<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Magnetic soap could make your next oil spill less oily]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/24/magnetic-soap-could-make-your-next-oil-spill-less-oily/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/24/magnetic-soap-could-make-your-next-oil-spill-less-oily/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/24/magnetic-soap-could-make-your-next-oil-spill-less-oily/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center; "> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/24/magnetic-soap-could-make-your-next-oil-spill-less-oily/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/oil-spill.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div><div style="text-align: left; "> Instead of spending millions upon millions to clean up the next <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/oil%20spill/">oil spill</a>, why don't we just all pitch in and buy some soap? That's basically what researchers at the University of Bristol are proposing, with a new kind of soap that's apparently like no other. This soap, you see, is magnetic, which means it could be easily removed from water without leaving behind any hazardous chemicals -- a potentially major selling point for cleanup crews and environmentalists alike. To create it, the team collected water with chlorine and bromine ions, and used it to dissolve iron particles, creating a metallic core. They proceeded to test their creation by placing the soapy particles within a test tube, underneath layers of water and oil. Much to their delight, they were able to remove the particles with only a magnet, ostensibly providing a template upon which disaster response crews may build.</div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/24/magnetic-soap-could-make-your-next-oil-spill-less-oily/">Magnetic soap could make your next oil spill less oily</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:24:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/24/magnetic-soap-could-make-your-next-oil-spill-less-oily/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20155242/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/24/magnetic-soap-could-make-your-next-oil-spill-less-oily/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bromide</category><category>cleanup</category><category>disaster</category><category>environment</category><category>hazard</category><category>iron</category><category>magnet</category><category>magnetic soap</category><category>MagneticSoap</category><category>metal</category><category>oil</category><category>oil spill</category><category>OilSpill</category><category>paper</category><category>research</category><category>soap</category><category>uk</category><category>university of bristol</category><category>UniversityOfBristol</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Amar Toor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:24:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chevy Volt safe from fire hazard after all, says government]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/24/chevy-volt-safe-from-fire-hazard-after-all-says-government/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/24/chevy-volt-safe-from-fire-hazard-after-all-says-government/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/24/chevy-volt-safe-from-fire-hazard-after-all-says-government/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/24/chevy-volt-safe-from-fire-hazard-after-all-says-government/"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/07/10x0702oub34teew.jpg" style="width: 600px; height: 350px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid;" /></a></div>The <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/chevy+volt/">Chevy Volt</a> isn't prone to catching fire after all, says the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/nhtsa/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a>. The all-electric car came under scrutiny last year after one caught fire following a side-impact crash test. GM offered <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/02/gm-considers-new-battery-for-volt-offers-to-buy-back-hybrids-fr/">a buyback program</a> for Volt owners concerned their cars might suddenly immolate, then the company <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/05/gm-chevy-volt-battery-fire-test/">made "enhancements"</a> to the Volt's battery coolant system. That set things right, as far as the NHTSA is concerned: it says "no discernable defect trend exists" in the Volt, and that GM's revisions "reduce the potential for battery intrusion resulting from side impacts." Chevy dropped the Volt's price by $1,000 for 2012, too. So what do you think? Is a $39,000 starting price and less of a chance of burning to death enough to make you go electric?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/24/chevy-volt-safe-from-fire-hazard-after-all-says-government/">Chevy Volt safe from fire hazard after all, says government</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 24 Jan 2012 02:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/24/chevy-volt-safe-from-fire-hazard-after-all-says-government/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20154886/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/24/chevy-volt-safe-from-fire-hazard-after-all-says-government/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto</category><category>batteries</category><category>battery</category><category>car</category><category>cars</category><category>chevrolet</category><category>Chevrolet Volt</category><category>ChevroletVolt</category><category>Chevy</category><category>Chevy Volt</category><category>ChevyVolt</category><category>electric</category><category>electric car</category><category>electric cars</category><category>ElectricCar</category><category>ElectricCars</category><category>fire</category><category>fire hazard</category><category>FireHazard</category><category>general motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>gm</category><category>hazard</category><category>National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</category><category>NationalHighwayTrafficSafetyAdministration</category><category>NHTSA</category><category>safety</category><category>volt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 02:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[BMW presents car-to-x communication, wants vehicles to talk more (video)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/24/bmw-presents-car-to-x-communication-wants-vehicles-to-talk-more/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/24/bmw-presents-car-to-x-communication-wants-vehicles-to-talk-more/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/24/bmw-presents-car-to-x-communication-wants-vehicles-to-talk-more/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/24/bmw-presents-car-to-x-communication-wants-vehicles-to-talk-more/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/car.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
What good is an Ultimate Driving Machine if it can't get a little help from its friends? A new hazard-dodging system from BMW could help these Bavarian autos get a bit more chatty, each vehicle talking to nearby traffic across long-range wireless networks. In a series of video demonstrations, the car maker shows how the car-to-x system could give advance warnings of traffic, emergency vehicles and weather hazards by enabling one car to beam warnings directly to others. BMW hopes to connect the system to mobile phone networks as latency times improve and possibly even access data from traffic light systems. Sure, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/20/gm-demos-accident-avoidance-system-with-brains-and-long-range/">GM</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/27/fords-intelligent-vehicles-communicate-wirelessly-shoot-hula-h/">Ford</a> got there a bit earlier, but you can see BMW's implementation demonstrated after the break, and check out the via link for more videos of the world's most boring game of <em>GTA</em>.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/24/bmw-presents-car-to-x-communication-wants-vehicles-to-talk-more/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>BMW presents car-to-x communication, wants vehicles to talk more (video)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/24/bmw-presents-car-to-x-communication-wants-vehicles-to-talk-more/">BMW presents car-to-x communication, wants vehicles to talk more (video)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/24/bmw-presents-car-to-x-communication-wants-vehicles-to-talk-more/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20088556/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/24/bmw-presents-car-to-x-communication-wants-vehicles-to-talk-more/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BMW</category><category>BMW car-to-x</category><category>BmwCar-to-x</category><category>car</category><category>car-to-x</category><category>cars</category><category>driving</category><category>emergency vehicle</category><category>EmergencyVehicle</category><category>hazard</category><category>hazard detection</category><category>hazard warning</category><category>HazardDetection</category><category>HazardWarning</category><category>road safety</category><category>RoadSafety</category><category>traffic</category><category>turning</category><category>vehicle warning system</category><category>VehicleWarningSystem</category><category>video</category><category>warning system</category><category>WarningSystem</category><category>wireless network</category><category>wireless networks</category><category>WirelessNetwork</category><category>WirelessNetworks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mat Smith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:47:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cellphones are dangerous / not dangerous: the WHO changes its mind]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/31/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-the-who-changes-its-mind/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/31/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-the-who-changes-its-mind/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/31/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-the-who-changes-its-mind/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/31/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-the-who-changes-its-mind/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/02/cell-radiation-01-09-2010.jpg" style="float: right;" /></a>To say that experts generally don't agree about whether cellphone radiation can fry your brain is an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/23/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-handsets-alter-brain-a/">understatement</a> of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2005/08/30/cellphones-are-dangerous-s-not-dangerous-s-chapter-8041/">massive</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=cellphone+dangerous&amp;submit=Go">proportions</a>, but amazingly enough, the World Health Organization has come to a pseudo-conclusion. A group of 31 scientists from 14 countries working in the org's International Agency for Research on Cancer says that -- based on a survey of the literature -- those electromagnetic fields are as likely to be <em>potentially</em> carcinogenic as 266 other worrisome substances, including DDT pesticide and the exhaust from your automobile. Mind you, the WHO isn't saying that cellphones <em>cause</em> cancer, as today's decision is merely the latest call for more research, but the fact that respected scientists even claim that a correlation should be considered will probably be enough to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/06/san-francisco-backs-away-from-cellphone-radiation-law-will-dist/">stir the pot</a>.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/31/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-the-who-changes-its-mind/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cellphones are dangerous / not dangerous: the WHO changes its mind</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/31/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-the-who-changes-its-mind/">Cellphones are dangerous / not dangerous: the WHO changes its mind</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 31 May 2011 13:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/31/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-the-who-changes-its-mind/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19954464/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/31/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-the-who-changes-its-mind/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cancer</category><category>cancerous</category><category>cellular</category><category>cellular radiation</category><category>CellularRadiation</category><category>danger</category><category>dangerous</category><category>hazard</category><category>hazardous</category><category>not dangerous</category><category>NotDangerous</category><category>radiation</category><category>WHO</category><category>world health organization</category><category>WorldHealthOrganization</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Hollister]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 13:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Foxconn confirms third death from explosion, earlier watchdog report points at aluminum dust (updated)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/22/foxconn-confirms-third-death-from-explosion-earlier-watchdog-re/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/22/foxconn-confirms-third-death-from-explosion-earlier-watchdog-re/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/22/foxconn-confirms-third-death-from-explosion-earlier-watchdog-re/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/22/foxconn-confirms-third-death-from-explosion-earlier-watchdog-re/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/foxconn-explosion-05232011.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Following the tragic <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/20/explosion-at-foxconns-chengdu-plant-injures-several-could-affe/">explosion</a> at Foxconn's Chengdu plant on Friday, the company has now confirmed to <em>All Things Digital</em> the death of a third employee, with nine remaining in hospital. While investigation is still ongoing, initial findings are pointing at "an explosion of combustible dust in a duct" at one of the polishing workshops, which supports earlier rumors of dust explosion; though there's no confirmation on what caused the ignition just yet.<br />
<br />
In related news: two weeks before the fatal accident, watchdog group SACOM released a report on the welfare of workers at the new Chengdu plant. Amongst the uncovering of management issues, excessive working hours, and hazardous environment, <em>PC World</em> highlights complaints from workers about the large amount of aluminum dust -- which is highly explosive -- floating around the polishing department, thus suggesting a lack of proper dust extraction methods within the facility. Foxconn has previously slammed this report, but the outcome of this explosion's investigation should once and for all prove who's telling the truth. For now, though, the priority is to make sure the victims and their families are taken care of.<br />
<br />
