<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Forthcoming 4G networks could interfere with TV in 10 percent of UK homes]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/17/4g-lte-uk-interference-freeview/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/17/4g-lte-uk-interference-freeview/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/17/4g-lte-uk-interference-freeview/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/17/4g-lte-uk-interference-freeview/"><img alt="Image" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/wn.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 488px; height: 379px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid;" /></a></p><p> If you live in the UK and a 4G wireless tower is going up right next to your house, you might want to hold off on the excitement. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/LTE/">LTE</a> networks occupying the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/15/european-parliament-approves-january-2013-deadline-for-4g-spectr/">800MHz</a> spectrum could cause some serious interference (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/14/fcc-to-deny-lightsquared-lte-bid/">sound familiar</a>?), capable of knocking out around two million households' free terrestrial TV channels. An independent company has been set up to lessen the effects of the wayward waves and is installing government-subsidized filters in residences across the country. But even its valiant efforts could leave up to 8,500 homes without <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/freeview/">Freeview,</a> as non-traditional antenna setups aren't covered by the public fund. Meanwhile, eager Brits continue to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/28/ofcom-delay-everything-everywhere-uk-4g-lte-network-decision/">patiently</a> line up for some kind of semblance of a 4G network.</p><div id="cke_pastebin" style="position: absolute; top: 74.6667px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow: hidden; left: -1000px;"></div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/17/4g-lte-uk-interference-freeview/">Forthcoming 4G networks could interfere with TV in 10 percent of UK homes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 17 May 2012 11:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/17/4g-lte-uk-interference-freeview/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20239970/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/17/4g-lte-uk-interference-freeview/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>4g</category><category>800 mhz</category><category>800mhz</category><category>cell phones</category><category>cellphones</category><category>data</category><category>freeview</category><category>interference</category><category>lte</category><category>mitco</category><category>ofcom</category><category>phones</category><category>television</category><category>terrestrial</category><category>tv</category><category>uk</category><category>wireless data</category><category>WirelessData</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Verrecchio]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 11:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sprint to LightSquared: it's over]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/16/sprint-dumps-lightsquared/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/16/sprint-dumps-lightsquared/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/16/sprint-dumps-lightsquared/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/16/sprint-dumps-lightsquared/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/lightsquared-fcc-logo-1331905125.png" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div><div> The writing's been on the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/07/sprint-dumping-lightsquared/">wall</a> for a few <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/15/sprint-kicks-lightsquared-to-the-curb-as-it-contests-fcc-ruling/">weeks</a> and now Sprint's officially severing its partnership with LightSquared. Philip Falcone's project had a contractual <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/31/sprint-grants-lightsquared-six-week-extension-for-fcc-approval/">deadline</a> of March 15th to gain regulatory approval for its LTE service on the 1.6GHz spectrum, which was shot down by the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/14/fcc-to-deny-lightsquared-lte-bid/">FCC</a> in February. A day later, Big Yellow exercised its right to pull the plug, paying back <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/15/sprint-may-have-dug-itself-a-65-million-hole-with-lightsquared/">$65 million</a> in prepayments and continuing to build out a LTE network on its own. Nextel's better half didn't slam the door shut entirely, however. If, by some <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/11/leaked-draft-shows-lightsquareds-network-interferes-with-great/">miracle</a> (and it would be a <em>big </em>one), the company can change Julius Genachowski's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/18/lightsquared-says-rigged-testing-of-its-network/">mind</a>, it'd certainly consider teaming up again, so no hard feelings, eh?<br /> <br /> For its part, LightSquared has issued a formal response, saying that the contract termination is in "the best interests of both parties" and "not unexpected given the regulatory delays." On the upside, the company has had its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/20/lightsquareds-troubles-continue-company-defaults-on-56m-payme/">coffers swelled</a> by a not inconsiderable $65 million, which is the first good news it's had for a while.</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/16/sprint-dumps-lightsquared/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Sprint to LightSquared: it's over</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/16/sprint-dumps-lightsquared/">Sprint to LightSquared: it's over</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/16/sprint-dumps-lightsquared/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20194905/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/16/sprint-dumps-lightsquared/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>4G</category><category>Breakup</category><category>Business</category><category>Collapse</category><category>Dumped</category><category>FCC</category><category>GPS</category><category>Inmarsat</category><category>Interference</category><category>Julius Genachowski</category><category>JuliusGenachowski</category><category>Lightsquared</category><category>LTE</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>Sprint</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:56:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sprint kicks LightSquared to the curb as it contests FCC ruling]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/15/sprint-kicks-lightsquared-to-the-curb-as-it-contests-fcc-ruling/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/15/sprint-kicks-lightsquared-to-the-curb-as-it-contests-fcc-ruling/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/15/sprint-kicks-lightsquared-to-the-curb-as-it-contests-fcc-ruling/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/15/sprint-kicks-lightsquared-to-the-curb-as-it-contests-fcc-ruling/"><img alt="Sprint Kicks LightSquared to the curb as it contests FCC ruling " src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/gpsjtlte-custom.jpg" style="width: 600px; height: 480px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid;" /></a></div>Sometimes when you start heading downhill, it can be hard to stop. Take LightSquared for instance -- not only were its LTE plans <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/11/leaked-draft-shows-lightsquareds-network-interferes-with-great/">repeatedly</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/14/lightsquareds-lte-hopes-dashed-by-federal-agency-report/">contested</a> and eventually <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/14/fcc-to-deny-lightsquared-lte-bid/">shot down</a>, but now <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Sprint/">Sprint</a>, its long time partner, will indeed be <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/07/sprint-dumping-lightsquared/">cutting ties</a> with the wireless start-up. According to the <em>Wall Street Journal,</em> the move will officially be announced on Friday, leaving LightSquared alone with its dreams. A representative from the start-up says its filing a 150-page defense of its network on the same day, hoping to refute the Feds' claims that its network interferes with GPS signals. The outfit made no comment on Sprint's plans, but mentioned that it has enough funds to operate on its own for several quarters. We'll let you know when Sprint officially drops the ball.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/15/sprint-kicks-lightsquared-to-the-curb-as-it-contests-fcc-ruling/">Sprint kicks LightSquared to the curb as it contests FCC ruling</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/15/sprint-kicks-lightsquared-to-the-curb-as-it-contests-fcc-ruling/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20194567/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/15/sprint-kicks-lightsquared-to-the-curb-as-it-contests-fcc-ruling/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>4g</category><category>break up</category><category>BreakUp</category><category>denied</category><category>interference</category><category>lightsquared</category><category>lightsquared lte</category><category>LightsquaredLte</category><category>LTE</category><category>lte gps</category><category>LteGps</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>network</category><category>PNT ExComm</category><category>PntExcomm</category><category>satellite</category><category>Sprint</category><category>Sprint Nextel</category><category>SprintNextel</category><category>telecoms</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Buckley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel puts CPU and WiFi radio together on same chip, with proper shielding of course]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/20/intel-puts-cpu-and-wifi-radio-on-same-chip/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/20/intel-puts-cpu-and-wifi-radio-on-same-chip/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/20/intel-puts-cpu-and-wifi-radio-on-same-chip/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/20/intel-puts-cpu-and-wifi-radio-on-same-chip/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/intel-rosepoint.