<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget RSS Feed</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 AOL Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Facebook says it was target of 'sophisticated attack,' no user data said to be compromised]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/15/facebook-says-it-was-target-of-sophisticated-attack-no-user-d/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/15/facebook-says-it-was-target-of-sophisticated-attack-no-user-d/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/15/facebook-says-it-was-target-of-sophisticated-attack-no-user-d/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/15/facebook-says-it-was-target-of-sophisticated-attack-no-user-d/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/08/facebook-profile.jpg" /></a></p><p> It looks like you can add another big name to the recent string of high-profile hacking attempts. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Facebook/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Facebook</a> announced in a blog post today that it discovered last month that it had been targeted in what's being described as a "sophisticated attack," which it says "occurred when a handful of employees visited a mobile developer website that was compromised." Facebook further pinpoints the attack to a previously unseen zero-day exploit that bypassed the Java sandbox and installed malware on the computers in question. The company goes on to note that it immediately notified Oracle of the exploit, which issued a patch on February 1st.</p><p> Facebook is also quick to point out that it has "found no evidence that Facebook user data was compromised," and adds that it was not alone in the attack, noting that it began to share information about the hack with other companies and entities as soon as it discovered it, and that it continues to work with law enforcement and others affected by the attack. You can find its full explanation of the matter at the source link.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/facebook/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Facebook</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/15/facebook-says-it-was-target-of-sophisticated-attack-no-user-d/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Via:</strong> <a target="_blank" href="http://allthingsd.com/20130215/facebook-hacked-claims-no-evidence-of-user-data-compromised/?mod=atdtweet">AllThingsD</a><!--//--></p>
<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a target="_blank" href="http://www.facebook.com/notes/facebook-security/protecting-people-on-facebook/10151249208250766">Facebook</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>cybersecurity</category><category>facebook</category><category>hacking</category><category>java</category><category>malware</category><category>osx</category><category>security</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:43:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20464616</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Java, Silverlight left in cold as Firefox disables all plugins by default -- except Flash]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/31/java-silverlight-disabled-by-default-firefox/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/31/java-silverlight-disabled-by-default-firefox/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/31/java-silverlight-disabled-by-default-firefox/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/31/java-silverlight-disabled-by-default-firefox/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Plugins enabled by default in Firefox, step forward  not so fast, Java and Silverlight " data-src-height="340" data-src-width="620" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2013/01/ff-plugins-1-31-13-03-1359612442.jpg" /></a></p><p> In an effort to prevent "drive-by exploitations," upcoming versions of Firefox will have Java, Adobe Reader and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/silverlight/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Silverlight</a> disabled by default, according to a recent Mozilla Security blog. All other third-party plugins except Flash will also be disabled, requiring users to enable them using the so-called click to play feature introduced last year. All that is to prevent "poorly designed" Firefox plugins from crashing or recent <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/12/us-cert-java-security-warning/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">headline-grabbing</a> exploits involving the likes of Java, with Adobe's Flash player being the one exception that works out of the box -- though versions <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/15/adobe-finds-critical-security-hole-in-flash-player-wont-fix/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">longer of tooth</a> than 10.3 won't see daylight without your say-so.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/internet/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/software/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Software</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/31/java-silverlight-disabled-by-default-firefox/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>

<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a href="https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2013/01/29/putting-users-in-control-of-plugins/" target="_blank">Mozilla Security Blog</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>Firefox</category><category>flash</category><category>java</category><category>Mozilla</category><category>plugins</category><category>security</category><category>silverlight</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Dent]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:46:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20444151</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Oracle patches Java exploits, toughens its default security levels (update: Apple does too)]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/14/oracle-patches-java-exploits-toughens-its-default-security-levels/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/14/oracle-patches-java-exploits-toughens-its-default-security-levels/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/14/oracle-patches-java-exploits-toughens-its-default-security-levels/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/14/oracle-patches-java-exploits-toughens-its-default-security-levels/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Oracle patches Java exploits, toughens its default security levels (update: Apple does too)" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2013/01/us-cert-java-warning.jpg" /></a></p><p> Oracle hasn't had a great start to 2013. It's barely into the new year, and Apple and Mozilla are already <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/12/us-cert-java-security-warning/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">putting up roadblocks</a> to some <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Java/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Java</a> versions after discoveries of significant browser-based exploits. The company has been quick to respond, however, and already has a patched-up version ready to go. The Java update goes one step further to minimize repeat incidents, as well -- it makes the "high" setting the default and asks permission before it launches any applet that wasn't officially signed. If you've been skittish about running a Java plugin ever since the latest exploits became public, hit the source to (potentially) calm your nerves.</p><p> <strong>Update:</strong> Apple has released its flavor of Java built for Macs with the appropriate patch as well.</p><p> [Thanks, Trevor]</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/internet/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/software/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Software</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/apple/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Apple</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/14/oracle-patches-java-exploits-toughens-its-default-security-levels/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Via:</strong> <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/01/13/us-java-oracle-security-idUSBRE90C0JB20130113" target="_blank">Reuters</a><!--//--></p>
