.engadget.com/2011/06/22/time-warner-viacom-legal-spat-over-live-streaming-to-ipad-comes/">is on hold</a> while they also try to work out a deal, but Cablevision's stance from the start is that its approach fell within the existing agreements and they appear to have gotten their way. Just like most other channel carriage disputes, it was likely a deal on the supposedly unrelated issue that got things moving, but as long as we can keep watching <i>Teen Mom </i>in the kitchen, bathroom or out on the patio it doesn't really matter. Check the official statement from both companies after the break.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/10/cablevision-and-viacom-settle-lawsuit-over-live-tv-on-ipad/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cablevision and Viacom settle lawsuit over live TV on iPad</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/10/cablevision-and-viacom-settle-lawsuit-over-live-tv-on-ipad/">Cablevision and Viacom settle lawsuit over live TV on iPad</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 10 Aug 2011 17:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/10/cablevision-and-viacom-settle-lawsuit-over-live-tv-on-ipad/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20014739/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/10/cablevision-and-viacom-settle-lawsuit-over-live-tv-on-ipad/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>breaking news</category><category>cable</category><category>cable tv</category><category>CableTv</category><category>cablevision</category><category>carriage</category><category>channels</category><category>ipad</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>live tv streaming</category><category>LiveTvStreaming</category><category>optimum</category><category>optimum for ipad</category><category>OptimumForIpad</category><category>resolved</category><category>tablet</category><category>viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 17:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AT&amp;T abruptly drops ESPN 3D from U-verse during the X-Games citing high price, low demand]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/01/atandt-abruptly-drops-espn-3d-from-u-verse-during-the-x-games-citi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/01/atandt-abruptly-drops-espn-3d-from-u-verse-during-the-x-games-citi/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/01/atandt-abruptly-drops-espn-3d-from-u-verse-during-the-x-games-citi/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/01/atandt-abruptly-drops-espn-3d-from-u-verse-during-the-x-games-citi/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/12/espn3dlogo600.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Support by AT&amp;T <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/u-verse/">U-verse</a> for the fledgling <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/espn3d/">ESPN 3D</a> channel always seemed halfhearted, while it was one of the providers to carry the channel at launch it was the only one at that time to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/atandt-u-verse-will-have-espn-3d-at-launch-for-a-fee/">levy a $10 fee</a> for the privilege of viewing. The good news for subscribers is that $10 fee is gone, but the bad news is the channel has exited stage left along with it yesterday, before the last night of ESPN's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/29/espn-x-games-17-returns-with-more-than-double-the-3d-coverage-t/">big X-Games broadcast in 3D</a> with no apparent warning. AT&amp;T's reason for the move follows after the break, which lays out the case that even despite interested viewers chipping in their Hamiltons it has decided with there's not enough demand to support the "high cost" of ESPN 3D. Slow down on ringing the death knell for 3D everywhere however, since AT&amp;T is still hanging onto its 3D VOD movies, for now. Its willingness to make the rare move of dropping one of the sports leaders offerings definitely speaks to the niche status of 3D, but experience suggests this comes down to a dollars and cents decision across the entire swath of the ever growing ESPN / ABC / Disney family.<br />
<br />
[Thanks, Larry]<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/01/atandt-abruptly-drops-espn-3d-from-u-verse-during-the-x-games-citi/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>AT&amp;T abruptly drops ESPN 3D from U-verse during the X-Games citing high price, low demand</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/01/atandt-abruptly-drops-espn-3d-from-u-verse-during-the-x-games-citi/">AT&amp;T abruptly drops ESPN 3D from U-verse during the X-Games citing high price, low demand</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 01 Aug 2011 01:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/01/atandt-abruptly-drops-espn-3d-from-u-verse-during-the-x-games-citi/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20005668/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/01/atandt-abruptly-drops-espn-3d-from-u-verse-during-the-x-games-citi/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3d</category><category>3d sports</category><category>3d tv</category><category>3dSports</category><category>3dTv</category><category>att</category><category>carriage</category><category>channel</category><category>espn</category><category>espn 3d</category><category>Espn3d</category><category>hd</category><category>u-verse</category><category>x-games</category><category>x-games 17</category><category>X-games17</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 01:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[FCC mandates data roaming after 3-2 vote, AT&amp;T and Verizon aren't too happy about it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/07/fcc-mandates-data-roaming-after-3-2-vote-atandt-and-verizon-aren/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/07/fcc-mandates-data-roaming-after-3-2-vote-atandt-and-verizon-aren/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/07/fcc-mandates-data-roaming-after-3-2-vote-atandt-and-verizon-aren/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/07/fcc-mandates-data-roaming-after-3-2-vote-atandt-and-verizon-aren/"><img align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/mobile.engadget.com/media/2006/05/tower.JPG" alt="" /></a>Good news for small cellular carriers, and bad news for big ones today -- the Federal Communications Commission has decided to mandate <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/26/fcc-looking-at-data-roaming-rules-not-interested-in-commonizing/">data roaming</a> by a 3-2 vote. Simply put, major carriers like AT&amp;T and Verizon will be required to let you check your email and perform VoIP calls over their federally-licensed airwaves even if you're actually paying a regional carrier for your cellular coverage instead -- just as they've been required to do <a href="http://mobile.engadget.com/2007/08/13/fcc-requires-nationals-to-offer-cheap-roaming/">for voice and messaging since 2007</a>. As you can imagine, Big Red and Ma Bell aren't exactly jumping for joy at the news, with both threatening to slow expansion into niche markets if they'll be forced to share their infrastructure. The victorious members of the FCC claim that this doesn't constitute common carriage because the big boys still get to negotiate "commercially reasonable" rates. Considering that two dissenting commissioners say that it is, indeed, common carriage, though, and thus beyond the powers granted to the FCC, we imagine we haven't heard the last of this debate. What happened to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/26/fcc-looking-at-data-roaming-rules-not-interested-in-commonizing/">simply "incenting</a>" the carriers to come to an agreement? Find statements from most every concerned party at the links below.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/07/fcc-mandates-data-roaming-after-3-2-vote-atandt-and-verizon-aren/">FCC mandates data roaming after 3-2 vote, AT&amp;T and Verizon aren't too happy about it</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 07 Apr 2011 18:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/07/fcc-mandates-data-roaming-after-3-2-vote-atandt-and-verizon-aren/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19906500/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/07/fcc-mandates-data-roaming-after-3-2-vote-atandt-and-verizon-aren/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>carriage</category><category>carrier</category><category>common carriage</category><category>CommonCarriage</category><category>data</category><category>data roaming</category><category>DataRoaming</category><category>FCC</category><category>federal communications commission</category><category>FederalCommunicationsCommission</category><category>roaming</category><category>rural</category><category>vote</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Hollister]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 18:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[2011 retransmission dispute roundup: which channels may go dark at midnight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/31/2011-retransmission-dispute-roundup-which-channels-may-go-dark/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/31/2011-retransmission-dispute-roundup-which-channels-may-go-dark/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/31/2011-retransmission-dispute-roundup-which-channels-may-go-dark/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/31/2011-retransmission-dispute-roundup-which-channels-may-go-dark/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/12/dichestyleretrans.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
It's a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/01/fox-and-time-warner-cable-cut-a-deal-turkish-missiles-to-be-remov/">yearly</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/01/time-warner-viacom-reach-agreement-bromance-crisis-averted/">thing</a>, with contracts between TV stations and pay-TV providers due to expire just as the ball drops for the New Year it's increasingly hard to tell which channels will still be around when 2011 dawns. Check out our list below to see which ones are on the chopping block and which ones have already reached a new agreement this time around. If you spot any we've missed let us know in the comments or if there are any last minute reprieves, updates or extensions.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update</strong>: Moved Suddenlink/Viacom, Time Warner/Sinclair to resolved<br />
<strong><br />
Expiring at midnight:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://fansfightback.com/">Dish Network vs. E!, Style</a> -- Dish Network and Comcast are negotiating over the networks, with a contract expiring at midnight. Dish and Comcast <a href="http://www.multichannel.com/article/461631-E_Style_Face_Dish_Disconnect_On_Jan_1.php">are also fighting over Comcast SportsNet California</a>, which has been off the air since November 24</li>
</ul>
<br />
<strong>Resolved:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/directv-tv-station-group-hearst-67112">Hearst vs. DirecTV</a> - Covering 29 stations across the country including CBS, ABC and CW affiliates</li>
    <li><a href="http://www.multichannel.com/article/461630-Insight_Raycom_Reach_Retrans_Deal.php">Insight vs. Raycom</a> - Three stations in Louisville, Evansville and Cincinnati</li>
    <li><a href="http://suddenlinkfyi.com/2010/12/31/suddenlink-viacom-reach-agreement/">Suddenlink vs. Viacom</a> - Not only will Suddenlink keep Viacom stations like MTV, VH1 and Spike, but it will also be adding EPIX "in the next few months," without raising its subscribers rates</li>
    <li><a href="http://www.twcableuntangled.com/2010/12/another-retrans-fight-sinclair-viewers-wont-lose-their-network-programming/">Time Warner Cable vs. Sinclair Broadcast Group</a>  -- Sinclair owns ABC, CBS, Fox, CW, MyNetworkTV and NBC affiliates in  35 markets which it will pull at midnight including San Antonio,  Pittsburgh and Tampa. Time Warner claims it will still be able to  provide programming from the "Big 4" networks in those areas without  Sinclair, although viewers may miss their local news stations -- This isn't fully resolved, but negotiations have been extended until January 14th. <a href="http://www.twcableuntangled.com/2010/12/we-have-an-extension-with-sinclair-broadcasting/">Details here</a>.</li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/31/2011-retransmission-dispute-roundup-which-channels-may-go-dark/">2011 retransmission dispute roundup: which channels may go dark at midnight</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 31 Dec 2010 19:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/31/2011-retransmission-dispute-roundup-which-channels-may-go-dark/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19782999/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/31/2011-retransmission-dispute-roundup-which-channels-may-go-dark/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>carriage</category><category>directv</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>dispute</category><category>e</category><category>hd</category><category>hearst</category><category>insight</category><category>raycom</category><category>retrans</category><category>sinclair</category><category>sinclair broadcasting</category><category>SinclairBroadcasting</category><category>style network</category><category>StyleNetwork</category><category>time warner cable</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 19:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U-verse loses HGTV, Food &amp; other Scripps networks during latest carriage dispute]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/05/u-verse-loses-hgtv-food-and-other-scripps-networks-during-latest/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/05/u-verse-loses-hgtv-food-and-other-scripps-networks-during-latest/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/05/u-verse-loses-hgtv-food-and-other-scripps-networks-during-latest/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/05/u-verse-loses-hgtv-food-and-other-scripps-networks-during-latest/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/11/hgtvuversecarriage.jpg"  alt="" /></a></div>