Full statement from Foxconn after the break.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update:</strong> According to <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&amp;prev=_t&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;layout=2&amp;eotf=1&amp;sl=zh-CN&amp;tl=en&amp;u=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.chinatimes.com%2Ffocus%2F110501%2F122011052200086.html"><em>China Times'</em></a> industry sources, the explosion has only affected some storage facilities and chemical coating lines, though Foxconn president <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/terry+gou">Terry Gou</a> is said to be reallocating some production to his Shenzhen plant as a just-in-case measure.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/22/foxconn-confirms-third-death-from-explosion-earlier-watchdog-re/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Foxconn confirms third death from explosion, earlier watchdog report points at aluminum dust (updated)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/22/foxconn-confirms-third-death-from-explosion-earlier-watchdog-re/">Foxconn confirms third death from explosion, earlier watchdog report points at aluminum dust (updated)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 22 May 2011 23:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/22/foxconn-confirms-third-death-from-explosion-earlier-watchdog-re/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19947008/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/22/foxconn-confirms-third-death-from-explosion-earlier-watchdog-re/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>accident</category><category>aluminum</category><category>aluminum dust</category><category>AluminumDust</category><category>Apple</category><category>assembly line</category><category>AssemblyLine</category><category>Chengdu factory</category><category>ChengduFactory</category><category>China</category><category>death</category><category>dust</category><category>dust explosion</category><category>DustExplosion</category><category>explosion</category><category>Foxconn</category><category>hazard</category><category>investigation</category><category>iPad</category><category>report</category><category>SACOM</category><category>Terry Gou</category><category>TerryGou</category><category>welfare</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lai]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 23:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cellphones are dangerous / not dangerous: handsets alter brain activity -- scientists don't know what that means]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/23/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-handsets-alter-brain-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/23/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-handsets-alter-brain-a/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/23/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-handsets-alter-brain-a/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/23/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-handsets-alter-brain-a/"><img border="0" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="16" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/02/cell-radiation-01-09-2010.jpg" alt="" /></a>Cellphones are bad, mmkay? Or at least that is what many want us to believe, what with all these <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/cellphone,+health">warning labels</a> and studies telling us that mobile users will end up with <a href="http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/04/01/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-youre-better-off-smokin/">brain cancer</a> and <a href="http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/12/29/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-watch-your-kidneys-editi/">kidney damage</a>. Not to mention the dangers of <a href="http://mobile.engadget.com/2008/06/21/mental-health-clinic-treats-children-for-cellphone-addiction/">phone addiction</a> -- horror of horrors -- for our youth. Now, the National Institutes of Health have shown that radiation from your phone's antenna <strike>turns you into a supergenius</strike> increases brain activity. Using positron emission tomography (PET) scans on 47 individuals with a muted phone on each ear (to prevent aural brain stimulation), the study found a seven percent increase in brain activity in the area closest to the phones' antennas when receiving a call. The catch -- scientists don't know "whether this is detrimental or if it could even be beneficial," so don't go trading your <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/cell-mate-headset-heads-on/">Cell-Mate</a> in for a Bluetooth headset just yet.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/23/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-handsets-alter-brain-a/">Cellphones are dangerous / not dangerous: handsets alter brain activity -- scientists don't know what that means</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 23 Feb 2011 17:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/23/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-handsets-alter-brain-a/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19856450/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/23/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-handsets-alter-brain-a/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>brain</category><category>cellphone</category><category>cellphone research</category><category>CellphoneResearch</category><category>cellphones</category><category>danger</category><category>dangerous</category><category>hazard</category><category>health</category><category>medical</category><category>not dangerous</category><category>NotDangerous</category><category>research</category><category>study</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Gorman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 17:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple ordered to make public iPod nano battery fix in Japan]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/06/apple-ordered-to-publish-statement-on-receiving-replacement-ipod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/06/apple-ordered-to-publish-statement-on-receiving-replacement-ipod/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/06/apple-ordered-to-publish-statement-on-receiving-replacement-ipod/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/06/apple-ordered-to-publish-statement-on-receiving-replacement-ipod/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/08/brad-pitt-hot-ipod.jpg" alt="" /><br />
</a></div>
We had an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/12/japan-orders-apple-to-investigate-exploding-ipod-nanos/">eerie feeling</a> it'd come to this, and come it has. Nearly <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/19/japan-investigates-exploding-first-generation-ipod-nanos-again/">two full years to the day</a> after the government of Japan began a thorough investigation into the spontaneous <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/08/ipod-nano-sparks-bedroom-fire-no-humans-harmed/">combusting</a> of iPod nano devices, that same entity is now mandating that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Apple/">Apple</a> publish an "easy to understand" statement on the web that explains how customers can "receive replacement batteries and obtain advice." So far, these volatile Li-ion cells have been blamed for four cases of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/05/ipod-nana-spews-chest-high-flames-from-trousers-lawsuit-at/">minor burns</a> in the Land of the Rising Sun, and while Apple has been replacing first-generation iPod nano batteries since 2008 for those that complained, it seems that Japan wants the company to make the option readily apparent to consumers. Be sure to keep an eye on Apple's Japanese site for more, but as of now, we're not seeing any such PSA posted.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/06/apple-ordered-to-publish-statement-on-receiving-replacement-ipod/">Apple ordered to make public iPod nano battery fix in Japan</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 06 Aug 2010 08:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/06/apple-ordered-to-publish-statement-on-receiving-replacement-ipod/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19583689/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/06/apple-ordered-to-publish-statement-on-receiving-replacement-ipod/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Apple</category><category>apple ipod</category><category>AppleIpod</category><category>battery</category><category>burns</category><category>charger</category><category>charging</category><category>exploding</category><category>exploding battery</category><category>ExplodingBattery</category><category>explosion</category><category>fire</category><category>fire hazard</category><category>FireHazard</category><category>fix</category><category>government</category><category>hazard</category><category>ipod</category><category>ipod nano</category><category>IpodNano</category><category>japan</category><category>lithium ion</category><category>LithiumIon</category><category>MA004JA</category><category>ma005</category><category>MA005JA</category><category>ma099</category><category>MA099JA</category><category>MA107JA</category><category>nano</category><category>overheat</category><category>overheating</category><category>portable audio</category><category>portableaudio</category><category>recall</category><category>safety</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 08:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dell Mini 9 suffers meltdown, scorches owner's floor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/23/dell-mini-9-suffers-meltdown-scorches-owners-floor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/23/dell-mini-9-suffers-meltdown-scorches-owners-floor/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/23/dell-mini-9-suffers-meltdown-scorches-owners-floor/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://consumerist.com/2009/12/dell-mini-9-mysteriously-ablaze-pics.html"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/12/23dec90z0z0.jpg" /></a></div>
While this isn't quite bad enough to merit a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/22/dude-your-dell-is-on-fire/"><em>"dude, your Dell is on fire"</em></a> part deux, it's a pretty frightful example of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/24/samsung-p10-laptop-battery-melts-in-south-korea/">hazard</a> modern batteries (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/apple-recalls-faulty-first-generation-ipod-nano-players-in-korea/">of any</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/htc-touch-pro-battery-goes-rogue-lights-up-an-otherwise-fine-pa/">kind</a>) represent. A <em>Consumerist</em> reader reports that her year-old Dell Mini 9 recently popped, "hissed and sizzled" as it filled her room with smoke and tarnished her fine wooden flooring. Judging from the fallout pictures (available after the break), we'd say the culprit for this Mini fire (oh!) was the battery pack, which again reminds us how badly we need to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/">improve our energy storage technologies</a>. Dell has been quick to remedy the situation with an upgraded laptop being sent over to the young lady and the melted machine packed off to the labs for inspection, though there's no mention of compensation for the owner's scarred floor and mind.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/23/dell-mini-9-suffers-meltdown-scorches-owners-floor/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dell Mini 9 suffers meltdown, scorches owner's floor</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/23/dell-mini-9-suffers-meltdown-scorches-owners-floor/">Dell Mini 9 suffers meltdown, scorches owner's floor</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 23 Dec 2009 06:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/23/dell-mini-9-suffers-meltdown-scorches-owners-floor/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19291972/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/23/dell-mini-9-suffers-meltdown-scorches-owners-floor/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>battery</category><category>danger</category><category>dangerous</category><category>dell</category><category>dell mini 9</category><category>DellMini9</category><category>fire</category><category>hazard</category><category>laptop</category><category>melt</category><category>meltdown</category><category>mini 9</category><category>Mini9</category><category>netbook</category><category>overheat</category><category>overheating</category><category>safety</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 06:52:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nokia initiates shocking charger recall program (update: affects 14 million)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/nokia-initiates-shocking-charger-recall-program/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/nokia-initiates-shocking-charger-recall-program/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/nokia-initiates-shocking-charger-recall-program/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://chargerexchange.nokia.com/chargerexchange/en/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/11/charger-exchange-program-600.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
New Nokia owners take notice: Espoo just launched an "exchange program" for certain Nokia-branded chargers. According to the world's largest handset maker:<br /><blockquote>"We have determined that the plastic covers of the affected chargers could come loose and separate, exposing the charger's internal components and potentially posing an electric shock hazard if certain internal components are touched while the charger is plugged into a live socket."<br /></blockquote>The chargers affected are models AC-3E and AC-3U, manufactured between June 15 and August 9, 2009, and model AC-4U, manufactured between April 13 and October 25, 2009. Fortunately, Nokia provides a website that removes all the guesswork from obtaining your free replacement.<br /><br /><strong>Update</strong>: Gulp, looks like we're talking about <a _fcksavedurl="http://in.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idINIndia-43803920091109" href="http://in.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idINIndia-43803920091109">14 million defective chargers</a>.<br /><br />
<div id="pr_box">
<div id="pr_box_button">Show full PR text</div>
<div id="pr_text">NOKIA PRESS RELEASE November 9, 2009 <strong><br /><br />Nokia initiates charger exchange program</strong> <br /><br />Espoo, Finland - Nokia today initiated a charger exchange program, in which consumers owning certain Nokia-branded chargers manufactured by a third-party supplier are recommended to exchange these chargers for free replacements. <br /><br />During a routine quality control process, Nokia identified a potential product quality issue with certain chargers manufactured by one of its third-party suppliers. The plastic covers of the affected chargers could come loose and separate, exposing the charger's internal components and potentially posing an electrical shock hazard if certain internal components are touched while the charger is plugged into a live socket. Nokia is not aware of any incidents or injuries related to these chargers. <br /><br />Only a limited number of chargers of certain model types manufactured by a single third-party supplier during a specific time period are within the scope of the exchange program. They are the AC-3E and AC-3U models, manufactured between June 15, 2009 and August 9, 2009; and the AC-4U model, manufactured between April 13, 2009 and October 25, 2009. <br /><br />For more information, including how consumers can check to see if their chargers are part of this exchange program, Nokia has established a website. Consumers are asked to visit http://chargerexchange.nokia.com or their local Nokia website. <br /><br />Nokia recommends consumers with chargers within the scope of this exchange program to stop using the charger and exchange it for a free replacement.</div>