<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a href="https://blogs.oracle.com/security/entry/security_alert_for_cve_2013" target="_blank">Oracle</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>apple</category><category>applet</category><category>browser</category><category>exploit</category><category>java</category><category>mozilla</category><category>oracle</category><category>security</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 02:37:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20427679</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[US-CERT warns users to disable Java in web browsers, Apple and Mozilla move to block it]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/12/us-cert-java-security-warning/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/12/us-cert-java-security-warning/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/12/us-cert-java-security-warning/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/12/us-cert-java-security-warning/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="USCERT warns users to disable Java in web browsers, Apple and Mozilla move to block it" data-src-height="450" data-src-width="565" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2013/01/us-cert-java-warning.jpg" /></a></p><p> It's far from the first time that computer users have been warned to disable <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/java/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Java</a>, but this latest security issue has risen to some high levels at a particularly rapid pace. After first being reported by security researchers on Thursday, the United States Computer Emergency Readiness Team (or US-CERT, a part of the Homeland Security department) stepped in with a warning of its own on Friday, which bluntly suggested that all computer users should disable Java in their web browsers (for its part, Oracle says that a fix is coming "shortly"). The flaw itself is a vulnerability in the Java Security Manager, which an attacker could exploit to run code on a user's computer.</p><p> Not content to wait for a fix, some companies have already taken steps to block possible exploits. That includes Apple, which has added recent versions of Java to its blacklist covering all OS X users, and Mozilla, which has enabled its "<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/20/firefox-17-heads-out-of-beta-officially-drops-support-for-os-x/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Click To Play</a>" functionality in Firefox for all recent versions of Java across all platforms (it was previously only enabled by default for older versions of Java). Apple's move follows an earlier decision to remove the Java plug-in from browsers in OS X 10.7 and up <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/18/apple-removes-java-from-osx/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">last fall</a>. You can find the full alert issued by US-CERT and additional details on the vulnerability at the links below.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/internet/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/software/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Software</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/12/us-cert-java-security-warning/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Via:</strong> <a target="_blank" href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/1/12/3867332/department-of-homeland-security-disable-java">The Verge</a><!--//--></p>
<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a target="_blank" href="http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA13-010A.html">US-CERT</a><!--//-->, <a target="_blank" href="https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2013/01/11/protecting-users-against-java-vulnerability/">Mozilla</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>apple</category><category>browser</category><category>java</category><category>mozilla</category><category>security</category><category>webbrowser</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 11:03:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20427234</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple says no Java for you, removes plugin from browsers on OS X 10.7 and up]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/18/apple-removes-java-from-osx/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/18/apple-removes-java-from-osx/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/18/apple-removes-java-from-osx/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center; "> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/18/apple-removes-java-from-osx/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Apple says no Java for you, removes plugin from browsers on OS X 107 and up" data-src-height="381" data-src-width="620" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/10/javalogocross.png" /></a></p><p> Apple has recently released a Mac update for OS X Lion and Mountain Lion that removes its <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/java?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Java</a> plugin from all OS X browsers. If you install the update, you'll find a region labeled "Missing plug-in" in place of a Java applet; of course, Apple can't stop you from clicking on it to download a Java plug-in directly from Oracle. The Cupertino-based company had previously halted pre-installing Java in OS X partially due to the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/apple-releases-fix-for-flashback-malware/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">exploitable factors of the platform</a>, so this update signifies further distancing from Larry Ellison's pride and joy.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/internet/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/apple/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Apple</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/18/apple-removes-java-from-osx/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Via:</strong> <a target="_blank" href="http://arstechnica.com/apple/2012/10/apple-removes-java-from-all-os-x-web-browsers/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+arstechnica%2Findex+%28Ars+Technica+-+All+content%29">Ars Technica</a><!--//--></p>
<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a target="_blank" href="http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5493">Apple Support</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>apple</category><category>apple os x</category><category>AppleOsX</category><category>applet</category><category>browsers</category><category>java</category><category>java applet</category><category>java software</category><category>java update</category><category>JavaApplet</category><category>JavaSoftware</category><category>JavaUpdate</category><category>mac</category><category>mac update</category><category>MacUpdate</category><category>oracle</category><category>oracle java</category><category>OracleJava</category><category>os x</category><category>os x lion</category><category>os x mountain lion</category><category>OsX</category><category>OsXLion</category><category>OsXMountainLion</category><category>software update</category><category>SoftwareUpdate</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicole Lee]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 19:34:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20354448</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Oracle begins appeal process in its Java patent case against Google, Android (Update: Google too)]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/03/oracle-google-android-java-lawsuit/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/03/oracle-google-android-java-lawsuit/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/03/oracle-google-android-java-lawsuit/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/03/oracle-google-android-java-lawsuit/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/2010-08-13androidga.jpg" /></a></p><p> You should know by now that it's never truly over when tech giants resort to legal warfare over their technology, and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/20/google-to-pay-0-in-damages-to-oracle/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">just as it said it would</a>, Oracle has filed an appeal of the US District Court ruling in its case against Google. In case you'd forgotten, back in May Judge William Alsup found that the structure of its Java APIs <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/31/oracle-v-google-judge-finds-no-copyright-for-the-structure-of/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">were not copyrightable</a> so Oracle had to settle for $0 in damages over its claims that Android infringed on its patents and copyrights. <i>FOSS Patent's</i> Florian Mueller has a full breakdown of what he sees in the case, meanwhile we'll be preparing our fallout shelters for potential Android Armageddon... <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/02/oracle-and-google-get-a-trial-date-april-16th-is-the-start-of-a/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">again</a>.</p><p> <strong>Update</strong>: Haven't had enough of paperwork flying back and forth? Good, because according to <em>Bloomberg</em>, Google has also filed an appeal in the case over the judge's decision not to set aside the jury's copyright verdict or order a new trial.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/software/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Software</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/mobile/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Mobile</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/03/oracle-google-android-java-lawsuit/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>

