<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Hulu may not sell after all, bidding drama continues]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/19/hulu-may-not-sell-after-all-bidding-drama-continues/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/19/hulu-may-not-sell-after-all-bidding-drama-continues/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/19/hulu-may-not-sell-after-all-bidding-drama-continues/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/19/hulu-may-not-sell-after-all-bidding-drama-continues/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/hulu-custom.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Hulu has been dressed in its Sunday best for some time now hoping to attract potential buyers -- but according to <em>Reuters</em>, a slew of speed bumps have slowed down the process and may even kill all hopes of selling the service. According to sources, the first bump in the road can be attributed to Hulu's owners -- News Corp., Disney, NBC Universal and Providence Equity Partners -- who may not all be on the same page when it comes to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/02/hulu-ceo-welcomes-back-the-daily-show-and-more-from-viacom-lays-o/">selling the service</a>. Without a unified front, it's been hard for the company to find an acceptable offer from the likes of Google, Amazon, DirecTV and Dish Network, who have all talked about bidding between $500 million to $2 billion. As the service awaits a new round of bids next week, it's been said that the major players involved have (unsurprisingly) agreed to reject any lowball offers. Despite a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/06/hulu-ceo-lays-out-q2-results-875-000-paying-subscribers-for-pot/">growing numbers of subscribers</a>, it's entirely uncertain whether anyone will step in to clean up the company's hot mess -- we're sure the drama would make for a perfect Hulu Plus exclusive, though.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/19/hulu-may-not-sell-after-all-bidding-drama-continues/">Hulu may not sell after all, bidding drama continues</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 19 Sep 2011 19:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/19/hulu-may-not-sell-after-all-bidding-drama-continues/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20046613/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/19/hulu-may-not-sell-after-all-bidding-drama-continues/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amazon</category><category>comcast</category><category>DirecTV</category><category>Dish Network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>google</category><category>hdpostmini</category><category>hulu</category><category>Hulu Plus</category><category>HuluPlus</category><category>IPO</category><category>NBC</category><category>NBC Universal</category><category>NbcUniversal</category><category>news corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>TV</category><category>TV shows</category><category>tv shows on the internet</category><category>TvShows</category><category>TvShowsOnTheInternet</category><category>yahoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lydia Leavitt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 19:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Poll: Are you watching TV with/on a tablet?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/10/poll-are-you-watching-tv-with-on-a-tablet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/10/poll-are-you-watching-tv-with-on-a-tablet/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/10/poll-are-you-watching-tv-with-on-a-tablet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/10/poll-are-you-watching-tv-with-on-a-tablet/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/04/fios-ipad-rm-eng.jpg"  alt="" /></a></div>
Adding a tablet component to your TV service is all the rage among providers and set-top box manufacturers these days (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/25/comcasts-xfinity-tv-app-for-ios-updated-with-more-streaming-and/">Comcast</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/28/official-directv-app-for-ipad-now-available-brings-touch-contro/">DirecTV</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/02/dish-network-launches-remote-access-app-brings-live-tv-and-sche/">Dish</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/tivo,ipad">TiVo</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/08/motorolas-socialtv-app-will-turn-your-xoom-or-atrix-into-a-comm/">Motorola</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/21/verizon-fios-mobile-app-hits-ipad-a-virtual-remote-with-no-stre/">FiOS</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/02/cablevision-optimum-for-ipad-app-now-available-streams-hundreds/">Cablevision</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/07/time-warner-cable-takes-viacom-to-court-over-its-twcable-tv-ipad/">Time Warner</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/30/boxee-details-next-box-update-with-ipad-support-and-more-in-may/">Boxee</a> just to name a few) but our question today is how many of our EHD readers <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/07/cable-ipad-app-roundup-cablevision-counts-50k-downloads-time-w/">are putting any of them to use</a>. Check out the poll options below and find the one that fits you best, then tell us why in the comments below. Are all these <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ipad">iPad apps</a> just a fad or is the tablet here to stay? <br />
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/10/poll-are-you-watching-tv-with-on-a-tablet/#poll62573">View Poll</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/10/poll-are-you-watching-tv-with-on-a-tablet/">Poll: Are you watching TV with/on a tablet?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 10 Apr 2011 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/10/poll-are-you-watching-tv-with-on-a-tablet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19908370/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/10/poll-are-you-watching-tv-with-on-a-tablet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>apple</category><category>apple ipad</category><category>AppleIpad</category><category>boxee</category><category>cablevision</category><category>comcast</category><category>directv</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>fios</category><category>hd</category><category>ipad</category><category>ipad app</category><category>ipad remote</category><category>IpadApp</category><category>IpadRemote</category><category>optimum for ipad</category><category>OptimumForIpad</category><category>poll</category><category>remote app</category><category>RemoteApp</category><category>tablet</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twcable tv</category><category>TwcableTv</category><category>xfinity tv</category><category>XfinityTv</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[2011 retransmission dispute roundup: which channels may go dark at midnight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/31/2011-retransmission-dispute-roundup-which-channels-may-go-dark/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/31/2011-retransmission-dispute-roundup-which-channels-may-go-dark/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/31/2011-retransmission-dispute-roundup-which-channels-may-go-dark/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/31/2011-retransmission-dispute-roundup-which-channels-may-go-dark/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/12/dichestyleretrans.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
It's a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/01/fox-and-time-warner-cable-cut-a-deal-turkish-missiles-to-be-remov/">yearly</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/01/time-warner-viacom-reach-agreement-bromance-crisis-averted/">thing</a>, with contracts between TV stations and pay-TV providers due to expire just as the ball drops for the New Year it's increasingly hard to tell which channels will still be around when 2011 dawns. Check out our list below to see which ones are on the chopping block and which ones have already reached a new agreement this time around. If you spot any we've missed let us know in the comments or if there are any last minute reprieves, updates or extensions.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update</strong>: Moved Suddenlink/Viacom, Time Warner/Sinclair to resolved<br />
<strong><br />
Expiring at midnight:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://fansfightback.com/">Dish Network vs. E!, Style</a> -- Dish Network and Comcast are negotiating over the networks, with a contract expiring at midnight. Dish and Comcast <a href="http://www.multichannel.com/article/461631-E_Style_Face_Dish_Disconnect_On_Jan_1.php">are also fighting over Comcast SportsNet California</a>, which has been off the air since November 24</li>
</ul>
<br />
<strong>Resolved:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/directv-tv-station-group-hearst-67112">Hearst vs. DirecTV</a> - Covering 29 stations across the country including CBS, ABC and CW affiliates</li>
    <li><a href="http://www.multichannel.com/article/461630-Insight_Raycom_Reach_Retrans_Deal.php">Insight vs. Raycom</a> - Three stations in Louisville, Evansville and Cincinnati</li>
    <li><a href="http://suddenlinkfyi.com/2010/12/31/suddenlink-viacom-reach-agreement/">Suddenlink vs. Viacom</a> - Not only will Suddenlink keep Viacom stations like MTV, VH1 and Spike, but it will also be adding EPIX "in the next few months," without raising its subscribers rates</li>
    <li><a href="http://www.twcableuntangled.com/2010/12/another-retrans-fight-sinclair-viewers-wont-lose-their-network-programming/">Time Warner Cable vs. Sinclair Broadcast Group</a>  -- Sinclair owns ABC, CBS, Fox, CW, MyNetworkTV and NBC affiliates in  35 markets which it will pull at midnight including San Antonio,  Pittsburgh and Tampa. Time Warner claims it will still be able to  provide programming from the "Big 4" networks in those areas without  Sinclair, although viewers may miss their local news stations -- This isn't fully resolved, but negotiations have been extended until January 14th. <a href="http://www.twcableuntangled.com/2010/12/we-have-an-extension-with-sinclair-broadcasting/">Details here</a>.</li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/31/2011-retransmission-dispute-roundup-which-channels-may-go-dark/">2011 retransmission dispute roundup: which channels may go dark at midnight</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 31 Dec 2010 19:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/31/2011-retransmission-dispute-roundup-which-channels-may-go-dark/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19782999/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/31/2011-retransmission-dispute-roundup-which-channels-may-go-dark/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>carriage</category><category>directv</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>dispute</category><category>e</category><category>hd</category><category>hearst</category><category>insight</category><category>raycom</category><category>retrans</category><category>sinclair</category><category>sinclair broadcasting</category><category>SinclairBroadcasting</category><category>style network</category><category>StyleNetwork</category><category>time warner cable</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 19:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dish Network has AMC HD now, casually points out DirecTV still doesn't]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/20/dish-network-has-amc-hd-now-casually-points-out-directv-still-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/20/dish-network-has-amc-hd-now-casually-points-out-directv-still-d/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/20/dish-network-has-amc-hd-now-casually-points-out-directv-still-d/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/20/dish-network-has-amc-hd-now-casually-points-out-directv-still-d/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/08/mad-men-logo.jpg" /></a></div>
Congratulations <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/DishNetwork/">Dish Network</a> on announcing yourself as "the first and only satellite TV provider in America to offer this channel." Though DirecTV still has NFL Sunday ticket, if your taste run more towards Don Draper than Adrian Peterson, you won't get <em>Mad Men</em> in HD there, yet. Check for the new network on channel 130 in the America's Top 200 package of channels and higher, and let us know if <em>Rubicon </em>is worth watching -- going into these conspiracy stories blind can be tiring.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/20/dish-network-has-amc-hd-now-casually-points-out-directv-still-d/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dish Network has AMC HD now, casually points out DirecTV still doesn't</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/20/dish-network-has-amc-hd-now-casually-points-out-directv-still-d/">Dish Network has AMC HD now, casually points out DirecTV still doesn't</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 20 Aug 2010 19:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/20/dish-network-has-amc-hd-now-casually-points-out-directv-still-d/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19602694/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/20/dish-network-has-amc-hd-now-casually-points-out-directv-still-d/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amc</category><category>amc hd</category><category>AmcHd</category><category>directv</category><category>Dish Network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>hd</category><category>mad men</category><category>MadMen</category><category>rubicon</category><category>satellite</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 19:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apricorn's DVR Expanders get bigger, prettier, quieter with new 2TB option and fanless designs]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/06/apricorns-dvr-expanders-get-bigger-prettier-quieter-with-new/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/06/apricorns-dvr-expanders-get-bigger-prettier-quieter-with-new/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/06/apricorns-dvr-expanders-get-bigger-prettier-quieter-with-new/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/06/apricorns-dvr-expanders-get-bigger-prettier-quieter-with-new/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/08/dvrexpanderfront400.jpg"  alt="" /></a></div>
