<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget RSS Feed</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 AOL Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator>


<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple revises warranty policies in France, Germany and Belgium in response to EU law]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2013/06/12/apple-eu-two-year-warranty-policy/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2013/06/12/apple-eu-two-year-warranty-policy/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2013/06/12/apple-eu-two-year-warranty-policy/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/06/12/apple-eu-two-year-warranty-policy/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/10/img7333.jpg" /></a></p>

<p>Apple revised its warranty policy in Italy last year after being hit with a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/italian-antri-trust-body-fines-apple-for-misleading-customers-on/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">&euro;900,000 fine</a> for not complying with an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/03/19/EU-commission-calls-for-better-enforcement-following-app/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">EU-mandated two-year term</a>, and it looks like those changes are now starting to spread further throughout Europe. The company has today revised the terms of its warranties in France, Germany and Belgium, specifying that customers are entitled to repairs and replacements of their Apple products for a full two years after purchase, and not just one as previously stated. No word yet on when the rest of the EU will see those changes, but it would now seem to be just a matter of time before other countries get the new terms as well.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Laptops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/tablets/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Tablets</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/mobile/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Mobile</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/apple/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Apple</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/06/12/apple-eu-two-year-warranty-policy/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Via:</strong> <a target="_blank" href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/13/06/12/extends.coverage.to.two.year.period.demanded.by.eu.law/">Electronista</a><!--//--></p>
<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a target="_blank" href="http://www.zdnet.com/apple-tweaks-eu-two-year-warranty-policy-7000016756/">ZDNet</a><!--//-->, <a target="_blank" href="http://9to5mac.com/2013/06/12/apple-changes-warranty-policy-in-belgium-to-offer-two-years-protection/">9 to 5 Mac</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>apple</category><category>belgium</category><category>eu</category><category>france</category><category>germany</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>warranty</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 17:09:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20619687</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[EU Commissioner teases net neutrality rules: no throttling, easy switching]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2013/06/04/european-commission-teases-net-neutrality-rules/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2013/06/04/european-commission-teases-net-neutrality-rules/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2013/06/04/european-commission-teases-net-neutrality-rules/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/06/04/european-commission-teases-net-neutrality-rules/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="European Commission teases net neutrality rules no throttling, lots of transparency" data-src-height="340" data-src-width="620" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2013/06/neelie-kroes-council-european-union.jpg" /></a></p>

<p>The European Union has only taken baby steps toward proper <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/eu-investigation-to-take-a-closer-look-at-net-neutrality/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">net neutrality legislation</a> so far. Today, however, the European Commission's Neelie Kroes just gave the first glimpse of what those continent-wide rules could look like. Her proposals would let companies prioritize traffic, but not block or throttle it. The measures would also prevent gotchas once customers have signed on the dotted line: internet providers would not only have to offer clear terms of service, but make it easier to jump ship for something better. There are concerns that the proposals would let providers favor their own services, but Kroes also makes no arbitrary distinctions (and thus exemptions) between wired and wireless networks, like <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/24/fcc-releases-full-net-neutrality-rules/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">we've seen in the US</a> -- can we get these rules elsewhere, please?</p>

<p>[Image credit: <a href="http://consilium.europa.eu/council/photographic-library?command=PIC&amp;pic=31&amp;bid=92&amp;lang=mt&amp;rubrique=1195&amp;dateEvent=10/05/2010&amp;id=&amp;picid=%7B3442fd6b-fc3b-4d9f-b83e-5b913278c255%7D">The Council of the European Union</a>]</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/wireless/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Wireless</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Networking</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/internet/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Internet</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/06/04/european-commission-teases-net-neutrality-rules/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Via:</strong> <a href="http://gigaom.com/2013/06/04/heres-what-europes-net-neutrality-law-would-look-like/" target="_blank">GigaOM</a><!--//--></p>
<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a href="http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-13-498_en.htm" target="_blank">European Union</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>eu</category><category>europe</category><category>EuropeanCommission</category><category>EuropeanUnion</category><category>internet</category><category>NeelieKroes</category><category>netneutrality</category><category>networking</category><category>wireless</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 15:09:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20598660</dc:identifier>

</item>



<item>
<title><![CDATA[European commissioner promises single mobile market by 2015]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/20/neelie-kroes-single-eu-mobile-market/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/20/neelie-kroes-single-eu-mobile-market/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/20/neelie-kroes-single-eu-mobile-market/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/20/neelie-kroes-single-eu-mobile-market/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="European commissioner promises single mobile market by 2015" data-src-height="339" data-src-width="620" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2013/05/europe.jpg" /></a></p>