<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a href="http://www.fosspatents.com/2012/10/oracle-gives-notice-of-appeal-of-ruling.html" target="_blank">FOSS Patents</a><!--//-->, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-04/google-to-appeal-copyright-infringement-finding-in-oracle-trial.html" target="_blank">Bloomberg</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>android</category><category>appeal</category><category>appeals</category><category>copyright</category><category>google</category><category>ip</category><category>java</category><category>java api</category><category>java apis</category><category>JavaApi</category><category>JavaApis</category><category>judge alsup</category><category>JudgeAlsup</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>oracle</category><category>patent</category><category>patent infringement</category><category>PatentInfringement</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 23:03:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20341202</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[AT&amp;T ready to battle Sprint for push-to-talk supremacy starting in November]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/17/atandt-to-battle-sprint-for-push-to-talk-supremacy/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/17/atandt-to-battle-sprint-for-push-to-talk-supremacy/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/17/atandt-to-battle-sprint-for-push-to-talk-supremacy/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/17/atandt-to-battle-sprint-for-push-to-talk-supremacy/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="AT&amp;T ready to take battle Sprint for PushtoTalk supremacy starting in November" data-src-height="338" data-src-width="600" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/09/att-headquarters.jpeg" /></a></p><p> While Sprint's iDEN network is <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/16/sprint-direct-connect-will-replace-iden-with-cdma-launch-late-t/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">getting the axe in favor of a new CDMA setup</a>, AT&amp;T will soon be <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/22/atandt-launches-pilot-program-for-expanded-push-to-talk-services/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">sprucing up</a> its near absent push-to-talk services. Targeting a November release with plans starting around $30, Ma Bell's enhanced PTT will be compatible with smartphones running Android 2.3+, BlackBerry 7, Windows Phone 8 and even Java-powered feature phones. In addition to playing nice with a variety of mobile platforms, this new service will also work across laptops, tablets and smart cars.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/wireless/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Wireless</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/mobile/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Mobile</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/17/atandt-to-battle-sprint-for-push-to-talk-supremacy/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Via:</strong> <a target="_blank" href="http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/att-chase-sprint-iden-subs-november-launch-enhanced-ptt-service/2012-09-17">Fierce Wireless</a><!--//--></p>
<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a target="_blank" href="http://switchtoattptt.com/">AT&amp;T</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>android</category><category>android 2.3</category><category>Android2.3</category><category>app</category><category>apps</category><category>ATT</category><category>blackberry</category><category>blackberry 7</category><category>Blackberry7</category><category>Direct Connect</category><category>DirectConnect</category><category>gingerbread</category><category>google</category><category>iDEN</category><category>java</category><category>kodiak</category><category>kodiak networks</category><category>KodiakNetworks</category><category>microsoft</category><category>minipost</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>mobilepostmini</category><category>Nextel</category><category>PTT</category><category>Push to Talk</category><category>PushToTalk</category><category>rim</category><category>Sprint</category><category>Sprint Nextel</category><category>SprintNextel</category><category>windows phone</category><category>windows phone 8</category><category>WindowsPhone</category><category>WindowsPhone8</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Hearn]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 23:24:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20325835</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google releases new Java to iOS source code translator]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/17/google-releases-new-java-to-ios-source-code-translator/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/17/google-releases-new-java-to-ios-source-code-translator/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/17/google-releases-new-java-to-ios-source-code-translator/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center; "> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/17/google-releases-new-java-to-ios-source-code-translator/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Google releases new open-source Java to iOS translator: makes transferring apps easier" data-src-height="320" data-src-width="600" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/09/javacodeios.jpg" /></a></p><p> Developers have their work cut out. Even if we (impolitely) sidestep the likes of Windows Phone, BlackBerry <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/bada,symbian?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">and the rest</a>, those coders often have to pitch their work across web, iOS and Android. Google's trying to make that job a little easier, introducing a new tool that automatically converts Java source code into <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/objective-c/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Objective-C</a>, which is used in iPad and iPhone apps. While the J2ObjC tool can't tackle the UI for these, it does allow developers to craft other parts (including data access and nuts-and-bolts programming) into an easily shareable code without editing. Some existing Google projects already utilize the new translator, but its results remains a little temperamental -- the tool hasn't translated all possible paths just yet, and many Java devs have, according to the project page, "a slightly different way of using Java."</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/17/google-releases-new-java-to-ios-source-code-translator/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Via:</strong> <a target="_blank" href="http://www.zdnet.com/google-releases-tool-to-bridge-back-ends-for-ios-and-android-apps-7000004341/">ZDNET</a><!--//--></p>
<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a target="_blank" href="http://google-opensource.blogspot.de/2012/09/j2objc-java-to-ios-objective-c.html">Google Open Source Blog</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>android</category><category>apps</category><category>code</category><category>coding</category><category>developer</category><category>developers</category><category>Google</category><category>ios</category><category>java</category><category>minipost</category><category>Objective-C</category><category>open source</category><category>OpenSource</category><category>tool</category><category>web apps</category><category>WebApps</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mat Smith]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 10:54:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20324880</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google to pay $0 in damages to Oracle, wait for appeal]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/20/google-to-pay-0-in-damages-to-oracle/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/20/google-to-pay-0-in-damages-to-oracle/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/20/google-to-pay-0-in-damages-to-oracle/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/20/google-to-pay-0-in-damages-to-oracle/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Google to pay $0 in damages to Oracle, wait for appeal " src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/oracle-v-google-1308942960.jpg" style="width: 593px; height: 376px;" /></a></p><p> After watching Judge Alsup strike down its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/23/jury-google-oracle/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">patent</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/31/oracle-v-google-judge-finds-no-copyright-for-the-structure-of/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Java API</a> infringement claims, Oracle seems to be cutting its losses, agreeing to accept $0 in damages from Google. Confused? So was the Judge, who reportedly responded to the proposal by asking, "is there a catch I need to be aware of?" No catch, but Oracle isn't giving up, stating that it's taking its case to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. If successful, the appeal could put the two firms back in Alsup's courtroom, perhaps asking for somewhere between the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/20/oracles-final-damage-claim-against-google-well-under-100-milli/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">previously proposed</a> $32.3 million and today's sum total of zilch. We'll let you know when the drama comes around again.