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>It's little notches like these that could eventually carve out a big <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/motorola-intel-android-smartphone-partnership/">Intel-shaped</a> niche in the mobile universe. What you're looking at is a prototype chip codenamed 'Rosepoint' that somehow crams a digital WiFi radio and a dual-core Atom CPU onto the same piece of silicon. Interference would  normally make such proximity impossible, but Rosepoint incorporates new anti-radiation and noise-cancelling shielding to prevent the components from corrupting each other. The aim isn't just to shrink everything, but also to deliver "state of the art power efficiency" by removing unnecessary circuitry. Intel even claims it can fit the RF antenna onto a chip too, but it doesn't want to show that off just yet. Too many <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/09/ti-stuffs-wifi-gps-bluetooth-and-fm-radios-on-a-single-chip-u/">prying eyes</a>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/20/intel-puts-cpu-and-wifi-radio-on-same-chip/">Intel puts CPU and WiFi radio together on same chip, with proper shielding of course</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 20 Feb 2012 11:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/20/intel-puts-cpu-and-wifi-radio-on-same-chip/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20175273/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/20/intel-puts-cpu-and-wifi-radio-on-same-chip/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>atom</category><category>digital wifi</category><category>DigitalWifi</category><category>intel</category><category>intel rosepoint</category><category>IntelRosepoint</category><category>interference</category><category>noise shielding</category><category>noise-cancelling shielding</category><category>Noise-cancellingShielding</category><category>NoiseShielding</category><category>radiation</category><category>radiation shielding</category><category>RadiationShielding</category><category>RF</category><category>rosepoint</category><category>shielding</category><category>soc</category><category>system-on-chip</category><category>wifi</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 11:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[LightSquared grasps at straws, slams FCC in a statement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/lightsqured-grasps-at-straws-slams-fcc-in-a-statement/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/lightsqured-grasps-at-straws-slams-fcc-in-a-statement/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/lightsqured-grasps-at-straws-slams-fcc-in-a-statement/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/lightsqured-grasps-at-straws-slams-fcc-in-a-statement/"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/lightsquared-fcc-logo.png" style="width: 370px; height: 73px;" /></a></div>To say <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/14/fcc-to-deny-lightsquared-lte-bid/">it's been</a> a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/15/sprint-may-have-dug-itself-a-65-million-hole-with-lightsquared/">bumpy road</a> for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/lightsquared">LightSquared</a> over <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/07/lightsquared-seeks-regulatory-changes-to-satisfy-gps-interference/">recent months</a> would be an understatement. However, developments this week could see the beleaguered company reach a critical fork in the road. On Tuesday, the <span id="articleText">National Telecommunications and Information Administration</span> confirmed that LightSquared's planned network would indeed interfere with global positioning systems, and that there was no "practical way" to work around this. The FCC subsequently <span id="articleText">proposed to indefinitely suspend LightSquared's authority to migrate its satellite spectrum to land-based use. </span>Unsurprisingly, this evoked a less than cheerful response from the troubled startup, which slammed the FCC in a statement, claiming it's "harmed not only LightSquared, but also the American public" and accusing the committee of "the height of bureaucratic irresponsibility." The following day, the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> reported that firm was now making a last-ditch effort to revive hope, by attempting to exchange its wireless licenses for ones similar to those operated by the Department of Defense. <em>Reuters</em> has since reported that contrary to rumors that the company was seeking restructuring advice, hedge fund manager <span id="articleText"><span class="focusParagraph"><span class="articleLocatio&lt;/span&gt;n">Philip Falcone claims that </span></span></span>filing for bankruptcy would be off the cards, defiantly stating <span id="articleText">"there are other ways around this."</span> As to what these other ways include we're as yet to see, but we admire the optimism.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/lightsqured-grasps-at-straws-slams-fcc-in-a-statement/">LightSquared grasps at straws, slams FCC in a statement</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/lightsqured-grasps-at-straws-slams-fcc-in-a-statement/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20173217/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/lightsqured-grasps-at-straws-slams-fcc-in-a-statement/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dispute</category><category>fcc</category><category>gps</category><category>interference</category><category>lightsquared</category><category>lte</category><category>ntia</category><category>spectrum</category><category>sprint</category><category>wireless</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[James Trew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sprint may have dug itself a $65 million hole with LightSquared partnership]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/15/sprint-may-have-dug-itself-a-65-million-hole-with-lightsquared/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/15/sprint-may-have-dug-itself-a-65-million-hole-with-lightsquared/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/15/sprint-may-have-dug-itself-a-65-million-hole-with-lightsquared/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/15/sprint-may-have-dug-itself-a-65-million-hole-with-lightsquared/"><img alt="Sprint and LightSquared" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/sprint-lightsquared2011-06-02-1308349253-1328050156.jpg" style="width: 250px; height: 171px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 12px; float: right;" /></a>Well, if there's a silver lining for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/lightsquared">LightSquared</a> in the debacle that has been its attempt to launch a nationwide LTE network, it's that it should be getting a $65 million check from Sprint if everything <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/14/fcc-to-deny-lightsquared-lte-bid/">collapses</a>. The former WiMAX champion and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/07/sprint-converts-its-cdma-network-to-lte/">LTE convert</a> may have to return the cash it received as part of a 15 year agreement if the FCC doesn't approve the 4G venture by a March <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/31/sprint-grants-lightsquared-six-week-extension-for-fcc-approval/">deadline</a>. There is still a chance for an appeal of the commission's decision to reject LightSquared's bid to build an LTE network. But, with the company's inability to solve its vexing <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/11/leaked-draft-shows-lightsquareds-network-interferes-with-great/">GPS</a> issues and increasingly <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/07/lightsquared-seeks-regulatory-changes-to-satisfy-gps-interference/">desperate</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/18/lightsquared-says-rigged-testing-of-its-network/">looking</a> maneuvers, we wouldn't be surprised if the check was already in the mail.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/15/sprint-may-have-dug-itself-a-65-million-hole-with-lightsquared/">Sprint may have dug itself a $65 million hole with LightSquared partnership</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/15/sprint-may-have-dug-itself-a-65-million-hole-with-lightsquared/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20172775/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/15/sprint-may-have-dug-itself-a-65-million-hole-with-lightsquared/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>fcc</category><category>gps</category><category>interference</category><category>lightsquared</category><category>lte</category><category>spectrum</category><category>sprint</category><category>wireless</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[FCC to dash LightSquared's bid for LTE glory]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/14/fcc-to-deny-lightsquared-lte-bid/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/14/fcc-to-deny-lightsquared-lte-bid/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/14/fcc-to-deny-lightsquared-lte-bid/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/14/fcc-to-deny-lightsquared-lte-bid/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/lightsquared-fcc-logo-1329269961.png" style="margin: 4px;" /></a></div>Many of us have seen this coming for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/14/lightsquareds-lte-hopes-dashed-by-federal-agency-report/">some time now</a>, but the FCC issued a statement late today that it intends to reject <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/lightsquared">LightSquared's</a> bid to create a wholesale LTE network on the basis that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/18/lightsquared-says-rigged-testing-of-its-network/">interference</a> with existing GPS devices is unavoidable. The news follows a similar recommendation from the NTIA that was delivered to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/fcc">FCC</a> Chairman Julius Genachowski today, which concluded "there are no mitigation strategies that both solve the interference issues and provide LightSquared with an adequate commercial network deployment." For its part, the upstart wireless provider responded that it "profoundly disagrees" with the NTIA's conclusions and remains committed to finding a solution -- easier said than done. You'll find that statement in its entirety after the break.