Say hello to the latest iteration of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/apricorn">Apricorn's</a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/apricorn"> DVR Expander</a>  series, now offering sizes up to 2TB. The drives are wrapped in a  passively cooled design that not only upgrades the looks from its  external storage units of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/apricorn">years gone by</a> but are also "ultra-quiet" after <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/12/western-digital-dvr-expander-preorders-apricorn-add-ons/">dropping the fans</a>.  The 1.5TB and 2TB ($169 and $249, respectively) models are only for  compatible DirecTV boxes, while Dish Network and Scientific Atlanta  (8300 and 8240 series) DVR users can plug in units of either 500GB or  1TB ($99 and ($129, respectively) in size.  With up to 234 hours of HDTV  recording on the eSATA/USB connected units, mentioning the possibility  of connecting multiple drives to the satellite boxes seems like  overkill, but if you want to record every episode of <i>The Daily Show</i> and <i>Colbert Report</i> left this year, we won't judge.<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/apricorn-dvr-expander-2010/">Apricorn DVR Expander 2010</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/apricorn-dvr-expander-2010/#3242163"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/hd.engadget.com/media/2010/08/dvrexpandertvdesk800_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/apricorn-dvr-expander-2010/#3242160"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/hd.engadget.com/media/2010/08/dvrexpanderfront800_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/apricorn-dvr-expander-2010/#3242161"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/hd.engadget.com/media/2010/08/dvrexpanderback800_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/apricorn-dvr-expander-2010/#3242162"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/hd.engadget.com/media/2010/08/dvrexpandertop800_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/06/apricorns-dvr-expanders-get-bigger-prettier-quieter-with-new/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Apricorn's DVR Expanders get bigger, prettier, quieter with new 2TB option and fanless designs</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/06/apricorns-dvr-expanders-get-bigger-prettier-quieter-with-new/">Apricorn's DVR Expanders get bigger, prettier, quieter with new 2TB option and fanless designs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 06 Aug 2010 15:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/06/apricorns-dvr-expanders-get-bigger-prettier-quieter-with-new/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19584329/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/06/apricorns-dvr-expanders-get-bigger-prettier-quieter-with-new/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2tb</category><category>apricorn</category><category>Apricorn dvr xpander</category><category>ApricornDvrXpander</category><category>directv</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>dvr</category><category>dvr expander</category><category>dvr xpander</category><category>DvrExpander</category><category>DvrXpander</category><category>esata</category><category>external</category><category>external storage</category><category>ExternalStorage</category><category>hard drive</category><category>HardDrive</category><category>hd</category><category>scientific atlanta</category><category>ScientificAtlanta</category><category>usb</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 15:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AT&amp;T, DirecTV, Verizon push Comcast &amp; Cablevision for HD sports channels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-directv-verizon-push-comcast-and-cablevision-for-access-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-directv-verizon-push-comcast-and-cablevision-for-access-to/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-directv-verizon-push-comcast-and-cablevision-for-access-to/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-directv-verizon-push-comcast-and-cablevision-for-access-to/"><img vspace="4" hspace="16" border="0" align="left" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/msg070909.jpg" /></a>After the FCC <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/20/fcc-sides-against-cable-companies-restricting-local-sports-hd-fe/">closed the terrestrial loophole</a> we knew it wouldn't be long until satellite and IPTV providers started moving on the cable companies regarding access to high definition versions of their regional sports networks and now they have. <i>Multichannel News</i> reports AT&amp;T has put in its request for access to HD feeds of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/msg">MSG Network</a>, while DirecTV and DISH Network have done the same for Comcast and its SportsNet Philadelphia channel. Today, Verizon filed a supplement to its existing Program access Complaint to the FCC asking it to force <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Cablevision/">Cablevision</a> into opening up those MSG and MSG+ HD feeds. so far, Comcast has had no response at all, while Cablevision maintains that providing standard def access to U-Verse and FiOS satisfies its requirements under the current laws -- although it certainly doesn't match our standard of common decency -- the rest is up to the courts, lawyers and the FCC.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-directv-verizon-push-comcast-and-cablevision-for-access-to/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>AT&amp;T, DirecTV, Verizon push Comcast &amp; Cablevision for HD sports channels</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-directv-verizon-push-comcast-and-cablevision-for-access-to/">AT&amp;T, DirecTV, Verizon push Comcast &amp; Cablevision for HD sports channels</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-directv-verizon-push-comcast-and-cablevision-for-access-to/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19534039/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-directv-verizon-push-comcast-and-cablevision-for-access-to/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>att</category><category>cablevision</category><category>comcast</category><category>comcast sportsnet</category><category>comcast sportsnet philadelphia</category><category>ComcastSportsnet</category><category>ComcastSportsnetPhiladelphia</category><category>directv</category><category>dish</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>fcc</category><category>hd</category><category>msg</category><category>msg network</category><category>MsgNetwork</category><category>regional sports network</category><category>RegionalSportsNetwork</category><category>rsn</category><category>terrestrial loophole</category><category>TerrestrialLoophole</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DirecTV, DISH offer "free HD for life" with a few strings -- anyone signing up?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/07/directv-dish-offer-free-hd-for-life-with-a-few-strings-any/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/07/directv-dish-offer-free-hd-for-life-with-a-few-strings-any/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/07/directv-dish-offer-free-hd-for-life-with-a-few-strings-any/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/07/directv-dish-offer-free-hd-for-life-with-a-few-strings-any/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/directdishhdlife600.jpg" /></a></div>
Just in case you missed the ads airing on TV or splattered across websites (like this one) <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/directv,dishnetwork">DirecTV and DISH Network have launched headlong into their latest war</a>. DISH started things last week by offering "free HD for life" (ad embedded from YouTube after the break), eliminating the $10 service charge for new customers signing up for a two year contract with automatic bill pay, or existing customers who either pay $99 "HD upgrade fee" up front, or sign a two year deal and add auto bill payment to their accounts. This weekend, DirecTV began offering its own "HD free for life" deal that scrubs its $10 fee for new customers under similar requirements to the DISH offer. By comparison, HD service is usually included with digital cable packages but we're wondering if dropping the extra fees is enough to make you think of joining the satellite team, or switching your current agreement.<br />
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/07/directv-dish-offer-free-hd-for-life-with-a-few-strings-any/#poll47589">View Poll</a></p><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/07/directv-dish-offer-free-hd-for-life-with-a-few-strings-any/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>DirecTV, DISH offer "free HD for life" with a few strings -- anyone signing up?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/07/directv-dish-offer-free-hd-for-life-with-a-few-strings-any/">DirecTV, DISH offer "free HD for life" with a few strings -- anyone signing up?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 07 Jun 2010 09:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/07/directv-dish-offer-free-hd-for-life-with-a-few-strings-any/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19505368/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/07/directv-dish-offer-free-hd-for-life-with-a-few-strings-any/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>directv</category><category>dish</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>fees</category><category>free hd for life</category><category>FreeHdForLife</category><category>hd</category><category>poll</category><category>price war</category><category>PriceWar</category><category>promotions</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 09:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DirecTV raises its HD channels claim to 160, disses Dish for juking the numbers]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/20/directv-ups-its-channels-claim-to-160-disses-dish-for-juking-th/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/20/directv-ups-its-channels-claim-to-160-disses-dish-for-juking-th/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/20/directv-ups-its-channels-claim-to-160-disses-dish-for-juking-th/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/20/directv-ups-its-channels-claim-to-160-disses-dish-for-juking-th/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/04/06-daniels-and-rawls.jpg" /></a></div>
We hadn't even finished counting Dish's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/19/dish-adds-epix-hd-and-eight-more-to-crack-the-200-hd-channel-bar/">200 channels claim</a> when DirecTV pops up with plans to add a whole slew of new HD networks as well. By its reckoning, tossing ESPNU HD, WGN HD, MSNBC HD, some additional DirecTV Cinema Channels and more puts it over 160 "around the clock HD channels", and executive VP Derek Chang couldn't resist tossing in a link to count them for yourself. He's laid the gauntlet down for Dish to put its channel lineup up for similar scrutiny, we'll see if the end result of this duel is more clarity in the channel/choices count wars. Check the full press release after the break.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/20/directv-ups-its-channels-claim-to-160-disses-dish-for-juking-th/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>DirecTV raises its HD channels claim to 160, disses Dish for juking the numbers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/20/directv-ups-its-channels-claim-to-160-disses-dish-for-juking-th/">DirecTV raises its HD channels claim to 160, disses Dish for juking the numbers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/20/directv-ups-its-channels-claim-to-160-disses-dish-for-juking-th/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19447262/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/20/directv-ups-its-channels-claim-to-160-disses-dish-for-juking-th/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>160 hd channels</category><category>160HdChannels</category><category>channels</category><category>derek chang</category><category>DerekChang</category><category>DirecTV</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>hd</category><category>hd channels</category><category>HdChannels</category><category>may</category><category>new channels</category><category>NewChannels</category><category>the wire</category><category>TheWire</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dish Network countersues DirecTV over signal reliability claims]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/22/dish-network-countersues-directv-over-signal-reliability-claims/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/22/dish-network-countersues-directv-over-signal-reliability-claims/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/22/dish-network-countersues-directv-over-signal-reliability-claims/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704841304575138281401786338.html"><img border="0" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/dish-and-dtv-rm-eng_250x234.jpg" /></a>Oh, don't act surprised. As is the norm with these things, Dish Network has filed a countersuit against DirecTV. Last month, the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/13/directv-suing-dish-network-over-why-pay-more-ads-says-theres-p/">latter company filed suit</a>, claiming Dish's "Why Pay More" ads were false and misleading. The countersuit, unsurprisingly, is also false and misleading advertising -- in this instance, the claim "nothing comes close to the reliability and quality of DirecTV." Dish asserts its signal reliability is exactly the same, 99.9 percent. Better strap yourself in, it's gonna be a long and bumpy ride through the court system.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/22/dish-network-countersues-directv-over-signal-reliability-claims/">Dish Network countersues DirecTV over signal reliability claims</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/22/dish-network-countersues-directv-over-signal-reliability-claims/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19410192/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/22/dish-network-countersues-directv-over-signal-reliability-claims/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>counter suit</category><category>CounterSuit</category><category>directv</category><category>dish</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>law</category><category>legal</category><category>satellite</category><category>sue</category><category>suit</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:11:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hands-on with the interactive Olympics and web videos]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/15/hands-on-with-the-interactive-olympics-and-web-videos/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/15/hands-on-with-the-interactive-olympics-and-web-videos/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/15/hands-on-with-the-interactive-olympics-and-web-videos/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/fiosolympic02md.jpg" /></div>
Events like the Olympics usual bring new technology home -- which is a good thing -- but unfortunately these apps really show us how far we are from the interactive TV future we've been promised. There really isn't any realistic way to try out every version of interactive Olympic coverage since so many providers are only offered in certain areas of the country and some providers -- like Time Warner Cable, Bright House Networks, Charter and most Cox areas -- aren't offering any at all. In addition to interactive TV the Winter games have actually taken a step back in regards to online video. While anyone could watch all the live videos and replays online before, the Winter Olympic coverage <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/interactive-olympics/#2711691">requires that you to prove you pay for TV</a> before giving you full access. In the case of Verizon's FiOS TV, it allows viewers to access the EBIF interactive information from NBC Universal's channels, which is the first time we've every experienced the use of CableLabs' new interactive platform, as for how we like it or Comcast's mosaic channel, click on through to find out.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;"><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/interactive-olympics/">Interactive Olympics</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/interactive-olympics/#2711596"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/hd.engadget.com/media/2010/02/fiosolympic01lg_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/interactive-olympics/#2711631"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/hd.engadget.com/media/2010/02/fiosolympic08lg_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/interactive-olympics/#2711591"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/hd.engadget.com/media/2010/02/fiosolympic06lg_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/interactive-olympics/#2711592"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/hd.engadget.com/media/2010/02/fiosolympic05lg_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/interactive-olympics/#2711593"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/hd.engadget.com/media/2010/02/fiosolympic04lg_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/15/hands-on-with-the-interactive-olympics-and-web-videos/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Hands-on with the interactive Olympics and web videos</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/15/hands-on-with-the-interactive-olympics-and-web-videos/">Hands-on with the interactive Olympics and web videos</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/15/hands-on-with-the-interactive-olympics-and-web-videos/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19358850/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/15/hands-on-with-the-interactive-olympics-and-web-videos/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2010 Olympic Winter Games</category><category>2010 olympics</category><category>2010 Winter Olympics</category><category>2010Olympics</category><category>2010OlympicWinterGames</category><category>2010WinterOlympics</category><category>Bright House networks</category><category>BrightHouseNetworks</category><category>Comcast</category><category>DirecTV</category><category>Dish NEtwork</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>EBIF</category><category>FiOS</category><category>FiOS TV</category><category>FiosTv</category><category>hands-on</category><category>hd</category><category>interactive TV</category><category>InteractiveTv</category><category>Olympics</category><category>Time Warner Cable</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><category>winterolympics</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Drawbaugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DirecTV suing Dish Network over Why Pay More ads, says there's plenty of reasons]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/13/directv-suing-dish-network-over-why-pay-more-ads-says-theres-p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/13/directv-suing-dish-network-over-why-pay-more-ads-says-theres-p/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/13/directv-suing-dish-network-over-why-pay-more-ads-says-theres-p/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGXPw3WyvXQ"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/whywouldyoupaymore021210.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
