<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[In-Stat sees Blu-ray players closing in on DVD sales in 2013]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/25/in-stat-sees-blu-ray-players-closing-in-on-dvd-sales-in-2013/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/25/in-stat-sees-blu-ray-players-closing-in-on-dvd-sales-in-2013/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/25/in-stat-sees-blu-ray-players-closing-in-on-dvd-sales-in-2013/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.virtualpressoffice.com/publicsiteContentFileAccess?fileContentId=237151&amp;fromOtherPageToDisableHistory=Y&amp;menuName=MyNews&amp;mId=&amp;pId=237176&amp;sId=&amp;sInfo="><img vspace="4" hspace="16" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.hdbeat.com/media/2006/06/blu-ray119.jpg"  alt="" /></a>While Futuresource may still be sticking to its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/26/futuresource-still-predicting-big-things-for-blu-ray/">2012  predictions of Blu-ray software dominance</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/in-stat">In-Stat</a> has taken a break  from the tea leaves to mention it expects Blu-ray player sales to near  80 million by 2013. In its vision of the near-future that's not enough  to overtake DVD player sales of 90 million, but with a higher average  selling price Blu-ray players will own most of the dollars being spent.  Naturally, Blu-ray recorders (and, we'd expect Blu-ray/VHS combos) are  most popular in Japan, while Europe produces the most revenue for  players. We're not ready to lay down $3,495 to find out more detailed  forecasts, but we'll put a pin in the calendar and ask Jeremy Toeman to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/19/engadget-hd-podcast-174-01-19-2009/">save  the date for our 2013 podcas</a>t about whether or not Blu-ray <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/18/blu-ray-sales-were-up-67-percent-in-2009/">sales</a>  have lived up to expectations.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/25/in-stat-sees-blu-ray-players-closing-in-on-dvd-sales-in-2013/">In-Stat sees Blu-ray players closing in on DVD sales in 2013</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/25/in-stat-sees-blu-ray-players-closing-in-on-dvd-sales-in-2013/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19330566/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/25/in-stat-sees-blu-ray-players-closing-in-on-dvd-sales-in-2013/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2013</category><category>analyst</category><category>blu-ray</category><category>forecast</category><category>hd</category><category>in-stat</category><category>projections</category><category>sales</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Forget HDTV and 3D, when is Ultra HDTV / Super Hi-vision coming home?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/forget-hdtv-and-3d-when-is-ultra-hdtv-super-hi-vision-coming/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/forget-hdtv-and-3d-when-is-ultra-hdtv-super-hi-vision-coming/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/forget-hdtv-and-3d-when-is-ultra-hdtv-super-hi-vision-coming/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.instat.com/press.asp?Sku=IN0904468MBS&amp;ID=2656"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/11/uhdvcomparison060107.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Not willing to make predictions about the future of HDTV with all the other analysts, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/in-stat">In-Stat</a> has jumped ahead with its latest report, a peek at the future of Ultra High Definition (though the kids are calling it <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/shv">Super Hi-Vision</a> these days.) We'd heard the 8K / 4K broadcasts could flip on as early as <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/33-megapixel-super-hi-vision-ultra-hdtv-could-be-on-the-air-in/">2015</a>, but this report pegs 2017 - 2022 as a more likely time period, with the expectation that 28.2% of European households will be sporting the 22.2-channel audio spec by 2025. Of course, if you must be first on the block with it, there's always <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/10/jvc-puts-4k-dla-rs4000-projector-in-your-home-for-just-175-000/">JVC's $175k DLA-RS4000</a> available right now.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/" rel="tag">Misc</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/forget-hdtv-and-3d-when-is-ultra-hdtv-super-hi-vision-coming/">Forget HDTV and 3D, when is Ultra HDTV / Super Hi-vision coming home?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.instat.com/press.asp?Sku=IN0904468MBS&amp;ID=2656>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/forget-hdtv-and-3d-when-is-ultra-hdtv-super-hi-vision-coming/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19223497/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/forget-hdtv-and-3d-when-is-ultra-hdtv-super-hi-vision-coming/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analyst</category><category>hd</category><category>in-stat</category><category>prediction</category><category>shv</category><category>super hi-vision</category><category>SuperHi-vision</category><category>uhdtv</category><category>ultra hdtv</category><category>UltraHdtv</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Survey says consumer won't pay that much extra for 3D]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/survey-says-consumer-wont-pay-that-much-extra-for-3d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/survey-says-consumer-wont-pay-that-much-extra-for-3d/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/survey-says-consumer-wont-pay-that-much-extra-for-3d/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.homemediamagazine.com/3-d/report-consumers-dont-want-pay-more-3d-home-17212"><img hspace="4" border="0" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/09/panasonic-3dcam-md.jpg" alt="3D camera" /></a><br /></div>