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/14/fcc-to-deny-lightsquared-lte-bid/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>FCC to dash LightSquared's bid for LTE glory</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/14/fcc-to-deny-lightsquared-lte-bid/">FCC to dash LightSquared's bid for LTE glory</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:37:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/14/fcc-to-deny-lightsquared-lte-bid/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20172058/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/14/fcc-to-deny-lightsquared-lte-bid/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>4g</category><category>fcc</category><category>gps</category><category>interference</category><category>lightsquared</category><category>lte</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>ntia</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Lutz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:37:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[LightSquared gets desperate, seeks regulatory changes to satisfy GPS debacle]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/07/lightsquared-seeks-regulatory-changes-to-satisfy-gps-interference/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/07/lightsquared-seeks-regulatory-changes-to-satisfy-gps-interference/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/07/lightsquared-seeks-regulatory-changes-to-satisfy-gps-interference/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/07/lightsquared-seeks-regulatory-changes-to-satisfy-gps-interference/"><img alt="LightSquared gets desperate, seeks regulatory changes to satisfy GPS debacle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/lightsquared-fcc-logo.png" style="margin: 4px;" /></a></div>If we were the betting type -- and hell, some of us really are -- we'd wager a crisp ten spot that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/lightsquared">LightSquared</a> isn't going to assuage the FCC's concerns over those pesky GPS interference issues <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/31/sprint-grants-lightsquared-six-week-extension-for-fcc-approval/">in the next few weeks</a>. After previously stating that the interference test reports were <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/18/lightsquared-says-rigged-testing-of-its-network/">rigged by GPS insiders</a>, the upstart LTE network is now getting political with its argument and is calling on the FCC to institute new standards for GPS equipment. LightSquared contends that current GPS devices on the market are poorly designed and purposefully encroach on the company's licensed spectrum. Of course, this change would do little to remedy the millions of interference prone / (causing?) devices on the market, but LightSquared notes that, by the FCC's own admission, GPS receivers must "reasonably discriminate against the reception of signals outside their allocated spectrum." With the company's latest argument flying high atop the flagpole, it begs the question, will anybody salute? You'll find LightSquared's statement in its entirety after the break.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/07/lightsquared-seeks-regulatory-changes-to-satisfy-gps-interference/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>LightSquared gets desperate, seeks regulatory changes to satisfy GPS debacle</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/07/lightsquared-seeks-regulatory-changes-to-satisfy-gps-interference/">LightSquared gets desperate, seeks regulatory changes to satisfy GPS debacle</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/07/lightsquared-seeks-regulatory-changes-to-satisfy-gps-interference/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20166743/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/07/lightsquared-seeks-regulatory-changes-to-satisfy-gps-interference/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>4g</category><category>fcc</category><category>gps</category><category>interference</category><category>lightsquared</category><category>lte</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Lutz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[LightSquared says obsolete devices used in 'rigged' testing of its LTE network]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/18/lightsquared-says-rigged-testing-of-its-network/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/18/lightsquared-says-rigged-testing-of-its-network/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/18/lightsquared-says-rigged-testing-of-its-network/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/18/lightsquared-says-rigged-testing-of-its-network/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/lsgps1-18.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px; width: 489px; height: 391px;" /></a></div><div> LightSquared's encountered <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/lightsquared/">many bumps</a> on the road to winning clearance for its LTE network, but it's not ready to throw in the towel just yet. During a conference call today, Jeff Carlisle (Executive Vice President for Regulatory Affairs), Geoff Stearn (Vice President of Spectrum Development) and Ed Thomas (Former FCC Chief Engineer, now a LightSquared consultant) refuted the government's claims that the network <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/11/leaked-draft-shows-lightsquareds-network-interferes-with-great/">interferes with GPS receivers</a>, lambasting the use of "obsolete" devices and other tests that don't "reflect reality." The LightSquared executives went as far as calling the entire process "rigged" and "shrouded in secrecy." In their opinion, the testing was "set up to be a failure," thanks in part to the involvement of GPS manufacturers. Moreover, when questioned about what the next step would be, the company stated that all it'd like are "valid scientific results," the use of non-obsolote devices and a "fair process with proper testing." Needless to say, we can expect the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/14/lightsquareds-lte-hopes-dashed-by-federal-agency-report/">drama to continue</a> over the coming months -- after all, LightSquared is claiming it's got enough money to keep the battle going for at least a few quarters yet.</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/18/lightsquared-says-rigged-testing-of-its-network/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>LightSquared says obsolete devices used in 'rigged' testing of its LTE network</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/18/lightsquared-says-rigged-testing-of-its-network/">LightSquared says obsolete devices used in 'rigged' testing of its LTE network</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/18/lightsquared-says-rigged-testing-of-its-network/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20151251/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/18/lightsquared-says-rigged-testing-of-its-network/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>4g</category><category>Ed Thomas</category><category>EdThomas</category><category>FCC</category><category>Geoff Stern</category><category>GeoffStern</category><category>interference</category><category>Jeff Carlisle</category><category>JeffCarlisle</category><category>lightsquared</category><category>lightsquared lte</category><category>lightsquared network</category><category>LightsquaredLte</category><category>LightsquaredNetwork</category><category>lte gps</category><category>LteGps</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>network</category><category>PNT ExComm</category><category>PntExcomm</category><category>Sprint</category><category>telecoms</category><category>test</category><category>testing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Edgar Alvarez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[LightSquared's LTE hopes dashed by federal agency report]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/14/lightsquareds-lte-hopes-dashed-by-federal-agency-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/14/lightsquareds-lte-hopes-dashed-by-federal-agency-report/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/14/lightsquareds-lte-hopes-dashed-by-federal-agency-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/14/lightsquareds-lte-hopes-dashed-by-federal-agency-report/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/gpsjtlte-custom.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>When it was <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/11/leaked-draft-shows-lightsquareds-network-interferes-with-great/">first mooted</a> that LightSquared's LTE technology might interfere with GPS equipment, the firm was quick to deny it. Since then, the company has tried <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/28/lightsquared-partners-with-pctel-on-antenna-fix-for-gps-interf/">to mitigate the issue,</a> but the nine agencies making up the National Space-Based Positioning, Navigation and Timing Executive Committee (PNT ExComm) all agreed that the problems are real and any attempts at mitigation are futile. This comes only days after Sprint reneged on a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/05/sprint-puts-the-brakes-on-lightsquared-spectrum-deal-waits-for/">resource sharing deal</a>, issuing a further blow to the company's plans for a terrestrial network. LightSquared's reaction is naturally not a happy one, claiming that the testing process is not only flawed, but that the agencies have a bias in favor of the GPS industry. By our reasoning, this only leaves the stage of depression before final acceptance of the grief-ridden situation.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/14/lightsquareds-lte-hopes-dashed-by-federal-agency-report/">LightSquared's LTE hopes dashed by federal agency report</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 14 Jan 2012 14:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/14/lightsquareds-lte-hopes-dashed-by-federal-agency-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20148921/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/14/lightsquareds-lte-hopes-dashed-by-federal-agency-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>4g</category><category>denied</category><category>interference</category><category>lightsquared</category><category>lightsquared lte</category><category>LightsquaredLte</category><category>lte gps</category><category>LteGps</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>network</category><category>PNT ExComm</category><category>PntExcomm</category><category>telecoms</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[James Trew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 14:56:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Editorial: How FAA-certified gadgets could improve air travel and eliminate the Terrible 10,000 Feet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/30/faa-certified-gadgets-could-improve-air-travel/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/30/faa-certified-gadgets-could-improve-air-travel/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/30/faa-certified-gadgets-could-improve-air-travel/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: transparent; text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/30/faa-certified-gadgets-could-improve-air-travel/"><b style="font-weight: normal;"><img alt="Boeing" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/2011-12-15-econ1dsc04330.jpg" style="width: 600px; height: 400px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid;" /></b></a></div>