</div><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/peripherals/" rel="tag">Peripherals</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/nokia/" rel="tag">Nokia</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/nokia-initiates-shocking-charger-recall-program/">Nokia initiates shocking charger recall program (update: affects 14 million)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 09 Nov 2009 04:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://chargerexchange.nokia.com/chargerexchange/en/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/nokia-initiates-shocking-charger-recall-program/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19228536/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/nokia-initiates-shocking-charger-recall-program/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>charger</category><category>exchange</category><category>hazard</category><category>mobile</category><category>nokia</category><category>peripherals</category><category>recall</category><category>replacement</category><category>shock</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 04:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nokia initiates shocking charger recall program (update: affects 14 million)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/nokia-initiates-shocking-charger-recall-program/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/nokia-initiates-shocking-charger-recall-program/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/nokia-initiates-shocking-charger-recall-program/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://chargerexchange.nokia.com/chargerexchange/en/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/11/charger-exchange-program-600.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
New Nokia owners take notice: Espoo just launched an "exchange program" for certain Nokia-branded chargers. According to the world's largest handset maker:<br />
<blockquote>"We have determined that the plastic covers of the affected chargers could come loose and separate, exposing the charger's internal components and potentially posing an electric shock hazard if certain internal components are touched while the charger is plugged into a live socket."<br />
</blockquote>The chargers affected are models AC-3E and AC-3U, manufactured between June 15 and August 9, 2009, and model AC-4U, manufactured between April 13 and October 25, 2009. Fortunately, Nokia provides a website that removes all the guesswork from obtaining your free replacement.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update</strong>: Gulp, looks like we're talking about <a href="http://in.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idINIndia-43803920091109">14 million defective chargers</a>.<br />
<br />
<div id="pr_box">
<div id="pr_box_button">Show full PR text</div>
<div id="pr_text">NOKIA PRESS RELEASE November 9, 2009 <strong><br />
<br />
Nokia initiates charger exchange program</strong> <br />
<br />
Espoo, Finland - Nokia today initiated a charger exchange program, in which consumers owning certain Nokia-branded chargers manufactured by a third-party supplier are recommended to exchange these chargers for free replacements. <br />
<br />
During a routine quality control process, Nokia identified a potential product quality issue with certain chargers manufactured by one of its third-party suppliers. The plastic covers of the affected chargers could come loose and separate, exposing the charger's internal components and potentially posing an electrical shock hazard if certain internal components are touched while the charger is plugged into a live socket. Nokia is not aware of any incidents or injuries related to these chargers. <br />
<br />
Only a limited number of chargers of certain model types manufactured by a single third-party supplier during a specific time period are within the scope of the exchange program. They are the AC-3E and AC-3U models, manufactured between June 15, 2009 and August 9, 2009; and the AC-4U model, manufactured between April 13, 2009 and October 25, 2009. <br />
<br />
For more information, including how consumers can check to see if their chargers are part of this exchange program, Nokia has established a website. Consumers are asked to visit http://chargerexchange.nokia.com or their local Nokia website. <br />
<br />
Nokia recommends consumers with chargers within the scope of this exchange program to stop using the charger and exchange it for a free replacement.</div>
</div><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/nokia-initiates-shocking-charger-recall-program/">Nokia initiates shocking charger recall program (update: affects 14 million)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 09 Nov 2009 04:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/nokia-initiates-shocking-charger-recall-program/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19228530/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/nokia-initiates-shocking-charger-recall-program/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>byd</category><category>charger</category><category>exchange</category><category>hazard</category><category>nokia</category><category>recall</category><category>replacement</category><category>shock</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 04:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[BMW's Emergency Stop Assistant halts your vehicle if you can't]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/08/bmws-emergency-stop-assistant-stops-your-vehicle-if-you-cant/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/08/bmws-emergency-stop-assistant-stops-your-vehicle-if-you-cant/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/08/bmws-emergency-stop-assistant-stops-your-vehicle-if-you-cant/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/06/05/bmw-working-on-system-that-stops-vehicles-during-a-medical-emerg/"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/06/emergency-stop-assist-bmw.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
While it may seem as if <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/BMW/">BMW</a> and the Federal Ministry of Education and Research in Germany just hate seniors, we kind of doubt that's the prevailing mentality behind the admittedly brilliant Emergency Stop Assistant. Said technology is being testing as part of the Smart Senior project, and in theory, it will be able to detect medical emergencies, activate hazard lights and autonomously pull the car over safely if the driver cannot. Of course, we're still anxiously awaiting details on how the system plans on detecting said calamities and figuring out how to pull over without crashing, but one thing's for sure: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/OnStar/">OnStar</a> just got a lot more outdated.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/transportation/" rel="tag">Transportation</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/08/bmws-emergency-stop-assistant-stops-your-vehicle-if-you-cant/">BMW's Emergency Stop Assistant halts your vehicle if you can't</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 08 Jun 2009 09:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autoblog.com/2009/06/05/bmw-working-on-system-that-stops-vehicles-during-a-medical-emerg/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/08/bmws-emergency-stop-assistant-stops-your-vehicle-if-you-cant/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19060584/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/08/bmws-emergency-stop-assistant-stops-your-vehicle-if-you-cant/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BMW</category><category>driving</category><category>emergency</category><category>Emergency Stop Assistant</category><category>EmergencyStopAssistant</category><category>esa</category><category>europe</category><category>hazard</category><category>health</category><category>medical</category><category>safety</category><category>Smart Senior</category><category>SmartSenior</category><category>vehicle</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 09:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[HTC Touch Pro battery goes rogue, lights up an otherwise fine pair of pants]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/htc-touch-pro-battery-goes-rogue-lights-up-an-otherwise-fine-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/htc-touch-pro-battery-goes-rogue-lights-up-an-otherwise-fine-pa/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/htc-touch-pro-battery-goes-rogue-lights-up-an-otherwise-fine-pa/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/showthread.php?t=68554"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/05/touch-pro-battery-fire-pant.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Just a note to everyone who carries around a spare smartphone Li-ion in their rear pocket: buy thicker underwear. The scene you see above was all caused by an obviously volatile <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/TouchPro/">HTC Touch Pro</a> battery, one that the pants-wearer claims is an authentic HTC cell and not a cheap-o alternative from eBay. As the story goes, a foul odor led him to a laundry pile, where he uncovered eight moist socks, a torched battery and a ruined pair of pants. Look, we're glad this guy's okay and all, but seriously, can you imagine what this testy little thing would've done when tossed into the dryer? It's a blessing in disguise, kiddo.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.phonearena.com/htmls/Spare-Touch-Pro-battery-burns-through-pocket-article-a_5118.html">phoneArena</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/peripherals/" rel="tag">Peripherals</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/htc/" rel="tag">HTC</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/htc-touch-pro-battery-goes-rogue-lights-up-an-otherwise-fine-pa/">HTC Touch Pro battery goes rogue, lights up an otherwise fine pair of pants</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 21 May 2009 10:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/showthread.php?t=68554>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/htc-touch-pro-battery-goes-rogue-lights-up-an-otherwise-fine-pa/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1552611/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/htc-touch-pro-battery-goes-rogue-lights-up-an-otherwise-fine-pa/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>battery</category><category>battery explosion</category><category>BatteryExplosion</category><category>burner</category><category>exploding</category><category>exploding battery</category><category>ExplodingBattery</category><category>explosion</category><category>fire</category><category>fire hazard</category><category>FireHazard</category><category>hazard</category><category>HTC</category><category>mobile</category><category>overheat</category><category>overheating</category><category>peripherals</category><category>smartphone</category><category>touch</category><category>touch pro</category><category>TouchPro</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 10:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[HTC Touch Pro battery goes rogue, lights up an otherwise fine pair of pants]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/htc-touch-pro-battery-goes-rogue-lights-up-an-otherwise-fine-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/htc-touch-pro-battery-goes-rogue-lights-up-an-otherwise-fine-pa/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/htc-touch-pro-battery-goes-rogue-lights-up-an-otherwise-fine-pa/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/showthread.php?t=68554"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/05/touch-pro-battery-fire-pant.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Just a note to everyone who carries around a spare smartphone Li-ion in their rear pocket: buy thicker underwear. The scene you see above was all caused by an obviously volatile <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/tag/TouchPro/">HTC Touch Pro</a> battery, one that the pants-wearer claims is an authentic HTC cell and not a cheap-o alternative from eBay. As the story goes, a foul odor led him to a laundry pile, where he uncovered eight moist socks, a torched battery and a ruined pair of pants. Look, we're glad this guy's okay and all, but seriously, can you imagine what this testy little thing would've done when tossed into the dryer? It's a blessing in disguise, kiddo.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.phonearena.com/htmls/Spare-Touch-Pro-battery-burns-through-pocket-article-a_5118.html">phoneArena</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/htc-touch-pro-battery-goes-rogue-lights-up-an-otherwise-fine-pa/">HTC Touch Pro battery goes rogue, lights up an otherwise fine pair of pants</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 21 May 2009 10:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/showthread.php?t=68554>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/htc-touch-pro-battery-goes-rogue-lights-up-an-otherwise-fine-pa/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1552604/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/htc-touch-pro-battery-goes-rogue-lights-up-an-otherwise-fine-pa/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>battery</category><category>battery explosion</category><category>BatteryExplosion</category><category>burner</category><category>exploding</category><category>exploding battery</category><category>ExplodingBattery</category><category>explosion</category><category>fire</category><category>fire hazard</category><category>FireHazard</category><category>hazard</category><category>HTC</category><category>overheat</category><category>overheating</category><category>smartphone</category><category>touch</category><category>touch pro</category><category>TouchPro</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 10:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[70,000 HP laptop batteries recalled due to fire hazard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/70-000-hp-laptop-batteries-recalled-due-to-fire-hazard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/70-000-hp-laptop-batteries-recalled-due-to-fire-hazard/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/70-000-hp-laptop-batteries-recalled-due-to-fire-hazard/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml09/09221.html"><img hspace="4" border="0" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/05/hp-dv2000-laptop-battery.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