</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/20/google-to-pay-0-in-damages-to-oracle/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>Alsup</category><category>android</category><category>copyright</category><category>copyright infringement</category><category>CopyrightInfringement</category><category>district court</category><category>DistrictCourt</category><category>google</category><category>ip</category><category>java</category><category>Judge Alsup</category><category>JudgeAlsup</category><category>judgment</category><category>law</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>lawsuits</category><category>legal</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>oracle</category><category>patent</category><category>patent infringement</category><category>PatentInfringement</category><category>ruling</category><category>us district cour</category><category>UsDistrictCour</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Buckley]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:48:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20263016</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Oracle v. Google: Judge finds structure of Java APIs not copyrightable, renders jury infringement verdict moot]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/31/oracle-v-google-judge-finds-no-copyright-for-the-structure-of/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/31/oracle-v-google-judge-finds-no-copyright-for-the-structure-of/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/31/oracle-v-google-judge-finds-no-copyright-for-the-structure-of/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/31/oracle-v-google-judge-finds-no-copyright-for-the-structure-of/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Image" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/2010-08-13androidga.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 399px;" /></a></p><p> Thought the Oracle v. Google litigation fireworks <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/23/jury-google-oracle/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">were over</a>? Well, if you weren't aware, during the copyright phase of the trial, the jury found that Google had infringed the structure, sequence and organization of Oracle's Java APIs. However, at the time, Judge Alsup had yet to evaluate the validity of Oracle's API copyright claims upon which that verdict was based. Today, Alsup found that Oracle's argument didn't hold water because it would expand the breadth of copyright holder's rights too far -- in essence, it would allow owners of software code to prevent others from writing different versions to perform the same functions. This ruling renders the jury's earlier infringement verdict moot, and gives Mountain View yet another courtroom victory. Despite this latest defeat, Oracle's sure to run the case up one more rung on the legal ladder, so let the countdown to the appeal begin.</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/31/oracle-v-google-judge-finds-no-copyright-for-the-structure-of/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>api</category><category>copyright</category><category>copyright infringement</category><category>copyright.</category><category>CopyrightInfringement</category><category>google</category><category>infringment</category><category>ip</category><category>java</category><category>java api</category><category>java apis</category><category>JavaApi</category><category>JavaApis</category><category>judge alsup</category><category>JudgeAlsup</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>litigation</category><category>oracle</category><category>ruling</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Gorman]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 18:15:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20249025</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Jury issues verdict in Android suit, finds that Google doesn't infringe Oracle patents]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/23/jury-google-oracle/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/23/jury-google-oracle/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/23/jury-google-oracle/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/23/jury-google-oracle/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Image" height="376" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/oracle-v-google-1308942960.jpg" style="margin:4px" width="593" /></a></p><p> It appears that the jury has come to a conclusion in the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/02/oracle-and-google-get-a-trial-date-april-16th-is-the-start-of-a/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Oracle v. Google trial</a>, determining that Android does not infringe Oracle patents. Judge William Alsup of the US District Court for Northern California exonerated the search giant following a trial that lasted three weeks, ruling that Google did not infringe on six claims in US Patent RE38,104, along two claims in US Patent 6,061,520. Jurors were dismissed following today's ruling, with the trial's damages phase reportedly set to begin on Tuesday. According to <em>The Verge</em>, the jury did determine that Google was responsible for two counts of minor copyright infringement, relating to the order of Java APIs and several lines of rangeCheck code, which could be matched with a maximum penalty of $150,000 for each count. Regardless, it appears that the lawsuit, which <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/12/oracle-sues-google-over-java-patent-infringement-in-android/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">dates back to 2010</a>, when Oracle filed against Google for copyright and patent infringement related to Sun's Java code, could finally be coming to a close.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/mobile/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Mobile</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/23/jury-google-oracle/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>android</category><category>copyright</category><category>copyright infringement</category><category>CopyrightInfringement</category><category>district court</category><category>DistrictCourt</category><category>google</category><category>ip</category><category>java</category><category>judgment</category><category>law</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>lawsuits</category><category>legal</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>oracle</category><category>patent</category><category>patent infringement</category><category>PatentInfringement</category><category>ruling</category><category>us district court</category><category>UsDistrictCourt</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Honig]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 14:05:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20243704</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple issues Leopard update with Flashback removal tool]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/apple-issues-leopard-update-with-flashback-removal-tool/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/apple-issues-leopard-update-with-flashback-removal-tool/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/apple-issues-leopard-update-with-flashback-removal-tool/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/apple-issues-leopard-update-with-flashback-removal-tool/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Apple issues Leopard update with Flashback removal tool" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/leopard-osx.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 375px; height: 431px;" /></a></p><p> <span>Folks still rocking Apple's Leopard may have been feeling left out after Lion and Snow Leopard both got an update for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/apple-releases-fix-for-flashback-malware/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">addressing that Flashback malware</a>. If you're one of them, you'll be glad to know that Apple has finally issued a Leopard fix that comes with a removal tool for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/10/apple-publishes-support-page-for-flashback-malware-is-working-o/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">the vulnerability</a> afflicting its big cats. In addition to a 1.23MB Flashback update, Apple also released a second 1.11MB </span><span>fix for Leopard that disables versions of Adobe Flash Player that don't have the requisite security updates. Both should <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/18/apple-flashback-virus-infections-update/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">further whittle down</a> the number of Apple computers affected by the Flashback trojan. For the actual updates, feel free to pounce on the source links below.