You know what the least accurate type of survey is? One where you ask someone what they'd pay for something, because we don't know about anyone else, but the answer is almost always, "as little as possible." So it isn't much of a shocker that when asked, only 43 percent of those interested in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/3D/">3D</a> at home, said they're willing to spend an extra $200 for a 3D capable HDTV. Of that same group who actually wants 3D, only 33 percent would be willing to spend an extra $50 on a 3D capable Blu-ray player -- no clue why these two numbers aren't the same, guess the respondents didn't think about where the 3D content would come from. Although these numbers aren't encouraging, we wonder if a similar survey was ever conducted for 1080p HDTVs. We say that because at this point most consumers wouldn't think about buying a 720p HDTV and 3D is a much bigger upgrade.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/blu-ray/" rel="tag">Blu-ray</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/displays/" rel="tag">Displays</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/survey-says-consumer-wont-pay-that-much-extra-for-3d/">Survey says consumer won't pay that much extra for 3D</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:07:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.homemediamagazine.com/3-d/report-consumers-dont-want-pay-more-3d-home-17212>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/survey-says-consumer-wont-pay-that-much-extra-for-3d/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19182100/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/survey-says-consumer-wont-pay-that-much-extra-for-3d/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3D</category><category>blu ray</category><category>blu-ray</category><category>bluray</category><category>hd</category><category>In-stat</category><category>Survey</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Drawbaugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:07:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[85 percent of the 14 billion videos downloaded last year were illegal]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/07/85-percent-of-the-14-billion-videos-downloaded-last-year-were-il/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/07/85-percent-of-the-14-billion-videos-downloaded-last-year-were-il/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/07/85-percent-of-the-14-billion-videos-downloaded-last-year-were-il/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.homemediamagazine.com/downloads/report-content-holders-need-better-online-user-experience-16276"><img vspace="4" hspace="16" border="0" align="right" alt="Down with DRM logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/02/dwposter.jpg" /></a>A new report from In-Stat indicates what we already suspected; because of the ridiculous DRM on digital downloads, most people are opting to obtain content illegally. Consumers will come up with just about <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/30/top-ten-rationales-for-illegally-downloading-hdtv-shows/">any justification</a> because the current offerings from Hollywood are just way too draconian to buy in to. For us that is good news and we can't wait for the video industry to follow the music's lead and give up on all of this overly complicated DRM, that really just doesn't work. Like us, In-Stat believes that watermarking will become the preferred way to control the distribution of digital content. It really is win-win because while consumers are free to use the content as they deem fit, it is very easy for Hollywood to catch up with them if they decide to share it with the whole world.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/features/" rel="tag">Features</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/07/85-percent-of-the-14-billion-videos-downloaded-last-year-were-il/">85 percent of the 14 billion videos downloaded last year were illegal</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.homemediamagazine.com/downloads/report-content-holders-need-better-online-user-experience-16276>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/07/85-percent-of-the-14-billion-videos-downloaded-last-year-were-il/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19089761/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/07/85-percent-of-the-14-billion-videos-downloaded-last-year-were-il/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Digital Downloads</category><category>DigitalDownloads</category><category>DRM</category><category>hd</category><category>Illegal downloads</category><category>IllegalDownloads</category><category>In-Stat</category><category>Video Downloads</category><category>VideoDownloads</category><category>watermark</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Drawbaugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:43:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[802.11n to dominate the wireless HD wars, says In-Stat]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/29/802-11n-to-dominate-the-wireless-hd-wars-says-in-stat/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/29/802-11n-to-dominate-the-wireless-hd-wars-says-in-stat/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/29/802-11n-to-dominate-the-wireless-hd-wars-says-in-stat/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20090429005304&amp;newsLang=en"><img vspace="4" hspace="16" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/04/mimo.jpg" /></a>Industry watchers <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/in-stat">In-Stat</a> didn't mention which variant of WiFi based HD streaming it expects to win out, but just based on the install base <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/802.11n">802.11n</a> should be the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/12/provision-exec-calls-wifi-the-only-suitable-wireless-hdtv-medi/">leader</a>. UWB? <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/16/uwb-is-dead-long-live-uwb/">DOA</a>. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/whdi">WHDI</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/wirelesshd">WirelessHD</a>? Too expensive, too power hungry, too new. WiFi isn't perfect however, requiring codec support on either end to work with HD video but that's not expected to hold back the 25 million TVs with wireless hardware In-Stat sees shipping by 2013, but for the rest of the details you'll need $3,495 for the research report or a time machine.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/42228/97/">TG Daily</a>]<br /><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/media-streamers/" rel="tag">Media streamers</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/other-hardware/" rel="tag">Other hardware</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/29/802-11n-to-dominate-the-wireless-hd-wars-says-in-stat/">802.11n to dominate the wireless HD wars, says In-Stat</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20090429005304&amp;newsLang=en>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/29/802-11n-to-dominate-the-wireless-hd-wars-says-in-stat/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1531717/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/29/802-11n-to-dominate-the-wireless-hd-wars-says-in-stat/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>802.11n</category><category>analyst</category><category>hd</category><category>in-stat</category><category>other hardware</category><category>otherhardware</category><category>streaming</category><category>uwb</category><category>whdi</category><category>wifi</category><category>wireless hd</category><category>wireless tv</category><category>WirelessHd</category><category>WirelessTv</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Are you watching TV and reading this at the same time? In-Stat survey says probably]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/11/are-you-watching-tv-and-reading-this-at-the-same-time-in-stat-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/11/are-you-watching-tv-and-reading-this-at-the-same-time-in-stat-s/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/11/are-you-watching-tv-and-reading-this-at-the-same-time-in-stat-s/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.instat.com/press.asp?ID=2471&amp;sku=IN0904557CM"><img vspace="4" hspace="16" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/instat.gif.jpg"  alt="" /></a>Wonder why TV manufacturers are so happy to jam the Internet into TV sets? A recent <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/in-stat">In-Stat</a> survey reveals that synchronizing the web and TV programming could be key going forward, since so many people (up to 50% of men and 30% of women, depending on age group) already watch TV while using a computer. They'll need to figure something out to keep customers attention, with results also indicating that around 15% of consumers plan to cut back on subscription TV, Internet and mobile services over the next year, which could trim up to $5 billion in revenue. Of course, you'll have to drop $3,495 to find out more about TV viewing habits including <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/05/analyst-nearly-half-of-broadband-households-are-interested-in-i/">consumer interest in Internet TV services</a>, so we wouldn't be surprised to see the pay TV execs that cough up for this kind of data put it to use sooner rather than later.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/" rel="tag">Misc</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/11/are-you-watching-tv-and-reading-this-at-the-same-time-in-stat-s/">Are you watching TV and reading this at the same time? In-Stat survey says probably</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.instat.com/press.asp?ID=2471&amp;sku=IN0904557CM>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/11/are-you-watching-tv-and-reading-this-at-the-same-time-in-stat-s/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1485091/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/11/are-you-watching-tv-and-reading-this-at-the-same-time-in-stat-s/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analyst</category><category>analyst report</category><category>AnalystReport</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>ConsumerSpending</category><category>hd</category><category>in-stat</category><category>internet tv</category><category>InternetTv</category><category>pay tv</category><category>PayTv</category><category>survey</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:17:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Research says WiMAX and LTE will live different lives, coexist]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/research-says-wimax-and-lte-will-live-different-lives-coexist/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/research-says-wimax-and-lte-will-live-different-lives-coexist/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/research-says-wimax-and-lte-will-live-different-lives-coexist/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20090225005392&amp;newsLang=en"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/02/2-26-09-clearwire-pc-card.