Well, we can't say we weren't <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/12/u-verse-preps-customers-for-carriage-disputes-and-missing-channe/">warned</a>. It appears AT&amp;T and Scripps Networks have been unable to reach a price for the family of TV channels including HGTV, Food Network, DIY Network, Cooking Channel and GAC, resulting in them disappearing at 1 a.m. last night. Naturally, each side has issued press releases (included after the break) and put up websites accusing the other of being unreasonable, unfair, and undoubtedly being the cause of the mess though curiously this time around it's the content provider Scripps claiming U-verse refused an extension while negotiations continued. In the meantime, AT&amp;T suggests subscribers check out TLC and others on a free preview to fill the gap -- we'll see how long that lasts, it's the real Bobby Flay or nothing where we come from.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/05/u-verse-loses-hgtv-food-and-other-scripps-networks-during-latest/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U-verse loses HGTV, Food &amp; other Scripps networks during latest carriage dispute</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/05/u-verse-loses-hgtv-food-and-other-scripps-networks-during-latest/">U-verse loses HGTV, Food &amp; other Scripps networks during latest carriage dispute</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 05 Nov 2010 12:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/05/u-verse-loses-hgtv-food-and-other-scripps-networks-during-latest/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19704806/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/05/u-verse-loses-hgtv-food-and-other-scripps-networks-during-latest/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>att</category><category>carriage</category><category>carriage dispute</category><category>CarriageDispute</category><category>channels</category><category>Cooking Channel</category><category>CookingChannel</category><category>diy network</category><category>DiyNetwork</category><category>food network</category><category>FoodNetwork</category><category>gac</category><category>hd</category><category>hgtv</category><category>scripps</category><category>scripps networks</category><category>ScrippsNetworks</category><category>u-verse</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 12:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fox blackout on Cablevision ends after 14 day standoff, glaring contest continues on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/30/fox-blackout-on-cablevision-ends-after-14-day-standoff-glaring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/30/fox-blackout-on-cablevision-ends-after-14-day-standoff-glaring/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/30/fox-blackout-on-cablevision-ends-after-14-day-standoff-glaring/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/30/fox-blackout-on-cablevision-ends-after-14-day-standoff-glaring/"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/10/10-30-10-foxcarries.jpg" /></a></div>
Evidently missing the first two games of the World Series was about all Cablevision thought it subscribers could take, as news just hit the wire: the fourteen-day standoff is over and both tonight's game three of the World Series and tomorrow's Jets vs Packers game are available to subscribers. While these carriage disputes are pretty common, it is very rare for channels to be pulled and downright unheard of for a channel as popular as Fox. It came to this because Cablevision was very unhappy about News Corp's new terms and after many pleas to the FCC and politicians to intervene, an <a href="http://hd.engadget.com/2010/10/19/cablevision-updates-its-anti-fox-message-as-blackout-continues/">advertising campaign</a>, and eventually an unaccepted offer to match <a href="http://hd.engadget.com/2010/01/01/fox-and-time-warner-cable-cut-a-deal-turkish-missiles-to-be-remov/">the price that Time Warner Cable pays</a>, a deal has finally been done. Not exactly all's well that ends well, though, as Cablevision released the following statement: "In the absence of any meaningful action from the FCC, Cablevision has agreed to pay Fox an unfair price for multiple channels of its programming including many in which our customers have little or no interest." Talk about sour grapes. Well at least we can hope that Cablevision's efforts paid off a little bit and your cable bill won't go up as much as it would've if the outage never occurred to begin with. We can hope.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/30/fox-blackout-on-cablevision-ends-after-14-day-standoff-glaring/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fox blackout on Cablevision ends after 14 day standoff, glaring contest continues on</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/30/fox-blackout-on-cablevision-ends-after-14-day-standoff-glaring/">Fox blackout on Cablevision ends after 14 day standoff, glaring contest continues on</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 30 Oct 2010 20:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/30/fox-blackout-on-cablevision-ends-after-14-day-standoff-glaring/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19696278/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/30/fox-blackout-on-cablevision-ends-after-14-day-standoff-glaring/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Cablevision</category><category>carriage</category><category>content</category><category>Fox</category><category>News Corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>programming</category><category>world series</category><category>WorldSeries</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Drawbaugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 20:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fox, Dish Network deal means no network TV blackout, FX &amp; sports networks back on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/29/fox-dish-network-deal-means-no-network-tv-blackout-fx-and-sports/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/29/fox-dish-network-deal-means-no-network-tv-blackout-fx-and-sports/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/29/fox-dish-network-deal-means-no-network-tv-blackout-fx-and-sports/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/29/fox-dish-network-deal-means-no-network-tv-blackout-fx-and-sports/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/10/foxdishdispute-1288401122.jpg"  alt="" /></a></div>
Just that fast, it's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/05/fox-dish-play-the-blame-game-over-disappearing-fx-sports-netwo/">like it all never happened</a>.  Fox and Dish Network have cut a deal to restore programming from the  giant's channels including 19 regional sports networks, FX and National  Geographic Channel. No word yet on the terms of the deal, but the key is  it arrived in time to avoid a possible November 1 Cablevision-style  (still ongoing btw, and getting nastier than ever with allegations of  cable recommended piracy and unfair dealing) blackout of Fox in many  cities during the World Series. Check out the press release after the  break, or just go through and queue up a few episodes of <i>Always Sunny in Philadelphia</i> on the ol' 922. <br />
<br />
[Thanks, Justin]<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/29/fox-dish-network-deal-means-no-network-tv-blackout-fx-and-sports/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fox, Dish Network deal means no network TV blackout, FX &amp; sports networks back on</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/29/fox-dish-network-deal-means-no-network-tv-blackout-fx-and-sports/">Fox, Dish Network deal means no network TV blackout, FX &amp; sports networks back on</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 29 Oct 2010 21:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/29/fox-dish-network-deal-means-no-network-tv-blackout-fx-and-sports/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19695847/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/29/fox-dish-network-deal-means-no-network-tv-blackout-fx-and-sports/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>carriage</category><category>carriage dispute</category><category>CarriageDispute</category><category>dish</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>fox</category><category>fox sports</category><category>FoxSports</category><category>fx</category><category>hd</category><category>rsn</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 21:13:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Television networks block Google TV from accessing web-based content (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/21/television-networks-block-google-tv-from-accessing-web-based-con/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/21/television-networks-block-google-tv-from-accessing-web-based-con/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/21/television-networks-block-google-tv-from-accessing-web-based-con/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/21/television-networks-block-google-tv-from-accessing-web-based-con/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/10/googletvlogo.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
You may be able to watch <em>The Office</em> on your <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/GoogleTV/">Google TV</a>, but perhaps not on demand -- ABC, CBS and NBC are barring Sony and Logitech's web-infused TVs and set-top-boxes from accessing full episodes of streaming video content. The <em>Wall Street Journal</em> reports that all three networks have confirmed the ban, and that Fox hasn't yet reached a decision on whether it will ban Google TV as well. For its part, Google says that it's "ultimately the content owners' choice to restrict their fans from accessing their content on the platform," so don't expect the search company to pitch in, unless it can work out some <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/06/google-and-hulu-in-talks-about-google-tv-integration/">premium arrangements</a> for all parties involved. This is the part where we'd normally direct you to the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/18/playing-hulu-on-google-tv-is-as-easy-as-changing-one-sett/">simple browser tweak</a> that made Hulu accessible when it pulled the very same stunt, but alas, we're finding Hulu too is once again blocked.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update: </strong><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE69K5QS20101022"><em>Reuters</em> reports</a> that Google is "actively negotiating" with the three networks after all.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/21/television-networks-block-google-tv-from-accessing-web-based-con/">Television networks block Google TV from accessing web-based content (update)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/21/television-networks-block-google-tv-from-accessing-web-based-con/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19684543/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/21/television-networks-block-google-tv-from-accessing-web-based-con/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABC</category><category>browser</category><category>carriage</category><category>CBS</category><category>Fox</category><category>Google</category><category>Google TV</category><category>GoogleTv</category><category>Hulu</category><category>NBC</category><category>streaming video</category><category>StreamingVideo</category><category>television</category><category>TV</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Hollister]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cablevision updates its anti-Fox message as blackout continues]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/19/cablevision-updates-its-anti-fox-message-as-blackout-continues/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/19/cablevision-updates-its-anti-fox-message-as-blackout-continues/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/19/cablevision-updates-its-anti-fox-message-as-blackout-continues/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/19/cablevision-updates-its-anti-fox-message-as-blackout-continues/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/10/cablevisionfox10192010.jpg"  alt="" /></a></div>
For those in need of an update, the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/16/fox-channels-fox5-my9-disappear-from-cablevision-lineup/">Fox/Cablevision dispute </a>continues to drag on. Customers who try to tune into the channels on Cablevision are seeing an updated message (after the break) from the company calling out Fox for not accepting its offer of arbitration. <em>Multichannel News</em> mentions the parties met briefly Monday, and may again on Wednesday, with Fox claiming Cablevision refuses to accept the same terms accepted by other providers in the market. <em>ESPN New York</em> found some sports fans <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/18/poll-what-do-you-do-when-channels-go-blank/">waiting things out at the local bar</a>, but if this extends to the World Series and the Yankees advance, things could get ugly.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/19/cablevision-updates-its-anti-fox-message-as-blackout-continues/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cablevision updates its anti-Fox message as blackout continues</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/19/cablevision-updates-its-anti-fox-message-as-blackout-continues/">Cablevision updates its anti-Fox message as blackout continues</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:37:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/19/cablevision-updates-its-anti-fox-message-as-blackout-continues/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19680628/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/19/cablevision-updates-its-anti-fox-message-as-blackout-continues/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cablevision</category><category>carriage</category><category>carriage dispute</category><category>CarriageDispute</category><category>fox</category><category>fox5</category><category>hd</category><category>my9</category><category>new york</category><category>NewYork</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:37:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Poll: What do you do when channels go blank?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/18/poll-what-do-you-do-when-channels-go-blank/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/18/poll-what-do-you-do-when-channels-go-blank/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/18/poll-what-do-you-do-when-channels-go-blank/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/10/keepfoxonscreengrab.jpg"  alt="" /></div>