It's been quite awhile since we've seen a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/31/sony-battery-recall-hits-100-000-adds-lenovo-and-acer-to-list/">major recall</a> surrounding volatile laptop batteries, but it looks as if <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/HP/">HP</a> is the company bringing the topic back to the forefront. Announced today, the US Consumer Product Safety Commission and Health Canada, in cooperation with Hewlett-Packard, has issued a voluntary recall of about 70,000 Li-ion batteries. Reportedly, these cells can "overheat, posing a fire and burn hazard to consumers," and so far, the firm and CPSC have received two separate reports of batteries that have overheated and ruptured, resulting in -- wait for it -- "flames / fire that caused minor property damage." For a look at what units are affected, head on past the break -- oh, and if you're reading this on an HP lappie right now, go ahead and grab the fire extinguisher just in case.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/70-000-hp-laptop-batteries-recalled-due-to-fire-hazard/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>70,000 HP laptop batteries recalled due to fire hazard</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/70-000-hp-laptop-batteries-recalled-due-to-fire-hazard/">70,000 HP laptop batteries recalled due to fire hazard</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 14 May 2009 15:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml09/09221.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/70-000-hp-laptop-batteries-recalled-due-to-fire-hazard/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1546395/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/70-000-hp-laptop-batteries-recalled-due-to-fire-hazard/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>burn</category><category>Canada</category><category>Compaq</category><category>Compaq Presario</category><category>CompaqPresario</category><category>danger</category><category>dangerous</category><category>fire</category><category>fire hazard</category><category>FireHazard</category><category>hazard</category><category>Hewlett-Packard</category><category>HP</category><category>HP Compaq</category><category>HP Pavilion</category><category>HpCompaq</category><category>HpPavilion</category><category>overheat</category><category>overheating</category><category>Pavilion</category><category>recall</category><category>recalled</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 15:13:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[LG recalls 30,000 830 Spyder handsets for crappy 911 connections]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/02/lg-recalls-30-000-830-spyder-handsets-for-crappy-911-connections/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/02/lg-recalls-30-000-830-spyder-handsets-for-crappy-911-connections/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/02/lg-recalls-30-000-830-spyder-handsets-for-crappy-911-connections/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml09/09724.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/3-1-09-lg-help-830-spyder.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
While things like <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/20/unofficial-copy-paste-comes-to-the-iphone-again/">copy and paste</a>, multimedia messaging and video calling are nice extras to have, there's really only one thing that's most important when it comes to a reliable cellphone: the 911 functionality. Evidently, around 30,000 LG 830 Spyder handsets aren't having the easiest time dialing for help, with a product recall noting that a huge swath of 'em have "difficulty sustaining a connection or have poor voice quality on calls to emergency 911." It should be noted, however, that LG's actually being really, really <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/27/lg-electronics-recalls-45-000-lg-150-phones-in-canada/">proactive</a> here, as it has only received a single report (and no injuries) to date. The Spyder phones affected have software versions T83LGV03 and T83LGV04, and you can hit the read link if you suspect yours is amongst that 30,000.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.textually.org/textually/archives/2009/02/022875.htm">textually</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handsets/" rel="tag">Handsets</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/lg/" rel="tag">LG</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/02/lg-recalls-30-000-830-spyder-handsets-for-crappy-911-connections/">LG recalls 30,000 830 Spyder handsets for crappy 911 connections</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml09/09724.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/02/lg-recalls-30-000-830-spyder-handsets-for-crappy-911-connections/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1475131/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/02/lg-recalls-30-000-830-spyder-handsets-for-crappy-911-connections/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>830</category><category>830 Spyder</category><category>830Spyder</category><category>911</category><category>dangerous</category><category>emergency</category><category>fire</category><category>hazard</category><category>LG</category><category>lg 830</category><category>Lg830</category><category>mobile</category><category>recall</category><category>recalled</category><category>Spyder</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[LG recalls 30,000 830 Spyder handsets for crappy 911 connections]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/01/lg-recalls-30-000-830-spyder-handsets-for-crappy-911-connections/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/01/lg-recalls-30-000-830-spyder-handsets-for-crappy-911-connections/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/01/lg-recalls-30-000-830-spyder-handsets-for-crappy-911-connections/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml09/09724.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/3-1-09-lg-help-830-spyder.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
While things like <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2009/01/20/unofficial-copy-paste-comes-to-the-iphone-again/">copy and paste</a>, multimedia messaging and video calling are nice extras to have, there's really only one thing that's most important when it comes to a reliable cellphone: the 911 functionality. Evidently, around 30,000 LG 830 Spyder handsets aren't having the easiest time dialing for help, with a product recall noting that a huge swath of 'em have "difficulty sustaining a connection or have poor voice quality on calls to emergency 911." It should be noted, however, that LG's actually being really, really <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2009/01/27/lg-electronics-recalls-45-000-lg-150-phones-in-canada/">proactive</a> here, as it has only received a single report (and no injuries) to date. The Spyder phones affected have software versions T83LGV03 and T83LGV04, and you can hit the read link if you suspect yours is amongst that 30,000.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.textually.org/textually/archives/2009/02/022875.htm">textually</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/01/lg-recalls-30-000-830-spyder-handsets-for-crappy-911-connections/">LG recalls 30,000 830 Spyder handsets for crappy 911 connections</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 01 Mar 2009 11:53:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml09/09724.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/01/lg-recalls-30-000-830-spyder-handsets-for-crappy-911-connections/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1475117/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/01/lg-recalls-30-000-830-spyder-handsets-for-crappy-911-connections/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>830</category><category>830 Spyder</category><category>830Spyder</category><category>911</category><category>dangerous</category><category>emergency</category><category>fire</category><category>hazard</category><category>LG</category><category>lg 830</category><category>Lg830</category><category>recall</category><category>recalled</category><category>Spyder</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 11:53:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cellphones are dangerous/not dangerous, watch your kidneys edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/29/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-watch-your-kidneys-editi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/29/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-watch-your-kidneys-editi/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/29/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-watch-your-kidneys-editi/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://macedoniaonline.eu/content/view/4904/54/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/12/plush-kidney.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Believe it or not, this latest study on how cell phones are killing you doesn't invoke the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/cancer">dreaded c-word</a>. Instead, scientists at the European Research Institute for Electronic Components in Bucharest found that exposing red blood cells to low-level radiation -- lower than what emanates from your mobile buddy, apparently -- caused them to leak hemoglobin, which they say can lead to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2004/08/16/would-you-sell-your-kidney-s-for-a-hush/">kidney</a> damage and heart disease. The Federation of the Electronics Industry have already come out swinging, saying there is still no consistent evidence the mobile devices are physically hurting us. If history tells us anything, expect to see a report in the near future on how inconclusive these findings are, followed by separate findings on how <em>beneficial</em> a healthy kick of radiation to the kidneys can be.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.textually.org/textually/archives/2008/12/022155.htm">textually</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/" rel="tag">Misc</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/29/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-watch-your-kidneys-editi/">Cellphones are dangerous/not dangerous, watch your kidneys edition</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 29 Dec 2008 11:07:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://macedoniaonline.eu/content/view/4904/54/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/29/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-watch-your-kidneys-editi/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1413428/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/29/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-watch-your-kidneys-editi/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>culture</category><category>dangerous</category><category>hazard</category><category>health</category><category>heart</category><category>heart disease</category><category>HeartDisease</category><category>kidney</category><category>kidney failure</category><category>KidneyFailure</category><category>mobile</category><category>not dangerous</category><category>NotDangerous</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 11:07:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[UK warns that fake imported DS handhelds could be hazardous]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/05/uk-warns-that-fake-imported-ds-handhelds-could-be-hazardous/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/05/uk-warns-that-fake-imported-ds-handhelds-could-be-hazardous/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/05/uk-warns-that-fake-imported-ds-handhelds-could-be-hazardous/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://nds.coi.gov.uk/Content/Detail.asp?ReleaseID=386594&amp;NewsAreaID=2"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/12/12-5-08-fake-ds.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
HM Revenue &amp; Customs has put out an official report warning that "hundreds of imported counterfeit game consoles seized at UK freight depots were found to have been supplied with potentially dangerous power adapters." Most of the wares had been purchased at a deep discount from Asian websites claiming to sell "genuine <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Nintendo/">Nintendo</a> products" for over 50% off. The Big N has already stepped in to confirm that the DS / DS Lites are indeed <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2005/11/15/keepin-it-real-fake-part-v-rudeboyz-ds-rip-isnt-even/">counterfeit</a>, and the accompanying power adapters were also deemed "potentially <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2004/10/09/dell-recalls-a-million-laptop-ac-adapters/">dangerous</a>, since they had not been electronically tested and do not meet strict UK safety standards." C'mon parents -- even if the youngin' has<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/24/engadget-holiday-gift-guide-2008/"> been bad</a>, we'd still say coal is more fitting than a stocking full of potential electrocution.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.pocket-lint.co.uk/news/news.phtml/19719/20743/Buyers-warned-about-fake-consoles.phtml">Pocket-lint</a>, image courtesy of <a href="http://www.infendo.com/uploaded_images/dsfake-772305.jpg">Infendo</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gaming/" rel="tag">Gaming</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handhelds/" rel="tag">Handhelds</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/05/uk-warns-that-fake-imported-ds-handhelds-could-be-hazardous/">UK warns that fake imported DS handhelds could be hazardous</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 05 Dec 2008 08:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://nds.coi.gov.uk/Content/Detail.asp?ReleaseID=386594&amp;NewsAreaID=2>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/05/uk-warns-that-fake-imported-ds-handhelds-could-be-hazardous/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1392267/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/05/uk-warns-that-fake-imported-ds-handhelds-could-be-hazardous/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ac adapter</category><category>AcAdapter</category><category>Christmas</category><category>customs</category><category>dangerous</category><category>ds</category><category>ds lite</category><category>DsLite</category><category>fake</category><category>fire</category><category>gaming handheld</category><category>GamingHandheld</category><category>hazard</category><category>holidaze</category><category>import</category><category>knockoff</category><category>nintendo</category><category>power adapter</category><category>PowerAdapter</category><category>ripoff</category><category>uk</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 08:47:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cellphones are dangerous/not dangerous: leaky fillings edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/17/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-leaky-fillings-edition/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/17/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-leaky-fillings-edition/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/17/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-leaky-fillings-edition/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://209.85.135.104/search?q=cache:FvlRM70PRr8J:www.ansijournals.com/pjbs/2008/1142-1146.pdf+dental+cell+phone+study+by+Shiraz+University+of+Medical+Sciences&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;cd=2"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/11/11-17-08-fillings_amalgam.jpg"  alt="" /></a>We're not even going to pretend we fully grasp what's going on here, but the long and short of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences' latest findings are that cellphones can trigger the release of mercury from one's fillings. Yes, seriously. The study asserts that out of 14 test subjects with fillings, those who used mobile phones had a statistically significant increase of mercury from urine tests than those who refrained from yapping. The science behind all of this is far beyond our IQ levels, but we're a little <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/dangerous/">freaked out/not freaked out</a>, regardless.