<p>Europe may be enjoying deeper and deeper integration, but that doesn't extend to mobile connectivity; citizens are still whacked with hefty roaming rates. European digital commissioner <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Neelie+Kroes/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Neelie Kroes</a> hopes to change this, telling business leaders that she's planning to push through a single mobile telecoms market before she retires in 2015. Speaking at the European Business Summit, she said she had "no intention to retire until [she'd] knocked down all the barriers to a single market," which was her "major priority" for the rest of her term. Hopefully those on that side of the pond will <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/europe-votes-to-cap-data-roaming-prices/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">never again</a> have to fork over <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/13/three-uk-euro-internet-pass/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">$8 per day</a> just to check Vine.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/wireless/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Wireless</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/mobile/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Mobile</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/20/neelie-kroes-single-eu-mobile-market/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>

<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a target="_blank" href="http://euobserver.com/economic/120149">EUObserver</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>Bill Shock</category><category>BillShock</category><category>EU</category><category>Europe</category><category>Market</category><category>Mobile</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>Neelie Kroes</category><category>NeelieKroes</category><category>Single</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 09:07:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20575638</dc:identifier>

</item>





<item>
<title><![CDATA[EU reportedly accepts Google's antitrust concessions for online search]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/15/eu-reportedly-accepts-googles-antitrust-concessions-for-search/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/15/eu-reportedly-accepts-googles-antitrust-concessions-for-search/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/15/eu-reportedly-accepts-googles-antitrust-concessions-for-search/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/15/eu-reportedly-accepts-googles-antitrust-concessions-for-search/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Google antitrust saga" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2013/04/google-antitrust-eu.jpg" /></a></p><p> Google has no doubt been on pins and needles wondering whether or not the European Commission will accept the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/12/google-provides-antitrust-concessions-to-eu/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">search engine changes</a> it's proposing to avoid an antitrust showdown. If what we're hearing is right, Larry Page and crew might just get to relax in the near future: sources for the <em>New York Times</em> claim that the EU agency has accepted Google's proposal. Reportedly, the terms of the deal are close to what had been mentioned last week. Google would have to explicitly label search results that come from its own services while sometimes showing those results from others. It would also have to test the results in the field to get feedback from both the Commission and competitors. While neither Google nor European officials have confirmed the apparent leak so far, any truth to the story could mean the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/21/eu-competition-head-gives-google-weeks-to-offer-antitrust-deal/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">long-running saga</a> might draw to a close before it gets ugly.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/internet/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/google/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Google</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/15/eu-reportedly-accepts-googles-antitrust-concessions-for-search/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>

<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a target="_blank" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/15/technology/google-and-europe-reach-deal-on-search-results.html?_r=1&amp;">New York Times</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>antitrust</category><category>eu</category><category>EuropeanCommission</category><category>europeanunion</category><category>google</category><category>internet</category><category>regulation</category><category>search</category><category>web</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:45:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20541576</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google delivers EU antitrust concessions, now subject to feedback from rivals]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/12/google-provides-antitrust-concessions-to-eu/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/12/google-provides-antitrust-concessions-to-eu/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/12/google-provides-antitrust-concessions-to-eu/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/12/google-provides-antitrust-concessions-to-eu/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Google provides formal concessions to EU antitrust concerns, now subject to feedback from rivals" data-src-height="320" data-src-width="600" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2013/04/google-antitrust-eu.jpg" /></a></p><p> There's no question that most of the talk between Google and EU regulators over the firm's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/30/google-to-face-formal-eu-investigation-over-unfair-downranking-o/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">search ranking practices</a> have taken place behind closed doors, but now the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/eu-launches-preliminary-antitrust-probe-for-google/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">antitrust inquiry</a> is one step closer to a binding resolution. Following a preliminary assessment in which the European Commission laid out its concerns, Google has offered up a formal list of commitments in attempt to assuage the regulator -- and in the process, avoid a nasty fine that could top $5 billion. <em>Reuters</em> sources suggest that one concession may involve labels within search results that distinguish Google's services from those of its rivals, but whatever the final resolution entails, EU Commissioner Joaquin Almunia asserts that it'll be a legally binding agreement. As for the next step, Google's proposal will be subject to input from its peers, which includes <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/31/microsoft-lodges-antitrust-complaint-against-google-with-europea/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">complainants such as Microsoft</a>. If there were ever an opportunity to kick up some dust, we reckon this'd be it. Then again, it could be that Redmond is more <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/08/eu-antitrust-complaint-google-android/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">preoccupied with Android</a> nowadays.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/internet/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/google/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Google</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/12/google-provides-antitrust-concessions-to-eu/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>