Disputes over fees that result in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/carriage/">channels being blacked out</a> seem to be occurring more regularly than ever, and as we've found out <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/16/news-corp-removes-hulu-from-cablevision-escalating-carriage-dis/">can even extend to internet access</a> for streaming TV shows. So what would you do, or have you done when (insert channel here) goes off the air after negotiations for a new contract stall right before (insert major TV event here) airs and even <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/wabc-7-pulled-from-cablevision-on-the-eve-of-the-oscars-or-two/">John Kerry</a> can't make it right? We remember the great <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/01/time-warner-viacom-reach-agreement-bromance-crisis-averted/">Viacom dispute of 2008</a>, if we had missed even a single episode of <em>The Hills</em>, there would have been serious repercussions for all involved.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/18/poll-what-do-you-do-when-channels-go-blank/#poll54414">View Poll</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/18/poll-what-do-you-do-when-channels-go-blank/">Poll: What do you do when channels go blank?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 18 Oct 2010 08:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/18/poll-what-do-you-do-when-channels-go-blank/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19677910/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/18/poll-what-do-you-do-when-channels-go-blank/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>blackout</category><category>cable</category><category>carriage</category><category>carriage dispute</category><category>CarriageDispute</category><category>channels</category><category>hd</category><category>negotiation</category><category>satellite</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 08:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fox channels (Fox5, My9) disappear from Cablevision lineup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/16/fox-channels-fox5-my9-disappear-from-cablevision-lineup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/16/fox-channels-fox5-my9-disappear-from-cablevision-lineup/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/16/fox-channels-fox5-my9-disappear-from-cablevision-lineup/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/16/fox-channels-fox5-my9-disappear-from-cablevision-lineup/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/10/cablevisionfox10162010.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
The latest edition of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/carriage/">carriage</a> disputes is also the most damaging, especially to sports fans in the New York area, as several Fox stations are no longer available to Cablevision subscribers. Naturally Fox and Cablevision have done the blame each other dance (both press releases are after the break) and set up websites arguing each side, but we're pretty sure the only real question here is if Fox5, My9 and the other networks will be back on the air in time for the NLCS which starts tonight, the New York Giants football game on Sunday, and potentially the World Series. Reports from the <em>L.A. Times</em> indicate Fox wants fees for its channel to reach $1 per subscriber, per month, plus deals for its cable channels. The FCC and several elected officials have tried to intervene and Cablevision has proposed entering binding arbitration but to no avail, now all that's left is the waiting to see if one side will blink.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/16/fox-channels-fox5-my9-disappear-from-cablevision-lineup/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fox channels (Fox5, My9) disappear from Cablevision lineup</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/16/fox-channels-fox5-my9-disappear-from-cablevision-lineup/">Fox channels (Fox5, My9) disappear from Cablevision lineup</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 16 Oct 2010 02:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/16/fox-channels-fox5-my9-disappear-from-cablevision-lineup/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19676697/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/16/fox-channels-fox5-my9-disappear-from-cablevision-lineup/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cablevision</category><category>carriage</category><category>fox</category><category>fox5</category><category>hd</category><category>my9</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 02:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U-verse preps customers for carriage disputes and missing channels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/12/u-verse-preps-customers-for-carriage-disputes-and-missing-channe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/12/u-verse-preps-customers-for-carriage-disputes-and-missing-channe/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/12/u-verse-preps-customers-for-carriage-disputes-and-missing-channe/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/12/u-verse-preps-customers-for-carriage-disputes-and-missing-channe/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/10/uversescrippsletter.jpg"  alt="" /></a></div>
Already involved in a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/carriage">carriage</a> dispute with Hallmark Channel, AT&amp;T's gotten out in front of a possible new carriage dispute with Scripps Networks Interactive by notifying customers what channels they could lose at month's end. Others are also on the block unless a new deal is worked out, including FamilyNet, EWTN and Bloomberg, but Scripps' DIY Network, Food Network, HGTV and others are the most notable. Our friends at <em>ZatzNotFunny </em>recently linked up a <em>Bloomberg </em>article detailing the rising number of retrans fee disputes and discussing the reasons behind them, as content providers and operators continue to try to squeeze profits out of their existing business model while still expanding into new ones, all without raising rates so rapidly customers complain.<br />
<br />
[Thanks, Salman]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/12/u-verse-preps-customers-for-carriage-disputes-and-missing-channe/">U-verse preps customers for carriage disputes and missing channels</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 12 Oct 2010 15:37:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/12/u-verse-preps-customers-for-carriage-disputes-and-missing-channe/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19671108/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/12/u-verse-preps-customers-for-carriage-disputes-and-missing-channe/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>att</category><category>carriage</category><category>diy network</category><category>DiyNetwork</category><category>food network</category><category>FoodNetwork</category><category>hallmark</category><category>hd</category><category>hgtv</category><category>scripps</category><category>u-verse</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 15:37:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fox, Dish play the blame game over disappearing FX, sports networks]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/05/fox-dish-play-the-blame-game-over-disappearing-fx-sports-netwo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/05/fox-dish-play-the-blame-game-over-disappearing-fx-sports-netwo/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/05/fox-dish-play-the-blame-game-over-disappearing-fx-sports-netwo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/05/fox-dish-play-the-blame-game-over-disappearing-fx-sports-netwo/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/10/foxdishdispute.jpg"  alt="" /></a></div>
The latest <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/carriage/">carriage</a> dispute is already a few days old and shows no signs of breaking yet, as Fox and Dish Network square off. Naturally both have issued the usual press releases and promotional websites blaming the other but at the moment, the only thing to know is for Dish customers, Fox regional sports networks, National Geographic Channel and FX are off the air. For its part, Dish is throwing in CBS College Sports, NBA TV, NHL Network, NBig Ten Network and a few others for affected customers. Of course, that doesn't do much for missing the conclusion of pennant races in baseball or preseason NBA games hitting many of those RSNs, though Fox claims things could get worse -- November 1 Fox and MyNetworkTV could be next to go.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/05/fox-dish-play-the-blame-game-over-disappearing-fx-sports-netwo/">Fox, Dish play the blame game over disappearing FX, sports networks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 05 Oct 2010 12:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/05/fox-dish-play-the-blame-game-over-disappearing-fx-sports-netwo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19659850/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/05/fox-dish-play-the-blame-game-over-disappearing-fx-sports-netwo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>carriage</category><category>dish</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>fox</category><category>fox sports</category><category>FoxSports</category><category>fx</category><category>hd</category><category>national geographic</category><category>NationalGeographic</category><category>rsn</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 12:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DirecTV will have ESPN 3D at launch, next to its own N3D channel]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/29/directv-will-have-espn-3d-at-launch-next-to-its-n3d-channel/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/29/directv-will-have-espn-3d-at-launch-next-to-its-n3d-channel/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/29/directv-will-have-espn-3d-at-launch-next-to-its-n3d-channel/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.espnmediazone3.com/us/2010/03/directv-to-launch-espn-3d-to-millions/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/espn3dlogo600-1269868576.jpg" /></a></div>
Not that we ever doubted they would, but DirecTV and ESPN have made official plans to make <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/espn3d">ESPN 3D</a> available to the satellite broadcaster's millions of customers as <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/05/espn-3d-launches-in-june-with-world-cup-soccer-our-football-t/">soon as it launches June 11</a> with the South Africa / Mexico World Cup game. Better news? There's no additional charge for ESPN 3D, at least for now, though of course you will need a 3DTV to make any use of the signal. The only other new news is a name for<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/directv-3d-broadcasts-officially-announced-coming-in-june/"> DirecTV's native Panasonic-sponsored linear 3D network</a>, now dubbed N3D (Get it? In 3D? ...Yeah, we didn't either.) Now the only wait is to see if DirecTV can shove its own 3D exclusive in the competition's face (doubtful) or if we hear about any other carriage announcements between now and NAB 2010.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/29/directv-will-have-espn-3d-at-launch-next-to-its-n3d-channel/">DirecTV will have ESPN 3D at launch, next to its own N3D channel</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/29/directv-will-have-espn-3d-at-launch-next-to-its-n3d-channel/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19417969/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/29/directv-will-have-espn-3d-at-launch-next-to-its-n3d-channel/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3d</category><category>3dtv</category><category>breaking news</category><category>BreakingNews</category><category>carriage</category><category>directv</category><category>directv 3d</category><category>Directv3d</category><category>espn</category><category>espn 3d</category><category>Espn3d</category><category>hd</category><category>n3d</category><category>panasonic</category><category>world cup</category><category>WorldCup</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[WABC-7 comes back on Cablevision, return to Oscar watching at DEFCON 4]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/abc-7-comes-back-on-cablevision-return-to-oscar-watching-at-def/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/abc-7-comes-back-on-cablevision-return-to-oscar-watching-at-def/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/abc-7-comes-back-on-cablevision-return-to-oscar-watching-at-def/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.saveabc7.com/2010/03/program-alert-for-cablevision-viewers.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="16" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/cablevisionhdtv.jpg" alt="" /></a>Just that fast, the situation has been defused, as ABC-7 has suddenly reappeared on the screens of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/cablevision">Cablevision</a> viewers. It's been <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/wabc-7-pulled-from-cablevision-on-the-eve-of-the-oscars-or-two/">off for less than a day</a> but despite missing a great Magic/Lakers matchup earlier in the day it's on just in time to see if <em>Avatar</em> actually takes the Best Picture trophy home for the 3D camp. The statement from WABC-TV president Rebecca Campbell:<br />
<br />
<em>"We've made significant progress, and have reached an agreement in principle that recognizes the fair value of ABC7, with deal points that we expect to finalize with Cablevision. Given this movement, we're pleased to announce that ABC7 will return to Cablevision households while we work to complete our negotiations."</em><br />
<br />