If you're reading this now and have experienced the wonders of modern air travel then you have surely suffered through what I call the "Terrible 10,000 Feet." This is the period between the clunk of the cabin door closing and the bong of the cabin indicator, the chime signifying arrival of the magic altitude where "approved electronic devices" can then be used again. The first half of the worst part of the flight is then over -- the latter half to commence as soon as the plane dips again below that gadget ceiling.<br />
<br />
This is the loudest part of the flight -- engines throttled up, flaps and gear hanging in the breeze and scared kids doing their best to drown all that out with screams and shouts. It's exactly when you most want to use your portable music player, and exactly when you aren't allowed. We've been told that this is for safety reasons, to prevent interference from the myriad devices carried by a cabin full of passengers, but that's never quite felt satisfactory to me. (Why is it okay to use those very same devices over 10,000 feet? Why can <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/01/ipad-gets-approval-from-faa-to-replace-paper-flight-charts-and-m/">pilots use iPads</a> but I can't?)<br />
<br />
So many questions, but I'm not here to second-guess the people whose jobs it is to keep me safe as I schlep myself, my roller bag and my personal item across the country yet again. I'm here to propose a very simple solution: a certification program in which manufacturers submit devices for testing and the FAA charges a (possibly hefty) fee for their approval. It could not only improve the lives of frequent travellers like myself, but could also stand to provide millions in funding to the FAA, funds that could be put toward its unfortunately named NextGen air traffic control system. Win win? Read on and decide for yourself.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/30/faa-certified-gadgets-could-improve-air-travel/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Editorial: How FAA-certified gadgets could improve air travel and eliminate the Terrible 10,000 Feet</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/30/faa-certified-gadgets-could-improve-air-travel/">Editorial: How FAA-certified gadgets could improve air travel and eliminate the Terrible 10,000 Feet</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 30 Dec 2011 12:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/30/faa-certified-gadgets-could-improve-air-travel/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20137382/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/30/faa-certified-gadgets-could-improve-air-travel/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>boeing</category><category>editorial</category><category>electromagnetic interference</category><category>ElectromagneticInterference</category><category>em</category><category>faa</category><category>fcc</category><category>interference</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Stevens]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 12:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[LightSquared proposes 'simple, affordable solution' to that pesky GPS interference issue]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/21/lightsquared-proposes-simple-affordable-solution-to-that-pesk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/21/lightsquared-proposes-simple-affordable-solution-to-that-pesk/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/21/lightsquared-proposes-simple-affordable-solution-to-that-pesk/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/21/lightsquared-proposes-simple-affordable-solution-to-that-pesk/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/got-an-issue-we-handle-it.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>It's not the first "<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/20/lightsquared-announces-solution-for-gps-issue-says-lte-networ/">solution</a>" that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/lightsquared">LightSquared</a> has proposed for the GPS interference issue that's gotten in the way of its LTE network rollout, but the company's now touting a new "simple, affordable solution" to the problem. That doesn't actually involve any changes to the network itself, but rather changes to the high-precision GPS hardware that is being interfered with. To that end, the company has announced that it's signed an agreement with Javad GNSS, which says that it's been able to reconfigure the filters and linear amplifiers used on existing receivers and make them "completely compatible with LightSquared's bottom 10 MHz of spectrum." According to Javad, those changes are not expected to increase selling price of newly reconfigured devices for consumers, although there would presumably be some cost to retrofit existing devices (the first units for testing are expected to be available next month). So, it may be "simple" and "affordable," but it doesn't seem like it's necessarily an "easy" solution. LightSquared's press release is after the break.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/21/lightsquared-proposes-simple-affordable-solution-to-that-pesk/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>LightSquared proposes 'simple, affordable solution' to that pesky GPS interference issue</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/21/lightsquared-proposes-simple-affordable-solution-to-that-pesk/">LightSquared proposes 'simple, affordable solution' to that pesky GPS interference issue</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/21/lightsquared-proposes-simple-affordable-solution-to-that-pesk/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20048847/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/21/lightsquared-proposes-simple-affordable-solution-to-that-pesk/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>gps</category><category>gps interference</category><category>GpsInterference</category><category>interference</category><category>javad</category><category>javad gnss</category><category>JavadGnss</category><category>lightsquared</category><category>lte</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>satellite</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[OnLive CEO reveals 'entirely new approach' to wireless, credits Rearden for toppling Shannon's Law]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/29/onlive-ceo-reveals-entirely-new-approach-to-wireless-credits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/29/onlive-ceo-reveals-entirely-new-approach-to-wireless-credits/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/29/onlive-ceo-reveals-entirely-new-approach-to-wireless-credits/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/29/onlive-ceo-reveals-entirely-new-approach-to-wireless-credits/"><img border="1" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/06/reardon-wireless-innovation.jpg" vspace="4" /></a></div>
"In advance, yes -- you're right, it's impossible. But nonetheless, we have ten radios all working at the same frequency, all at the Shannon limit... and there's no interference." You may not fully grok the significance of that statement, but anyone heavily involved in solving the wireless bandwidth crisis is probably dropjawed. For a little background, there's a perceived limit in wireless known as Shannon's Law, which largely explains why no one can watch a YouTube clip on their EVO at Michigan Stadium. For whatever reason, it's been assumed that this law was fundamentally unbreakable, but it looks as if an unlikely member of society may have just overrode expectations. OnLive's CEO <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/25/video-onlive-streaming-game-demonstrated/">Steve Perlman</a> recently revealed a breakthrough from Rearden Companies -- in short, they've figured out a workaround, and in testing, it's doing things like "removing dead zones" altogether. His slide, shown during a presentation at Columbia, notes that the implications here are "profound," and we couldn't agree more. Do yourself a solid and hit play in the video below the break -- we've fast-forwarded to where this section begins.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/29/onlive-ceo-reveals-entirely-new-approach-to-wireless-credits/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>OnLive CEO reveals 'entirely new approach' to wireless, credits Rearden for toppling Shannon's Law</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/29/onlive-ceo-reveals-entirely-new-approach-to-wireless-credits/">OnLive CEO reveals 'entirely new approach' to wireless, credits Rearden for toppling Shannon's Law</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/29/onlive-ceo-reveals-entirely-new-approach-to-wireless-credits/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19979371/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/29/onlive-ceo-reveals-entirely-new-approach-to-wireless-credits/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>700mhz</category><category>capacity</category><category>columbia</category><category>congestion</category><category>infrastructure</category><category>interference</category><category>onlive</category><category>rearden</category><category>Rearden Companies</category><category>ReardenCompanies</category><category>shannons law</category><category>ShannonsLaw</category><category>spectrum</category><category>spectrum crunch</category><category>SpectrumCrunch</category><category>Steve Perlman</category><category>StevePerlman</category><category>university</category><category>video</category><category>wireless</category><category>wwan</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[LightSquared announces 'solution' for GPS issue, says LTE network will roll out on