</span></p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/apple-issues-leopard-update-with-flashback-removal-tool/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>10.5</category><category>10.6</category><category>10.7</category><category>adobe flash</category><category>AdobeFlash</category><category>apple</category><category>botnet</category><category>dr. web</category><category>Dr.Web</category><category>flashback</category><category>flashfake</category><category>java</category><category>Java Virtual Machine</category><category>JavaVirtualMachine</category><category>leopard</category><category>lion</category><category>malware</category><category>os x</category><category>OsX</category><category>patch</category><category>security</category><category>snow leopard</category><category>SnowLeopard</category><category>trojan</category><category>update</category><category>virus</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Hidalgo]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 04:01:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20238100</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Xamarin's XobotOS opens prospect of Android port to C#, can of worms]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/Xamarin-XobotOS-ports-Android-to-C-Sharp/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/Xamarin-XobotOS-ports-Android-to-C-Sharp/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/Xamarin-XobotOS-ports-Android-to-C-Sharp/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/Xamarin-XobotOS-ports-Android-to-C-Sharp/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Xamarin-XobotOS-ports-Android-to-C-Sharp" height="400" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/android-c-05-04-12-01.jpg" style="margin:4px" width="600" /></a></p><p> Would it be ironic if Android developers did an end-run around <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/pegatron-licenses-microsofts-patent-porfolio-for-android-and-ch/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Microsoft patents</a> by using Microsoft's own C#? Or if Google kiboshed its Oracle <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/02/oracle-and-google-get-a-trial-date-april-16th-is-the-start-of-a/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">brouhaha</a> with the aid of none other than Redmond? We're asking because Xamarin, the wacky open source implementer of .NET, has ported Android to Microsoft's C# with its XobotOS project. Although just an experiment and unlikely to solve Google's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/02/oracle-and-google-get-a-trial-date-april-16th-is-the-start-of-a/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">issues</a>, the team showed that running the robot on C# instead of Java gave fewer coding limitations, better battery life and direct graphics access. Additionally, Xamarin reports "massive" speed gains on its HTC Flyer and Acer Iconia when running the side-project port -- no surprise given C#'s machine heritage. Sure, it's pure speculation that Mountain View and its developers would ever change their Java MO, but a little patent relief and faster Android devices in one kill shot? That's a sweet idea.</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/Xamarin-XobotOS-ports-Android-to-C-Sharp/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>android</category><category>business</category><category>c</category><category>C Sharp</category><category>CSharp</category><category>dalvik</category><category>dev</category><category>developer</category><category>developers</category><category>google</category><category>hack</category><category>hacks</category><category>java</category><category>java dalvik</category><category>JavaDalvik</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>microsoft</category><category>oracle</category><category>OS</category><category>patent</category><category>patent deal</category><category>PatentDeal</category><category>port</category><category>ports</category><category>software</category><category>xamarin</category><category>xobot</category><category>xobotOS</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Dent]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 16:16:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20230869</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Around 140,000 Apple machines still infected with Flashback malware, says Symantec]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/18/apple-flashback-virus-infections-update/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/18/apple-flashback-virus-infections-update/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/18/apple-flashback-virus-infections-update/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/18/apple-flashback-virus-infections-update/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Around 140,000 Apple machines still infected with Flashback malware, says Symantec" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/04/fb4-17-1334719252.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 285px;" /></a></p><p> By now, we're all quite familiar with the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/10/apple-publishes-support-page-for-flashback-malware-is-working-o/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Java-driven trojan</a> that's affected thousands of Apple's rigs, and while the numbers seem to have drastically dropped since the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/apple-releases-fix-for-flashback-malware/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">first Cupertino fix</a>, there's still a plethora of machines carrying the bug. According to Symantec, the number of infected computers is now at around 140,000, seeing a decline of over 460,000 since April 9th. Still, the security outfit remains puzzled by the fact, as it expected the digits to be somewhere near the 99,000 mark by now. Perhaps this is due to some folks not even being aware of Flashback's existence, or maybe not checking for software updates as often as most of us. Either way, we hope <em>you've</em> already used <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/14/apple-issues-flashback-removal-tool-for-10-7-lion/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">one of the tools</a> Apple handed you.</p><p></p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/18/apple-flashback-virus-infections-update/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>apple</category><category>bug</category><category>bugs</category><category>flashback</category><category>flashback malware</category><category>FlashbackMalware</category><category>java</category><category>malware</category><category>os x</category><category>os x lion</category><category>OsX</category><category>OsXLion</category><category>security</category><category>virus</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edgar Alvarez]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 07:21:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20218185</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple issues Flashback removal tool for 10.7 Lion systems not running Java]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/14/apple-issues-flashback-removal-tool-for-10-7-lion/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/14/apple-issues-flashback-removal-tool-for-10-7-lion/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/14/apple-issues-flashback-removal-tool-for-10-7-lion/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/14/apple-issues-flashback-removal-tool-for-10-7-lion/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Apple issues Flashback removal tool for 10.7 Lion systems not running Java" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/04/trojanlion107nojtool.png" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 234px;" /></a></div>The <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/10/apple-publishes-support-page-for-flashback-malware-is-working-o/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Flashback OS X trojan</a> continues to cast a rainy shadow over Mac owners' sense of security, and even though a fix has <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/apple-releases-fix-for-flashback-malware/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">been released</a>, this was only for what Apple considered "the most common variants." Users of Lion, who don't have Java installed, weren't included in that initial run, but there is a new removal tool just for them. So, if you're running 10.7 and never installed Oracle's virtual machine, make sure you point your browser at the source link below.