No word on what those "deal points" are, but as long as our friend <a href="http://twitter.com/Gartenberg/status/10139312383">@Gartenberg</a> gets to watch his <em>Castle</em> it's probably all for the best.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/abc-7-comes-back-on-cablevision-return-to-oscar-watching-at-def/">WABC-7 comes back on Cablevision, return to Oscar watching at DEFCON 4</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 07 Mar 2010 21:23:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/abc-7-comes-back-on-cablevision-return-to-oscar-watching-at-def/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19387015/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/abc-7-comes-back-on-cablevision-return-to-oscar-watching-at-def/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>abc</category><category>breaking news</category><category>BreakingNews</category><category>cablevision</category><category>carriage</category><category>disney</category><category>hd</category><category>oscars</category><category>wabc-7</category><category>wabc-tv</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 21:23:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[WABC-7 pulled from Cablevision on the eve of the Oscars or two days before Lost]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/wabc-7-pulled-from-cablevision-on-the-eve-of-the-oscars-or-two/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/wabc-7-pulled-from-cablevision-on-the-eve-of-the-oscars-or-two/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/wabc-7-pulled-from-cablevision-on-the-eve-of-the-oscars-or-two/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/abcvscablevision030710.jpg" /></div>
Depending on your personal calendar, the removal of WABC-7's signal from Cablevision in New York is potentially tragic for different reasons but all in all it's a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/carriage">very familiar scene</a>. Fresh off its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/21/food-network-hgtv-are-back-on-cablevision/">standoff with Scripps over Food Network and HGTV</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/cablevision">Cablevision</a> is rumbling with Disney over the same issue that nearly caused Time Warner customers to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/01/its-2010-fox-is-still-on-twc-for-now-but-food-and-hgtv-are-of/">miss Fox-broadcasted bowl games</a> around New Years Day (and yes, Senator John Kerry is involved, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/25/senator-kerry-asks-fox-and-time-warner-to-keep-the-bowl-games-on/">again</a>) -- will the cable company pay to carry what's available free OTA? With both sides firmly dug in slinging accusations back and forth via screen crawls and press releases (propaganda from both sides embedded after the break) the most interesting wrinkle is Cablevision's suggestion that users just go online and check out primetime programming via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/abc.com">ABC.com</a> or <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Hulu/">Hulu</a> (or grab an antenna for some digital TV love, whatever works.) These things can turn at a moments notice so we'll wait see if the fighting is resolved in time for an afternoon NBA Finals flashback as the Lakers take on the Magic, or for the 82nd Annual Academy Awards at 8:30 p.m. No matter what happens, if things aren't back to normal by Tuesday we'd evacuate the city, a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/lost">Lostie</a> without their fix is a dangerous thing.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/wabc-7-pulled-from-cablevision-on-the-eve-of-the-oscars-or-two/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>WABC-7 pulled from Cablevision on the eve of the Oscars or two days before Lost</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/wabc-7-pulled-from-cablevision-on-the-eve-of-the-oscars-or-two/">WABC-7 pulled from Cablevision on the eve of the Oscars or two days before Lost</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 07 Mar 2010 09:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/wabc-7-pulled-from-cablevision-on-the-eve-of-the-oscars-or-two/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19386454/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/wabc-7-pulled-from-cablevision-on-the-eve-of-the-oscars-or-two/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>abc</category><category>academy awards</category><category>AcademyAwards</category><category>cablevision</category><category>carriage</category><category>hd</category><category>hulu</category><category>new york</category><category>new york city</category><category>NewYork</category><category>NewYorkCity</category><category>oscars</category><category>wabc-7</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 09:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Food Network, HGTV are back on Cablevision]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/21/food-network-hgtv-are-back-on-cablevision/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/21/food-network-hgtv-are-back-on-cablevision/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/21/food-network-hgtv-are-back-on-cablevision/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.virtualpressoffice.com/publicsiteContentFileAccess/236639/236639.html/?fileContentId=236639&amp;fileName=236639.html&amp;fromOtherPageToDisableHistory=Y"><img vspace="4" hspace="16" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/01/20071129-cablevision-hgtv-food.jpg"  alt="" /></a>It took three weeks, but Scripps &amp; Cablevision have settled their  differences, allowing Food Network and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/hgtv">HGTV</a> to return to New  York area cable customers this afternoon. Both sides had plenty of tough talk New Year's  Day <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/01/its-2010-fox-is-still-on-twc-for-now-but-food-and-hgtv-are-of/">when  the channels disappeared</a>, but all that's faded into the general  "we're glad to be back on" PR-speak. Terms of the agreement weren't  disclosed but we hear Bobby Flay and Guy Fieri will be suiting up for  the Knicks tonight, which could explain the lengthy negotiations.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/21/food-network-hgtv-are-back-on-cablevision/">Food Network, HGTV are back on Cablevision</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/21/food-network-hgtv-are-back-on-cablevision/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19326832/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/21/food-network-hgtv-are-back-on-cablevision/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>agreement</category><category>cablevision</category><category>carriage</category><category>food</category><category>food network</category><category>FoodNetwork</category><category>hd</category><category>hgtv</category><category>negotiations</category><category>scripps</category><category>scripps networks</category><category>ScrippsNetworks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[It's 2010 - Fox is still on TWC (for now) but Food &amp; HGTV are off Cablevision]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/01/its-2010-fox-is-still-on-twc-for-now-but-food-and-hgtv-are-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/01/its-2010-fox-is-still-on-twc-for-now-but-food-and-hgtv-are-of/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/01/its-2010-fox-is-still-on-twc-for-now-but-food-and-hgtv-are-of/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img vspace="4" hspace="16" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/01/cablevision_hdtv.jpg" />As two digits flipped over last night we waited to see if <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/fox,twc">Fox and Time Warner Cable</a> would work out their differences or turn channels dark.... and waited... and waited until we finally dozed off. As it stands, thanks to a series of extensions and ongoing negotiations, the channels are still on, but there's no new deal. As long as that remains to be the case, many football fans and several members of the government should be quite pleased, but in a New Year's Day surprise, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/cablevision">Cablevision</a> has rid itself of two networks on its service - Food Network and HGTV. While we've been upset by reports of some odd aspect ratio stretching on HGTV, these channels have their own fans that are upset to see them missing. Cablevision's posture seems to be that they won't be coming back, but parent company Scripps has already launched campaigns at <a href="http://www.ilovehgtv.com/">ILoveHGTV.com</a> and <a href="http://www.ilovefoodnetwork.com/">ILoveFoodNetwork.com</a> for viewers to appeal for their return. We'll keep an eye on the ongoing Fox/TWC spat, though we're sure they wouldn't suddenly let channels go dark right before the Sugar Bowl tonight, would they?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/01/its-2010-fox-is-still-on-twc-for-now-but-food-and-hgtv-are-of/">It's 2010 - Fox is still on TWC (for now) but Food &amp; HGTV are off Cablevision</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 01 Jan 2010 15:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/01/its-2010-fox-is-still-on-twc-for-now-but-food-and-hgtv-are-of/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19300112/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/01/its-2010-fox-is-still-on-twc-for-now-but-food-and-hgtv-are-of/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cablevision</category><category>carriage</category><category>dispute</category><category>food</category><category>food network</category><category>FoodNetwork</category><category>fox</category><category>hd</category><category>hgtv</category><category>negotiations</category><category>new years day</category><category>NewYearsDay</category><category>scripps</category><category>time wanrer</category><category>time warner cable</category><category>TimeWanrer</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><category>twc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 15:17:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Senator Kerry asks Fox &amp; Time Warner to keep the Bowl Games on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/25/senator-kerry-asks-fox-and-time-warner-to-keep-the-bowl-games-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/25/senator-kerry-asks-fox-and-time-warner-to-keep-the-bowl-games-on/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/25/senator-kerry-asks-fox-and-time-warner-to-keep-the-bowl-games-on/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.multichannel.com/article/441520-Kerry_TWC_News_Corp_Retrans_Impasse_Must_Not_Interrupt_College_Football.php?rssid=20059&amp;utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed:+MultichannelBreakingNews+%28Multichannel+News+-+Breaking+News%29"><img vspace="4" hspace="16" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/12/jk_headshot.jpg"  alt="" /></a>As the New Year's Day deadline closes in, the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/time-warner-fox-trade-shots-on-who-to-blame-when-you-cant-see/">Time Warner Cable - Fox standoff</a> has gained another participant, Senator John Kerry. He's sent a letter to executives at both companies in hopes to avoid a New Year's Day blackout that could pull the network's Bowl Games (Cotton, Sugar, Fiesta, Orange) from sports loving cable subscribers. This is a bit of a habit for the senator, who has previously put his two cents in on the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/21/nfl-network-cries-to-the-fcc/">Comcast/TWC &amp; NFL Network dispute</a>. What he's asking for from the two is that if an agreement isn't reached, they continue transmitting at least through the College Bowl season under the current terms. Some may question such a letter on the grounds that this doesn't deserve such attention, or whether it will have any effect, but we're happy someone is standing up for viewers stuck in the middle and only have one question: Can we push that extension out to cover the season premiere of <i>24</i>?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/25/senator-kerry-asks-fox-and-time-warner-to-keep-the-bowl-games-on/">Senator Kerry asks Fox &amp; Time Warner to keep the Bowl Games on</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 25 Dec 2009 14:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/25/senator-kerry-asks-fox-and-time-warner-to-keep-the-bowl-games-on/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19294079/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/25/senator-kerry-asks-fox-and-time-warner-to-keep-the-bowl-games-on/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bowl games</category><category>BowlGames</category><category>carriage</category><category>fox</category><category>hd</category><category>john kerry</category><category>JohnKerry</category><category>retrans</category><category>time warner</category><category>time warner cable</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><category>twc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 14:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner, Fox trade shots on who to blame when you can't see the bowl games]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/time-warner-fox-trade-shots-on-who-to-blame-when-you-cant-see/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/time-warner-fox-trade-shots-on-who-to-blame-when-you-cant-see/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/time-warner-fox-trade-shots-on-who-to-blame-when-you-cant-see/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/12/homepage_logosoup2.jpg" alt="" /></div>
