<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[TiVo asks court for a billion dollars in EchoStar case]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/13/tivo-asks-court-for-a-billion-dollars-in-echostar-case/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/13/tivo-asks-court-for-a-billion-dollars-in-echostar-case/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/13/tivo-asks-court-for-a-billion-dollars-in-echostar-case/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-07/tivo-wants-1-billion-out-of-dishechostar/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/07/7-13-09tivoecho1.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Remember when we thought that those <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/18/tivo-awarded-90m-and-permanent-injunction-aginst-echostar/">$90 million</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/02/dish-echostar-ordered-to-pay-tivo-190-million-in-patent-infri/">$190 million</a> judgments in the endless TiVo / EchoStar case were big noise? Yeah, they were apparently pocket change: according to documents recently filed with the court, TiVo's asking for nearly a <em>billion dollars</em> in contempt sanctions against EchoStar. Unfortunately, the original document in which TiVo made the request was filed under seal because it contains confidential information, but it appears that TiVo's none too pleased that EchoStar violated the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/02/dish-echostar-ordered-to-pay-tivo-190-million-in-patent-infri/">permanent injunction</a> that ordered it to disable some 193,000 DVRs in the wild, and it's looking for some payback. For its part, EchoStar says that it doesn't have to comply with the court's order because the injunction was put on hold pending appeal -- an argument that appears on the surface to make perfect sense, but since we can't read TiVo's motion we can't say for sure what's going on, and there's always a chance the company's just playing hardball in order to force a late settlement. Given the <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/tivo,echostar">rocky history</a> of this endless case, we doubt that's likely, but one thing's for certain: all these lawyers are eating well tonight.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/" rel="tag">Misc</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/13/tivo-asks-court-for-a-billion-dollars-in-echostar-case/">TiVo asks court for a billion dollars in EchoStar case</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:41:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-07/tivo-wants-1-billion-out-of-dishechostar/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/13/tivo-asks-court-for-a-billion-dollars-in-echostar-case/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19096855/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/13/tivo-asks-court-for-a-billion-dollars-in-echostar-case/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>contempt</category><category>echostar</category><category>hd</category><category>injunction</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>patent</category><category>sanctions</category><category>tivo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:41:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[TiVo asks court for a billion dollars in EchoStar case]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/13/tivo-asks-court-for-a-billion-dollars-in-echostar-case/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/13/tivo-asks-court-for-a-billion-dollars-in-echostar-case/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/13/tivo-asks-court-for-a-billion-dollars-in-echostar-case/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-07/tivo-wants-1-billion-out-of-dishechostar/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/07/7-13-09tivoecho1.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Remember when we thought that those <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/18/tivo-awarded-90m-and-permanent-injunction-aginst-echostar/">$90 million</a> and  <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/02/dish-echostar-ordered-to-pay-tivo-190-million-in-patent-infri/">$190 million</a> judgments in the endless TiVo / EchoStar case were big noise? Yeah, they were apparently pocket change: according to documents recently filed with the court, TiVo's asking for nearly a <em>billion dollars</em> in contempt sanctions against EchoStar. Unfortunately, the original document in which TiVo made the request was filed under seal because it contains confidential information, but it appears that TiVo's none too pleased that EchoStar violated the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/02/dish-echostar-ordered-to-pay-tivo-190-million-in-patent-infri/">permanent injunction</a> that ordered it to disable some 193,000 DVRs in the wild, and it's looking for some payback. For its part, EchoStar says that it doesn't have to comply with the court's order because the injunction was put on hold pending appeal -- an argument that appears on the surface to make perfect sense, but since we can't read TiVo's motion we can't say for sure what's going on, and there's always a chance the company's just playing hardball in order to force a late settlement. Given the <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/tivo,echostar">rocky history</a> of this endless case, we doubt that's likely, but one thing's for certain: all these lawyers are eating well tonight.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/homeentertainment/" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/13/tivo-asks-court-for-a-billion-dollars-in-echostar-case/">TiVo asks court for a billion dollars in EchoStar case</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:41:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-07/tivo-wants-1-billion-out-of-dishechostar/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/13/tivo-asks-court-for-a-billion-dollars-in-echostar-case/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19096845/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/13/tivo-asks-court-for-a-billion-dollars-in-echostar-case/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>contempt</category><category>echostar</category><category>injunction</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>patent</category><category>sanctions</category><category>tivo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:41:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