schedule]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/20/lightsquared-announces-solution-for-gps-issue-says-lte-networ/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/20/lightsquared-announces-solution-for-gps-issue-says-lte-networ/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/20/lightsquared-announces-solution-for-gps-issue-says-lte-networ/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/20/lightsquared-announces-solution-for-gps-issue-says-lte-networ/"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/06/satellitealienmis.jpg" style="width: 440px; height: 353px;" /></a></div><div> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/lightsquared">LightSquared</a> may have steadfastly insisted otherwise, but <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/02/lightsquareds-lte-breaks-gps-in-new-mexico-trial-angers-john-d/">recent</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/10/government-report-finds-lightsquareds-lte-interferes-with-gps/">tests</a> showing that its wholesale 4G LTE network interferes with GPS have been getting tough for it to ignore, and it turns out the company has been quietly working on a backup plan. In addition to fessing up that one of the 10MHz blocks used by its network does indeed interfere with many GPS receivers, LightSquared has also now announced a two-fold "solution" to the problem. That will involve it using only a lower block of the 10MHz spectrum that it says doesn't interfere with GPS (with a few "limited" exceptions), and a new agreement with Inmarsat that LightSquared says will let it "accelerate the schedule" to begin using the alternative block of spectrum. Those new measures, LightSquared says, will let it roll out its network in accordance with its original business plan, and give it enough spectrum to serve its customers for the "next several years." What happens after that is a bit less clear, but LightSquared says it believes its network can "live harmoniously, side-by-side, with GPS users," and that "enlightened and responsible spectrum management will give the American public the best of both worlds." The company's full press release is after the break.<br /> <br /> [Thanks, Nick]</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/20/lightsquared-announces-solution-for-gps-issue-says-lte-networ/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>LightSquared announces 'solution' for GPS issue, says LTE network will roll out on schedule</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/20/lightsquared-announces-solution-for-gps-issue-says-lte-networ/">LightSquared announces 'solution' for GPS issue, says LTE network will roll out on schedule</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/20/lightsquared-announces-solution-for-gps-issue-says-lte-networ/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19971931/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/20/lightsquared-announces-solution-for-gps-issue-says-lte-networ/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>10mhz</category><category>10mhz block</category><category>10mhzBlock</category><category>4g</category><category>4g lte</category><category>4gLte</category><category>gps</category><category>interference</category><category>lightsquared</category><category>lte</category><category>network</category><category>satellite</category><category>spectrum</category><category>wholesale</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Government report finds LightSquared's LTE interferes with GPS -- color us surprised]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/10/government-report-finds-lightsquareds-lte-interferes-with-gps/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/10/government-report-finds-lightsquareds-lte-interferes-with-gps/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/10/government-report-finds-lightsquareds-lte-interferes-with-gps/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/10/government-report-finds-lightsquareds-lte-interferes-with-gps/"><img alt="Government report finds LightSquared's LTE interferes with GPS -- color us surprised" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/06/satellitealienmis.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>No one said bathing the great United States in LTE would be easy, but the hits just keep on coming for Falcone and co. Following up on <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/02/lightsquareds-lte-breaks-gps-in-new-mexico-trial-angers-john-d/">reports</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/19/us-air-force-raises-concerns-over-lightsquareds-lte-network-mes/">concerns</a> about <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/lightsquared">LightSquared's</a> possible interference, a government study has found that the outfit's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/20/lightsquared-does-lte-and-satellite-connectivity-wholesale-noki/">proposed broadband network</a> does indeed impede GPS signals. According to the National PNT Engineering Forum, the federal advisory group that conducted the study, LiqhtSquared's network disrupted GPS signals for all of the devices tested in the area. The report lists OnStar, Garmin, John Deere, emergency services, the FAA, and NASA among those affected by interference. Both LightSquared and the GPS industry are scheduled to present their own tests for the FCC's consideration next week. The news isn't exactly shocking, but it certainly doesn't bode well for the ambitious LTE network.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/10/government-report-finds-lightsquareds-lte-interferes-with-gps/">Government report finds LightSquared's LTE interferes with GPS -- color us surprised</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/10/government-report-finds-lightsquareds-lte-interferes-with-gps/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19964148/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/10/government-report-finds-lightsquareds-lte-interferes-with-gps/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>emergency services</category><category>EmergencyServices</category><category>FAA</category><category>FCC</category><category>global positioning</category><category>Global Positioning System</category><category>GlobalPositioning</category><category>GlobalPositioningSystem</category><category>government report</category><category>GovernmentReport</category><category>GPS</category><category>GPS interference</category><category>GPS signal</category><category>GpsInterference</category><category>GpsSignal</category><category>interference</category><category>jamming</category><category>John Deere</category><category>JohnDeere</category><category>l-band</category><category>lband</category><category>Light Squared</category><category>LightSquared</category><category>LTE</category><category>LTE network</category><category>LteNetwork</category><category>NASA</category><category>National PNT Engineering Forum</category><category>NationalPntEngineeringForum</category><category>network</category><category>Philip Falcone</category><category>PhilipFalcone</category><category>satellite</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Trout]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[LightSquared's LTE breaks GPS in New Mexico trial, angers John Deere]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/02/lightsquareds-lte-breaks-gps-in-new-mexico-trial-angers-john-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/02/lightsquareds-lte-breaks-gps-in-new-mexico-trial-angers-john-d/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/02/lightsquareds-lte-breaks-gps-in-new-mexico-trial-angers-john-d/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/02/lightsquareds-lte-breaks-gps-in-new-mexico-trial-angers-john-d/"><img alt="LightSquared breaks GPS" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/02/satellite_alien_mis.jpg" style="width: 440px; height: 353px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>With <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/23/best-buy-signs-up-for-lightsquareds-wholesale-lte-service/">Best Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/23/cricket-ties-up-with-lightsquared-for-lte-roaming-agreement/">Cricket</a>, and Leap already signed on as partners, LightSquared has a lot riding on the success of its nationwide LTE network. Unfortunately, the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/19/us-air-force-raises-concerns-over-lightsquareds-lte-network-mes/">Airforce's concerns</a> about it interfering with GPS have been born by a test run in New Mexico. Officials in charge of the state's 911 systems as well as trucker hat kings Deere &amp; Co. reported loss of service up to 22 miles away from LightSquared's cell tower. The company believes it has a solution to the interference problem, but hasn't specified exactly what the fix might be. Now the 4G wholesaler's future rests on a June 15th report to the FCC detailing the potential issues for both consumer navigators and the precision GPS systems used by the military and airlines -- but when even John Deere is lobbying against you things start to look a little bleak.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/02/lightsquareds-lte-breaks-gps-in-new-mexico-trial-angers-john-d/">LightSquared's LTE breaks GPS in New Mexico trial, angers John Deere</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/02/lightsquareds-lte-breaks-gps-in-new-mexico-trial-angers-john-d/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19955951/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/02/lightsquareds-lte-breaks-gps-in-new-mexico-trial-angers-john-d/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>4g</category><category>911</category><category>deere  co</category><category>DeereCo</category><category>fcc</category><category>global positioning system</category><category>GlobalPositioningSystem</category><category>gps</category><category>interference</category><category>jamming</category><category>john deere</category><category>JohnDeere</category><category>l band</category><category>l-band</category><category>LBand</category><category>lightsquared</category><category>lte</category><category>new mexico</category><category>NewMexico</category><category>satellite</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cellular South inks deal with LightSquared, gets LTE with stroke of a pen]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/23/cellular-south-inks-deal-with-lightsquared-gets-lte-with-stroke/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/23/cellular-south-inks-deal-with-lightsquared-gets-lte-with-stroke/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/23/cellular-south-inks-deal-with-lightsquared-gets-lte-with-stroke/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/23/cellular-south-inks-deal-with-lightsquared-gets-lte-with-stroke/"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/04/cellular-south-engadget.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Cellular South just dropped a nugget, announcing it's hopped aboard with <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/lightsquared">LightSquared</a> to provide nationwide LTE service to its 900,000 subscribers. In turn, the 4G wholesaler promised to bring coverage to rural communities (and offer satellite service for those in <em>really</em> distant locales). Cellular South joins Cricket, Best Buy Connect and SI Wireless as the latest to add LTE coverage the easy way, though they're left waiting for the network to come online sometime in 2012. Meanwhile, LightSquared continues working to resolve those pesky <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/19/us-air-force-raises-concerns-over-lightsquareds-lte-network-mes/">GPS concerns</a>, with a final report due to the FCC on June 15th. PR after the break.<br />