Time Warner didn't say who it was targeting with the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/01/time-warner-wants-to-know-if-it-should-get-tough-about-rate-hike/">heavily-slanted RollOverorGetTough</a> (Spanish language version available at <a href="//scribefire/content/editor/www.cederoponersefirme.com">www.cederoponersefirme.com</a>) website recently, but now that Fox has yelped like a hit dog and launched its own campaign at <a href="http://www.keepfoxon.com">KeepFoxOn.com</a> we can see where this is going. While Time Warner's latest press release claims victory from over 400,000 visitors overwhelmingly voting in favor of Getting Tough on price gouging programmers, Fox is claiming it seeks only "fair compensation" and is fulfilling its "responsibility" to prepare viewers for losing their channels. The Fox website hypes up switching to satellite and all the programming that could be lost if Time Warner does not opt to continue its agreement to carry Fox networks, and pointing out everything that's at stake: House, 24, several BCS games and more. The only ones we truly have sympathy for are the customers in the middle, hopefully this slapfight ends in time for them to avoid missing even a second of precious TV, just like <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/01/time-warner-viacom-reach-agreement-bromance-crisis-averted/">the great Viacom near-miss of '08 - '09</a>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/time-warner-fox-trade-shots-on-who-to-blame-when-you-cant-see/">Time Warner, Fox trade shots on who to blame when you can't see the bowl games</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/time-warner-fox-trade-shots-on-who-to-blame-when-you-cant-see/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19287610/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/time-warner-fox-trade-shots-on-who-to-blame-when-you-cant-see/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bcs</category><category>cable</category><category>carriage</category><category>channel bundling</category><category>ChannelBundling</category><category>channels</category><category>fox</category><category>hd</category><category>keep fox on</category><category>KeepFoxOn</category><category>rate hike</category><category>RateHike</category><category>roll over or get tough</category><category>RollOverOrGetTough</category><category>time warner</category><category>time warner cable</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><category>twc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:11:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NFL Network &amp; Comcast could be close to a deal, moving channel to digital basic]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/nfl-network-and-comcast-could-be-close-to-a-deal-moving-channel-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/nfl-network-and-comcast-could-be-close-to-a-deal-moving-channel-t/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/nfl-network-and-comcast-could-be-close-to-a-deal-moving-channel-t/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/peter_king/05/17/comcast.nflnetwork/index.html?eref=writers"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/05/11-21-07-nfl-vs-comcast.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Not that we usually put much stock in Peter King's NFL rumors, but word is the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/nflnetwork">NFL Network</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Comcast/">Comcast</a> are close to working out a deal that will put the channel right where the NFL wanted it all along, on the regular digital cable package instead of the added-price sports tier. Since the channel <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/nfl-network-remaining-on-comcast-for-the-time-being/">didn't disappear</a> May 1 as <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/09/nfl-network-comcast-slapfight-could-see-channel-yanked-may-1/">threatened</a>, it would seem an agreement on pricing has been reached and according to King things were nearly finished on Thursday and Friday but the two have been hammering out final details even today. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/18/poll-who-is-right-in-the-nfl-network-comcast-battle/">We'll see</a> if this really happens, and not a moment too soon negotiations also under way with Fox, CBS and NBC and labor talks due to get under way with the Players Association.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cable/" rel="tag">Cable</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Sports</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/nfl-network-and-comcast-could-be-close-to-a-deal-moving-channel-t/">NFL Network &amp; Comcast could be close to a deal, moving channel to digital basic</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 17 May 2009 21:23:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/peter_king/05/17/comcast.nflnetwork/index.html?eref=writers>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/nfl-network-and-comcast-could-be-close-to-a-deal-moving-channel-t/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1548582/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/nfl-network-and-comcast-could-be-close-to-a-deal-moving-channel-t/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>basic cable</category><category>BasicCable</category><category>cable</category><category>carriage</category><category>comcast</category><category>hd</category><category>nfl</category><category>nfl network</category><category>NflNetwork</category><category>sports</category><category>sports tier</category><category>SportsTier</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 21:23:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NFL Network remaining on Comcast, for the time being]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/nfl-network-remaining-on-comcast-for-the-time-being/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/nfl-network-remaining-on-comcast-for-the-time-being/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/nfl-network-remaining-on-comcast-for-the-time-being/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.comcastvoices.com/2009/04/an-update-on-the-nfl-network.html"><img hspace="4" border="0" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/04/11-21-07-nfl-vs-comcast.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
As you already know, the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/nflnetwork">NFL Network's</a> contract with Comcast <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/09/nfl-network-comcast-slapfight-could-see-channel-yanked-may-1/">expires tonight</a>, and while the two fight it out over where the channel belongs, on basic cable or a sports tier, it's been threatening to leave the cable company's lineup altogether. Not <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/01/time-warner-viacom-reach-agreement-bromance-crisis-averted/">quite at the 11th hour</a> however, comes word from the <em>Comcast Voices</em> blog that the two are still trying to work things our and due to currently "productive discussions" NFL Network will stay on <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/comcast">Comcast</a> systems for now. It'll still be some time be some time before their court case has a ruling, but we're sure your voice on the matter <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/18/poll-who-is-right-in-the-nfl-network-comcast-battle/">has already been heard</a>.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cable/" rel="tag">Cable</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Sports</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/nfl-network-remaining-on-comcast-for-the-time-being/">NFL Network remaining on Comcast, for the time being</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 30 Apr 2009 22:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.comcastvoices.com/2009/04/an-update-on-the-nfl-network.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/nfl-network-remaining-on-comcast-for-the-time-being/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1533605/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/nfl-network-remaining-on-comcast-for-the-time-being/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cable</category><category>carriage</category><category>comcast</category><category>football</category><category>hd</category><category>nfl</category><category>nfl network</category><category>NflNetwork</category><category>sports</category><category>sports tier</category><category>SportsTier</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 22:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Poll: Who is right in the NFL Network / Comcast battle?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/18/poll-who-is-right-in-the-nfl-network-comcast-battle/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/18/poll-who-is-right-in-the-nfl-network-comcast-battle/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/18/poll-who-is-right-in-the-nfl-network-comcast-battle/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="left">
<div align="center"><img hspace="4" border="0" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/04/11-21-07-nfl-vs-comcast.jpg" /><br /></div>
The hearing is over and both sides have presented their cases to the judge, but it could be up to a month before there's a ruling on the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/09/nfl-network-comcast-slapfight-could-see-channel-yanked-may-1/">NFL Network vs. Comcast case</a>, and with the channel due to disappear in just a few more days we're leaving the decision up to you. Who do you roll with, the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/nflnetwork">sports channel</a> arguing the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/comcast">cable giant</a> won't open up its lucrative massive subscriber base while keeping them tied to its own useless channels, or the cable company protesting too high subscriber fees for a niche product? Submit your amius briefs in the comments.<br /><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/18/poll-who-is-right-in-the-nfl-network-comcast-battle/#poll29301">View Poll</a></p></div><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/polls/" rel="tag">Polls</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cable/" rel="tag">Cable</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Sports</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/new-content/" rel="tag">New content</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/18/poll-who-is-right-in-the-nfl-network-comcast-battle/">Poll: Who is right in the NFL Network / Comcast battle?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/18/poll-who-is-right-in-the-nfl-network-comcast-battle/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1521072/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/18/poll-who-is-right-in-the-nfl-network-comcast-battle/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cable</category><category>carriage</category><category>channel</category><category>channel lineup</category><category>ChannelLineup</category><category>comcast</category><category>football</category><category>hd</category><category>new content</category><category>newcontent</category><category>nfl</category><category>nfl network</category><category>NflNetwork</category><category>poll</category><category>polls</category><category>sports</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DISH &amp; NFL work out a new multiyear agreement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/12/dish-and-nfl-work-out-a-new-multiyear-agreement/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/12/dish-and-nfl-work-out-a-new-multiyear-agreement/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/12/dish-and-nfl-work-out-a-new-multiyear-agreement/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/category/industryarticle.aspx?feed=PR&amp;Date=20090410&amp;ID=9778097&amp;industry=IND_MEDIA&amp;isub="><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/04/10-23-08-superticker.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Things haven't all been sweet between <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/dish/">DISH Network</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/nflnetwork/">NFL Network</a>, wrangling over details of their agreement <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/26/dish-and-nfl-network-make-a-deal/">since '06</a>, but a new deal should keep the channel on the Classic Silver 200 package for years to come. Combined with DirecTV's new Sunday Ticket deal satellite dish owning football fans can rest easy, but it still looks like Comcast subs will be sweating it out <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/09/nfl-network-comcast-slapfight-could-see-channel-yanked-may-1/">'til the end of the month</a>.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/sports/football/nfl/2009-04-10-nfl-dish-settlement_N.htm">USA Today</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/satellite/" rel="tag">Satellite</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Sports</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/12/dish-and-nfl-work-out-a-new-multiyear-agreement/">DISH &amp; NFL work out a new multiyear agreement</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 12 Apr 2009 11:24:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/category/industryarticle.aspx?feed=PR&amp;Date=20090410&amp;ID=9778097&amp;industry=IND_MEDIA&amp;isub=>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/12/dish-and-nfl-work-out-a-new-multiyear-agreement/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1514490/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/12/dish-and-nfl-work-out-a-new-multiyear-agreement/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>carriage</category><category>dish</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>hd</category><category>nfl</category><category>nfl network</category><category>NflNetwork</category><category>satellite</category><category>sports</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 11:24:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Epix (and it's Hollywood backers) looking to shake up premium cable]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/07/epix-and-its-hollywood-backers-looking-to-shake-up-premium-ca/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/07/epix-and-its-hollywood-backers-looking-to-shake-up-premium-ca/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/07/epix-and-its-hollywood-backers-looking-to-shake-up-premium-ca/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/media/2009-03-01-viacom-lionsgate-mgm-epix-channel_N.htm"><img vspace="4" hspace="16" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/boxoff_cloverfield.jpg" alt="Cloverfield" /></a>Now that it <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/20/viacom-paramount-lionsgate-and-mgm-team-up-for-new-premium-chann/">finally has a name</a>, the Viacom / Lionsgate / MGM backed <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/epix">Epix</a> can finally be a bit more forthcoming about its plans as a premium movie channel to rival HBO, Starz and Showtime. Now the question is whether the new channel will get the $1.50 per subscriber fee it's asking from potential cable and satellite providers, which could make that planned fourth quarter launch dicier than first imagined. Still, the studios seem entrenched behind the idea of improving their prospects for profiting from their newest, hottest movies like <em>Cloverfield</em>, even in these economic times, so we wouldn't be surprised to see a very <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/bigtennetwork">Big Ten Network</a>-style standoff in the making.