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/14/apple-issues-flashback-removal-tool-for-10-7-lion/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>10.7</category><category>apple</category><category>flashback</category><category>java</category><category>lion</category><category>malware</category><category>os x</category><category>OsX</category><category>osx 10.7</category><category>osx lion</category><category>Osx10.7</category><category>OsxLion</category><category>security</category><category>update</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Trew]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 09:53:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20215808</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple releases fix for Flashback malware]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/apple-releases-fix-for-flashback-malware/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/apple-releases-fix-for-flashback-malware/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/apple-releases-fix-for-flashback-malware/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/apple-releases-fix-for-flashback-malware/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/04/javaapple.jpg" style="width: 476px; height: 346px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid;" /></a></div>It <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/10/apple-publishes-support-page-for-flashback-malware-is-working-o/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">promised</a> earlier this week that a fix was coming, and Apple has now delivered a Java security update that is says removes "<span>the most common variants of the Flashback malware."</span> That update also reconfigures the Java web plug-in to disable the automatic execution of Java applets by default (in Lion, at least -- those still on Snow Leopard are advised to do that themselves), although folks can re-enable that functionality if they choose. As usual, OS X users can download the update through the Software Update application.

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/apple-releases-fix-for-flashback-malware/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>apple</category><category>flashback</category><category>java</category><category>malware</category><category>os x</category><category>OsX</category><category>security</category><category>update</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:08:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20214664</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple publishes support page for Flashback malware, is working on a fix]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/10/apple-publishes-support-page-for-flashback-malware-is-working-o/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/10/apple-publishes-support-page-for-flashback-malware-is-working-o/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/10/apple-publishes-support-page-for-flashback-malware-is-working-o/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/10/apple-publishes-support-page-for-flashback-malware-is-working-o/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Apple publishes support page for Flashback malware, is working on a fix" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/04/208193442.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 514px; height: 450px;" /></a></div>After the Flashback / Flashfake Mac trojan was exposed by Russian site <em>Dr. Web</em>, Apple has finally responded by publishing a support page about the issue and promising a fix. If you haven't heard by now, the malware exploits a flaw in the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/java?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Java</a> Virtual Machine, which Oracle pushed a fix for back in February, but Apple didn't patch until a botnet consisting of as many as 650,000 Macs was identified on March 4th. Antivirus maker Kaspersky has confirmed the earlier findings, and released a free tool affected users can run to remove the trojan from their computers. Other than the update already delivered for computers running OS 10.6 and 10.7 Apple recommends users on 10.5 and earlier disable Java in their browser preferences. What isn't mentioned however, is when its fix is incoming or any timetable on its efforts with international ISPs to cut off the IP addresses used by the network. This is <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/01/apple-cracks-down-on-macdefender-prevents-malware-downloads-wit/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">not</a> the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/22/iwork-09-trojan-infects-at-least-20-000-machines/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">first time</a> Macs have fallen prey to malware and as their market share grows will likely not be the last, so don't think just opting for OS X is automatically keeping you a step ahead security-wise. Check the links below for more information about what the malware does, and how to get rid of it.

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/10/apple-publishes-support-page-for-flashback-malware-is-working-o/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>10.6</category><category>10.7</category><category>apple</category><category>botnet</category><category>dr. web</category><category>Dr.Web</category><category>flashback</category><category>flashfake</category><category>java</category><category>Java Virtual Machine</category><category>JavaVirtualMachine</category><category>kaspersky</category><category>lion</category><category>malware</category><category>os x</category><category>OsX</category><category>patch</category><category>security</category><category>snow leopard</category><category>SnowLeopard</category><category>trojan</category><category>update</category><category>virus</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:50:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20212858</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Oracle and Google get a trial date, April 16th is the start of Android armageddon]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/02/oracle-and-google-get-a-trial-date-april-16th-is-the-start-of-a/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/02/oracle-and-google-get-a-trial-date-april-16th-is-the-start-of-a/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/02/oracle-and-google-get-a-trial-date-april-16th-is-the-start-of-a/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/02/oracle-and-google-get-a-trial-date-april-16th-is-the-start-of-a/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Oracle and Google get a trial date, April 16th is the start of Android armageddon" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/04/oracle-v-google-1308942960.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 593px; height: 376px;" /></a></div>As regular readers of this site are well aware, Google and Oracle have had an ongoing <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/12/oracle-sues-google-over-java-patent-infringement-in-android/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">legal spat</a> for nearly two years now. In the time since the lawsuit's filing, the legal claims have been <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/20/oracle-drops-patent-from-google-lawsuit-google-moves-to-strike/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">narrowed</a>, damages claims have been <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/25/judge-tells-oracle-to-rethink-2-6-billion-claim-against-google/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">adjusted</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/17/judge-attacks-oracles-stratospheric-damages-claim-against-goo/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">reduced</a>, and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/20/oracles-final-damage-claim-against-google-well-under-100-milli/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">reduced </a>again. All that activity, plus continuous settlement talks caused the trial to be delayed several times. But now it appears that the two sides have officially reached an impasse, and so the tech giants will go to trial on April 16th to determine if Android illicitly pulled code from Java. Will Oracle get paid? Will Google and its green bots be gloating in the end? Pop some popcorn and settle in, folks, we'll start getting some answers in a couple weeks.