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.textually.org/textually/archives/2008/11/021789.htm">textually</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/studies/" rel="tag">Studies</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/" rel="tag">Misc</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/17/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-leaky-fillings-edition/">Cellphones are dangerous/not dangerous: leaky fillings edition</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://209.85.135.104/search?q=cache:FvlRM70PRr8J:www.ansijournals.com/pjbs/2008/1142-1146.pdf+dental+cell+phone+study+by+Shiraz+University+of+Medical+Sciences&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;cd=2>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/17/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-leaky-fillings-edition/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1374667/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/17/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-leaky-fillings-edition/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>danger</category><category>dangerous</category><category>dentist</category><category>fillings</category><category>hazard</category><category>hazardous</category><category>mercury</category><category>mobile</category><category>research</category><category>Shiraz University</category><category>ShirazUniversity</category><category>studies</category><category>study</category><category>teeth</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Recalled: 35,000 volatile Sony batteries in Dell / HP / Toshiba laptops]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/30/35-000-volatile-sony-batteries-in-dell-hp-toshiba-laptops-re/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/30/35-000-volatile-sony-batteries-in-dell-hp-toshiba-laptops-re/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/30/35-000-volatile-sony-batteries-in-dell-hp-toshiba-laptops-re/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/PC-Notebook-Computer-Batteries-Recalled/story.aspx?guid={306A1F8C-48BF-47FC-819B-DD82A99F101C}"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/10/10-20-08-eltb026k_big.jpg" /></a>Ruh roh. We're really, really hoping this isn't just the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/16/dell-recall-prompts-investigation-into-all-sony-laptop-batteries/">first</a> of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/06/hitachi-recalls-16-000-sony-laptop-batteries-too/">another</a> long <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/24/apple-to-recall-1-8-million-sony-made-batteries/">string</a> of laptop battery <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/23/sony-recalls-340-000-batteries-in-second-wave/">recalls</a>, but the US Consumer Product Safety Commission, in cooperation with a slew of other outfits, has just announced a voluntary recall of around 35,000 <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/28/sony-to-begin-global-battery-replacement-program/">Sony laptop batteries</a>. As you'd expect, the Li-ions in question "can overheat, posing a fire and burn hazard to consumers," and there have already been 19 reports of overheating including 17 reports of flames / fire and two reports of consumers getting mildly burnt. For the full list (and it's pretty long) of affected laptop models from HP / HP Compaq, Toshiba and Dell, be sure to give the read link some serious attention. Oh, and stop using that battery pronto if yours is one of the afflicted.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/peripherals/" rel="tag">Peripherals</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/30/35-000-volatile-sony-batteries-in-dell-hp-toshiba-laptops-re/">Recalled: 35,000 volatile Sony batteries in Dell / HP / Toshiba laptops</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/PC-Notebook-Computer-Batteries-Recalled/story.aspx?guid={306A1F8C-48BF-47FC-819B-DD82A99F101C}>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/30/35-000-volatile-sony-batteries-in-dell-hp-toshiba-laptops-re/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1358074/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/30/35-000-volatile-sony-batteries-in-dell-hp-toshiba-laptops-re/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>batteries</category><category>battery</category><category>breaking news</category><category>BreakingNews</category><category>danger</category><category>dangerous</category><category>dell</category><category>fire</category><category>hazard</category><category>HP</category><category>laptop battery</category><category>LaptopBattery</category><category>li-ion</category><category>overheat</category><category>overheating</category><category>recall</category><category>sony</category><category>Toshiba</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rage Wireless Guitars recalled, chemical burns deemed too emo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/23/rage-wireless-guitars-recalled-chemical-burns-deemed-too-emo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/23/rage-wireless-guitars-recalled-chemical-burns-deemed-too-emo/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/23/rage-wireless-guitars-recalled-chemical-burns-deemed-too-emo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml09/09019.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/10/10-22-08-rage_guitar.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Performance Designed Products' Rage Wireless Guitar isn't the most well known <em><a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/GuitarHero/">Guitar Hero</a></em> peripheral out there, but that's apt to change in a hurry after this. Said instrument has just been recalled after the company received a single report of a burn after the user self-pwnt him / herself by installing the AA batteries incorrectly. Apparently the circuit board within the axe is "defective" in such a way that it causes cells to leak if they are inserted in an incorrect manner, and thus, it poses a risk of chemical burn to the rocker handling it. Interestingly, consumers who own one are instructed to return the thing to the original place of purchase rather than PDP itself, so we'd recommend wrapping your arm in gauze and printing out the read link to help your case if you've trashed the receipt.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.slipperybrick.com/2008/10/rage-wireless-guitars-leak-acid-transforms-rock-into-acid-rock/">SlipperyBrick</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gaming/" rel="tag">Gaming</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/peripherals/" rel="tag">Peripherals</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/23/rage-wireless-guitars-recalled-chemical-burns-deemed-too-emo/">Rage Wireless Guitars recalled, chemical burns deemed too emo</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml09/09019.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/23/rage-wireless-guitars-recalled-chemical-burns-deemed-too-emo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1350432/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/23/rage-wireless-guitars-recalled-chemical-burns-deemed-too-emo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dangerous</category><category>fire</category><category>guitar hero</category><category>GuitarHero</category><category>hazard</category><category>Nintendo</category><category>Performance Designed Products</category><category>PerformanceDesignedProducts</category><category>rage</category><category>Rage Wireless Guitar</category><category>RageWirelessGuitar</category><category>recall</category><category>Wii</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nissan readies pilot for road-cam / slip-hazard alert services]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/nissan-readies-pilot-for-road-cam-slip-hazard-alert-services/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/nissan-readies-pilot-for-road-cam-slip-hazard-alert-services/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/nissan-readies-pilot-for-road-cam-slip-hazard-alert-services/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.webwire.com/ViewPressRel.asp?aId=77232"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/10/10-20-08-nissan-road-cam.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Way back in 2005, we got wind of a Bluetooth-based telematics systems for cars dubbed <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/13/nissan-launches-carwings-bluetooth-based-telematics-systems/">Carwings</a>. Now, Nissan is gearing up to launch two safety pilots which will rely on -- you guessed it -- Carwings HDD navigation <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/01/nissans-carwings-system-to-read-rss-feeds-aloud/">systems</a>. First up is the slip-hazard alert, which marries data from the ITS (Intelligent Transport System) and ABS (Anti-lock Braking System) in order to warn drivers of slippery road conditions. In addition to that, the recently concocted road-cam service can "enhance the effectiveness of the alert service by offering drivers a visual image" of surroundings. The company will make the slip-hazard alert and the new road-cam service available to all Carwings customers (in Japan) beginning next month, with the latter hitting first (in November) and the former second (in December). Oh, and did we mention the upgrades will be completely gratis? Because they will be.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://blog.wired.com/cars/2008/10/nissan-slip-ale.html">Wired</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/digitalcameras/" rel="tag">Digital Cameras</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/transportation/" rel="tag">Transportation</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/nissan-readies-pilot-for-road-cam-slip-hazard-alert-services/">Nissan readies pilot for road-cam / slip-hazard alert services</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 21 Oct 2008 02:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.webwire.com/ViewPressRel.asp?aId=77232>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/nissan-readies-pilot-for-road-cam-slip-hazard-alert-services/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1347886/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/nissan-readies-pilot-for-road-cam-slip-hazard-alert-services/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>abs</category><category>automaker</category><category>carwings</category><category>hazard</category><category>nissan</category><category>pilot</category><category>road cam</category><category>road-cam</category><category>RoadCam</category><category>safety</category><category>slip</category><category>test</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 02:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[MIT gurus dream up self-sustaining sensor network for preventing forest fires]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/26/mit-gurus-dream-up-self-sustaining-sensor-network-for-preventing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/26/mit-gurus-dream-up-self-sustaining-sensor-network-for-preventing/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/26/mit-gurus-dream-up-self-sustaining-sensor-network-for-preventing/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2008/trees-0923.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/09/9-26-08-trees-love-enlarged.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Thanks, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/MIT/">MIT</a>. Why don't you just make the rest of the world feel a little more useless. Every week or so, we're forced to stare at yet another <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/22/mits-emf-detector-bracelet-takes-all-the-fun-out-of-radiation-p/">amazing</a> invention <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/21/mit-developing-autonomous-wheelchair-that-listens-when-you-speak/">coming</a> from your <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/24/mit-working-up-microbatteries-to-power-implantable-medical-senso/">doors</a>; to be frank, it's just downright unfair. All childish angst aside, the latest idea to come from the institution is one that could certainly be put to good use: a self-sustaining sensor network that taps into trees for power in order to continuously monitor forests for threats of fire. Moreover, the concept could be applied in other scenarios as well -- to detect potential threats such as smuggled contraband along a nation's borders, perhaps. Testing of the wireless sensor network (developed by the appropriately named Voltree Power) is scheduled to begin next spring, and we're hearing that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/23/gps-equipped-turtle-runs-into-reefer-farm-gets-high-fives-from/">pot-sniffing turtles</a> may even be brought in to create a completely natural self-policing environment.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/09/25/fighting-forest-fires-tree-power/">Inhabitat</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gadgets/" rel="tag">Misc. Gadgets</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/26/mit-gurus-dream-up-self-sustaining-sensor-network-for-preventing/">MIT gurus dream up self-sustaining sensor network for preventing forest fires</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2008/trees-0923.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/26/mit-gurus-dream-up-self-sustaining-sensor-network-for-preventing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1325506/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/26/mit-gurus-dream-up-self-sustaining-sensor-network-for-preventing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>eco-friendly</category><category>environment</category><category>fire</category><category>forest fire</category><category>forest fires</category><category>ForestFire</category><category>ForestFires</category><category>green</category><category>hazard</category><category>mit</category><category>sensor</category><category>sensor network</category><category>SensorNetwork</category><category>sensors</category><category>tree</category><category>university</category><category>Voltree Power</category><category>VoltreePower</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Did you cheap out on a TV stand? It probably just got recalled.]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/did-you-cheap-out-on-a-tv-stand-it-probably-just-got-recalled/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/did-you-cheap-out-on-a-tv-stand-it-probably-just-got-recalled/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/did-you-cheap-out-on-a-tv-stand-it-probably-just-got-recalled/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml08/08408.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/09/9-24-08-tipping-stand.