While we settle our disputes the old fashioned way (Judge Judy appearances) <a href="http://hd.engadget.com/tag/directv/">DirecTV's</a> taking its beef with recent <a href="http://hd.engadget.com/tag/dishnetwork/">Dish Network</a> ads to a slightly different courtroom. The "Why Pay More" ad campaign has been running for the last year but it appears the latest "Man on the Street" spot (embedded after the break) is what has really upset DirecTV, claiming that its package costs around $20 a month more than Dish. The lawsuit filed Thursday claims the DirecTV services offer more, and higher quality, channels than the one it's being compared to and according to <i>Multichannel News</i>, the company mentions many of the channels this ad is airing on aren't even a part of the Dish lineup being advertised. Of course, as long as it's <a href="http://hd.engadget.com/2009/12/11/dish-gets-back-on-the-plus-side-now-has-over-14-million-subscri/">adding customers</a> we don't see Dish backing off the comparisons on its own anytime soon and if you wonder how long it's willing totake the heat in court, just ask TiVo.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/13/directv-suing-dish-network-over-why-pay-more-ads-says-theres-p/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>DirecTV suing Dish Network over Why Pay More ads, says there's plenty of reasons</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/13/directv-suing-dish-network-over-why-pay-more-ads-says-theres-p/">DirecTV suing Dish Network over Why Pay More ads, says there's plenty of reasons</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 13 Feb 2010 01:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/13/directv-suing-dish-network-over-why-pay-more-ads-says-theres-p/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19356888/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/13/directv-suing-dish-network-over-why-pay-more-ads-says-theres-p/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ad</category><category>directv</category><category>dish</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>false advertising</category><category>FalseAdvertising</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>satellite</category><category>tv channels</category><category>TvChannels</category><category>why pay more</category><category>WhyPayMore</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 01:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Engadget HD takes an in-depth look at Media Center in Windows 7 RTM]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/27/engadget-hd-takes-an-in-depth-look-at-media-center-in-windows-7/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/27/engadget-hd-takes-an-in-depth-look-at-media-center-in-windows-7/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/27/engadget-hd-takes-an-in-depth-look-at-media-center-in-windows-7/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2009/07/27/windows-7-media-center-review/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadgethd.com/media/2009/07/7mc_14_md.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
<br />If you've ever thought about forcing your Xbox 360 to do double duty and in addition to all the games you require it to host for you, set it up to replace your TiVo or cable company DVR, then now might just be the time. The reason is simple, in Windows 7, Microsoft has really made some nice improvements to Windows Media Center. What improvements you might ask? Glad you did, because over at Engadget HD the team <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2009/07/27/windows-7-media-center-review/">went over the changes with a fine-tooth comb</a>. This includes a comprehensive list of improvements and shortfalls in regards to using Windows 7 Media Center as a full time HD DVR as well as a few videos to really help you appreciate what's new and what the experience is like on an Xbox 360. <br /><br />
<div style="text-align: center;"><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/windows-7-media-center-review/">Windows 7 Media Center review</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/windows-7-media-center-review/#2165801"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadgethd.com/media/2009/07/7mc_02_ld_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Guide with colors" title="Guide with colors" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/windows-7-media-center-review/#2165800"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadgethd.com/media/2009/07/7mc_03_ld_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Guide without colors" title="Guide without colors" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/windows-7-media-center-review/#2165859"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadgethd.com/media/2009/07/7mc_16_ld_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Custom favorites" title="Custom favorites" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/windows-7-media-center-review/#2165789"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadgethd.com/media/2009/07/7mc_08_ld_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Mini guide. " title="Mini guide. " /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/windows-7-media-center-review/#2165794"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadgethd.com/media/2009/07/7mc_01_ld_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Edit guide page" title="Edit guide page" /></a></div><br /></div><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/hdtv/" rel="tag">HDTV</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/homeentertainment/" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/mediapcs/" rel="tag">Media PCs</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/27/engadget-hd-takes-an-in-depth-look-at-media-center-in-windows-7/">Engadget HD takes an in-depth look at Media Center in Windows 7 RTM</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.engadgethd.com/2009/07/27/windows-7-media-center-review/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/27/engadget-hd-takes-an-in-depth-look-at-media-center-in-windows-7/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19110475/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/27/engadget-hd-takes-an-in-depth-look-at-media-center-in-windows-7/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>7MC</category><category>ATI</category><category>ATI DCT</category><category>AtiDct</category><category>CableCARD</category><category>DirecTV</category><category>DISH Network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>hdtv</category><category>Managed Copy</category><category>ManagedCopy</category><category>Media Center</category><category>media pc</category><category>media pcs</category><category>MediaCenter</category><category>mediapc</category><category>mediapcs</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>PlayReady</category><category>Project Draco</category><category>ProjectDraco</category><category>Tuning Adapter</category><category>TuningAdapter</category><category>Windows</category><category>Windows 7 Media Center</category><category>Windows Home Server</category><category>Windows Media Center</category><category>Windows7MediaCenter</category><category>WindowsHomeServer</category><category>WindowsMediaCenter</category><category>WMC</category><category>Xbox 360</category><category>Xbox360</category><category>Zune HD</category><category>ZuneHd</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Drawbaugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Windows 7 Media Center review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/27/windows-7-media-center-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/27/windows-7-media-center-review/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/27/windows-7-media-center-review/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/07/7mc_14_md.jpg" /></div>
<br />
We've been waiting a long time for this and it's finally here, the latest version of Windows Media Center. Well, we really stopped waiting a few months ago <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/windows-7-release-candidate-1-impressions-insights-and-expecta/">when the release candidate hit</a>, but waited on composing our thoughts until after we had a chance to play with <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/22/microsofts-windows-7-gets-released-to-manufacturing/">the RTM copy</a>. For the most part, as you'd expect the RTM build is identical to the RC, sans the bugs, but there are plenty of upgrades over Vista Media Center. Many of these new features <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/hands-on-with-the-vista-media-center-tv-pack/">were also in the TV Pack</a>, but in our book that doesn't count. For starters it was OEM only, and thus you could only get it (legitimately) by buying a new PC, but the real reason is because it was so buggy, it was beyond usable. In fact we still stand by <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/13/the-real-reason-why-the-media-center-tv-pack-update-was-oem-only/">the theory that the TV Pack was nothing more than an early preview</a> for OEMs of the new guts of Windows 7 Media Center. Gladly that is all behind us now, so keep reading to find out what gets us excited about Windows 7 Media Center.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;"><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/windows-7-media-center-review/">Windows 7 Media Center review</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/windows-7-media-center-review/#2165801"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadgethd.com/media/2009/07/7mc_02_ld_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Guide with colors" title="Guide with colors" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/windows-7-media-center-review/#2165800"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadgethd.com/media/2009/07/7mc_03_ld_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Guide without colors" title="Guide without colors" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/windows-7-media-center-review/#2165859"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadgethd.com/media/2009/07/7mc_16_ld_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Custom favorites" title="Custom favorites" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/windows-7-media-center-review/#2165789"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadgethd.com/media/2009/07/7mc_08_ld_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Mini guide. " title="Mini guide. " /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/windows-7-media-center-review/#2165794"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadgethd.com/media/2009/07/7mc_01_ld_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Edit guide page" title="Edit guide page" /></a></div></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/27/windows-7-media-center-review/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Windows 7 Media Center review</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/features/" rel="tag">Features</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/reviews/" rel="tag">Reviews</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/media-pcs/" rel="tag">Media PCs</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/27/windows-7-media-center-review/">Windows 7 Media Center review</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/27/windows-7-media-center-review/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19109834/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/27/windows-7-media-center-review/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>7MC</category><category>ATI</category><category>ATI DCT</category><category>AtiDct</category><category>CableCARD</category><category>DirecTV</category><category>DISH Network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>hd</category><category>Managed Copy</category><category>ManagedCopy</category><category>Media Center</category><category>MediaCenter</category><category>PlayReady</category><category>Project Draco</category><category>ProjectDraco</category><category>Tuning Adapter</category><category>TuningAdapter</category><category>windows 7</category><category>Windows 7 Media Center</category><category>Windows Home Server</category><category>Windows Media Center</category><category>Windows7</category><category>Windows7MediaCenter</category><category>WindowsHomeServer</category><category>WindowsMediaCenter</category><category>WMC</category><category>Xbox 360</category><category>Xbox360</category><category>Zune HD</category><category>ZuneHd</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Drawbaugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[TiVo coming to Time Warner Cable, potentially lots of other providers]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/22/tivo-coming-to-time-warner-cable-potentially-lots-of-other-prov/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/22/tivo-coming-to-time-warner-cable-potentially-lots-of-other-prov/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/22/tivo-coming-to-time-warner-cable-potentially-lots-of-other-prov/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601204&amp;sid=a2d0e1TXcCuc"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/04/4-28-09tivohdxl.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
It's been a long, messy road, but now that TiVo's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/02/dish-echostar-ordered-to-pay-tivo-190-million-in-patent-infri/">beaten a victory out of EchoStar</a> in that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/dish-echostar-dvr-injunction-temporarily-put-on-hold-by-court/">seemingly-endless</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/tivo,echostar">DVR patent lawsuit</a> it sounds like the company is trying to exert some muscle -- it's already in talks to bring its service to Time Warner Cable, and sources have told <em>Bloomberg</em> the ultimate plan is to eventually collect royalties from every pay-TV provider in the US. That might sound bullying and even a little trollish, but keep in mind these patents have <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/29/patent-office-upholds-tivos-time-warp-patent-echostar-not-so/">withstood</a> pretty much <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/31/appeals-court-upholds-tivo-patent-claims-against-echostar/">every</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/11/tivos-win-over-dish-network-upheld-by-court-of-appeals-its-ov/">legal</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/11/dish-network-wont-stop-cant-stop-fighting-tivo-heads-to-supr/">challenge</a> EchoStar could throw at them, so TiVo's operating from a position of some certainty here -- especially since it's got license agreements with huge players like Comcast and DirecTV to use as leverage in negotiations as well. Of course, none of this solves any of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/28/ten-years-of-tivo-how-far-we-havent-come/">TiVo's actual problems with its products</a>, and the company's topsy-turvy balance sheet has some analysts thinking its ripe for a buyout by one of the bigs, so things could change dramatically at any minute, but for right now it sounds like your chances of getting the TiVo interface on your cable or satellite company DVR just went up, and that's almost certainly a good thing.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/dvrs/" rel="tag">DVRs</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/22/tivo-coming-to-time-warner-cable-potentially-lots-of-other-prov/">TiVo coming to Time Warner Cable, potentially lots of other providers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601204&amp;sid=a2d0e1TXcCuc>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/22/tivo-coming-to-time-warner-cable-potentially-lots-of-other-prov/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19074492/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/22/tivo-coming-to-time-warner-cable-potentially-lots-of-other-prov/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>comcast</category><category>directv</category><category>dish</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>dvr</category><category>echostar</category><category>hd</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>patent</category><category>time warner</category><category>time warner cable</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><category>tivo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[TiVo coming to Time Warner Cable, potentially lots of other providers]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/22/tivo-coming-to-time-warner-cable-potentially-lots-of-other-prov/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/22/tivo-coming-to-time-warner-cable-potentially-lots-of-other-prov/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/22/tivo-coming-to-time-warner-cable-potentially-lots-of-other-prov/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601204&amp;sid=a2d0e1TXcCuc"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/04/4-28-09tivohdxl.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