<br />
[Image courtesy <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/lordsutch/18600895/">Flickr</a>]<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/23/cellular-south-inks-deal-with-lightsquared-gets-lte-with-stroke/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cellular South inks deal with LightSquared, gets LTE with stroke of a pen</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/23/cellular-south-inks-deal-with-lightsquared-gets-lte-with-stroke/">Cellular South inks deal with LightSquared, gets LTE with stroke of a pen</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 23 Apr 2011 02:37:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/23/cellular-south-inks-deal-with-lightsquared-gets-lte-with-stroke/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19921634/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/23/cellular-south-inks-deal-with-lightsquared-gets-lte-with-stroke/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>4g</category><category>agreement</category><category>best buy mobile</category><category>BestBuyMobile</category><category>cellular south</category><category>CellularSouth</category><category>cricket</category><category>Cricket Wireless</category><category>CricketWireless</category><category>deal</category><category>FCC</category><category>GPS</category><category>interference</category><category>lightsquared</category><category>LTE</category><category>lte roaming</category><category>LteRoaming</category><category>mobile</category><category>partnership</category><category>roam</category><category>roaming</category><category>si wireless</category><category>SiWireless</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Lutz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 02:37:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[China, predictably, denies Google's accusations of Gmail tampering]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/23/china-predictably-denies-googles-accusations-of-gmail-tamperi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/23/china-predictably-denies-googles-accusations-of-gmail-tamperi/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/23/china-predictably-denies-googles-accusations-of-gmail-tamperi/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center; "><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/23/china-predictably-denies-googles-accusations-of-gmail-tamperi/"><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/03/11x03210g-1300888831.jpg" /></a></div>
On Monday, Google expressed its belief that its email users in China were experiencing "<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/21/google-and-china-clash-again-this-time-over-gmail-access/">a government blockage</a> carefully designed to look like the problem is with Gmail." Now, as is par for this thorny course, the Chinese state has come out with a terse rebuttal, saying simply that "this is an unacceptable accusation." The retort was, says the <em>BBC</em>, part of a regular news conference on Tuesday and it doesn't appear that any more time was spent on the subject. Which is odd since most people would tend to act to prevent something they see as unacceptable -- but then we suppose China already has a pretty long list of folks it'd like to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/16/china-tightens-grip-on-vpn-access-amid-pro-democracy-protests-g/">shut up</a>, Google's just gonna have to get in line and wait its turn. There's a good citizen.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/23/china-predictably-denies-googles-accusations-of-gmail-tamperi/">China, predictably, denies Google's accusations of Gmail tampering</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:14:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/23/china-predictably-denies-googles-accusations-of-gmail-tamperi/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19889137/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/23/china-predictably-denies-googles-accusations-of-gmail-tamperi/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>allegations</category><category>china</category><category>dispute</category><category>disruption</category><category>email</category><category>firewall</category><category>gmail</category><category>google</category><category>government</category><category>great firewall</category><category>GreatFirewall</category><category>hack</category><category>hacking</category><category>interference</category><category>political</category><category>politics</category><category>spat</category><category>state</category><category>tampering</category><category>tension</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:14:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google and China clash again, this time over Gmail access]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/21/google-and-china-clash-again-this-time-over-gmail-access/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/21/google-and-china-clash-again-this-time-over-gmail-access/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/21/google-and-china-clash-again-this-time-over-gmail-access/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center; "><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/21/google-and-china-clash-again-this-time-over-gmail-access/"><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/03/11x03210g.jpg" /></a></div>
Last week we noted, with a growing sense of disquiet, how China was busying itself with <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/16/china-tightens-grip-on-vpn-access-amid-pro-democracy-protests-g/">locking out VPN access</a> within its borders and, seemingly, preventing people from using their Gmail accounts. Google has now given a public voice to those concerns, noting that "there is no issue on our side. We have checked extensively. This is a government blockage carefully designed to look like the problem is with Gmail." Other Google tools, like the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/11/google-reacts-to-japanese-tsunami-with-a-person-finder-tool/">Person Finder</a> for Japanese tsunami survivors, have also exhibited intermittent issues. China's goal in these attacks is reportedly to stifle online revolutionary chatter inspired by Egypt's successful democratic revolt, though the nation's said to be taking a more <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/29/wikileaks-chinese-politburo-responsible-for-google-hacking/">clandestine</a> approach than <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/12/google-to-stop-censoring-chinese-search-results-soon-china-wa/">previously</a> by making its alleged sabotage appear like a software problem instead. Guess it's time to prepare ourselves for another battle of wits between these two.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/21/google-and-china-clash-again-this-time-over-gmail-access/">Google and China clash again, this time over Gmail access</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 21 Mar 2011 05:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/21/google-and-china-clash-again-this-time-over-gmail-access/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19885889/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/21/google-and-china-clash-again-this-time-over-gmail-access/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>activism</category><category>allegation</category><category>allegations</category><category>china</category><category>conflict</category><category>email</category><category>firewall</category><category>gmail</category><category>google</category><category>government</category><category>great firewall</category><category>GreatFirewall</category><category>hack</category><category>hacking</category><category>interference</category><category>political</category><category>politics</category><category>state</category><category>tension</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 05:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[US Air Force raises concerns over LightSquared's LTE network messing with GPS]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/19/us-air-force-raises-concerns-over-lightsquareds-lte-network-mes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/19/us-air-force-raises-concerns-over-lightsquareds-lte-network-mes/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/19/us-air-force-raises-concerns-over-lightsquareds-lte-network-mes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/19/us-air-force-raises-concerns-over-lightsquareds-lte-network-mes/"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/02/satellite_alien_mis.jpg" /></a></div>
Following a navigation system's instructions without driving into a ravine is hard enough as it is -- can you even imagine how hard it'd be if you kept losing GPS reception every time you drove within range of an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/LTE/">LTE</a> tower? There have been a few anecdotal concerns raised over the last several weeks that <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/lightsquared">LightSquared's</a> proposed LTE network -- which would repurpose L-band spectrum formerly used for satellite -- is too close to the spectrum used by the Global Positioning System, leading to unintentional jamming when the towers overpower the much weaker GPS signals. Things have gotten a little more interesting, though, now that the US Air Force Space Command has officially piped in. General William Shelton has gone on record saying that "a leading GPS receiver manufacturer just ... has concluded that within 3 to 5 miles on the ground and within about 12 miles in the air GPS is jammed by those towers," calling the situation "unbelievable" and saying he's "hopeful the FCC does the right thing."<br />