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Let's be honest -- after sinking a few large on a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/displays/">new HDTV</a>, a few hundies on some <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/16/furutech-unveils-1-800-powerflux-power-cable-yes-seriously/">overpriced cables</a> and even more on <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/20/gifting-someone-with-an-hdtv-dont-forget-the-hd-service/">HD programming</a>, you weren't about to cough up another month's paycheck for a decent TV stand. For the 48,600 customers out there who purchased one of four different King Pao Enterprise TV Stands (likely sold and distributed by Studio RTA), you now have a product known for tipping over and ruining lives. The E Series, Fierro, Madison DLP and Madison 3000 -- all of which were sold at Best Buy and other big box retailers from May 2004 to August 2008 -- have been deemed unstable and unfit for use in your living room, and it's suggested that you <em>cautiously</em> remove your set and wait for a "repair kit" before it does the removing for you. Godspeed.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/" rel="tag">Misc</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/other-hardware/" rel="tag">Other hardware</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/others/" rel="tag">Others</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/did-you-cheap-out-on-a-tv-stand-it-probably-just-got-recalled/">Did you cheap out on a TV stand? It probably just got recalled.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml08/08408.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/did-you-cheap-out-on-a-tv-stand-it-probably-just-got-recalled/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1323542/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/did-you-cheap-out-on-a-tv-stand-it-probably-just-got-recalled/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>best buy</category><category>BestBuy</category><category>china</category><category>chinese</category><category>danger</category><category>furniture</category><category>hazard</category><category>hd</category><category>King Pao Enterprise</category><category>KingPaoEnterprise</category><category>other hardware</category><category>otherhardware</category><category>others</category><category>recall</category><category>safety</category><category>Studio RTA</category><category>StudioRta</category><category>TV Stand</category><category>TV Stands</category><category>TvStand</category><category>TvStands</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Did you cheap out on a TV stand? It probably just got recalled.]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/did-you-cheap-out-on-a-tv-stand-it-probably-just-got-recalled/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/did-you-cheap-out-on-a-tv-stand-it-probably-just-got-recalled/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/did-you-cheap-out-on-a-tv-stand-it-probably-just-got-recalled/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml08/08408.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/09/9-24-08-tipping-stand.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Let's be honest -- after sinking a few large on a <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/category/displays/">new HDTV</a>, a few hundies on some <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/09/16/furutech-unveils-1-800-powerflux-power-cable-yes-seriously/">overpriced cables</a> and even more on <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/12/20/gifting-someone-with-an-hdtv-dont-forget-the-hd-service/">HD programming</a>, you weren't about to cough up another month's paycheck for a decent TV stand. For the 48,600 customers out there who purchased one of four different King Pao Enterprise TV Stands (likely sold and distributed by Studio RTA), you now have a product known for tipping over and ruining lives. The E Series, Fierro, Madison DLP and Madison 3000 -- all of which were sold at Best Buy and other big box retailers from May 2004 to August 2008 -- have been deemed unstable and unfit for use in your living room, and it's suggested that you <em>cautiously</em> remove your set and wait for a "repair kit" before it does the removing for you. Godspeed.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/hdtv/" rel="tag">HDTV</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/homeentertainment/" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/household/" rel="tag">Household</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/did-you-cheap-out-on-a-tv-stand-it-probably-just-got-recalled/">Did you cheap out on a TV stand? It probably just got recalled.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml08/08408.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/did-you-cheap-out-on-a-tv-stand-it-probably-just-got-recalled/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1323527/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/did-you-cheap-out-on-a-tv-stand-it-probably-just-got-recalled/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>best buy</category><category>BestBuy</category><category>china</category><category>chinese</category><category>danger</category><category>furniture</category><category>hazard</category><category>hdtv</category><category>King Pao Enterprise</category><category>KingPaoEnterprise</category><category>recall</category><category>safety</category><category>Studio RTA</category><category>StudioRta</category><category>TV Stand</category><category>TV Stands</category><category>TvStand</category><category>TvStands</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cellphone charger blamed for blaze in Delaware]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/02/cellphone-charger-blamed-for-blaze-in-delaware/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/02/cellphone-charger-blamed-for-blaze-in-delaware/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/02/cellphone-charger-blamed-for-blaze-in-delaware/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://delawareonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080828/NEWS/80828052"><img hspace="4" border="0" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/media/2008/09/9-2-08-fire_charger.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Details on this one are remarkably skimpy, but here are the facts as we know them. A <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/tag/fire/">fire</a> caused around $30,000 worth of damage to a mobile home in Delaware this past week, but thankfully, the Millsboro and Indian River firefighters found no one home at the time of the incident. The culprit? A "malfunctioning cellphone charger that ignited the wall covering in a bedroom." That's it, folks -- no manufacturer, no brand name, nothing. In other words, unplug your chargers when you leave the house... or store your home in a fireproof safe, either one.<br /><br />[Thanks, Carl]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/02/cellphone-charger-blamed-for-blaze-in-delaware/">Cellphone charger blamed for blaze in Delaware</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 02 Sep 2008 22:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://delawareonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080828/NEWS/80828052>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/02/cellphone-charger-blamed-for-blaze-in-delaware/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1302663/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/02/cellphone-charger-blamed-for-blaze-in-delaware/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>charger</category><category>dangerous</category><category>delaware</category><category>fire</category><category>hazard</category><category>phone charger</category><category>PhoneCharger</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 22:36:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cellphone charger blamed for blaze in Delaware]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/02/cellphone-charger-blamed-for-blaze-in-delaware/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/02/cellphone-charger-blamed-for-blaze-in-delaware/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/02/cellphone-charger-blamed-for-blaze-in-delaware/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://delawareonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080828/NEWS/80828052"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/09/9-2-08-fire_charger.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Details on this one are remarkably skimpy, but here are the facts as we know them. A <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/fire/">fire</a> caused around $30,000 worth of damage to a mobile home in Delaware this past week, but thankfully, the Millsboro and Indian River firefighters found no one home at the time of the incident. The culprit? A "malfunctioning cellphone charger that ignited the wall covering in a bedroom." That's it, folks -- no manufacturer, no brand name, nothing. In other words, unplug your chargers when you leave the house... or store your home in a fireproof safe, either one.<br /><br />[Thanks, Carl]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/peripherals/" rel="tag">Peripherals</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/" rel="tag">Misc</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/02/cellphone-charger-blamed-for-blaze-in-delaware/">Cellphone charger blamed for blaze in Delaware</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 02 Sep 2008 22:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://delawareonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080828/NEWS/80828052>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/02/cellphone-charger-blamed-for-blaze-in-delaware/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1301624/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/02/cellphone-charger-blamed-for-blaze-in-delaware/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>charger</category><category>dangerous</category><category>delaware</category><category>fire</category><category>hazard</category><category>mobile</category><category>peripherals</category><category>phone charger</category><category>PhoneCharger</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 22:36:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[HP fax machines recalled, could turn resume into flames]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/27/hp-fax-machines-recalled-could-turn-resume-into-flames/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/27/hp-fax-machines-recalled-could-turn-resume-into-flames/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/27/hp-fax-machines-recalled-could-turn-resume-into-flames/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml08/08313.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/06/6-27-08-hp-fax-1010.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Hey you. Yeah, you. You're about to beam that resume <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/fax+machine/">facsimile-style</a> to a prospective employer, aren't you? If said machine is a Hewlett-Packard Fax 1010 or 1010xi, we're recommend firing (ahem) it over through email instead. The US Consumer Product Safety Commission, in cooperation with HP, has issued a voluntary <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/recall/">recall</a> for the aforementioned fax machines after receiving three reports of "overheating," two of which resulted in "minor property damage." If you just so happen to own one of these machines, and you'd prefer your abode not be burned to the ground anytime soon, we'd suggest following the read link and applying for your rebate. After you unplug the machine and shove it in the freeze, of course.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gadgets/" rel="tag">Misc. Gadgets</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/27/hp-fax-machines-recalled-could-turn-resume-into-flames/">HP fax machines recalled, could turn resume into flames</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml08/08313.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/27/hp-fax-machines-recalled-could-turn-resume-into-flames/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1238997/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/27/hp-fax-machines-recalled-could-turn-resume-into-flames/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1010xi</category><category>fax</category><category>Fax 1010</category><category>fax machine</category><category>Fax1010</category><category>FaxMachine</category><category>fire</category><category>fire hazard</category><category>FireHazard</category><category>hazard</category><category>Hewlett-Packard</category><category>hp</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[iPod nano sparks bedroom fire, no humans harmed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/08/ipod-nano-sparks-bedroom-fire-no-humans-harmed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/08/ipod-nano-sparks-bedroom-fire-no-humans-harmed/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/08/ipod-nano-sparks-bedroom-fire-no-humans-harmed/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://niketalk.yuku.com/topic/52962"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/03/3-8-08-burnt-nano.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Oddly enough, this isn't the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/12/macbook-catches-fire-down-under/">first time</a> we've <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2004/10/07/iburnt-ipod-still-runs/">seen</a> a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/06/another-powerbook-violently-explodes/">product</a> proudly designed in Cupertino <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/05/ipod-nana-spews-chest-high-flames-from-trousers-lawsuit-at/">erupt</a>, but it's pretty safe to say this story could have had a much more tragic ending. Reportedly, an iPod nano owner recently awoke to a blaring fire alarm around 2:00AM, only to find his beloved PMP wrapped in flames on the bedroom floor. Thankfully, the fire was tiny enough to be extinguished without any major trouble, and no substantial damage of property or human flesh was tallied. As of now, we've no idea if the unit simply exploded or if surrounding circumstances are at least partly to blame, but you can bet your bottom dollar that be sleeping with one eye open (and on our media players) tonight.<br /><br />[Thanks, Sandy]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/portableaudio/" rel="tag">Portable Audio</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/portablevideo/" rel="tag">Portable Video</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/08/ipod-nano-sparks-bedroom-fire-no-humans-harmed/">iPod nano sparks bedroom fire, no humans harmed</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 08 Mar 2008 11:26:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://niketalk.yuku.com/topic/52962>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/08/ipod-nano-sparks-bedroom-fire-no-humans-harmed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1134873/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/08/ipod-nano-sparks-bedroom-fire-no-humans-harmed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>explosion</category><category>fire</category><category>hazard</category><category>ipod</category><category>ipod nano</category><category>IpodNano</category><category>mishap</category><category>nano</category><category>portable audio</category><category>portable video</category><category>portableaudio</category><category>portablevideo</category><category>problem</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 11:26:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Samsung P10 laptop battery "melts" in South Korea]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/24/samsung-p10-laptop-battery-melts-in-south-korea/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/24/samsung-p10-laptop-battery-melts-in-south-korea/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/24/samsung-p10-laptop-battery-melts-in-south-korea/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080224/tc_nm/samsung_battery_dc"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/02/2-24-08-p10.jpg"  alt="" /></a>Merely days after LG put the brakes on sales of its Z1-AE007 laptop due to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/22/lg-halts-sale-of-z1-ae007-laptop-suspects-defective-battery/">suspicions</a> of a faulty battery within, yet another lappie in South Korea is making headlines for its overheating, er, abilities. Reportedly, the battery in a P10 computer, produced in 2002, "melted" after inexplicably emitting smoke during use. The device managed to burn a bed and a certain part of the floor, but thankfully, no "big fire" was started. According to company spokesman James Chung, Samsung is now "checking details of the incident," but the actual manufacturer of said battery has yet to be revealed.