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cable/" rel="tag">Cable</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/satellite/" rel="tag">Satellite</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/new-content/" rel="tag">New content</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/07/epix-and-its-hollywood-backers-looking-to-shake-up-premium-ca/">Epix (and it's Hollywood backers) looking to shake up premium cable</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 07 Mar 2009 20:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/media/2009-03-01-viacom-lionsgate-mgm-epix-channel_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/07/epix-and-its-hollywood-backers-looking-to-shake-up-premium-ca/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1481355/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/07/epix-and-its-hollywood-backers-looking-to-shake-up-premium-ca/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cable</category><category>carriage</category><category>epix</category><category>hd</category><category>internet</category><category>lionsgate</category><category>mgm</category><category>new content</category><category>newcontent</category><category>premium channel</category><category>PremiumChannel</category><category>satellite</category><category>viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 20:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sunflower Broadband subs say goodbye to Kansas City's  KMBC-ABC and KCWE-CW]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/01/sunflower-broadband-subs-say-goodbye-to-kansas-citys-kmbc-abc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/01/sunflower-broadband-subs-say-goodbye-to-kansas-citys-kmbc-abc/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/01/sunflower-broadband-subs-say-goodbye-to-kansas-citys-kmbc-abc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2008/dec/31/sunflower-broadband-drops-two-kc-channels-after-st/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/01/1-1-09-sunflower-logo.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Time Warner Cable subscribers <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/01/time-warner-viacom-reach-agreement-bromance-crisis-averted/">managed</a> to avert a crisis early this morning, but it seems that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/21/macrovision-to-scrutinize-sunflower-broadband-in-guide-advertisi/">Sunflower Broadband</a> customers aren't so lucky. As it stands, KMBC-ABC and KCWE-CW -- both owned by Kansas City's Hearst-Argyle Television -- are being dropped from the provider. Both channels were being transmitted to customers in SD and HD, and until an agreement can be worked out, Sunflower has arranged to retransmit ABC Topeka affiliate KTKA in SD / HD so that customers can at least view ABC material. The good (or better, we should say) news? The carrier has vowed to "work around the clock with Hearst-Argyle to restore KMBC and KCWE under terms that are fair to its customers." And now, we wait.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/" rel="tag">Misc</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/abc/" rel="tag">ABC</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/the-cw/" rel="tag">The CW</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/fiber/" rel="tag">Fiber</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/01/sunflower-broadband-subs-say-goodbye-to-kansas-citys-kmbc-abc/">Sunflower Broadband subs say goodbye to Kansas City's  KMBC-ABC and KCWE-CW</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 01 Jan 2009 11:14:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2008/dec/31/sunflower-broadband-drops-two-kc-channels-after-st/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/01/sunflower-broadband-subs-say-goodbye-to-kansas-citys-kmbc-abc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1416351/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/01/sunflower-broadband-subs-say-goodbye-to-kansas-citys-kmbc-abc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABC</category><category>carriage</category><category>conflict</category><category>disagreement</category><category>fiber</category><category>hd</category><category>kansas city</category><category>KansasCity</category><category>KMBC</category><category>missouri</category><category>Sunflower</category><category>Sunflower broadband</category><category>SunflowerBroadband</category><category>The CW</category><category>TheCw</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 11:14:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[American Cable Association calls out Viacom's annoying crawl]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/31/american-cable-association-calls-out-viacoms-annoying-crawl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/31/american-cable-association-calls-out-viacoms-annoying-crawl/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/31/american-cable-association-calls-out-viacoms-annoying-crawl/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/12/12-30-08-hills-mad_alert.jpg" /><br /></div>
We're not sure how this demand will be received, but the American Cable Association's argument is simple: if only <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/timewarnercable">Time Warner Cable </a>and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/brighthouse">Bright House Networks</a> subs are in danger of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/30/viacom-stations-to-go-dark-on-time-warner-cable/">losing MTV Networks channels at the stroke of midnight</a>, why are we all bothered with an annoying crawl message? Of course, that plea is couched by statements backing TWC and BHN's reluctance to agree to new higher programming fees, but those of us eagerly anticipating a Miley-Sized surprise during tonight's NYE celebration that have a different provider could do without the interruptions.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/mhd/" rel="tag">MHD</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cable/" rel="tag">Cable</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/31/american-cable-association-calls-out-viacoms-annoying-crawl/">American Cable Association calls out Viacom's annoying crawl</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.americancable.org/node/837>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/31/american-cable-association-calls-out-viacoms-annoying-crawl/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1416120/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/31/american-cable-association-calls-out-viacoms-annoying-crawl/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>american cable association</category><category>AmericanCableAssociation</category><category>bright house</category><category>bright house networks</category><category>BrightHouse</category><category>BrightHouseNetworks</category><category>cable</category><category>carriage</category><category>comedy central</category><category>ComedyCentral</category><category>disagreement</category><category>hd</category><category>mhd</category><category>mtv networks</category><category>MtvNetworks</category><category>palladia</category><category>programming fees</category><category>ProgrammingFees</category><category>spike tv</category><category>SpikeTv</category><category>time warner cable</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><category>viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:47:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner Cable threatens Viacom with the ghosts of Christmas past]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/31/time-warner-cable-threatens-viacom-with-the-ghosts-of-christmas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/31/time-warner-cable-threatens-viacom-with-the-ghosts-of-christmas/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/31/time-warner-cable-threatens-viacom-with-the-ghosts-of-christmas/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.timewarnercable.com/Corporate/Products/DigitalCable/retrans/mtvnetworks/statement.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="16" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/12/12-12-08-time_warner_cable.jpg" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/TimeWarnerCable/">Time Warner Cable</a> CEO &amp; President Glenn Britt says don't blame him, blame sliding advertising and falling ratings for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Viacom/">Viacom</a>'s lost revenue and subsequent Scrooge-style "extortion" of TWC customers to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/30/viacom-stations-to-go-dark-on-time-warner-cable/">keep MTV Networks on after the ball drops</a> tonight. Beyond the outrageous claim that viewers might be tuning away from <em>My Super Sweet 16</em> marathons, Britt claims that "penny per subscriber per day" adds up to an unreasonable $39 million, while TWC nobly attempts to keep negotiations going on behalf of its customers. Oddly we find it hard to view either side as thinking of the customer first in this slapfight, but if we miss a single episode of <em>Bromance </em>before things are resolved, there will be hell to pay. <em>[Disclosure: Engadget is part of the Time Warner family]</em><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/mhd/" rel="tag">MHD</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cable/" rel="tag">Cable</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/31/time-warner-cable-threatens-viacom-with-the-ghosts-of-christmas/">Time Warner Cable threatens Viacom with the ghosts of Christmas past</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 31 Dec 2008 16:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.timewarnercable.com/Corporate/Products/DigitalCable/retrans/mtvnetworks/statement.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/31/time-warner-cable-threatens-viacom-with-the-ghosts-of-christmas/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1416048/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/31/time-warner-cable-threatens-viacom-with-the-ghosts-of-christmas/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cable</category><category>carriage</category><category>comedy central</category><category>ComedyCentral</category><category>hd</category><category>mhd</category><category>mtv</category><category>mtv hd</category><category>mtv networks</category><category>MtvHd</category><category>MtvNetworks</category><category>nickelodeon</category><category>palladia</category><category>time warner cable</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><category>twc</category><category>viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 16:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Viacom stations to go dark on Time Warner Cable]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/30/viacom-stations-to-go-dark-on-time-warner-cable/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/30/viacom-stations-to-go-dark-on-time-warner-cable/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/30/viacom-stations-to-go-dark-on-time-warner-cable/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://news.prnewswire.com/DisplayReleaseContent.aspx?ACCT=104&amp;STORY=/www/story/12-30-2008/0004947904&amp;EDATE="><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/12/12-30-08-hills-mad.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Bad news, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/TimeWarnerCable/">Time Warner Cable</a> subscribers. The cable carrier notorious for resisting HD expansion until a competitor rolls into town is getting ready to pull all 19 MTV Networks channels (MTV, Nickelodeon, VH1 and Comedy Central just to name a few, presumably including the HD versions). <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Viacom/">Viacom</a> has just unleashed a scathing announcement that calls the carrier's refusal to pony up "outrageous," and publicly pleads for its bigwigs to reconsider and open up the checkbook. In essence, Viacom is asking for a fee increase of just under $0.25 per month, per subscriber -- which, admittedly, sounds rather high given the lack of MTV-related content that's a) watchable and b) in high-definition -- but TWC is straight-up refusing. <br /><br />Now, we've no qualms with a provider balking at price increases, but while it's planning to let content vanish from lineups, it's also raising monthly rates by $3 in Raleigh, Orange County, Los Angeles and New York City. Ahem, TWC -- could you bother justifying these hikes by allowing us to keep our content? And don't even come at us with the "we just added more HD!" comment -- after all, you blast us everyday with ads proclaiming that your HD "is free."<em> [Disclosure: Engadget is part of the Time Warner family]</em><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/mhd/" rel="tag">MHD</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cable/" rel="tag">Cable</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/30/viacom-stations-to-go-dark-on-time-warner-cable/">Viacom stations to go dark on Time Warner Cable</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 30 Dec 2008 22:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.prnewswire.com/DisplayReleaseContent.aspx?ACCT=104&amp;STORY=/www/story/12-30-2008/0004947904&amp;EDATE=>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/30/viacom-stations-to-go-dark-on-time-warner-cable/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1415319/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/30/viacom-stations-to-go-dark-on-time-warner-cable/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>breaking news</category><category>BreakingNews</category><category>cable</category><category>carriage</category><category>COMEDY CENTRAL</category><category>disagreement</category><category>hd</category><category>mhd</category><category>MTV</category><category>MTV HD</category><category>MtvHd</category><category>Nickelodeon</category><category>Time Warner Cable</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><category>TWC</category><category>Viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 22:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Portland, Oregon's KATU booted from DISH Network]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/18/portland-oregons-katu-booted-from-dish-network/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/18/portland-oregons-katu-booted-from-dish-network/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/18/portland-oregons-katu-booted-from-dish-network/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.katu.com/about/36310734.html"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/12/12-18-08-katu-dish.jpg"  alt="" /></a>Oh, geez. Yet another cat fight akin to something you'd see on a third-grade playground between a greedy broadcast station and a greedy carrier. Portland, Oregon's KATU -- which can be received for free over-the-air -- has been dropped from DISH Network. A message on the station's website informs citizens that it had "been in negotiations with DISH in an attempt to reach a new agreement," but sadly, "those negotiations have not yet been successful." You now <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/03/lin-tv-owned-stations-go-dark-across-many-twc-systems/">the story by now</a> -- said station asserts that the carrier charges users a fee for access, and so rightfully, some of that fee should trickle back to the channel. The carrier, on the other hand, reckons that carriage should be free since it can easily be obtained by locals via an OTA antenna. We'll keep you posted on any developments, but until then, it's OTA or bust (or DirecTV / cable, to be honest) for resident DISH customers.