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Thinking that there's only room in this <strike>town</strike> world for either <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/qualcomm-throws-in-the-towel-on-umb-4g-race-down-to-lte-and-wim/comments/15804877/">WiMAX or LTE</a>? Research firm In-Stat would love to disagree, as a new report from it asserts that both will actually <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/25/lte-wimax-vie-for-itus-love-and-affection/">live on</a> for at least the next little while. Unsurprisingly, it's expected that mobile WiMAX will "outpace LTE over the next few years due to its head start on deployments," and potentially more importantly, the company believes that WiMAX and LTE will take "very different paths." In fact, it's stated that most WiMAX support will come from fixed network carriers looking to spruce up their existing offerings, while LTE expansion will likely be pushed solely (or mostly, anyway) by mobile operators. To us, it all boils down to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/30/nortel-quits-the-mobile-wimax-game/">support</a>, and it only takes a quick survey of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/04/kddi-japans-cdma-giant-goes-lte/">field</a> to see that LTE has <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/alltel-commits-to-lte-adds-1m-customers-in-q1/">the most</a> of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/15/atandt-looks-beyond-wimax-headed-for-lte/">that</a>. For better or worse, it seems the next-gen data war is but beginning, even though <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/29/the-4g-war-has-wimax-won-or-will-verizon-choose-lte/">we already thought</a> we were nearing the end.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/studies/" rel="tag">Studies</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/lte/" rel="tag">LTE</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/wimax/" rel="tag">WiMAX</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/research-says-wimax-and-lte-will-live-different-lives-coexist/">Research says WiMAX and LTE will live different lives, coexist</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20090225005392&amp;newsLang=en>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/research-says-wimax-and-lte-will-live-different-lives-coexist/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1472212/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/research-says-wimax-and-lte-will-live-different-lives-coexist/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3.5g</category><category>4g</category><category>in-stat</category><category>LTE</category><category>mobile</category><category>mobile broadband</category><category>mobile internet</category><category>MobileBroadband</category><category>MobileInternet</category><category>research</category><category>studies</category><category>wimax</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Research says WiMAX and LTE will live different lives, coexist]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/research-says-wimax-and-lte-will-live-different-lives-coexist/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/research-says-wimax-and-lte-will-live-different-lives-coexist/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/research-says-wimax-and-lte-will-live-different-lives-coexist/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20090225005392&amp;newsLang=en"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/02/2-26-09-clearwire-pc-card.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Thinking that there's only room in this <strike>town</strike> world for either <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/11/13/qualcomm-throws-in-the-towel-on-umb-4g-race-down-to-lte-and-wim/comments/15804877/">WiMAX or LTE</a>? Research firm In-Stat would love to disagree, as a new report from it asserts that both will actually <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/07/25/lte-wimax-vie-for-itus-love-and-affection/">live on</a> for at least the next little while. Unsurprisingly, it's expected that mobile WiMAX will "outpace LTE over the next few years due to its head start on deployments," and potentially more importantly, the company believes that WiMAX and LTE will take "very different paths." In fact, it's stated that most WiMAX support will come from fixed network carriers looking to spruce up their existing offerings, while LTE expansion will likely be pushed solely (or mostly, anyway) by mobile operators. To us, it all boils down to <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2009/01/30/nortel-quits-the-mobile-wimax-game/">support</a>, and it only takes a quick survey of the <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/12/04/kddi-japans-cdma-giant-goes-lte/">field</a> to see that LTE has <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/05/15/alltel-commits-to-lte-adds-1m-customers-in-q1/">the most</a> of <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/06/15/atandt-looks-beyond-wimax-headed-for-lte/">that</a>. For better or worse, it seems the next-gen data war is but beginning, even though <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/29/the-4g-war-has-wimax-won-or-will-verizon-choose-lte/">we already thought</a> we were nearing the end.