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/24/samsung-p10-laptop-battery-melts-in-south-korea/">Samsung P10 laptop battery "melts" in South Korea</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:23:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080224/tc_nm/samsung_battery_dc>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/24/samsung-p10-laptop-battery-melts-in-south-korea/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1123284/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/24/samsung-p10-laptop-battery-melts-in-south-korea/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>battery</category><category>dangerous</category><category>explosion</category><category>fire</category><category>hazard</category><category>korea</category><category>laptop battery</category><category>LaptopBattery</category><category>melt</category><category>melted</category><category>mishap</category><category>P10</category><category>problem</category><category>samsung</category><category>smoke</category><category>south korea</category><category>SouthKorea</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:23:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Tektronix oscilloscopes could catch fire due to volatile Li-ion]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/16/tektronix-oscilloscopes-could-catch-fire-due-to-volatile-li-ion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/16/tektronix-oscilloscopes-could-catch-fire-due-to-volatile-li-ion/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/16/tektronix-oscilloscopes-could-catch-fire-due-to-volatile-li-ion/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.tek.com/service/safety/tds3000b/index.html"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/10/10-15-07-tds3000.jpg" /></a>We've seen some <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/16/totos-z-series-toilets-recalled-due-to-fire-hazard/">strange</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/counterfeit-flashlight-batteries-recalled-due-to-fire-hazard/">devices</a> catch fire due to faulty batteries, but this one just may take top honors. Apparently, a pair of Tektronix <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/11/diy-project-turns-an-oscilloscope-into-a-clock/">oscilloscopes</a> (model numbers TDS3000 and TDS3000B) have the potential of catching fire; according to the company, it has received two reports of the units "burning at customer sites." Upon closer inspection, it was noticed that the machines both relied on a TDS3BATB Li-ion battery, which is now carrying the blame for the unexpected blazes. If you or a loved one just so happen to own or use one of these rigs in your everyday life, Tektronix is suggesting that you power it down and stop using the battery until further notice.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2007/10/15/exploding-battery-problem-sets">TheInquirer</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gadgets/" rel="tag">Misc. Gadgets</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/16/tektronix-oscilloscopes-could-catch-fire-due-to-volatile-li-ion/">Tektronix oscilloscopes could catch fire due to volatile Li-ion</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 16 Oct 2007 03:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.tek.com/service/safety/tds3000b/index.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/16/tektronix-oscilloscopes-could-catch-fire-due-to-volatile-li-ion/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1013943/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/16/tektronix-oscilloscopes-could-catch-fire-due-to-volatile-li-ion/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>battery</category><category>explode</category><category>exploding battery</category><category>ExplodingBattery</category><category>explosion</category><category>expoloding</category><category>fire</category><category>hazard</category><category>li-ion</category><category>oscilloscope</category><category>oscilloscopes</category><category>TDS 3000B</category><category>Tds3000b</category><category>TDS3BATB</category><category>Tektronix</category><category>TEXTRONIX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 03:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[MummyWrap fends off radiation from fetuses]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/02/mummywrap-fends-off-radiation-from-fetuses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/02/mummywrap-fends-off-radiation-from-fetuses/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/02/mummywrap-fends-off-radiation-from-fetuses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.mummywraps.com/"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/10/10-1-07-mummywrap.jpg" alt="" /></a>As the ongoing <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/09/07/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-hospital-edition-redux/">battle</a> between the naysayers and the paranoid continues, Neil Bullock is making sure that those situated squarely in the latter camp have a way to "protect" their <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/09/02/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-cell-division-edition/">unborn child(ren)</a>. MummyWrap is a "sleeveless, loose-fitting garment for pregnant women made from a light-weight copper-based cotton fabric known as Swiss Shield," and according to its creator, it can "minimize the risk of electro-magnetic radiation (EMR)" warping your kid's brain before he or she ever sees the world. 'Course, we're not going to step in and suggest that you do / don't need this, but for those who'd rather be safe than sorry, you can order one now for $69.95. As an added bonus, it should go great with your <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/20/isabodywear-underwear-fends-off-cellphone-radiation/">Isabodywear underwear</a>.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.textually.org/textually/archives/2007/09/017476.htm">Textually</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/02/mummywrap-fends-off-radiation-from-fetuses/">MummyWrap fends off radiation from fetuses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 02 Oct 2007 00:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.mummywraps.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/02/mummywrap-fends-off-radiation-from-fetuses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1002569/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/02/mummywrap-fends-off-radiation-from-fetuses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>baby</category><category>child</category><category>dangerour</category><category>electro-smog</category><category>emr</category><category>harmful</category><category>hazard</category><category>medical</category><category>mummywraps</category><category>radiation</category><category>rays</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 00:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[MummyWrap fends off radiation from fetuses]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/02/mummywrap-fends-off-radiation-from-fetuses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/02/mummywrap-fends-off-radiation-from-fetuses/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/02/mummywrap-fends-off-radiation-from-fetuses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.mummywraps.com/"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.engadget.com/media/2007/10/10-1-07-mummywrap.jpg" alt="" /></a>As the ongoing <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/07/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-hospital-edition-redux/">battle</a> between the naysayers and the paranoid continues, Neil Bullock is making sure that those situated squarely in the latter camp have a way to "protect" their <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/02/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-cell-division-edition/">unborn child(ren)</a>. MummyWrap is a "sleeveless, loose-fitting garment for pregnant women made from a light-weight copper-based cotton fabric known as Swiss Shield," and according to its creator, it can "minimize the risk of electro-magnetic radiation (EMR)" warping your kid's brain before he or she ever sees the world. 'Course, we're not going to step in and suggest that you do / don't need this, but for those who'd rather be safe than sorry, you can order one now for $69.95. As an added bonus, it should go great with your <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/20/isabodywear-underwear-fends-off-cellphone-radiation/">Isabodywear underwear</a>.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.textually.org/textually/archives/2007/09/017476.htm">Textually</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/" rel="tag">Misc</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/02/mummywrap-fends-off-radiation-from-fetuses/">MummyWrap fends off radiation from fetuses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 02 Oct 2007 00:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.mummywraps.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/02/mummywrap-fends-off-radiation-from-fetuses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1002568/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/02/mummywrap-fends-off-radiation-from-fetuses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>baby</category><category>child</category><category>Culture</category><category>dangerour</category><category>electro-smog</category><category>emr</category><category>harmful</category><category>hazard</category><category>medical</category><category>mobile</category><category>mummywraps</category><category>radiation</category><category>rays</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 00:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Toshiba to replace recalled AC adapters on portable DVD players]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/20/toshiba-to-replace-recalled-ac-adapters-on-portable-dvd-players/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/20/toshiba-to-replace-recalled-ac-adapters-on-portable-dvd-players/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/20/toshiba-to-replace-recalled-ac-adapters-on-portable-dvd-players/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070919/tc_afp/japanelectronicsrecall"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/09/9-19-07-sd-p1610.jpg"  alt="" /></a>If you're the proud owner of an SD-P1600 or SD-P1610 portable DVD player, and you've yet to experience any sort of unusual issues, listen up. According to Toshiba, four cases of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/overheating/">overheating</a> have been recorded in Japan, and although no injuries have occurred, the firm is suggesting that you yank the AC adapter and swap it for a new one. Reportedly, the outfit sold around 328,000 of the units during its manufacturing run from February 2005 to January 2006, so if you've got one of 'em (and still use it), be sure and take advantage of the free replacement.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/homeentertainment/" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/20/toshiba-to-replace-recalled-ac-adapters-on-portable-dvd-players/">Toshiba to replace recalled AC adapters on portable DVD players</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070919/tc_afp/japanelectronicsrecall>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/20/toshiba-to-replace-recalled-ac-adapters-on-portable-dvd-players/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/993641/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/20/toshiba-to-replace-recalled-ac-adapters-on-portable-dvd-players/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dvd</category><category>dvd player</category><category>DvdPlayer</category><category>fire</category><category>hazard</category><category>japan</category><category>overheating</category><category>portable dvd player</category><category>PortableDvdPlayer</category><category>recall</category><category>SD-P1600</category><category>SD-P1610</category><category>toshiba</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Non-recalled Nokia phone battery explodes, injures woman]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/03/non-recalled-nokia-phone-battery-explodes-injures-woman/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/03/non-recalled-nokia-phone-battery-explodes-injures-woman/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/03/non-recalled-nokia-phone-battery-explodes-injures-woman/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070901/bs_afp/indiafinlandjapan"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/09/9-3-07-bl-d3.jpg" /></a>While Nokia and Matsushita were busying <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/08/24/nokia-and-matsushita-agree-on-defective-battery-costs/">settling</a> the <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/08/17/japanese-government-orders-nokia-to-report-on-overheating-batter/">disputes</a> that arose when the phone maker had to recall some <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/08/14/nokia-branded-batteries-at-risk-of-exploding-46-million-devic/">46 million</a> handset batteries, a lady in India has been injured by a Nokia-branded cell that's <em>not</em> on that list. Located in eastern India, the woman noted that the BL-D3 series battery "blew up about 10 minutes after it was put on charge," resulting in a "ball of fire" that led to minor burn injuries to the user. According to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Nokia/">Nokia</a>, the incident was "isolated," and if it finds that the handset, battery, and charger are original, the 30-year old victim will supposedly be compensated.