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/02/oracle-and-google-get-a-trial-date-april-16th-is-the-start-of-a/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>android</category><category>copyright</category><category>copyright infringement</category><category>CopyrightInfringement</category><category>google</category><category>ip</category><category>java</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>oracle</category><category>patent</category><category>patent infringement</category><category>PatentInfringement</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Gorman]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 17:37:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20206922</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Oracle's final damage claim against Google well under $100 million]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/20/oracles-final-damage-claim-against-google-well-under-100-milli/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/20/oracles-final-damage-claim-against-google-well-under-100-milli/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/20/oracles-final-damage-claim-against-google-well-under-100-milli/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/20/oracles-final-damage-claim-against-google-well-under-100-milli/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Oracle vs. Google" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/06/oracle-v-google-1308942960.jpg" style="width: 593px; height: 376px; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>My, my, my, how the mighty have fallen. In this case, the mighty is the roughly $6 billion Oracle initially sought in its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/12/oracle-sues-google-over-java-patent-infringement-in-android/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">suit against Google</a>. By September of last year that number had dropped to a comparatively paltry <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/22/oracle-amends-complaint-against-google-to-2-billion-risks-the/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">$2 billion</a>, which was still too high for presiding Judge William Alsup. Now that has plummeted precipitously, with Oracle's new starting figure sitting at $32.3 million. Of course, the final total for the damages will likely be higher than that, but we'd be mighty shocked if the ultimate settlement was even close to $100 million. Google's own estimates put the valuation at between $37.5 million and $46.6 million -- a far cry from the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/25/judge-tells-oracle-to-rethink-2-6-billion-claim-against-google/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">$100 million starting point</a> Alsup had suggested in July of last year. Now all that's left is for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/oracle,google?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">this sucker</a> to actually go to trial. Hit up the source to read the full filing.

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/20/oracles-final-damage-claim-against-google-well-under-100-milli/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>android</category><category>copyright</category><category>google</category><category>infringement</category><category>intellectual property</category><category>IntellectualProperty</category><category>ip</category><category>java</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>litigation</category><category>oracle</category><category>patent</category><category>patents</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 16:38:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20197340</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Oracle drops patent from Google lawsuit, Google moves to strike Oracle's third damages report]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/20/oracle-drops-patent-from-google-lawsuit-google-moves-to-strike/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/20/oracle-drops-patent-from-google-lawsuit-google-moves-to-strike/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/20/oracle-drops-patent-from-google-lawsuit-google-moves-to-strike/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/20/oracle-drops-patent-from-google-lawsuit-google-moves-to-strike/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Oracle drops patent from Google lawsuit, Google moves to strike Oracle's third damages report" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/2010-08-13androidga.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>After much sound and fury in its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/oracle%2C+google?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">legal proceedings</a> for IP infringement against Google, Oracle's claims continue to be whittled away. Judge Alsup has been on Oracle's case to downgrade its damages claims for months now, and on Friday, he got yet another reason to do so. Ellison's crew has finally withdrawn the last remaining claim of patent number 6,192,476 from the litigation -- the very same patent that had 17 of 21 claims <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/23/oracle-v-google-update-uspto-rejects-several-patent-claims-le/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">wiped out earlier</a> during a USPTO re-examination proceeding. Additionally, Google has filed a motion to strike Oracle's third damages report for, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/22/oracle-amends-complaint-against-google-to-2-billion-risks-the/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">once again</a>, artificially inflating the monetary damages in its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/17/judge-attacks-oracles-stratospheric-damages-claim-against-goo/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">expert report</a>. No one can say for sure how the judge will rule on that motion, but given that Oracle's got less IP than ever with which to allege infringement, it seems likely that the Court will send it back to the damages drawing board.

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/20/oracle-drops-patent-from-google-lawsuit-google-moves-to-strike/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>android</category><category>copyright</category><category>google</category><category>infringement</category><category>intellectual property</category><category>IntellectualProperty</category><category>ip</category><category>java</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>litigation</category><category>oracle</category><category>patent</category><category>patents</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Gorman]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 22:37:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20175665</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google's Dart lands in Chromium tech preview]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/17/googles-dart-lands-in-chromium-tech-preview/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/17/googles-dart-lands-in-chromium-tech-preview/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/17/googles-dart-lands-in-chromium-tech-preview/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/17/googles-dart-lands-in-chromium-tech-preview/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/dart-1318242959.jpg" style="width: 600px; height: 403px;" /></a></div>Leaves weren't the only things flying around Mountain View last Autumn <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/10/google-takes-steady-aim-at-web-programming-with-dart/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">if you remember</a>, Google also unleashed its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/09/google-set-to-introduce-dart-a-new-structured-programming-langu/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Dart</a> programming language. Now, developers can get their hands on a tech preview version of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/chromium?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Chromium</a>, with the Dart virtual machine baked right in. There are Mac and Linux binaries available today, but no details about other platforms (<em>ahem</em> Windows) at this time. The preview lets you run your programs directly on the Dart VM, skipping the separate compilation stage. While it's just for developers at the minute, there are plans to include this in standard Chrome releases in the future. Aim at the source link after the break for the full details.