It's been a long, messy road, but now that TiVo's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/02/dish-echostar-ordered-to-pay-tivo-190-million-in-patent-infri/">beaten a victory out of EchoStar</a> in that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/dish-echostar-dvr-injunction-temporarily-put-on-hold-by-court/">seemingly-endless</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/tivo,echostar">DVR patent lawsuit</a> it sounds like the company is trying to exert some muscle -- it's already in talks to bring its service to Time Warner Cable, and sources have told <em>Bloomberg</em> the ultimate plan is to eventually collect royalties from every pay-TV provider in the US. That might sound bullying and even a little trollish, but keep in mind these patents have <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/29/patent-office-upholds-tivos-time-warp-patent-echostar-not-so/">withstood</a> pretty much <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/31/appeals-court-upholds-tivo-patent-claims-against-echostar/">every</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/11/tivos-win-over-dish-network-upheld-by-court-of-appeals-its-ov/">legal</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/11/dish-network-wont-stop-cant-stop-fighting-tivo-heads-to-supr/">challenge</a> EchoStar could throw at them, so TiVo's operating from a position of some certainty here -- especially since it's got license agreements with huge players like Comcast and DirecTV to use as leverage in negotiations as well. Of course, none of this solves any of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/28/ten-years-of-tivo-how-far-we-havent-come/">TiVo's actual problems with its products</a>, and the company's topsy-turvy balance sheet has some analysts thinking its ripe for a buyout by one of the bigs, so things could change dramatically at any minute, but for right now it sounds like your chances of getting the TiVo interface on your cable or satellite company DVR just went up, and that's almost certainly a good thing.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/homeentertainment/" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/22/tivo-coming-to-time-warner-cable-potentially-lots-of-other-prov/">TiVo coming to Time Warner Cable, potentially lots of other providers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601204&amp;sid=a2d0e1TXcCuc>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/22/tivo-coming-to-time-warner-cable-potentially-lots-of-other-prov/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19074491/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/22/tivo-coming-to-time-warner-cable-potentially-lots-of-other-prov/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>comcast</category><category>directv</category><category>dish</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>dvr</category><category>echostar</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>patent</category><category>time warner</category><category>time warner cable</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><category>tivo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is the future of Windows Media Center with Windows Home Server?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/22/is-the-future-of-windows-media-center-with-windows-home-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/22/is-the-future-of-windows-media-center-with-windows-home-server/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/22/is-the-future-of-windows-media-center-with-windows-home-server/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/is-the-future-of-windows-media-center-with-windows-home-server/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/05/wmc_whs_2.jpg" alt="WHS and WMC" /></a><br /></div>
With all the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/16/linksys-discontinues-its-extenders-for-media-center/">bad news around Windows Media Center</a> this week, many enthusiasts are wondering about the future of Media Center. To say that the past few years have had a few disappointments is an understatement, especially when you think back to the way CableCARD support was implemented and how <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/20/netflix-watch-instantly-comes-to-vista-media-center-not-extende/">poorly the Extenders have been supported</a>. Although things look pretty grim for our preferred DVR platform, we're optimistic that things are actually about to get really good in the next year thanks to Windows 7 and some unannounced features and products. Part of the reason we think this is because over the years we've been watching Microsoft develop products that have taken years to catch on and gain dominance. But lets be honest, we're not on the inside and most of what we think will happen is <a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/chrisl/archive/2008/09/17/1648064.aspx ">based on rumors</a> and conjecture. With that being said, we've convinced ourselves that the future of Media Center, and the key to wider adoption that we think it deserves, is with Windows Home Server.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/22/is-the-future-of-windows-media-center-with-windows-home-server/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is the future of Windows Media Center with Windows Home Server?</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/features/" rel="tag">Features</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/media-pcs/" rel="tag">Media PCs</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/media-streamers/" rel="tag">Media streamers</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/22/is-the-future-of-windows-media-center-with-windows-home-server/">Is the future of Windows Media Center with Windows Home Server?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 22 May 2009 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/22/is-the-future-of-windows-media-center-with-windows-home-server/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1552866/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/22/is-the-future-of-windows-media-center-with-windows-home-server/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>7MC</category><category>CableCARD</category><category>DirecTV</category><category>DISH</category><category>DISH Network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>Featured</category><category>Features</category><category>hd</category><category>UPnP</category><category>VMC</category><category>WHS</category><category>WHSv2</category><category>Windows 7</category><category>Windows Home Server</category><category>Windows Media Center</category><category>Windows7</category><category>WindowsHomeServer</category><category>WindowsMediaCenter</category><category>WMC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Drawbaugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[HD channel expansion roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/16/hd-channel-expansion-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/16/hd-channel-expansion-roundup/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/16/hd-channel-expansion-roundup/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/05/2-5-09-hd-channels.jpg"  alt="" /><br /></div>
Once upon a time, a smattering of new HD channels in one major metropolitan area was a huge deal. Nowadays, it's almost expected that one area or another will experience some HD expansion each week. In order to keep things nice and tidy around here, we deliver high-def expansions, market expansions and anything else dealing with HD channel growth right here. If we missed an area that you're familiar with, drop us a line in comments so everyone can catch up. The more the merrier, we say!<br /><br /><a href="http://dish.client.shareholder.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=384033">Read</a> - DISH Network(R) Adds 30 HD Channels in Hawaii<br /><a href="http://dish.client.shareholder.com/releases.cfm">Read</a> - DISH Network(R) Adds 30 HD Channels in Alaska<br /><a href="http://www.businesswire.com/news/google/20090514006065/en">Read</a> - DIRECTV to Deliver Local HD Programming to Customers in Lafayette, Ind.<br /><a href="http://blog.seattletimes.nwsource.com/brierdudley/2009/05/15/comcast_digital_switch_update.html">Read</a> - Comcast digital switch update: Bellevue's next, Seattle in fall<br /><a href="http://www.redorbit.com/news/entertainment/1686758/fashiontvr_introduces_new_247_ftvr_hd_channel_in_the_us/">Read</a> - FashionTV(R) Introduces New 24/7 FTV(R) HD Channel in the U.S. on DISH Network(R)<br /><a href="http://www.webwire.com/ViewPressRel.asp?aId=94744">Read</a> - National Geographic Channels International Co-Produces Alaskan Killer Shark With Off The Fence Productions<br /><a href="http://news.prnewswire.com/DisplayReleaseContent.aspx?ACCT=104&amp;STORY=/www/story/05-11-2009/0005023120&amp;EDATE=">Read</a> - Cox Launches WRIC in HD to Customers in King and Queen County, New Kent, and West Point<br />Fox News Chicago switched to HD (Thanks, Garst)<br /><a href="http://www.timewarnercable.com/northeastohio/learn/programming/whatsontv/programmingnotices.html">Read</a> - Time Warner Cable North East Ohio new HD Channels (Thanks, Justin)<br /><a href="http://www.cox.com/sandiego/newsroom/service/2009/20090504-4hd.asp">Read</a> - Special Preview: ABC Family HD, Disney HD, HBO2 HD and BET HD (Thanks, Gary)<br /><a href="http://www.hdtvtwincities.com/forumbb/viewtopic.php?f=1&amp;t=4440">Read</a> - KMSP Fox 9 news in Minneapolis now in HD (Thanks, Nathan)<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cable/" rel="tag">Cable</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/satellite/" rel="tag">Satellite</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/16/hd-channel-expansion-roundup/">HD channel expansion roundup</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 16 May 2009 09:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/16/hd-channel-expansion-roundup/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1547885/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/16/hd-channel-expansion-roundup/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alaska</category><category>all digital</category><category>AllDigital</category><category>cable</category><category>channel</category><category>channels</category><category>comcast</category><category>directv</category><category>dish</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>EPG</category><category>fashion tv</category><category>FashionTv</category><category>ftv hd</category><category>FtvHd</category><category>hawaii</category><category>hd</category><category>indiana</category><category>kmsp</category><category>lafayette</category><category>lineup</category><category>news roundup</category><category>NewsRoundup</category><category>satellite</category><category>seattle</category><category>wric</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 09:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[HD channel expansion roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/18/hd-channel-expansion-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/18/hd-channel-expansion-roundup/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/18/hd-channel-expansion-roundup/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/04/2-5-09-hd-channels.jpg"  alt="" /><br /></div>
Once upon a time, a smattering of new HD channels in one major metropolitan area was a huge deal. Nowadays, it's almost expected that one area or another will experience some HD expansion each week. In order to keep things nice and tidy around here, we deliver high-def expansions, market expansions and anything else <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/channels/">dealing with HD channel growth right here</a>. If we missed an area that you're familiar with, drop us a line in comments so everyone can catch up. The more the merrier, we say!<br /><a href="http://newscenter.verizon.com/press-releases/verizon/2009/verizon-to-distribute-the-yes.html">Read</a> - Verizon to Distribute the YES Network Nationally in High Definition to FiOS 'Extreme HD' Subscribers, Under Multiyear Agreement<br /> <a href="http://www.multichannel.com/article/196369-NBA_TV_Scores_Multiyear_Distribution_Deal_With_DirecTV.php?rssid=20059">Read</a> - NBA TV Scores Multiyear Distribution Deal With DirecTV<br /> <a href="http://investor.directv.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=377764">Read</a> - DIRECTV Delivers Local HD Programming To Customers in Bangor, Maine<br /> <a href="http://www.daily-times.com/ci_12144272">Read</a> - Comcast project to increase available Internet speeds, add HDTV in Farmington, NM<br /> <a href="http://www.chattanoogan.com/articles/article_148842.asp">Read</a> - Comcast To Begin Rollout Of 22 More High Def Channels - Chattannooga, TN<br /> <a href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ent/tv/6379114.html">Read</a> - Comcast adds HD channels - Houston, TX<br /> DISH adds HD Locals in Tucson [Thanks, Adam]<br /> DISH adds KCAL9 in Los Angeles [Thanks, Ryan]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/18/hd-channel-expansion-roundup/">HD channel expansion roundup</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/18/hd-channel-expansion-roundup/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1521166/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/18/hd-channel-expansion-roundup/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bangor</category><category>channel</category><category>channels</category><category>chattanooga</category><category>directv</category><category>dish</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>epg</category><category>farmington</category><category>hd</category><category>HD channel expansion roundup</category><category>houston</category><category>kcal9</category><category>lineup</category><category>nba tv</category><category>NbaTv</category><category>news roundup</category><category>NewsRoundup</category><category>roundup</category><category>tucson</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DISH Network sees Q4 profit grow 24%, still sheds over 100,000 subscribers]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/05/dish-network-sees-q4-profit-grow-24-still-sheds-over-100-000-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/05/dish-network-sees-q4-profit-grow-24-still-sheds-over-100-000-s/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/05/dish-network-sees-q4-profit-grow-24-still-sheds-over-100-000-s/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/satellite-tv-firms-take-hit/story.aspx?guid=%7BEF69AD28-DA23-4C7F-BF04-FCB0136AD12B%7D&amp;dist=msr_10"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/3-5-09-dish-on-couch.