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/03/non-recalled-nokia-phone-battery-explodes-injures-woman/">Non-recalled Nokia phone battery explodes, injures woman</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 03 Sep 2007 18:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070901/bs_afp/indiafinlandjapan>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/03/non-recalled-nokia-phone-battery-explodes-injures-woman/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/980074/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/03/non-recalled-nokia-phone-battery-explodes-injures-woman/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>accident</category><category>batteries</category><category>battery</category><category>BL-D3</category><category>explode</category><category>exploded</category><category>explosion</category><category>fire</category><category>hazard</category><category>Matsushita</category><category>mishap</category><category>nokia</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 18:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Non-recalled Nokia phone battery explodes, injures woman]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/03/non-recalled-nokia-phone-battery-explodes-injures-woman/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/03/non-recalled-nokia-phone-battery-explodes-injures-woman/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/03/non-recalled-nokia-phone-battery-explodes-injures-woman/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070901/bs_afp/indiafinlandjapan"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.engadget.com/media/2007/09/9-3-07-bl-d3.jpg" /></a>While Nokia and Matsushita were busying <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/24/nokia-and-matsushita-agree-on-defective-battery-costs/">settling</a> the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/17/japanese-government-orders-nokia-to-report-on-overheating-batter/">disputes</a> that arose when the phone maker had to recall some <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/14/nokia-branded-batteries-at-risk-of-exploding-46-million-devic/">46 million</a> handset batteries, a lady in India has been injured by a Nokia-branded cell that's <em>not</em> on that list. Located in eastern India, the woman noted that the BL-D3 series battery "blew up about 10 minutes after it was put on charge," resulting in a "ball of fire" that led to minor burn injuries to the user. According to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Nokia/">Nokia</a>, the incident was "isolated," and if it finds that the handset, battery, and charger are original, the 30-year old victim will supposedly be compensated.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/peripherals/" rel="tag">Peripherals</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/nokia/" rel="tag">Nokia</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/03/non-recalled-nokia-phone-battery-explodes-injures-woman/">Non-recalled Nokia phone battery explodes, injures woman</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 03 Sep 2007 18:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070901/bs_afp/indiafinlandjapan>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/03/non-recalled-nokia-phone-battery-explodes-injures-woman/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/980073/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/03/non-recalled-nokia-phone-battery-explodes-injures-woman/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>accident</category><category>batteries</category><category>battery</category><category>explode</category><category>exploded</category><category>exploding</category><category>explosion</category><category>fire</category><category>hazard</category><category>Matsushita</category><category>mishap</category><category>mobile</category><category>nokia</category><category>peripherals</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 18:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Shindaiwa backpack blowers recalled due to fire hazard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/24/shindaiwa-backpack-blowers-recalled-due-to-fire-hazard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/24/shindaiwa-backpack-blowers-recalled-due-to-fire-hazard/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/24/shindaiwa-backpack-blowers-recalled-due-to-fire-hazard/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml07/07289.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/08/8-24-07-eb630.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
As the wave of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/recall/">recalls</a> continue to flow in, a pair of backpack blowers from Shindaiwa look to be claiming next. Reportedly, the "muffler's outer shell can melt, allowing exhaust gas to exit from the bottom or back side of the muffler." Consequently, the "exhaust gas may cause damage to the fuel tank creating a possible <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/fire/">fire</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/hazard/">hazard</a> for the user." To date, the outfit is only aware of a single incident where "a small muffler fire was involved," but no humans were maimed and no property was marred. Still, if you're the owner of an EB630 or EB630RT, we'd recommend getting set up with a free muffler replacement before firing that bad boy back up again.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gadgets/" rel="tag">Misc. Gadgets</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/24/shindaiwa-backpack-blowers-recalled-due-to-fire-hazard/">Shindaiwa backpack blowers recalled due to fire hazard</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml07/07289.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/24/shindaiwa-backpack-blowers-recalled-due-to-fire-hazard/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/973154/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/24/shindaiwa-backpack-blowers-recalled-due-to-fire-hazard/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>backpack</category><category>backpack blowers</category><category>BackpackBlowers</category><category>EB630</category><category>EB630RT</category><category>fire</category><category>fire hazard</category><category>FireHazard</category><category>hazard</category><category>japan</category><category>muffler</category><category>recall</category><category>Safety</category><category>Shindaiwa</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[HP ridicules Queensland study linking laser printer particles to potential health issues]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/03/hp-ridicules-queensland-study-linking-laser-printer-particles-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/03/hp-ridicules-queensland-study-linking-laser-printer-particles-to/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/03/hp-ridicules-queensland-study-linking-laser-printer-particles-to/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/07/7-31-07-coughing.jpg" alt="" />Oh noes, that study claiming that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/31/laser-printer-particles-as-dangerous-as-cigarette-smoke/">laser printer particles are dangerous</a> is shaping up to be just as contentious as those studies <em>proving</em> that <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/search/?q=dangerous">cellphones are/aren't dangerous</a>. As you'll recall, the Queensland University study tested 62 "relatively new" laser printers from Canon, HP, and Toshiba and found 17 to be "high emitters" of potentially dangerous, ultra-fine toner particles. Of these, all but one (a Toshiba model) were manufactured by HP. As you'd expect, HP has issued a formal response courtesy of Tuan Tran, HP's vice president of marketing for supplies. Perhaps predictably after such a damning report, HP's response can be summarized as an attempt to both discredit and mock the research while standing behind the safety of their products. Tuan first ridicules the study by stating "the nature and chemical composition of such particles - whether from a laser printer or from a toaster - cannot be accurately characterized by analytical technology." He goes on to say that, "Testing of ultrafine particles is a very new scientific discipline. There are no indications that ultrafine particle (UFP) emissions from laser printing systems are associated with special health risks." HP does agree with the study's assessment that "more testing in this area is needed" and claims to be actively engaged in the process. Since HP's statement came our way via a PR agency and not HP's official news site, we offer you their complete response after the break. While it's tempting to label HP the <em>Big Tobacco</em> of the printer business, don't; it's far too early to jump to such conclusions. Still, with a press release like this, they're not making it easy on anyone.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/03/hp-ridicules-queensland-study-linking-laser-printer-particles-to/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>HP ridicules Queensland study linking laser printer particles to potential health issues</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gadgets/" rel="tag">Misc. Gadgets</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/03/hp-ridicules-queensland-study-linking-laser-printer-particles-to/">HP ridicules Queensland study linking laser printer particles to potential health issues</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 03 Aug 2007 08:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/03/hp-ridicules-queensland-study-linking-laser-printer-particles-to/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/957045/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/03/hp-ridicules-queensland-study-linking-laser-printer-particles-to/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dangerous</category><category>hazard</category><category>health</category><category>hp</category><category>laser printer</category><category>LaserPrinter</category><category>printer</category><category>printer particles</category><category>PrinterParticles</category><category>queensland university</category><category>Queensland University of Technology</category><category>QueenslandUniversity</category><category>QueenslandUniversityOfTechnology</category><category>study</category><category>tuan tran</category><category>TuanTran</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 08:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Laser printer particles as dangerous as cigarette smoke?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/31/laser-printer-particles-as-dangerous-as-cigarette-smoke/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/31/laser-printer-particles-as-dangerous-as-cigarette-smoke/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/31/laser-printer-particles-as-dangerous-as-cigarette-smoke/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/technology/printer-particles-as-bad-as-cigarettes/2007/07/31/1185647903291.html"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/07/7-31-07-coughing.jpg" /></a>In today's edition of How Your Office is Slowly Killing You, a study emerging from <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=Queensland">Queensland</a> University of Technology suggests that laser <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/printers/">printers</a> can emit clouds of ultra-fine particles that compare to "cigarette smoke and motor vehicle emissions." Reportedly, 13 out of 40 models tested were deemed "high emitters" of particles from the toner, and while office photocopiers failed to produce similar results, concentrations of microscopic particles near laser printers were found to be "five times higher than outdoor levels often produced by traffic" in a given investigation. Currently, no efforts have been made to actually study the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=chemistry">chemistry</a> of the emissions, but considering that such fine objects could easily sink "to the very lowest reaches of the lungs," we'd say that's reason enough to request an airtight office a few floors underground.<br /><br />[Image courtesy of <a href="http://www.gripguard.net/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/coughing.jpg">Gripguard</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gadgets/" rel="tag">Misc. Gadgets</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/31/laser-printer-particles-as-dangerous-as-cigarette-smoke/">Laser printer particles as dangerous as cigarette smoke?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:49:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.smh.com.au/news/technology/printer-particles-as-bad-as-cigarettes/2007/07/31/1185647903291.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/31/laser-printer-particles-as-dangerous-as-cigarette-smoke/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/954451/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/31/laser-printer-particles-as-dangerous-as-cigarette-smoke/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>australia</category><category>cigarette</category><category>dangerous</category><category>hazard</category><category>health</category><category>printer</category><category>queensland</category><category>Queensland University of Technology</category><category>QueenslandUniversityOfTechnology</category><category>study</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:49:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Toshiba waves the recall flag again on Sony laptop batteries]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/19/toshiba-waves-the-recall-flag-again-on-sony-laptop-batteries/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/19/toshiba-waves-the-recall-flag-again-on-sony-laptop-batteries/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/19/toshiba-waves-the-recall-flag-again-on-sony-laptop-batteries/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=technologyNews&amp;storyid=2007-07-19T105742Z_01_TKU002815_RTRUKOC_0_US-TOSHIBA-SONY-BATTERIES.xml"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/07/7-19-07-exploding_battery.jpg" /></a>Groundhog's Day ain't got nothing on this. Yet again, we're faced with <em>another</em> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/recall/">recall</a> on potentially defective laptop <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=batteries">batteries</a>, and yet again, these cells in question could catch <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/fire/">fire</a> when you least expect it. The latest <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/19/toshiba-recalls-340-000-satellite-dynabook-batteries/">round</a> of recalls by Toshiba allows for some 10,000 Sony-made batteries to be replaced after a trio of fire incidents over the past ten months got its attention. Of course, Sony noted that the financial impact of this wave should be minor, particularly compared to the recall-related costs it's already <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/19/sony-battery-recall-approaches-10-million-costs-mounting/">trying to swallow</a>.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/19/toshiba-waves-the-recall-flag-again-on-sony-laptop-batteries/">Toshiba waves the recall flag again on Sony laptop batteries</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=technologyNews&amp;storyid=2007-07-19T105742Z_01_TKU002815_RTRUKOC_0_US-TOSHIBA-SONY-BATTERIES.xml>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/19/toshiba-waves-the-recall-flag-again-on-sony-laptop-batteries/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/944468/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/19/toshiba-waves-the-recall-flag-again-on-sony-laptop-batteries/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>batteries</category><category>battery</category><category>defective</category><category>exploding batteries</category><category>ExplodingBatteries</category><category>explosive</category><category>explosive batteries</category><category>ExplosiveBatteries</category><category>fire</category><category>fire hazard</category><category>FireHazard</category><category>hazard</category><category>overheat</category><category>overheating</category><category>recall</category><category>sony</category><category>toshiba</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:19:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