<br /><br />[Thanks, Lance and Jonny]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/" rel="tag">Misc</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/abc/" rel="tag">ABC</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/satellite/" rel="tag">Satellite</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/18/portland-oregons-katu-booted-from-dish-network/">Portland, Oregon's KATU booted from DISH Network</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.katu.com/about/36310734.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/18/portland-oregons-katu-booted-from-dish-network/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1405961/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/18/portland-oregons-katu-booted-from-dish-network/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>abc</category><category>carriage</category><category>conflict</category><category>DISH</category><category>DISH Network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>hd</category><category>issue</category><category>KATU</category><category>oregon</category><category>portland</category><category>problem</category><category>retrans</category><category>retransmission</category><category>satellite</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Sportsman Channel coming to DirecTV, HD not far behind?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/12/the-sportsman-channel-coming-to-directv-hd-not-far-behind/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/12/the-sportsman-channel-coming-to-directv-hd-not-far-behind/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/12/the-sportsman-channel-coming-to-directv-hd-not-far-behind/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/The-Sportsman-Channel-Reaches-Distribution/story.aspx?guid={03223C8F-8AC0-47ED-B283-632FB8C6AA15}"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/12/12-8-08-tsc-logo.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
In case the likes of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/rfd-inks-carriage-agreement-with-comcast/">RFD HD</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/16/world-fishing-network-hd-officially-on-dish-network/">World Fishing Network HD</a> weren't enough to keep you planted in your overalls, The Sportsman Channel is gearing up to give DirecTV viewers some of that tasty outdoor goodness. The network has just recently inked a distribution deal that will see it added to the satcaster's CHOICE XTRA package in January 2009. Best of all, we're also hearing that TSC will be developing content in HD and will transition to a high-def channel in due time -- of course, there's no telling when that will happen, but if DirecTV is serious about maintain its clout in the HD quantity department, it'll be reeling it in just as soon as it's available.<br /><br />[Thanks, Vanbrothers]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/satellite/" rel="tag">Satellite</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Sports</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/new-content/" rel="tag">New content</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/12/the-sportsman-channel-coming-to-directv-hd-not-far-behind/">The Sportsman Channel coming to DirecTV, HD not far behind?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/The-Sportsman-Channel-Reaches-Distribution/story.aspx?guid={03223C8F-8AC0-47ED-B283-632FB8C6AA15}>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/12/the-sportsman-channel-coming-to-directv-hd-not-far-behind/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1394567/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/12/the-sportsman-channel-coming-to-directv-hd-not-far-behind/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>carriage</category><category>channel</category><category>directv</category><category>distribution</category><category>hd</category><category>new content</category><category>newcontent</category><category>satellite</category><category>sports</category><category>The Sportsman Channel</category><category>TheSportsmanChannel</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[LIN TV and Time Warner Cable strike a retransmission deal]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/29/lin-tv-and-time-warner-cable-strike-a-retransmission-deal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/29/lin-tv-and-time-warner-cable-strike-a-retransmission-deal/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/29/lin-tv-and-time-warner-cable-strike-a-retransmission-deal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/lin-tv-reaches-carriage-agreement-with/199502"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/10/10-29-08-celebrating.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
This is one of those rare cases where the headline tells all: TWC and LIN TV have finally agreed to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/16/time-warner-cable-lin-tv-bicker-over-retransmission-fees/">put their differences</a> aside and strike a retransmission deal. In other words, those 17 <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/LINTV/">LIN TV</a>-owned local stations that have <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/03/lin-tv-owned-stations-go-dark-across-many-twc-systems/">been dark</a> for the past few weeks should be back online at any moment. LIN TV's President and Chief Executive Officer Vincent L. Sadusky was quoted as saying that it was "pleased to have reached a fair market agreement with Time Warner Cable," and he continued by calling the deal "a mutually acceptable economic agreement." While we can't imagine he said that with a straight face, we're just glad you folks won't have to rely on any more <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/22/twc-wisconsin-offers-world-series-to-lin-tv-area-customers/">EPG trickery</a> to watch the (possible) final game of the World Series tonight. Or tomorrow. Or whenever Philadelphia decides to stop acting like Siberia.<br /><br /><br />[Image courtesy of <a href="http://media-2.web.britannica.com/eb-media/71/91471-004-CA2A5318.jpg">Britannica</a>, thanks Dayton Guy and Brian]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/abc/" rel="tag">ABC</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/fox/" rel="tag">Fox</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/nbc/" rel="tag">NBC</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cable/" rel="tag">Cable</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/29/lin-tv-and-time-warner-cable-strike-a-retransmission-deal/">LIN TV and Time Warner Cable strike a retransmission deal</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/lin-tv-reaches-carriage-agreement-with/199502>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/29/lin-tv-and-time-warner-cable-strike-a-retransmission-deal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1356236/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/29/lin-tv-and-time-warner-cable-strike-a-retransmission-deal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>abc</category><category>agreement</category><category>BHN</category><category>breaking news</category><category>BreakingNews</category><category>bright house</category><category>bright house networks</category><category>BrightHouse</category><category>BrightHouseNetworks</category><category>cable</category><category>carriage</category><category>cbs</category><category>fox</category><category>hd</category><category>LIN TV</category><category>LinTv</category><category>locals</category><category>nbc</category><category>retrans</category><category>retransmission</category><category>solution</category><category>time warner cable</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><category>twc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[LIN TV-owned stations go dark across many TWC systems]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/03/lin-tv-owned-stations-go-dark-across-many-twc-systems/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/03/lin-tv-owned-stations-go-dark-across-many-twc-systems/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/03/lin-tv-owned-stations-go-dark-across-many-twc-systems/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.timewarnercable.com/Dayton/products/cable/retrans/default_post.html"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/10/9-16-08-lin-tv-logo.gif"  alt="" /></a>Reports have been flooding in from across Ohio, Indiana and Texas to confirm the cold, hard truth: LIN TV has begun removing its stations from Time Warner Cable systems. Last month, we found that the two were <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/16/time-warner-cable-lin-tv-bicker-over-retransmission-fees/">still in disagreement over carriage terms</a>, with <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/LINTV/">LIN TV</a> wanting TWC to pony up to carry stations that could otherwise be fetched OTA for free. Amazingly, they let the October 2nd deadline come and go without even a stopgap deal, meaning that some locals in Dayton, Columbus, Toledo, Fort Wayne, Indianapolis, Austin, Green Bay, Buffalo and a handful of other cities have now vanished from TWC's EPG. In a posting made on the carrier's site, it bluntly states that LIN TV is "trying to make up for lower ratings and advertising revenue by adding fees that will fall, ultimately, on the backs of our cable customers." Granted, that's only one half of the story, but here's the bottom line: you two need to come to terms, and fast.<br /><br />[Thanks to everyone who sent this in]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/abc/" rel="tag">ABC</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/fox/" rel="tag">Fox</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/nbc/" rel="tag">NBC</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cable/" rel="tag">Cable</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/03/lin-tv-owned-stations-go-dark-across-many-twc-systems/">LIN TV-owned stations go dark across many TWC systems</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 03 Oct 2008 08:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.timewarnercable.com/Dayton/products/cable/retrans/default_post.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/03/lin-tv-owned-stations-go-dark-across-many-twc-systems/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1332164/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/03/lin-tv-owned-stations-go-dark-across-many-twc-systems/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>abc</category><category>agreement</category><category>argument</category><category>cable</category><category>carriage</category><category>cbs</category><category>conflict</category><category>dayton</category><category>fox</category><category>hd</category><category>lin tv</category><category>LinTv</category><category>locals</category><category>nbc</category><category>ohio</category><category>problem</category><category>retrans</category><category>retransmission</category><category>texas</category><category>time warner cable</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><category>twc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 08:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hong Kong's All Sports Network nabs NHL distribution rights in much of Asia]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/28/hong-kongs-all-sports-network-nabs-nhl-distribution-rights-in-m/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/28/hong-kongs-all-sports-network-nabs-nhl-distribution-rights-in-m/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/28/hong-kongs-all-sports-network-nabs-nhl-distribution-rights-in-m/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5hSwY6Fm4ns0lY6ASIe79isDRKc4w"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/09/9-26-08-hurricanes-cup.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