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Unlike DirecTV, which managed to post <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/11/directv-q4-aftermath-focusing-on-middle-market-receiving-pra/">remarkable Q4 numbers</a> across the board, DISH Network is only able to partially celebrate. You see, the satcaster did see profits in the fourth quarter rise some 24 percent, but at the same time, 102,000 (net) subscribers decided to head elsewhere. A recent report on the matter suggests that DISH is hurting from increased competition from main rival DirecTV, not to mention fiber-based entrants such as AT&amp;T and Verizon. Of course, the general economic environment hasn't exactly helped matters, but DISH's smaller amount of high-def channels seems to be a magnified issue when money's tight. Oh, and if <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/directv-shows-interest-in-internet-tv-initiative-twc-chief-gets/">DirecTV</a> is somehow able to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/27/sirius-directv-bundles-already-being-considered/">integrate</a> Sirius service into its pay-TV offering, we'd say DISH will need to think fast if it hopes to stop the bleeding of customers. Speaking of, have any of you recently jumped from DISH to DirecTV? Vice-versa? <br /><br />[Image courtesy of <a href="http://www.propertyworld.com/agents/images/dccouch.jpg">PropertyWorld</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/satellite/" rel="tag">Satellite</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/05/dish-network-sees-q4-profit-grow-24-still-sheds-over-100-000-s/">DISH Network sees Q4 profit grow 24%, still sheds over 100,000 subscribers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/satellite-tv-firms-take-hit/story.aspx?guid=%7BEF69AD28-DA23-4C7F-BF04-FCB0136AD12B%7D&amp;dist=msr_10>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/05/dish-network-sees-q4-profit-grow-24-still-sheds-over-100-000-s/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1479424/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/05/dish-network-sees-q4-profit-grow-24-still-sheds-over-100-000-s/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>busines</category><category>business</category><category>directv</category><category>dish</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>earnings</category><category>echostar</category><category>economy</category><category>hd</category><category>industry</category><category>quarterly earnings</category><category>QuarterlyEarnings</category><category>satcaster</category><category>satellite</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Poll: Have you switched carriers due to lack of HD?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/25/poll-have-you-switched-carriers-due-to-lack-of-hd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/25/poll-have-you-switched-carriers-due-to-lack-of-hd/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/25/poll-have-you-switched-carriers-due-to-lack-of-hd/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/10/10-21-08-u-verse-family.jpg"  alt="" /><br /></div>
We've <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/30/ask-engadget-hd-is-switching-from-cable-to-satellite-worth-it/">asked you before</a> whether it was "worth it" to switch from cable to satellite in search of a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/06/ask-engadget-hd-does-cable-satellite-or-fiber-provide-more-hd/">wider selection</a> of high-def material, but now we're looking to see if any of you walked the talk. Have any of you readers actually ditched your programming provider in order to find another with more HD content? And if so, where did you leave and where did you go? Any regrets? Is life <em>really</em> that much better with more HD than one could ever watch in a single day? Brag / sulk away in comments below.<br /><br />
<div align="center"><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/25/poll-have-you-switched-carriers-due-to-lack-of-hd/#poll21447">View Poll</a></p> </div><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/polls/" rel="tag">Polls</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cable/" rel="tag">Cable</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/fiber/" rel="tag">Fiber</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/ota/" rel="tag">OTA</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/satellite/" rel="tag">Satellite</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/25/poll-have-you-switched-carriers-due-to-lack-of-hd/">Poll: Have you switched carriers due to lack of HD?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/25/poll-have-you-switched-carriers-due-to-lack-of-hd/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1352324/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/25/poll-have-you-switched-carriers-due-to-lack-of-hd/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>att</category><category>cable</category><category>carrier</category><category>comcast</category><category>directv</category><category>dish</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>fiber</category><category>fios</category><category>fios tv</category><category>FiosTv</category><category>hd</category><category>mediacom</category><category>ota</category><category>poll</category><category>polls</category><category>proramming</category><category>provider</category><category>satellite</category><category>switch</category><category>switched</category><category>time warner cable</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><category>twc</category><category>u-verse</category><category>uverse</category><category>verizon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DirecTV replaces DISH as AT&amp;T's BFF, Advanced TV partner]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/26/directv-replaces-dish-as-atandts-bff-advanced-tv-partner/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/26/directv-replaces-dish-as-atandts-bff-advanced-tv-partner/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/26/directv-replaces-dish-as-atandts-bff-advanced-tv-partner/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://investor.directv.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=337059"><img hspace="16" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/09/20080402-attdishbestfriends.jpg"  alt="" /></a>The <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/04/atandt-picks-dish-as-new-best-friend/">AT&amp;T / DISH Network breakup</a> is official, with DirecTV satellite service <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/04/free-hd-for-one-year-to-new-atandt-directv-dish-network-or-u-ver/">sliding into place</a> alongside U-Verse as a triple-play option for customers beginning January 31, 2009. No word whether AT&amp;T plans to scale back the scope of these partnership deals as it continues to expand U-Verse, but  with the big guys' love for bundling we wouldn't be surprised to see the same game of musical chairs going on all next year as well.<br /><br />[Image courtesy <a href="http://www.giftsbyexpressions.net/images/STLR_TEEN_BEST_FRIENDS_HEART_PENDANT_19531_14KY.jpg">GiftsByExpressions</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/satellite/" rel="tag">Satellite</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/26/directv-replaces-dish-as-atandts-bff-advanced-tv-partner/">DirecTV replaces DISH as AT&amp;T's BFF, Advanced TV partner</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://investor.directv.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=337059>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/26/directv-replaces-dish-as-atandts-bff-advanced-tv-partner/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1326080/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/26/directv-replaces-dish-as-atandts-bff-advanced-tv-partner/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advanced tv</category><category>AdvancedTv</category><category>att</category><category>directv</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>hd</category><category>internet</category><category>satellite</category><category>triple play</category><category>TriplePlay</category><category>u-verse</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Blu-ray vs. 1080p VOD? No contest, says analyst]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/27/blu-ray-vs-1080p-vod-no-contest-says-analyst/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/27/blu-ray-vs-1080p-vod-no-contest-says-analyst/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/27/blu-ray-vs-1080p-vod-no-contest-says-analyst/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.strategyanalytics.com/blogs/322/"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/08/dish_1080p1_440.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Not that long ago, 1080p Hollywood movies were the domain of Blu-ray, but with <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/30/frances-numericable-debuts-1080p-full-hd-vod/">Numericable</a> jumping on the full HD VOD bandwagon, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/16/1080p-channels-on-the-way-according-to-tandberg-ceo/">followed in short order</a> by DISH Network and DirecTV, it's neighborhood is looking a little crowded. Luckily Strategy Analytics has an $899 <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/analyst/">report</a> on why Blu-ray is safe -- at least for now -- from competing with service providers, although they also report the BDA is "exploring" <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/directv/">DirecTV</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/dish/">DISH</a>'s claims of Blu-ray quality movies on demand and will take "appropriate action". We know how cheap you are, so the read link points to the totally free blog entry which you'll is about as <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/31/dish-to-have-150-hd-channels-this-year-and-1080p-vod-in-august/">skeptical as we were</a> about their supposed picture quality. Of course, since too many HDTV owners aren't even watching high definition, it could be a hard sell convincing them of the difference between Blu-ray and other lower-bitrate 1080p sources.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/blu-ray/" rel="tag">Blu-ray</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/fiber/" rel="tag">Fiber</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/satellite/" rel="tag">Satellite</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/27/blu-ray-vs-1080p-vod-no-contest-says-analyst/">Blu-ray vs. 1080p VOD? No contest, says analyst</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:14:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.strategyanalytics.com/blogs/322/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/27/blu-ray-vs-1080p-vod-no-contest-says-analyst/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1296097/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/27/blu-ray-vs-1080p-vod-no-contest-says-analyst/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1080p</category><category>blu ray</category><category>blu-ray</category><category>bluray</category><category>directv</category><category>dish</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>fiber</category><category>hd</category><category>numericable</category><category>satellite</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:14:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DirecTV delivers 31 new HD channels -- kind of]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/14/directv-delivers-31-new-hd-channels-kind-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/14/directv-delivers-31-new-hd-channels-kind-of/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/14/directv-delivers-31-new-hd-channels-kind-of/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.multichannel.com/blog/350000435/post/700031670.html?nid=3909"><img hspace="16" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" alt="DirecTV HD" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/01/directvhdpkg.png" /></a>When <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/28/directv-to-boast-130-hd-channels-on-august-14th-1080p-movies-la/">DirecTV recently promised it'd have 130 HD</a> channels on August 14th, we have to say this isn't exactly what we had in mind. What we expected was 31 new HD channels that would match <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/10/dish-to-roll-out-17-new-hd-channels-on-august-1st/">the lineup that Dish recently revealed</a>, but what we got was 4 real HD channels (Planet Green HD, ABC Family, Showtime Showcase HD, Showtime Extreme HD), 12 HD regional sports networks and 18 HD PPV channels. Sure, technically this is 31 new HD channels, but what about; Travel Channel HD, Outdoor Channel 2 HD, a whole slew of HBO and Cinemax HD channels, and finally all the Starz and Encore channels? According to DirecTV, all the HD PPV channels are simply place holders until the rest are brought online, but even with that excuse, this is just yet another reason why we take DirecTV's press releases with a grain of salt.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/satellite/" rel="tag">Satellite</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/14/directv-delivers-31-new-hd-channels-kind-of/">DirecTV delivers 31 new HD channels -- kind of</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.multichannel.com/blog/350000435/post/700031670.html?nid=3909>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/14/directv-delivers-31-new-hd-channels-kind-of/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1284943/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/14/directv-delivers-31-new-hd-channels-kind-of/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABC Family</category><category>DirecTV</category><category>DISH Network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>hd</category><category>Outdoor Channel HD</category><category>OutdoorChannelHd</category><category>Planet Green HD</category><category>PlanetGreenHd</category><category>satellite</category><category>Showtime Extr</category><category>Showtime Showcase HD</category><category>Travel Channel HD</category><category>TravelChannelHd</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Drawbaugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Warner Bros. 85th Anniversary celebration makes for a lot of HD VOD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/14/warner-bros-85th-anniversary-celebration-makes-for-a-lot-of-hd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/14/warner-bros-85th-anniversary-celebration-makes-for-a-lot-of-hd/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/14/warner-bros-85th-anniversary-celebration-makes-for-a-lot-of-hd/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20080814005261/en"><img vspace="4" hspace="16" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.hdbeat.com/media/2006/07/warner_home_video_logo.gif" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/warner">Warner Bros</a>. is all over digital distribution in celebration of its 85th anniversary, pushing 85 of its classic flick onto video on-demand, most in high definition and many of them available in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/vod">HD VOD</a> for the first time. Anyone with Time Warner, Comcast, Cox, Charter, Rogers, DirecTV or DISH Network should have access to flicks including <em>Doctor Zhivago</em>, <em>Casablanca</em>, <em>Chariots of Fire</em>, <em>Mad Max Beyond the Thunderdome</em> straight from their remote starting today. Additionally Time Warner has lined up a series of indoor and outdoor screenings in LA and New York so keep an eye out for those. Great films in high quality without having to leave our couch, if we could stop watching the Olympics we'd take a look, check out the full list after the break. [<em>Disclosure: Engadget is part of the Time Warner family</em>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cable/" rel="tag">Cable</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/satellite/" rel="tag">Satellite</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/new-content/" rel="tag">New content</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/14/warner-bros-85th-anniversary-celebration-makes-for-a-lot-of-hd/">Warner Bros. 85th Anniversary celebration makes for a lot of HD VOD</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:41:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20080814005261/en>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/14/warner-bros-85th-anniversary-celebration-makes-for-a-lot-of-hd/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1284524/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/14/warner-bros-85th-anniversary-celebration-makes-for-a-lot-of-hd/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>85</category><category>85th anniversary</category><category>85thAnniversary</category><category>cable</category><category>charter</category><category>comcast</category><category>cox</category><category>directv</category><category>dish</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>hd</category><category>new content</category><category>newcontent</category><category>rogers</category><category>satellite</category><category>time warner</category><category>time warner cable</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><category>warner</category><category>warner bros</category><category>WarnerBros</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:41:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DISH Network might attempt DirecTV merger again?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/dish-network-might-attempt-directv-merger-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/dish-network-might-attempt-directv-merger-again/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/dish-network-might-attempt-directv-merger-again/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/industryNews/idUSN0530816420080805"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadgethd.com/media/2008/08/dirctvanddish2gether080608.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