<br />
Presumably, the USAF thinks that "the right thing" would involve pulling LightSquared's license, but for its part, the company says it believes Shelton is referring to a test conducted by <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Garmin/">Garmin</a> (possibly explaining that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/20/faa-warns-of-ongoing-gps-issues-in-southeastern-us-due-to-defens/">recent outage</a> in the Southeastern US?) using simulated interference filters -- not the <em>actual</em> filters that it has spent several million dollars developing and perfecting. Regardless of how effective the filters might be, the idea that the only thing standing between a functional GPS system and a constellation of space-borne paperweights is a private company's privately-developed, privately-operated filtering equipment... but then again, we love LTE. Decisions!<br />
<br />
[Thanks, Brian]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/19/us-air-force-raises-concerns-over-lightsquareds-lte-network-mes/">US Air Force raises concerns over LightSquared's LTE network messing with GPS</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 19 Feb 2011 22:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/19/us-air-force-raises-concerns-over-lightsquareds-lte-network-mes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19851795/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/19/us-air-force-raises-concerns-over-lightsquareds-lte-network-mes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>4g</category><category>global positioning system</category><category>GlobalPositioningSystem</category><category>gps</category><category>interference</category><category>jamming</category><category>l band</category><category>l-band</category><category>LBand</category><category>lightsquared</category><category>lte</category><category>satellite</category><category>space command</category><category>SpaceCommand</category><category>usaf</category><category>usafsc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Ziegler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 22:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Broadcasters seek to slow action on FCC's white space ruling]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/18/broadcasters-seek-to-slow-action-on-fccs-white-space-ruling/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/18/broadcasters-seek-to-slow-action-on-fccs-white-space-ruling/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/18/broadcasters-seek-to-slow-action-on-fccs-white-space-ruling/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122428892359946643.html?mod=googlenews_wsj"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/10/10-18-08-fcc-kevin_martin.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
We knew they <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/20/wireless-audio-manufacturers-unhappy-with-googles-whitespace-in/">didn't like it</a>, and now they're going out of their way to prove it. After FCC chairman Kevin Martin set forth <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/16/fcc-chairman-wants-to-fill-white-spaces-with-broadband/">a proposal</a> to use the freed spectrum from the forthcoming <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/02/17/t-minus-one-year-till-the-us-analog-shutoff-are-you-ready/">2009 digital TV transition</a> for bringing mobile broadband <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/12/fcc-expected-to-recommend-unlicensed-white-space-spectrum-use/">to more locales</a>, broadcasters who'd rather not deal with the trouble are stepping in with a collective "nuh uh!" Station owners and the four television networks filed an "emergency request" on Friday afternoon in hopes of convincing the FCC to hold off on its plan to vote on white space rules until "everyone had a chance to comment on the findings." The report that's mentioned found that no significant interference would come into play should the waves be opened up for unlicensed devices, but a spokeswoman for the National Association of Broadcasters stated that "the FCC is misinterpreting the actual data collected by their own engineers." Whether or not NAB will get the 45-day grace period it's asking for, however, remains to be seen.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.mobile-tech-today.com/story.xhtml?story_id=62484">Mobile Tech Today</a>, image courtesy of <a href="http://www.orbitcast.com/archives/fcc-kevin_martin.jpg">Orbitcast</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/wireless/" rel="tag">Wireless</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/18/broadcasters-seek-to-slow-action-on-fccs-white-space-ruling/">Broadcasters seek to slow action on FCC's white space ruling</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122428892359946643.html?mod=googlenews_wsj>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/18/broadcasters-seek-to-slow-action-on-fccs-white-space-ruling/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1345922/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/18/broadcasters-seek-to-slow-action-on-fccs-white-space-ruling/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>broadband</category><category>complaint</category><category>fcc</category><category>interference</category><category>internet</category><category>kevin martin</category><category>KevinMartin</category><category>mobile broadband</category><category>mobile internet</category><category>MobileBroadband</category><category>MobileInternet</category><category>NAB</category><category>white space</category><category>white spaces</category><category>WhiteSpace</category><category>WhiteSpaces</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[High frequency processors could put your GPS on the fritz]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/26/high-frequency-processors-could-put-your-gps-on-the-fritz/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/26/high-frequency-processors-could-put-your-gps-on-the-fritz/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/26/high-frequency-processors-could-put-your-gps-on-the-fritz/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.tech.co.uk/gadgets/satellite-navigation/in-car-gps-installs/news/your-pc-could-knock-your-gps-out?articleid=2046970035"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/04/4-25-07-screwy_directions.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Just when you think things couldn't get any more <a href="http://digitalvideo.engadget.com/2007/03/31/hackers-next-target-your-in-car-navigation-system/">gloomy</a> in the world of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/20/uk-posts-signs-to-ignore-navigation-systems-avoid-perils/">in-car navigation systems</a>, here comes news that high frequency processors surrounding your GPS system could actually cause some seriously screwy routing. According to a study by the Swedish Defense Research Agency, "computers used near a NAV could disturb the signals utilized in the GPS receiver." More specifically, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/intel/">Intel</a> CPUs with clock speeds of 1.7GHz, 3.0GHz, and 3.2GHz were pinpointed as potential troublemakers, but a member of the study actually went so far as to suggest that a variety of other (untested) chips could indeed wreak the same havoc. The study showed that "modern computers produce interfering signals that reach as far as the frequency bandwidths used for GPS systems," and while specific reactions weren't apparent, testers did suggest to move any computer equipment further away from the GPS unit if it began to "play up" for no ostensible reason. Of course, we've huddled our own laptops and GPS systems together on many occasions with no ill consequences, so as always, your miles <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/21/warning-dont-gps-and-drive/">may vary</a>.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.navigadget.com/index.php/2007/04/25/processor-frequency-may-mess-up-your-gps-navigation-system/">NaviGadget</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gps/" rel="tag">GPS</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/26/high-frequency-processors-could-put-your-gps-on-the-fritz/">High frequency processors could put your GPS on the fritz</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.tech.co.uk/gadgets/satellite-navigation/in-car-gps-installs/news/your-pc-could-knock-your-gps-out?articleid=2046970035>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/26/high-frequency-processors-could-put-your-gps-on-the-fritz/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/882606/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/26/high-frequency-processors-could-put-your-gps-on-the-fritz/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cpu</category><category>defense</category><category>error</category><category>interfere</category><category>interference</category><category>mishap</category><category>nav</category><category>navi</category><category>navigation</category><category>processor</category><category>research</category><category>study</category><category>swedish</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[TiVo Series3 + plasma TV = big problems]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/tivo-series3-plasma-tv-big-problems/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/tivo-series3-plasma-tv-big-problems/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/tivo-series3-plasma-tv-big-problems/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.tivocommunity.com/tivo-vb/showthread.php?t=317405&amp;page=1&amp;pp=30"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.engadget.com/media/2006/09/tivo-series3-box.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