The <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/NHL/">NHL</a> may not have the viewership in America as, say, the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/NFL/">NFL</a>, but that doesn't mean it can't find fans elsewhere. In a rather unexpected move, Hong Kong-based All Sports Network (ASN) has signed a multi-year deal to posses rights for broadcasting NHL matchups throughout much of Asia (India, South Korea and China included). Over 130 upcoming regular-season games will be televised on ASN's Yes TV along with the All-Star game, playoffs and the Stanley Cup Final. The good news? The broadcast rights include "all forms of television, including HDTV." The bad? Japan, Australia and New Zealand have been excluded from the agreement.<br /><br />[Image courtesy of <a href="http://images.theglobeandmail.com/archives/RTGAM/images/20060620/woilers0620/0620brind.jpg">The Globe &amp; Mail</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Sports</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/new-content/" rel="tag">New content</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/28/hong-kongs-all-sports-network-nabs-nhl-distribution-rights-in-m/">Hong Kong's All Sports Network nabs NHL distribution rights in much of Asia</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 28 Sep 2008 17:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5hSwY6Fm4ns0lY6ASIe79isDRKc4w>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/28/hong-kongs-all-sports-network-nabs-nhl-distribution-rights-in-m/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1325833/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/28/hong-kongs-all-sports-network-nabs-nhl-distribution-rights-in-m/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>agreement</category><category>All Sports Network</category><category>AllSportsNetwork</category><category>asia</category><category>ASN</category><category>broadcast</category><category>carriage</category><category>china</category><category>global</category><category>hd</category><category>hocket</category><category>hong kong</category><category>HongKong</category><category>india</category><category>new content</category><category>newcontent</category><category>NHL</category><category>sport</category><category>sports</category><category>Yes TV</category><category>YesTv</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 17:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner Cable, LIN TV bicker over retransmission fees]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/16/time-warner-cable-lin-tv-bicker-over-retransmission-fees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/16/time-warner-cable-lin-tv-bicker-over-retransmission-fees/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/16/time-warner-cable-lin-tv-bicker-over-retransmission-fees/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/Stock%20News/1881289/"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/09/9-16-08-lin-tv-logo.gif" /></a>While we singled out <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/15/twc-running-out-of-time-could-see-daytons-wdtn-dropped/">TWC's spat with Dayton's own WDTN</a>, the issue spreads much, much further. As of now, 15 <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/LINTV/">LIN TV</a>-owned stations are at risk of falling off of Time Warner Cable if the two can't reach an agreement before October 2nd. Since July of this year, LIN TV has attempted to extract a presumably large amount of cash from the carrier in order to seal the deal on a long-term agreement for both analog and high-def signals. As of now, local stations in Austin, Buffalo, Columbus, Dayton, Ft. Wayne, Green Bay, Indianapolis, Mobile, Springfield (MA), Terre Haute and Toledo are at risk, but we have a pretty good feeling that the two will eventually work it out. 'Course, TWC won't enjoy paying through the nose in order to do so, but hey, that's life. [<em>Disclosure: Engadget is part of the Time Warner family</em>]<br /><br />[Thanks to everyone who sent this in]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/the-cw/" rel="tag">The CW</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/16/time-warner-cable-lin-tv-bicker-over-retransmission-fees/">Time Warner Cable, LIN TV bicker over retransmission fees</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 16 Sep 2008 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/Stock%20News/1881289/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/16/time-warner-cable-lin-tv-bicker-over-retransmission-fees/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1315375/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/16/time-warner-cable-lin-tv-bicker-over-retransmission-fees/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>affiliate</category><category>agreement</category><category>buffalo</category><category>carriage</category><category>cbs</category><category>deal</category><category>disagreement</category><category>green bay</category><category>GreenBay</category><category>hd</category><category>KXAN</category><category>lin tv</category><category>LinTv</category><category>locals</category><category>new york</category><category>NewYork</category><category>san antonio</category><category>SanAntonio</category><category>texas</category><category>the cw</category><category>thecw</category><category>time warner cable</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><category>twc</category><category>wisconsin</category><category>WIVB</category><category>WLUK</category><category>WNLO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Big Ten Networks lands on Bright House Michigan]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/08/big-ten-networks-lands-on-bright-house-michigan/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/08/big-ten-networks-lands-on-bright-house-michigan/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/08/big-ten-networks-lands-on-bright-house-michigan/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://michigan.mybrighthouse.com/default.aspx"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/09/9-8-08-big-ten-bhn.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/19/comcast-and-big-ten-network-finally-reach-agreement/">Comcast</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/27/charter-reaches-agreement-with-big-ten-network-just-in-time-to-s/">Charter</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/27/time-warner-cable-gets-big-ten-network-in-time-for-ohio-states/">Time Warner Cable</a> already wrapped up deals in at least some locales to get Big Ten Network out to its subscribers. Now, we've got Bright House Networks in Michigan doing the same. You all know the details by now -- more Big 10 in high-def -- but we're wondering if any other BHN markets got gifted as well. Chime in either way, will you?<br /><br />[Thanks, <a href="http://dsimmer.com/">Dean</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cable/" rel="tag">Cable</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Sports</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/08/big-ten-networks-lands-on-bright-house-michigan/">Big Ten Networks lands on Bright House Michigan</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 08 Sep 2008 09:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://michigan.mybrighthouse.com/default.aspx>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/08/big-ten-networks-lands-on-bright-house-michigan/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1307382/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/08/big-ten-networks-lands-on-bright-house-michigan/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>agreement</category><category>BHN</category><category>big ten network</category><category>BigTenNetwork</category><category>bright house</category><category>bright house networks</category><category>BrightHouse</category><category>BrightHouseNetworks</category><category>btn</category><category>cable</category><category>carriage</category><category>football</category><category>hd</category><category>ncaa</category><category>sports</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 09:17:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cox Communications to carry Hallmark Movie Channel HD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/24/cox-communications-to-carry-hallmark-movie-channel-hd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/24/cox-communications-to-carry-hallmark-movie-channel-hd/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/24/cox-communications-to-carry-hallmark-movie-channel-hd/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20080623005254&amp;newsLang=en"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/06/8-9-07-hallmark.jpg" alt="" /></a>Another month, another carrier <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/hallmark/">picking up</a> Hallmark Movie Channel HD. This time, we see Cox Communications landing an agreement with Crown Media Holdings in order to distribute the high-definition feed of Hallmark Movie Channel. The operator currently beams out the SD flavor along with Hallmark Channel, but this newly inked multi-year agreement ensures that fans of the network will soon be seeing an HD version. Exactly how soon, unfortunately, remains unanswered.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cable/" rel="tag">Cable</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/new-content/" rel="tag">New content</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/24/cox-communications-to-carry-hallmark-movie-channel-hd/">Cox Communications to carry Hallmark Movie Channel HD</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 24 Jun 2008 04:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20080623005254&amp;newsLang=en>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/24/cox-communications-to-carry-hallmark-movie-channel-hd/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1233706/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/24/cox-communications-to-carry-hallmark-movie-channel-hd/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>agreement</category><category>cable</category><category>carriage</category><category>cox</category><category>Crown Media</category><category>Crown Media Holdings</category><category>CrownMedia</category><category>CrownMediaHoldings</category><category>distribution</category><category>hallmark</category><category>hallmark channel</category><category>hallmark movie channel</category><category>HallmarkChannel</category><category>HallmarkMovieChannel</category><category>hd</category><category>new content</category><category>newcontent</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 04:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[MountainWest Sports Network comes to DirecTV on August 27th]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/08/mountainwest-sports-network-comes-to-directv-on-august-27th/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/08/mountainwest-sports-network-comes-to-directv-on-august-27th/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/08/mountainwest-sports-network-comes-to-directv-on-august-27th/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.byucougars.com/Filing.jsp?ID=10843"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/06/2-22-08-mtn-directv.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
We already knew the MountainWest Sports Network was <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/25/the-mountainwest-sports-network-coming-to-directv/">destined to land on DirecTV eventually</a>, and while we had heard that September was looking like a good candidate for a launch month, fans of the conference will be delighted to know that it'll be going live on the satcaster this August. Beginning on Wednesday, August 27th -- just in time for the BYU opener against Northern Iowa on August 30th -- The Mtn. will go live on channel 616. Notably, it'll be available on DirecTV CHOICE (and higher packages) for Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah, Wyoming and Dallas / Fort Worth / San Diego, though customers outside of these regions will be required to subscribe to DirecTV's Sportspack. For more on what to expect from the network this football season, head southwest to the read link.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/satellite/" rel="tag">Satellite</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Sports</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/new-content/" rel="tag">New content</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/08/mountainwest-sports-network-comes-to-directv-on-august-27th/">MountainWest Sports Network comes to DirecTV on August 27th</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 08 Jun 2008 01:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.byucougars.com/Filing.jsp?ID=10843>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/08/mountainwest-sports-network-comes-to-directv-on-august-27th/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1215512/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/08/mountainwest-sports-network-comes-to-directv-on-august-27th/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>agreement</category><category>carriage</category><category>college</category><category>directv</category><category>hd</category><category>mountain west</category><category>MountainWest</category><category>moutain west sports network</category><category>MoutainWestSportsNetwork</category><category>ncaa</category><category>new content</category><category>newcontent</category><category>satellite</category><category>sport</category><category>sports</category><category>the mtn.</category><category>TheMtn.</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 01:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[World Fishing Network HD officially on DISH Network]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/16/world-fishing-network-hd-officially-on-dish-network/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/16/world-fishing-network-hd-officially-on-dish-network/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/16/world-fishing-network-hd-officially-on-dish-network/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/May2008/14/c8486.html"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/05/5-14-08-wfn-hd-logo.jpg" alt="" /></a>For those with DISH Network, chances are you've <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/12/dish-network-rolls-out-22-new-hd-channels/">already realized</a> that World Fishing Network HD joined the lineup this past Monday. Nevertheless, the channel -- along with Insight Sports -- is eager for the world to know that WFN HD has indeed landed a carriage agreement on the aforementioned satcaster. In case you couldn't guess from the channel's name, it promises to deliver 24 / 7 fishing action, including shows like Dave Mercer's Facts of Fishing, The New Fly Fisher, Fishing the Flats, Fins N' Skins Classic Adventures and George Poveromo's Saltwater Fishing. Never mind buying a rod and reel -- just kick back and watch the real anglers do it.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/satellite/" rel="tag">Satellite</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Sports</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/new-content/" rel="tag">New content</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/16/world-fishing-network-hd-officially-on-dish-network/">World Fishing Network HD officially on DISH Network</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 16 May 2008 21:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/May2008/14/c8486.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/16/world-fishing-network-hd-officially-on-dish-network/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1195677/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/16/world-fishing-network-hd-officially-on-dish-network/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>agreement</category><category>carriage</category><category>dish</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>expansion</category><category>fishing</category><category>hd</category><category>new content</category><category>newcontent</category><category>satellite</category><category>sports</category><category>wfn</category><category>world fishing network</category><category>world fishing network hd</category><category>WorldFishingNetwork</category><category>WorldFishingNetworkHd</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 21:21:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