<a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/tag/directv">DirecTV</a> and <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/tag/dish">DISH Network</a> trying to get together again? That's the idea according to the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, apparently in response to DISH making "a major strategic shift" after <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/08/04/dish-network-loses-25-000-net-subscribers-in-q2-sees-revenue-in/">losing 25,000 subscribers in Q2</a>. Of course the last time these two tried U + me = Us back in 2001, regulators put the smackdown on the idea, but apparently DISH CEO Charlie Ergen thinks things may be different now. We can see how a 90% drop in subscriber growth (and a blown satellite or two) could cause anyone to reevaluate things, but as our extensive experience watching daytime TV proves, running into a new relationship to escape ones problems never works out long term, but it is interesting to see if either is really willing to stop the <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/28/directv-to-boast-130-hd-channels-on-august-14th-1080p-movies-la/">constant</a> <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/31/dish-to-have-150-hd-channels-this-year-and-1080p-vod-in-august/">one-upmanship</a> and concentrate on taking on the cable (&amp; telco) companies together.<br /><br />[Thanks, Adam]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/hdtv/" rel="tag">HDTV</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/homeentertainment/" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/dish-network-might-attempt-directv-merger-again/">DISH Network might attempt DirecTV merger again?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 06 Aug 2008 19:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/industryNews/idUSN0530816420080805>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/dish-network-might-attempt-directv-merger-again/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1277621/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/dish-network-might-attempt-directv-merger-again/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>charlie ergen</category><category>CharlieErgen</category><category>directv</category><category>dish</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>hdtv</category><category>merger</category><category>satellite</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 19:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DISH Network might attempt DirecTV merger again?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/dish-network-might-attempt-directv-merger-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/dish-network-might-attempt-directv-merger-again/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/dish-network-might-attempt-directv-merger-again/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/industryNews/idUSN0530816420080805"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/08/dirctvanddish2gether080608.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/directv">DirecTV</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/dish">DISH Network</a> trying to get together again? That's the idea according to the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, apparently in response to DISH making "a major strategic shift" after <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/dish-network-loses-25-000-net-subscribers-in-q2-sees-revenue-in/">losing 25,000 subscribers in Q2</a>. Of course the last time these two tried U + me = Us back in 2001, regulators put the smackdown on the idea, but apparently DISH CEO Charlie Ergen thinks things may be different now. We can see how a 90% drop in subscriber growth (and a blown satellite or two) could cause anyone to reevaluate things, but as our extensive experience watching daytime TV proves, running into a new relationship to escape ones problems never works out long term, but it is interesting to see if either is really willing to stop the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/28/directv-to-boast-130-hd-channels-on-august-14th-1080p-movies-la/">constant</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/31/dish-to-have-150-hd-channels-this-year-and-1080p-vod-in-august/">one-upmanship</a> and concentrate on taking on the cable (&amp; telco) companies together.<br /><br />[Thanks, Adam]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/regulatory/" rel="tag">Regulatory</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/satellite/" rel="tag">Satellite</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/dish-network-might-attempt-directv-merger-again/">DISH Network might attempt DirecTV merger again?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 06 Aug 2008 19:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/industryNews/idUSN0530816420080805>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/dish-network-might-attempt-directv-merger-again/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1277619/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/06/dish-network-might-attempt-directv-merger-again/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>directv</category><category>dish</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>hd</category><category>merger</category><category>satellite</category><category>wsj</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 19:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DISH to have 150 HD channels this year and 1080p VOD in August]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/31/dish-to-have-150-hd-channels-this-year-and-1080p-vod-in-august/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/31/dish-to-have-150-hd-channels-this-year-and-1080p-vod-in-august/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/31/dish-to-have-150-hd-channels-this-year-and-1080p-vod-in-august/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img vspace="4" hspace="16" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/07/4-16-08-dish-logo.jpg" alt="DISH Network" />Take that DirecTV, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/28/directv-to-boast-130-hd-channels-on-august-14th-1080p-movies-la/">you announce 1080p "this year" and 130 HD channels in August</a> and DISH one ups you with an announcement that it'll start offering 1080p VOD in August -- but DirecTV fanboys will take some comfort in the fact that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/directv11">DirecTV's latest bird started broadcasting HD channels today</a>, while <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/EchostarXI/">Echostar XI</a> won't start for a few more months. Either way, this is good for everyone, but based on both company's track record, we tend to take DISH's word over DirecTV's -- after the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/directv-to-carry-100-national-hd-channels-in-2007/">whole CES 07 lie</a>. DISH subscribers with MPEG-4 HD DVRs should receive an update in the next two weeks that will allow them access the 1080p VOD movies, such as <em>I Am Legend</em>. The release also goes on about how the quality will be "same as Blu-ray Disc quality," but we'll believe that one when we see it for ourselves.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/set-top-boxes/" rel="tag">Set-top boxes</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/satellite/" rel="tag">Satellite</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/new-content/" rel="tag">New content</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/31/dish-to-have-150-hd-channels-this-year-and-1080p-vod-in-august/">DISH to have 150 HD channels this year and 1080p VOD in August</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:23:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.satelliteguys.us/dish-network-forum/143823-dish-network-unveils-biggest-high-definition-upgrade-tv-history.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/31/dish-to-have-150-hd-channels-this-year-and-1080p-vod-in-august/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1271681/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/31/dish-to-have-150-hd-channels-this-year-and-1080p-vod-in-august/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1080p</category><category>DirecTV</category><category>DISH</category><category>DISH Network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>hd</category><category>MPEG-4</category><category>new content</category><category>newcontent</category><category>satellite</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Drawbaugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:23:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AT&amp;T picks DISH as new best friend]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/04/atandt-picks-dish-as-new-best-friend/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/04/atandt-picks-dish-as-new-best-friend/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/04/atandt-picks-dish-as-new-best-friend/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6547223.html?nid=4262"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="AT&amp;T picks DISH as new best friend" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/04/20080402-attdishbestfriends.jpg" /></a>The sometimes <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/04/free-hd-for-one-year-to-new-atandt-directv-dish-network-or-u-ver/">funny</a> relationship between AT&amp;T, DISH and DirecTV reminds us of pesky fourth grade decisions of the "who's your one, bestest friend?" variety. The makeups and breakups even have the same air of fickleness, too. AT&amp;T has officially phased out its reselling of DirecTV for 2008, but is keeping its relationship with DISH. Don't get comfy, though -- mum's the word on AT&amp;T's plans for 2009. The move makes DISH the exclusive satellite provider for AT&amp;T's primary markets. Like all biz relationships, this one's all about convenience (and prior commitments); it's safe to assume that if AT&amp;T is able to execute its 2008 <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/29/atandt-ends-2007-with-231000-u-verse-subscribers/">plans</a> for U-verse it will scale back ties to competitor's products. But, the "triple play" package is an asset that we don't expect AT&amp;T to jeopardize, even if it makes for uneasy friends.<br /><br />[Image courtesy <a href="http://www.giftsbyexpressions.net/images/STLR_TEEN_BEST_FRIENDS_HEART_PENDANT_19531_14KY.jpg">GiftsByExpressions</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/fiber/" rel="tag">Fiber</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/satellite/" rel="tag">Satellite</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/04/atandt-picks-dish-as-new-best-friend/">AT&amp;T picks DISH as new best friend</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 04 Apr 2008 04:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6547223.html?nid=4262>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/04/atandt-picks-dish-as-new-best-friend/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1156513/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/04/atandt-picks-dish-as-new-best-friend/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>att</category><category>directv</category><category>dish</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>fiber</category><category>hd</category><category>satellite</category><category>triple play</category><category>TriplePlay</category><category>u-verse</category><category>uverse</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Kim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 04:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[PBS pushes FCC for carriage on DISH]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/pbs-pushes-fcc-for-carriage-on-dish/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/pbs-pushes-fcc-for-carriage-on-dish/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/pbs-pushes-fcc-for-carriage-on-dish/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6537711.html?nid=3347"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/03/20080304-sesamestreet.jpg" alt="Sesame Street gang" /></a><br /></div>
It seems the Sesame Street gang is pissed at DISH Network. Once the analog shutoff occurs next year, FCC Chairman Martin wants to hold DirecTV and DISH to a "non-discrimination" rule -- they cannot carry some HD locals, but not others. However, if a carrier can demonstrate that it has limited capacity that prevents it from going live with all the channels at once, the FCC can grant a waiver. As the FCC is getting ready to vote on these waivers, PBS and the Association for Public Television Stations (APTS) have taken the opportunity to point out that DISH has "...refused to negotiate in good faith for carriage of local public television signals in HD." The real salt in the wound is that PBS can point to its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/20/local-pbs-hd-programs-coming-to-directv/">carriage deal</a> with DirecTV as a counter-example, but we'll see how this is balanced out against PBS's announced HD rollout <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/11/pbs-baby-steps-towards-hd/">plans</a>.<br /><br />[Image courtesy <a href="http://www.cynical-c.com/archives/bloggraphics/sesame.jpg">Cynical-C</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/regulatory/" rel="tag">Regulatory</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/satellite/" rel="tag">Satellite</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/pbs-pushes-fcc-for-carriage-on-dish/">PBS pushes FCC for carriage on DISH</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 05 Mar 2008 04:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6537711.html?nid=3347>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/pbs-pushes-fcc-for-carriage-on-dish/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1130676/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/pbs-pushes-fcc-for-carriage-on-dish/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DirecTV</category><category>DISH network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>FCC</category><category>hd</category><category>Kevin Martin</category><category>KevinMartin</category><category>PBS</category><category>satellite</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Kim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 04:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Engadget HD definitively answers: does cable, satellite, or fiber provide more HD?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/07/engadget-hd-definitively-answers-does-cable-satellite-or-fibe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/07/engadget-hd-definitively-answers-does-cable-satellite-or-fibe/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/07/engadget-hd-definitively-answers-does-cable-satellite-or-fibe/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/02/06/ask-engadget-hd-does-cable-satellite-or-fiber-provide-more-hd/"><img width="440" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="308" border="0" src="http://www.engadgethd.com/media/2008/02/2-5-08-hd-logos.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