<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/11/us-eu-google-idUSBRE93A0HK20130411">Reuters</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>antitrust</category><category>eu</category><category>EuropeanCommission</category><category>EuropeanUnion</category><category>google</category><category>JoaquinAlmunia</category><category>regulation</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Lutz]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:43:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20538357</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[EU countries to allow reuse of public data, including from libraries and museums]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/10/eu-countries-to-allow-reuse-of-public-data/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/10/eu-countries-to-allow-reuse-of-public-data/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/10/eu-countries-to-allow-reuse-of-public-data/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/10/eu-countries-to-allow-reuse-of-public-data/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="European Commission building flags" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2013/02/eu-flags-620-1361892824.jpg" /></a></p><p> Believe it or not, the European Union's public data hasn't been very public: despite a 2003 directive, there wasn't a clear right to reuse weather or other vital data, whether it's for an app or a service. Logic is taking hold now that 27 countries on an EU Council committee have endorsed a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/EuropeanCommission/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">European Commission</a> revision opening the floodgates. The new rules would require that EU countries explicitly permit citizens and companies to reuse public information, either for free or no more than the basic cost of sending it out. The revamp would also push availability in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/21/eu-says-itll-believe-microsoft-is-going-open-when-it-sees-it/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">open formats</a>, along with expanding the directive's coverage to archives, libraries and museums -- you know, repositories of <em>nothing but</em> public knowledge. Both the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/EuropeanParliament/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">European Parliament</a> and individual governments will have to sign the changes into law sometime in the (likely not-so-near) future, but the shift could lead to a sudden wealth of data for Euro-centric hardware and software.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Misc</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/internet/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Internet</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/10/eu-countries-to-allow-reuse-of-public-data/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Via:</strong> <a href="http://gigaom.com/2013/04/10/european-governments-agree-to-open-up-public-data/" target="_blank">GigaOM</a><!--//--></p>
<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a href="http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-13-316_en.htm" target="_blank">European Commission (1)</a><!--//-->, <a href="https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/public-sector-information-raw-data-new-services-and-products" target="_blank">(2)</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>data</category><category>eu</category><category>europe</category><category>EuropeanCommission</category><category>EuropeanParliament</category><category>europeanunion</category><category>opendata</category><category>transparency</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:44:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20536126</dc:identifier>

</item>


<item>
<title><![CDATA[Antitrust complaint levied against Google in EU, this time it's all about Android]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/08/eu-antitrust-complaint-google-android/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/08/eu-antitrust-complaint-google-android/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/08/eu-antitrust-complaint-google-android/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/08/eu-antitrust-complaint-google-android/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Antitrust complaint levied against Google in EU, this time it's all about Android" data-src-height="465" data-src-width="620" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2013/04/eu-4g.jpg" /></a></p><p> Google has spent the past couple years facing down <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/eu-launches-preliminary-antitrust-probe-for-google/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">antitrust accusations</a> in Europe for pushing its web services over those of competitors. But, just as that case is <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/02/google-offers-to-settle-with-eu-over-antitrust-gripes/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">coming to a close</a>, the <em>New York Times</em> now reports that new anti-competitive allegations have been levied against Android. This new complaint was filed by a group called Fairsearch -- whose members include old EU foes <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/31/google-lobs-antitrust-complaint-against-microsoft-and-nokia-in-eu/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Microsoft and Nokia</a>, plus Oracle and a host of travel booking websites -- and claims that Google's using Android as a way to deceive consumers into using Google apps instead of competitors' software. The problem, as Fairsearch sees it, is that Google forces OEMs who use Android to unfairly place apps like YouTube and Gmail in prominent places on the desktop. Of course, this new complaint is just the beginning, so we'll have to wait and see what the European Commission's investigation into the matter uncovers, and how the folks in Mountain View respond.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/microsoft/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Microsoft</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/nokia/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Nokia</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/google/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Google</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/08/eu-antitrust-complaint-google-android/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>

<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a target="_blank" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/09/technology/09iht-google09.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_r=2&amp;">New York Times</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>android</category><category>antitrust</category><category>eu</category><category>europe</category><category>EuropeanCommission</category><category>europeanunion</category><category>google</category><category>microsoft</category><category>nokia</category><category>oracle</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Gorman]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 20:49:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20534459</dc:identifier>