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/wireless/" rel="tag">Wireless</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/research-says-wimax-and-lte-will-live-different-lives-coexist/">Research says WiMAX and LTE will live different lives, coexist</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20090225005392&amp;newsLang=en>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/research-says-wimax-and-lte-will-live-different-lives-coexist/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1472208/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/research-says-wimax-and-lte-will-live-different-lives-coexist/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3.5g</category><category>4g</category><category>in-stat</category><category>LTE</category><category>mobile broadband</category><category>mobile internet</category><category>MobileBroadband</category><category>MobileInternet</category><category>research</category><category>wimax</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[HDMI saturates HDTVs, moving onto PMPs, STBs, etc.]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/09/hdmi-saturates-hdtvs-moving-onto-pmps-stbs-etc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/09/hdmi-saturates-hdtvs-moving-onto-pmps-stbs-etc/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/09/hdmi-saturates-hdtvs-moving-onto-pmps-stbs-etc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20090209005506&amp;newsLang=en"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/02/2-9-09-hdmi-cable.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
We <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/21/research-shows-hdmi-climbing-dvi-slipping/">already heard</a> late last year that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/HDMI/">HDMI</a> adoption was on the rise, and now a new report from In-Stat asserts that the famed port is just about ready to take other areas of consumer electronics by storm. With HDMI adoption reaching nearly 100 percent in HDTVs, it's expected that 85 percent of IPTV set-top-boxes will have an HDMI port by 2012, while 10 percent of portable media players can say the same in just under three years. Also of note, HDMI-enabled product shipments are expected to increase overall at an annual rate of 23 percent up until 2012, while DVI-enabled shipments are forecast to decline at an annual rate of 30 percent through the same year. Ah, the unavoidable passing of the torch, so to speak.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cables/" rel="tag">Cables</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/ports/" rel="tag">Ports</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/09/hdmi-saturates-hdtvs-moving-onto-pmps-stbs-etc/">HDMI saturates HDTVs, moving onto PMPs, STBs, etc.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20090209005506&amp;newsLang=en>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/09/hdmi-saturates-hdtvs-moving-onto-pmps-stbs-etc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1455002/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/09/hdmi-saturates-hdtvs-moving-onto-pmps-stbs-etc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>adopting</category><category>cable</category><category>cabling</category><category>dvi</category><category>hd</category><category>hdmi</category><category>in-stat</category><category>port</category><category>ports</category><category>research</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Analyst: Game consoles are most Internet connected STB, but Blu-ray players will lead growth]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/04/analyst-game-consoles-are-most-internet-connected-stb-but-blu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/04/analyst-game-consoles-are-most-internet-connected-stb-but-blu/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/04/analyst-game-consoles-are-most-internet-connected-stb-but-blu/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="left">
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.instat.com/press.asp?Sku=IN0804088RC&amp;ID=2441"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/02/instats_report_020409.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Wondering about the progress of the "connected home" so effectively diagrammed above? <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=%22in-stat%22&amp;invocationType=wl-gadgethd&amp;searchsubmit=">In-Stat's</a> got the numbers, noting that by June 2008, nearly 43% of U.S. Windows PCs were of the Media Center variety, and found 64% of respondents at least somewhat interested in streaming video from the Internet to their TV. As it is, it looks like getting your Internet video service onto a game console is the best move (you <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/30/netflix-earnings-call-roundup-testing-saturday-shipments-700k/">don't say</a>?) since they're the most commonly 'net connected CE device, but thanks to BD-Live and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/03/recession-busting-150-blu-ray-players-coming-this-year/">plunging hardware prices</a>, the analysts see Blu-ray players leading growth. We're just hoping the additional details in the $3,495 version include telling higher ups that we'd like more selection and surround sound to go with our streaming HD. Any other requests?</div><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/" rel="tag">Misc</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/blu-ray/" rel="tag">Blu-ray</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/media-pcs/" rel="tag">Media PCs</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/other-hardware/" rel="tag">Other hardware</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/04/analyst-game-consoles-are-most-internet-connected-stb-but-blu/">Analyst: Game consoles are most Internet connected STB, but Blu-ray players will lead growth</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.instat.com/press.asp?Sku=IN0804088RC&amp;ID=2441>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/04/analyst-game-consoles-are-most-internet-connected-stb-but-blu/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1450108/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/04/analyst-game-consoles-are-most-internet-connected-stb-but-blu/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analyst</category><category>blu