You want to know -- nay, you <em>deserve</em> to know -- which service provides the most HD content. Engadget HD's got the answer, see how your HD provider stacks up.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/hdtv/" rel="tag">HDTV</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/07/engadget-hd-definitively-answers-does-cable-satellite-or-fibe/">Engadget HD definitively answers: does cable, satellite, or fiber provide more HD?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 07 Feb 2008 01:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/02/06/ask-engadget-hd-does-cable-satellite-or-fiber-provide-more-hd/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/07/engadget-hd-definitively-answers-does-cable-satellite-or-fibe/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1108935/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/07/engadget-hd-definitively-answers-does-cable-satellite-or-fibe/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ask engadget hd</category><category>AskEngadgetHd</category><category>att</category><category>best</category><category>bright house</category><category>bright house networks</category><category>BrightHouse</category><category>BrightHouseNetworks</category><category>cable</category><category>comcast</category><category>compare</category><category>comparison</category><category>directv</category><category>dish</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>fiber</category><category>fios tv</category><category>FiosTv</category><category>hdtv</category><category>rcn</category><category>satellite</category><category>suddenlink</category><category>time warner</category><category>time warner cable</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><category>truth</category><category>twc</category><category>u-verse</category><category>verizon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Block]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 01:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ask Engadget HD: Does cable, satellite, or fiber provide more HD?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/06/ask-engadget-hd-does-cable-satellite-or-fiber-provide-more-hd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/06/ask-engadget-hd-does-cable-satellite-or-fiber-provide-more-hd/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/06/ask-engadget-hd-does-cable-satellite-or-fiber-provide-more-hd/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/02/2-5-08-hd-logos.jpg" alt="" /><br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<div style="text-align: left;">Particularly of late, cable television providers have been <a target="_blank" href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/19/directv-sues-cox-over-claims-of-cable-hd-superiority/">bullying</a> each other on the air and proudly <a target="_blank" href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/10/us-appellate-court-upholds-order-blocking-directv-ads/">proclaiming</a> <a target="_blank" href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/21/directv-and-comcast-make-amends-settle-hd-survey-lawsuit/">superiority</a> in the high-definition department. One would immediately assume that there's some black and white somewhere in this equation, but honestly, things are pretty gray. Hard though it may be to believe, there actually isn't a clear cut answer to this week's Ask Engadget HD question, which comes to us from the bewildered mind of Brian:<br /></div>
<br />"I want an unbiased opinion, and more importantly, the facts. DISH Network is looking more and more like the leading HD provider with its weekly HD additions this past fall. However, now my local cable provider, Comcast, is running ads stating that it has <span style="font-style: italic;">More, More, More</span> HD. My question is simple: who has more HD channels including and not including HD VOD?"<br /><br />The inability to find a clear cut answer hasn't stopped us from forging ahead in the past, and it won't be slowing us down today, either. Ready to plunge deep into the increasingly murky waters of HD offerings? Join us after the jump as we take a critical look at high-def options from DirecTV, DISH Network, Verizon, AT&amp;T and a slew of traditional cable operators in order to best address the above inquiry.<br /><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/10/us-appellate-court-upholds-order-blocking-directv-ads/"> </a></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/06/ask-engadget-hd-does-cable-satellite-or-fiber-provide-more-hd/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ask Engadget HD: Does cable, satellite, or fiber provide more HD?</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cable/" rel="tag">Cable</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/fiber/" rel="tag">Fiber</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/ota/" rel="tag">OTA</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/satellite/" rel="tag">Satellite</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/06/ask-engadget-hd-does-cable-satellite-or-fiber-provide-more-hd/">Ask Engadget HD: Does cable, satellite, or fiber provide more HD?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 06 Feb 2008 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/06/ask-engadget-hd-does-cable-satellite-or-fiber-provide-more-hd/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1106359/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/06/ask-engadget-hd-does-cable-satellite-or-fiber-provide-more-hd/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ask engadget hd</category><category>AskEngadgetHd</category><category>att</category><category>bright house</category><category>bright house networks</category><category>BrightHouse</category><category>BrightHouseNetworks</category><category>cable</category><category>comcast</category><category>comparison</category><category>directv</category><category>dish</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>features</category><category>fiber</category><category>fios tv</category><category>FiosTv</category><category>hd</category><category>internet</category><category>ota</category><category>rcn</category><category>satellite</category><category>suddenlink</category><category>time warner</category><category>time warner cable</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><category>twc</category><category>u-verse</category><category>verizon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ask Engadget HD: DISH Network or DirecTV?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/12/ask-engadget-hd-dish-network-or-directv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/12/ask-engadget-hd-dish-network-or-directv/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/12/ask-engadget-hd-dish-network-or-directv/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/01/1-12-08-dish_vs_directv_.jpg"  alt="" /><br /></div>
It's a question that's as old as the service itself, but as each wave of updates passes, the answer can vary wildly. Case in point: just days ago at CES, DISH Network unveiled its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/dish-network-unveils-100-hd-channels-and-100-markets/">100 HD channels / 100 markets initiative</a>, essentially throwing the ball back in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/DirecTV/">DirecTV</a>'s court. Of course, the back-and-forth between the two sat providers is nothing but beneficial for end users, but we still believe that there is enough differentiation between the two to give users something to debate. That said, we present Keith's totally timely inquiry:<br /><br />"I live in Austin, Texas and I'm considering both DirecTV and DISH Network. For me, it basically comes down to channel lineup versus hardware. Though I like DirecTV's channel selection more, from all the research I've done, DISH has the better HD DVR. I am leaning towards DISH because I think adding more HD channels is much easier than manufacturing and then distributing a new receiver. What do you guys think? Am I off base here?" <br /><br />We'll be straight with you -- we're not looking to incite any sort of flame war with the above question. Indeed, it's a legitimate concern that a myriad individuals mull over on a daily basis. So we're posing the question to you, and we're looking for your input on the performance of your HD DVR, the general quality of service, appearance of HD channels and overall satisfaction. C'mon -- give poor Keith some advice to keep him from tearing any more patches of hair out, would ya?<br /><br /><em>Got a burning question that you'd love to toss out for Engadget HD (or its readers) to take a look at? Tired of Google's blank stares when you ask for real-world experiences? Hit us up at </em><strong>ask at engadgethd dawt com </strong><em>and keep an eye on this space -- your inquiry could be next.</em><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/ask-engadgethd/" rel="tag">Ask Engadget HD</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/satellite/" rel="tag">Satellite</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/12/ask-engadget-hd-dish-network-or-directv/">Ask Engadget HD: DISH Network or DirecTV?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/12/ask-engadget-hd-dish-network-or-directv/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1083814/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/12/ask-engadget-hd-dish-network-or-directv/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ask</category><category>ask engadget dh</category><category>ask engadget hd</category><category>AskEngadgetHd</category><category>comparison</category><category>directv</category><category>dish</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>features</category><category>hd</category><category>satellite</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NBA TV HD launches on DirecTV and DISH]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/nba-tv-hd-launches-on-directv-and-dish/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/nba-tv-hd-launches-on-directv-and-dish/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/nba-tv-hd-launches-on-directv-and-dish/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="NBA TV HD" src="http://www.hdbeat.com/media/2006/04/nbatvskycam.jpg" /><br /></div>
Just in time for the start of the NBA season, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/NBATV/">NBA TV</a> HD launches on both <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/DirecTV/">DirecTV</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/DISHNetwork/">DISH Network</a>. Every major sports league needs their own channel and now NBA steps up to HD, bringing over 70 national HD games to their subscribers. In addition, they'll have 24 hours of programming, but who knows how much of that will actually be HD. At this point we've lost count of how many HD channels these two providers carry and wonder how many big time <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/NBA/">NBA</a> fans are going to give up on their cable provider -- assuming they haven't already.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/new-content/" rel="tag">New content</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/nba-tv-hd-launches-on-directv-and-dish/">NBA TV HD launches on DirecTV and DISH</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 01 Nov 2007 10:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nba.com/schedules/national_tv_schedule/NBATVHighDef/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/nba-tv-hd-launches-on-directv-and-dish/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1027123/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/nba-tv-hd-launches-on-directv-and-dish/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DirecTV</category><category>DISH</category><category>Dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>hd</category><category>NBA TV</category><category>NBA TV HD</category><category>NbaTv</category><category>NbaTvHd</category><category>new content</category><category>newcontent</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Drawbaugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 10:11:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NHL Network prepares for US launch]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/11/nhl-network-prepares-for-us-launch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/11/nhl-network-prepares-for-us-launch/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/11/nhl-network-prepares-for-us-launch/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/sports/s_531648.html"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/10/10-11-07-nhl_network.jpg"  alt="" /></a>It's a fantastic, albeit <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/29/college-football-kickoff-2007-in-hd/">hectic</a> time to be a sports fan right now, as there just seems to be too many good <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/07/cbs-steps-up-their-sec-college-football-coverage/">matchups</a> going on to truly enjoy <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/10/directv-offering-up-loads-of-mlb-postseason-action-in-hd/">them all</a>. Additionally, the NHL season is just now getting underway, and for those who eat, sleep and breath cross-checking, we've got stellar news. Reportedly, the 24-hour NHL Network will launch on several communications outlets this month, including Comcast, DirectTV and Dish Network. All told, it should be available to around 75 million homes across the US, but exact launch dates on the aforementioned carriers have yet to be pinpointed. Notably, Dish Network stated that it was targeting October 17th as the channel's first on-air date, and a spokesperson even mentioned that it would "only be available in high-definition." Hey, it won't hurt our feelings.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Sports</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/11/nhl-network-prepares-for-us-launch/">NHL Network prepares for US launch</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 11 Oct 2007 23:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/sports/s_531648.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/11/nhl-network-prepares-for-us-launch/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1011413/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/11/nhl-network-prepares-for-us-launch/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>comcast</category><category>directv</category><category>dish</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>hd</category><category>hockey</category><category>NHL</category><category>NHL Network</category><category>NhlNetwork</category><category>sports</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 23:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The History Channel HD launched, but where was DirecTV?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/06/the-history-channel-hd-launched-but-where-was-directv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/06/the-history-channel-hd-launched-but-where-was-directv/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/06/the-history-channel-hd-launched-but-where-was-directv/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img vspace="4" hspace="16" border="0" align="right" alt="The History Channel" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/05/historychannellogo.gif" />In the world of tech news, there's plenty of vaporware. Un-fulfilled promises run ramped and like everyone else, sometimes we forget. But as commenter <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/29/directvs-new-mpeg4-channel-show-up-in-guide-in-engineering-mod/comments/7197616/">Kenny G points out</a>, the History Channel HD launched yesterday on <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/DISH/">DISH</a> network and DirecTV wasn't there to see it. Sure, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/07/directv-10-launched-successfully-gears-up-for-september-action/">DirecTV 10</a> isn't operational just yet, and they'll probably have more HD than anyone else <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/03/details-about-directvs-new-hdtv-channels-continue-to-emerge/">by the end of this month</a>, but that doesn't change the fact that they <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/07/the-history-channel-hd-in-september-on-directv/">were touting how proud</a> they'd be, to be the first to carry the History Channel in HD. We're sure DirecTV wished we'd missed this, but no such luck thanks to Kenny.