So you just paid $800 for your brand new <a href="http://engadget.com/search/?q=series3">Series3</a> TiVo ($1,000 if you <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/07/lifetime-tivo-subs-transferrable-to-series-3-for-a-price/">transferred your lifetime subscription</a>), waited patiently as the morons from the cable company tried to get their heads around installing <a href="http://engadget.com/search/?q=cablecard">CableCARDs</a> in a non-TV device, and finally sat down on your couch to begin recording and commercial skipping all that great HD programming -- just to find out that your damn <a href="http://engadget.com/search/?q=tivo">TiVo</a> remote doesn't work! As many home theater aficionados know (first-hand, unfortunately), plasma TVs emit a significant amount of EMI and RFI signals from their surfaces that can confuse nearby IR sensors and render them useless, especially if your home theater gear juts out in front of the display. Well this problem has been happening in spades to new Series3 owners, as the box's IR receiver seems especially sensitive to other frequencies, so much so that they often need to press a button 10 to 15 times for a command to actually register. TiVo seems to be aware of the issue, but has not yet offered a solution, which is why the good folks who frequent the TiVo Community forum have put their heads together and come up with several effective workarounds. The most ghetto of these fixes involves attaching a tiny opaque "hood" around the box's sensor window, so that plasma interference can't go through but line-of-sight remote commands are still received. Since you probably don't want an ugly piece of cardboard hanging off of your beautiful $800 device, forum user "lightspeed" has come up with a slightly more difficult but much more aesthetically pleasing alternative: after carefully disassembling your Series3, you simply need to attach 6 to 8 small squares of GLAD Press 'n Seal to the inside of the IR window on the front face plate, which will serve to shield the sensor from the bad signals but let the good ones get through. Good job, intrepid TiVo devotees, but what we wanna know is: out of all the folks who beta tested this product, was there not even one of them who used it with a plasma and could have caught this problem much sooner? TiVo: makes a great product, but needs a little help in the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/17/tivo-fanatics-livid-over-series3-shipping-delays/">e-commerce</a> and quality assurance departments.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.tivocommunity.com/tivo-vb/showthread.php?t=317405&amp;page=1&amp;pp=30">Read</a>- Problem<br /><a href="http://www.tivocommunity.com/tivo-vb/showthread.php?p=4412449&amp;&amp;#post4412449">Read</a>- Fix<br /><a href="http://public.fotki.com/lightrunner/tivo_remote_fix/">Read</a>- Fix pics<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/dvrs/" rel="tag">DVRs</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/remotes/" rel="tag">Remotes</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/plasma/" rel="tag">Plasma</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cable/" rel="tag">Cable</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/tivo-series3-plasma-tv-big-problems/">TiVo Series3 + plasma TV = big problems</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/tivo-series3-plasma-tv-big-problems/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/675141/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/tivo-series3-plasma-tv-big-problems/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cable</category><category>dmr</category><category>dvr</category><category>hacks</category><category>hd</category><category>interference</category><category>ir</category><category>mods</category><category>plasma</category><category>problems</category><category>series3</category><category>tivo</category><category>tivo community forum</category><category>TivoCommunityForum</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evan Blass]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:43:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[TiVo Series3 + plasma TV = big problems]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/tivo-series3-plasma-tv-big-problems/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/tivo-series3-plasma-tv-big-problems/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/tivo-series3-plasma-tv-big-problems/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.tivocommunity.com/tivo-vb/showthread.php?t=317405&amp;page=1&amp;pp=30"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" id="vimage_1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2006/09/tivo-series3-box.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
So you just paid $800 for your brand new <a href="http://engadget.com/search/?q=series3">Series3</a> TiVo ($1,000 if you <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/07/lifetime-tivo-subs-transferrable-to-series-3-for-a-price/">transferred your lifetime subscription</a>), waited patiently as the morons from the cable company tried to get their heads around installing <a href="http://engadget.com/search/?q=cablecard">CableCARDs</a> in a non-TV device, and finally sat down on your couch to begin recording and commercial skipping all that great HD programming -- just to find out that your damn <a href="http://engadget.com/search/?q=tivo">TiVo</a> remote doesn't work! As many home theater aficionados know (first-hand, unfortunately), plasma TVs emit a significant amount of EMI and RFI signals from their surfaces that can confuse nearby IR sensors and render them useless, especially if your home theater gear juts out in front of the display. Well this problem has been happening in spades to new Series3 owners, as the box's IR receiver seems especially sensitive to other frequencies, so much so that they often need to press a button 10 to 15 times for a command to actually register. TiVo seems to be aware of the issue, but has not yet offered a solution, which is why the good folks who frequent the TiVo Community forum have put their heads together and come up with several effective workarounds. The most ghetto of these fixes involves attaching a tiny opaque "hood" around the box's sensor window, so that plasma interference can't go through but line-of-sight remote commands are still received. Since you probably don't want an ugly piece of cardboard hanging off of your beautiful $800 device, forum user "lightspeed" has come up with a slightly more difficult but much more aesthetically pleasing alternative: after carefully disassembling your Series3, you simply need to attach 6 to 8 small squares of GLAD Press 'n Seal to the inside of the IR window on the front face plate, which will serve to shield the sensor from the bad signals but let the good ones get through. Good job, intrepid TiVo devotees, but what we wanna know is: out of all the folks who beta tested this product, was there not even one of them who used it with a plasma and could have caught this problem much sooner? TiVo: makes a great product, but needs a little help in the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/17/tivo-fanatics-livid-over-series3-shipping-delays/">e-commerce</a> and quality assurance departments.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.tivocommunity.com/tivo-vb/showthread.php?t=317405&amp;page=1&amp;pp=30">Read</a>- Problem<br /><a href="http://www.tivocommunity.com/tivo-vb/showthread.php?p=4412449&amp;&amp;#post4412449">Read</a>- Fix<br /><a href="http://public.fotki.com/lightrunner/tivo_remote_fix/">Read</a>- Fix pics<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/hdtv/" rel="tag">HDTV</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/homeentertainment/" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/tivo-series3-plasma-tv-big-problems/">TiVo Series3 + plasma TV = big problems</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/tivo-series3-plasma-tv-big-problems/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/675103/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/tivo-series3-plasma-tv-big-problems/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dmr</category><category>dvr</category><category>hacks</category><category>hdtv</category><category>interference</category><category>ir</category><category>mods</category><category>plasma</category><category>problems</category><category>series3</category><category>tivo</category><category>tivo community forum</category><category>TivoCommunityForum</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evan Blass]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:43:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Enjoying OTA HDTV broadcasts? Not if you live by an airport]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/enjoying-ota-hdtv-broadcasts-not-if-you-live-by-an-airport/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/enjoying-ota-hdtv-broadcasts-not-if-you-live-by-an-airport/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/enjoying-ota-hdtv-broadcasts-not-if-you-live-by-an-airport/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060730/COLUMNISTS30/107300071/-1/opinion"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" id="vimage_1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.hdbeat.com/media/2006/08/airplane_landing.jpg" /></a></div>
In a report that may get more frequent as we move towards <a href="http://www.hdbeat.com/2006/02/09/bush-signs-dtv-bill-into-law/">all-digital broadcasting</a>, Nashua Telegraph writer Joe Konopka complains about aircraft knocking out his HDTV signal momentarily every night. Sure it was annoying after the nearby airport was built and sound pollution and radio interference affected his ability to get a good night's sleep or listen to the radio. But now that he's purchased a high definition television with a built in <a href="http://www.hdbeat.com/search/?q=ota">OTA</a> tuner, losing picture during a tense moment of <em>24 </em>is the simply unacceptable. Unfortunately, now that the airport is built he doesn't have much ability to change things and laments not joining forces with an environmentalist friend to get plans changed while the airport was still being built.<br /><br />Ouch. Any HD Beat readers dealt with a similar issue and have suggestions? (Other than switching to cable or satellite.)<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/ota/" rel="tag">OTA</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/enjoying-ota-hdtv-broadcasts-not-if-you-live-by-an-airport/">Enjoying OTA HDTV broadcasts? Not if you live by an airport</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 03 Aug 2006 09:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060730/COLUMNISTS30/107300071/-1/opinion>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/enjoying-ota-hdtv-broadcasts-not-if-you-live-by-an-airport/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/650186/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/enjoying-ota-hdtv-broadcasts-not-if-you-live-by-an-airport/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airplane</category><category>airport</category><category>hd</category><category>hdtv</category><category>high definition</category><category>HighDefinition</category><category>interference</category><category>konopka</category><category>nashua telegraph</category><category>NashuaTelegraph</category><category>ota</category><category>over the air</category><category>OverTheAir</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 09:52:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