ray</category><category>blu-ray</category><category>bluray</category><category>ce devices</category><category>CeDevices</category><category>connected home</category><category>ConnectedHome</category><category>hd</category><category>in stat</category><category>in-stat</category><category>InStat</category><category>media center</category><category>MediaCenter</category><category>online video</category><category>OnlineVideo</category><category>other hardware</category><category>otherhardware</category><category>streaming video</category><category>StreamingVideo</category><category>survey</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:43:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Study: for most, all-in-one phones aren't]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/31/study-for-most-all-in-one-phones-arent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/31/study-for-most-all-in-one-phones-arent/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/31/study-for-most-all-in-one-phones-arent/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.instat.com/catalog/Wcatalogue.asp?id=66#IN0603271WH"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2006/10/n95-preview-sm.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" /></a>Hey, isn't the idea of a cameraphone to have the luxury of leaving your big, fat digicam at home? With a smartphone, isn't the PDA supposed to be history? And doesn't that iPod belong in the circular file now that you've picked up that fancy musicphone? According to a newly released study by In-Stat, phones with extra goodness packed in aren't prompting their owners to leave other devices behind. In fact, over half of multimedia phone owners are still toting a dedicated MP3 player, some 75% of smartphone users lug a PDA as well, and a staggering 80% of cameraphone owners "regularly" carry their digital camera. Will the latest generation of superphones like the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/nokia-n95-gets-real/">Nokia N95</a> start to change attitudes, or is the concept of a true all-in-one device nothing more than a myth?<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/ITFacts/?p=11956">ZDNet</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/multimedia/" rel="tag">Multimedia</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/studies/" rel="tag">Studies</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/31/study-for-most-all-in-one-phones-arent/">Study: for most, all-in-one phones aren't</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.instat.com/catalog/Wcatalogue.asp?id=66#IN0603271WH>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/31/study-for-most-all-in-one-phones-arent/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/693622/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/31/study-for-most-all-in-one-phones-arent/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>camera</category><category>cameraphone</category><category>digicam</category><category>in-stat</category><category>mobile</category><category>mp3 player</category><category>Mp3Player</category><category>multimedia</category><category>music</category><category>musicphone</category><category>pda</category><category>smartphone</category><category>studies</category><category>study</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Ziegler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[HDTV service penetration on the rise]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/14/hdtv-service-penetration-on-the-rise/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/14/hdtv-service-penetration-on-the-rise/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/14/hdtv-service-penetration-on-the-rise/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20060814005569&amp;newsLang=en"><img vspace="16" hspace="10" border="0" align="right" alt="" id="vimage_1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.hdbeat.com/media/2006/08/instat.gif" /></a>High-def service is working its way into more and more households world-wide. In-Stat is predicting that the service penetration is going to rise from 15 million homes in mid-2006 to 20.3 million by the end of this year. This comes in the wake of the World Cup spurring more and more countries to launch their first high-def broadcasts. So far, us, HD fans here in the States and those over the Pacific in Japan make up the majority of that number at 91%. Other notable countries are our friends to the north in Canada, Australia, and South Korea. Even though we make up a good amount of the statistics, it could be higher as one-third of US households with HD sets are currently receiving any type of high-def signal. Hopefully that will change, as there are more and more stations available each week. We are will to bet that the low amount of high-def stations is the reason that many people do not pay for a few more stations.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/14/hdtv-service-penetration-on-the-rise/">HDTV service penetration on the rise</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20060814005569&amp;newsLang=en>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/14/hdtv-service-penetration-on-the-rise/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/654266/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/14/hdtv-service-penetration-on-the-rise/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dtv</category><category>hd</category><category>hdtv</category><category>in-stat</category><category>instat</category><category>tv</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Burns]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:51:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