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/satellite/" rel="tag">Satellite</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/new-content/" rel="tag">New content</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/06/the-history-channel-hd-launched-but-where-was-directv/">The History Channel HD launched, but where was DirecTV?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 06 Sep 2007 11:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/06/the-history-channel-hd-launched-but-where-was-directv/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/982676/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/06/the-history-channel-hd-launched-but-where-was-directv/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Directv</category><category>DISH</category><category>Dish Network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>hd</category><category>new content</category><category>newcontent</category><category>satellite</category><category>The History Channel</category><category>TheHistoryChannel</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Drawbaugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 11:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[EchoStar beats Forgent's patent suit, makes chumps out of DirecTV et al.]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/10/echostar-beats-forgents-patent-suit-makes-chumps-out-of-direct/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/10/echostar-beats-forgents-patent-suit-makes-chumps-out-of-direct/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/10/echostar-beats-forgents-patent-suit-makes-chumps-out-of-direct/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/primenewswire/124733.htm"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/08/dish-network-logo.jpg" /></a>EchoStar's just making everybody else look bad. After <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/DirecTV/">DirecTV</a> and the cable companies caved to Forgent's patent demands and settled out of court to the tune of $28 million, EchoStar (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/DishNetwork/">Dish Network</a>'s parent company) has bested Forgent in court, and a judge yesterday denied Forgent a new trial. EchoStar is getting $90k for its trouble. This follows a jury verdict in May which invalidated Forgent's patent, which pertained to digital video recorders.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/homeentertainment/" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/10/echostar-beats-forgents-patent-suit-makes-chumps-out-of-direct/">EchoStar beats Forgent's patent suit, makes chumps out of DirecTV et al.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 10 Aug 2007 20:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/primenewswire/124733.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/10/echostar-beats-forgents-patent-suit-makes-chumps-out-of-direct/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/962660/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/10/echostar-beats-forgents-patent-suit-makes-chumps-out-of-direct/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>directv</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>echostar</category><category>forgent</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 20:18:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[EchoStar beats Forgent's patent suit, makes chumps out of DirecTV et al.]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/10/echostar-beats-forgents-patent-suit-makes-chumps-out-of-direct/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/10/echostar-beats-forgents-patent-suit-makes-chumps-out-of-direct/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/10/echostar-beats-forgents-patent-suit-makes-chumps-out-of-direct/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/primenewswire/124733.htm"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.engadget.com/media/2007/08/dish-network-logo.jpg"  alt="" /></a>EchoStar's just making everybody else look bad. After <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/DirecTV/">DirecTV</a> and the cable companies caved to Forgent's patent demands and setteled out of court to the tune of $28 million, EchoStar (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/DishNetwork/">Dish Network</a>'s parent company) has bested Forgent in court, and a judge yesterday denied Forgent a new trial. EchoStar is getting $90k for its trouble. This follows a jury verdict in May which invalidated Forgent's patent, which pertained to digital video recorders.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/recorders/" rel="tag">Recorders</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/satellite/" rel="tag">Satellite</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/10/echostar-beats-forgents-patent-suit-makes-chumps-out-of-direct/">EchoStar beats Forgent's patent suit, makes chumps out of DirecTV et al.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 10 Aug 2007 20:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/primenewswire/124733.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/10/echostar-beats-forgents-patent-suit-makes-chumps-out-of-direct/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/962659/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/10/echostar-beats-forgents-patent-suit-makes-chumps-out-of-direct/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>directv</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>echostar</category><category>forgent</category><category>hd</category><category>recorders</category><category>satellite</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 20:18:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DirecTV whines over HD survey results, sues Comcast for false advertising]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/19/directv-whines-over-hd-survey-results-sues-comcast-for-false-ad/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/19/directv-whines-over-hd-survey-results-sues-comcast-for-false-ad/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/19/directv-whines-over-hd-survey-results-sues-comcast-for-false-ad/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://nab.broadcastnewsroom.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=141695"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/05/5-19-07-directv-fights-comcast.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
You're probably familiar with the old adage that <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/02/06/directv-ruled-to-stop-claiming-their-hd-is-superior/">getting sued</a> just isn't satisfying enough until you take someone else to court over the exact thing that you're being <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/04/19/directv-1-time-warner-cable-1/">accused of</a>, but even if you're not, DirecTV's here to refresh your memory. The satellite TV provider has apparently scrunched up its nose at a recent promotional advertising campaign in which <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/tag/comcast/">Comcast</a> claims that two-thirds of satellite customers felt "Comcast delivered a better HD image" when compared to <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/tag/directv/">DirecTV</a> and <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/tag/dish/">Dish Network</a> alternatives. Not believing that we oh-so-capable humans might be able to actually perceive the difference when an HD feed is <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/11/the-engadget-hd-interview-directvs-cto-re-hd-lite/">somewhat crippled</a>, DirecTV decided that the results mustn't be correct, and suggested that the "survey upon which Comcast relies does not provide or sufficiently substantiate the propositions for which Comcast cites the survey," and concludes by boldly proclaiming that all of the claims "are literally false." Of course, Comcast is standing strong behind its results for the time being, and while either party could most certainly have a case against the other, why are we using cash for HD channel expansion to pay legal teams?<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/32105/118/">TGDaily</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/19/directv-whines-over-hd-survey-results-sues-comcast-for-false-ad/">DirecTV whines over HD survey results, sues Comcast for false advertising</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 19 May 2007 14:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://nab.broadcastnewsroom.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=141695>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/19/directv-whines-over-hd-survey-results-sues-comcast-for-false-ad/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/899660/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/19/directv-whines-over-hd-survey-results-sues-comcast-for-false-ad/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertisement</category><category>advertising</category><category>comcast</category><category>conflict</category><category>court</category><category>directv</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>echostar</category><category>false advertising</category><category>FalseAdvertising</category><category>fight</category><category>fued</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>marketing</category><category>misleading</category><category>promotion</category><category>sue</category><category>suit</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 14:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DirecTV whines over HD survey results, sues Comcast for false advertising]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/19/directv-whines-over-hd-survey-results-sues-comcast-for-false-ad/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/19/directv-whines-over-hd-survey-results-sues-comcast-for-false-ad/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/19/directv-whines-over-hd-survey-results-sues-comcast-for-false-ad/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://nab.broadcastnewsroom.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=141695"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.engadget.com/media/2007/05/5-19-07-directv-fights-comcast.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
You're probably familiar with the old adage that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/06/directv-ruled-to-stop-claiming-their-hd-is-superior/">getting sued</a> just isn't satisfying enough until you take someone else to court over the exact thing that you're being <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/19/directv-1-time-warner-cable-1/">accused of</a>, but even if you're not, DirecTV's here to refresh your memory. The satellite TV provider has apparently scrunched up its nose at a recent promotional advertising campaign in which <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/comcast/">Comcast</a> claims that two-thirds of satellite customers felt "Comcast delivered a better HD image" when compared to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/directv/">DirecTV</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/dish/">Dish Network</a> alternatives. Not believing that we oh-so-capable humans might be able to actually perceive the difference when an HD feed is <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/the-engadget-hd-interview-directvs-cto-re-hd-lite/">somewhat crippled</a>, DirecTV decided that the results mustn't be correct, and suggested that the "survey upon which Comcast relies does not provide or sufficiently substantiate the propositions for which Comcast cites the survey," and concludes by boldly proclaiming that all of the claims "are literally false." Of course, Comcast is standing strong behind its results for the time being, and while either party could most certainly have a case against the other, why are we using cash for HD channel expansion to pay legal teams?<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/32105/118/">TGDaily</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cable/" rel="tag">Cable</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/satellite/" rel="tag">Satellite</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/19/directv-whines-over-hd-survey-results-sues-comcast-for-false-ad/">DirecTV whines over HD survey results, sues Comcast for false advertising</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 19 May 2007 14:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://nab.broadcastnewsroom.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=141695>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/19/directv-whines-over-hd-survey-results-sues-comcast-for-false-ad/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/899659/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/19/directv-whines-over-hd-survey-results-sues-comcast-for-false-ad/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertisement</category><category>advertising</category><category>cable</category><category>comcast</category><category>conflict</category><category>court</category><category>directv</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>echostar</category><category>false advertising</category><category>FalseAdvertising</category><category>fight</category><category>fued</category><category>hd</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>marketing</category><category>misleading</category><category>promotion</category><category>satellite</category><category>sue</category><category>suit</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 14:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[National Geographic committed to high-def]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/national-geographic-committed-to-high-def/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/national-geographic-committed-to-high-def/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/national-geographic-committed-to-high-def/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img vspace="14" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2006/09/natgeohd.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" />TV Week had the opportunity to talk shop with National Geographic's executive VP of programming John Ford. Mr. Ford was the one responsible for all the high-def programming on Discover HD Theater and now he is trying to do the same for National Geographic HD. Currently the majority of their viewers come via Dish Network and only reach in the mid hundreds of thousands, but that hasn't stopped the station from their commitment to 100% HD footage. The whole interview is mainly standard stock with the exception of some large distribution partner that has yet to be announced but is set to launch at the end of September. Large you say, hmm, couldn't be <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/25/directvs-magical-disapearing-high-def-station/">DIRECTV as they can't handle the HD stations</a> they already have and Dish Network already has the channel, so would it be safe to say Comcast, being the other large provider, might start broadcasting National Geographic HD within the coming weeks? Only time, and insiders, will tell but we will take all the new HDTV stations we can get.<br /><br />[via <a href="http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/09/national_geogra_1.html">Home Theater Blog</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cable/" rel="tag">Cable</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/satellite/" rel="tag">Satellite</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/daytime/" rel="tag">Daytime</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/national-geographic-committed-to-high-def/">National Geographic committed to high-def</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.tvweek.com/page.cms?pageId=304>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/national-geographic-committed-to-high-def/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/675090/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/national-geographic-committed-to-high-def/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cable</category><category>daytime</category><category>directv</category><category>dish network</category><category>DishNetwork</category><category>hd</category><category>national geographic channel</category><category>NationalGeographicChannel</category><category>satellite</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Burns]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:57:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