</item>



<item>
<title><![CDATA[EU commission calls for better enforcement following Apple warranty dust up]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2013/03/19/EU-commission-calls-for-better-enforcement-following-app/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2013/03/19/EU-commission-calls-for-better-enforcement-following-app/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2013/03/19/EU-commission-calls-for-better-enforcement-following-app/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/03/19/EU-commission-calls-for-better-enforcement-following-app/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="EU commission calls for better enforcement following Apple warranty dust up" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/10/img7333.jpg" /></a></p><p> In 2011 Apple found itself in some hot water for failing to provide the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/03/apple-may-get-the-italian-boot-has-30-days-to-push-2-year-warranty/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">legally required two-year warranty</a> to European consumers. But, since being slapped with a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/italian-antri-trust-body-fines-apple-for-misleading-customers-on/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">&euro;900,000 fine by Italy in December</a> of that year, few other countries have taken any signifcant action. That's led European Justice Commissioner Viviane Reding to call on the nations of the European Union to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/01/apple-facing-eu-warranty-investigation/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">step up their enforcement efforts</a> and to cooperate more on consumer protection issues. She also said that the Justice Commission should take a more prominent role in helping various state institutions work together. The call for stricter enforcement comes after only five EU members took any action against Apple for openly flouting the Union's Warranty laws -- and just two (Italy and Bulgaria) imposed any financial penalties. <span>Denmark, Finland, Luxembourg and </span><span>Belgium are still investigating the company, but it's not clear what consequences if any remain to be faced. The company has begun to alter its warranty policies to fall more inline with local laws, but there are still concerns about the specific wording that leave room for abuse.</span></p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/apple/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Apple</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/03/19/EU-commission-calls-for-better-enforcement-following-app/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>apple</category><category>applecare</category><category>EU</category><category>europe</category><category>VivianeReding</category><category>warranty</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:55:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20510012</dc:identifier>

</item>





<item>
<title><![CDATA[EU Apple Online Stores list Mac Pro as unavailable prior to March 1st cutoff]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/19/mac-pro-unavailable-on-european-online-stores/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/19/mac-pro-unavailable-on-european-online-stores/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/19/mac-pro-unavailable-on-european-online-stores/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center; "> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/19/mac-pro-unavailable-on-european-online-stores/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="EU Apple Online Stores list Mac Pro as unavailable prior to March 1st cutoff" data-src-height="326" data-src-width="620" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2013/02/applestoreeurope-1361240033.png" /></a></p><p> <span>We already knew the current line of </span><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/31/apple-halting-mac-pro-sales-in-europe-on-march-1st/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Mac Pros would be discontinued in Europe</a><span> due to new regulatory standards come March 1st, but we didn't think Apple would pull the plug on its tower desktop this early. According to <em>9to5Mac</em>, several European Apple Online Stores now show its </span><a href="http://engadget.com/tag/macpro?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Mac Pros</a><span> as "currently unavailable" a couple of weeks before the computers are to be sunsetted. We're not sure if this is the case with machines in brick-and-mortar locales, but Europeans keen on the existing Mac Pro should get to their nearest reseller before it's completely out of stock. Either that or you can choose to sit tight and wait for that </span><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/12/andy-hertzfeld-mac-pro-refresh-2013/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">impending Mac Pro refresh</a><span>, whenever the folks in Cupertino get around to it. </span></p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/apple/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Apple</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/19/mac-pro-unavailable-on-european-online-stores/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>

<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a target="_blank" href="http://9to5mac.com/2013/02/18/mac-pro-no-longer-available-from-european-apple-online-stores-ahead-of-march-1st-discontinuation/">9to5Mac</a><!--//-->, <a target="_blank" href="http://store.apple.com/uk/browse/home/shop_mac/family/mac_pro">Apple Store (UK)</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>apple</category><category>computer</category><category>eu</category><category>europe</category><category>europeanunion</category><category>macpro</category><category>regulation</category><category>workstation</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicole Lee]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 04:05:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20466369</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[EU regulators unsatisfied with Google's response to privacy policy concerns]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/19/eu-regulators-google-privacy-policy-investigation-continues/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/19/eu-regulators-google-privacy-policy-investigation-continues/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/19/eu-regulators-google-privacy-policy-investigation-continues/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/19/eu-regulators-google-privacy-policy-investigation-continues/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="EU regulators unsatisfied with Google's response to privacy policy concerns" data-src-height="252" data-src-width="570" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2013/02/google-privacy.jpg" /></a></p><p> European Union regulators <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/03/google-eu-privacy-pause/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">weren't exactly content</a> with Google after it rolled up most of its privacy policies into a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/24/google-new-privacy-policy/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">monolithic document</a> early last year, and it doesn't seem like that's about to change. After giving Page and Co. four months to respond to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/16/eu-regulators-urge-google-to-modify-privacy-policy/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">12 recommendations</a> regarding its new policy, French regulator CNIL has come to the conclusion that "Google did not provide any precise and effective answers." Though EU officials aren't happy with Mountain View's responses, Google says its policies respect European law and that it replied with steps to address the concerns by the January 8th deadline. Still, data protection regulators are committed to their investigation and are aiming to form a group before the summertime that would respond to the search titan.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/internet/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/google/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Google</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/19/eu-regulators-google-privacy-policy-investigation-continues/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>

<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/18/us-google-privacy-idUSBRE91H0FF20130218?" target="_blank">Reuters</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>CNIL</category><category>EU</category><category>Europe</category><category>EuropeanUnion</category><category>google</category><category>privacy</category><category>privacypolicy</category><category>regulators</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexis Santos]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 01:42:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20466385</dc:identifier>

</item>

</channel></rss>