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/17/googles-dart-lands-in-chromium-tech-preview/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>chromium</category><category>Dart</category><category>Dart programming language</category><category>DartLang</category><category>DartProgrammingLanguage</category><category>developer preview</category><category>DeveloperPreview</category><category>download</category><category>google</category><category>Google Dart</category><category>google products</category><category>GoogleDart</category><category>GoogleProducts</category><category>java</category><category>JavaScript</category><category>javascript virtual machine</category><category>JavascriptVirtualMachine</category><category>programming</category><category>programming lan</category><category>Programming Language</category><category>ProgrammingLan</category><category>ProgrammingLanguage</category><category>tech preview</category><category>TechPreview</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Trew]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:39:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20174291</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Firefox 10 out now: full screen apps, fewer crashes, disappearing forward button]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/31/firefox-10-out-now/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/31/firefox-10-out-now/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/31/firefox-10-out-now/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/31/firefox-10-out-now/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/screen-shot-2012-01-31-at-16.49.41.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>The tenth iteration of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/20/firefox-9-now-available-boasts-speedier-javascript-handling-li/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Mozilla's browser</a> is rolling out from today and we're sat here waiting for our own go signal. As the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/28/mozilla-to-overhaul-firefoxs-default-home-and-tab-pages/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">biggest UI tweaks</a> will arrive in v12, the majority of changes are under the hood: except that the "forward" button now only appears once you've pressed "back." New APIs provide for full-screen viewing of web apps, Anti-aliased WebGL graphics and an "extended support release" that enables enterprise customers to only download security updates. CSS 3D Transitions are now supported alongside a new CSS inspector for those digging deep into the fabric of the universe internet. Java applet and moving bookmarks crashes should be a thing of the past, but it's not all plain sailing: no new release ever is, after all. On the "to be fixed" list includes <em>herky-jerky</em> scrolling in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/01/google-rolls-out-new-look-for-gmail/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Gmail</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/12/silverlight-hits-5-0-microsoft-silent-as-to-its-future/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Silverlight</a> videos not working in OS X and vertical scrolling is broken on some touch-pads. Let's hope they get the former fixed quickly, our inbox is already overflowing 'round these parts.<br /><br /><strong>Update</strong>: The Mozilla blog has posted a quick demo video of how the new tools can help developers, check it out after the break.

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/31/firefox-10-out-now/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>Browser</category><category>CSS</category><category>CSS 3D</category><category>Css3d</category><category>Firefox</category><category>Firefox 10</category><category>Firefox 9</category><category>Firefox Update</category><category>Firefox10</category><category>Firefox9</category><category>FirefoxUpdate</category><category>Java</category><category>minipost</category><category>Mozilla</category><category>Mozilla Firefox</category><category>MozillaFirefox</category><category>Silverlight</category><category>video</category><category>WebGL</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:49:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20161010</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Judge attacks Oracle's 'stratospheric' damages claim against Google, postpones trial]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/17/judge-attacks-oracles-stratospheric-damages-claim-against-goo/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/17/judge-attacks-oracles-stratospheric-damages-claim-against-goo/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/17/judge-attacks-oracles-stratospheric-damages-claim-against-goo/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/17/judge-attacks-oracles-stratospheric-damages-claim-against-goo/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/oracle-vs-google.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>Everything we've heard about Judge William Alsup tells us he's a guy you don't mess with -- and yet Oracle seems bent on doing precisely that. When the company initially demanded <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/22/oracle-amends-complaint-against-google-to-2-billion-risks-the/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">$6.1 billion</a> from Google in recompense for alleged violations of its Java patents, Alsup laughed that figure out of court and suggested <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/25/judge-tells-oracle-to-rethink-2-6-billion-claim-against-google/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">$100 million</a> might be closer to the mark. Ellison's crew then came back with a revised claim of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/22/oracle-amends-complaint-against-google-to-2-billion-risks-the/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">$2 billion</a>, which we just knew would lead to another smackdown. Well, here it is: the judge has now cancelled the latest trial date (which had been scheduled for March) and refused to set a new one until the claimant stops using "improper methodologies" for assessing damages, which are "obviously calculated to reach stratospheric numbers." Perhaps Oracle should try something more tropospheric?

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/17/judge-attacks-oracles-stratospheric-damages-claim-against-goo/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>android</category><category>complaint</category><category>damage complaint</category><category>DamageComplaint</category><category>google</category><category>java</category><category>judge william alsup</category><category>JudgeWilliamAlsup</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>oracle</category><category>oracle vs. google</category><category>OracleVs.Google</category><category>patent</category><category>patent dispute</category><category>patent suit</category><category>PatentDispute</category><category>patents</category><category>PatentSuit</category><category>Willia</category><category>william alsup</category><category>WilliamAlsup</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 02:27:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20149414</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Android Design Preview simplifies app mockups, developers' lives (video)]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/03/android-design-preview-simplifies-app-mockups-developers-lives/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/03/android-design-preview-simplifies-app-mockups-developers-lives/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/03/android-design-preview-simplifies-app-mockups-developers-lives/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/02/android-design-preview-simplifies-app-mockups/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/android-design-preview-tool.jpg" style="display: none;" /></a><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" scrolling="no" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/WvQrP1szEzg" width="560"></iframe></div>
A new Java utility should help Android developers and designers who need to rapidly prototype application layouts. The appropriately named Android Design Preview mirrors part of your desktop on an Android device over USB -- just select area on your computer screen and it'll show up remotely using the Android Debug Bridge. It's more lightweight than a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/vnc/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">VNC</a> app and doesn't require a lot of mucking with settings, whether you're coding on Windows, Mac OS X or Linux. In other words, it's perfect for dealing with indecisive project managers who don't know what they want until you show it to them, and since it's free, you won't even need their budgetary approval.
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/mobile/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Mobile</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/03/android-design-preview-simplifies-app-mockups-developers-lives/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>android</category><category>android design preview</category><category>AndroidDesignPreview</category><category>developer</category><category>development</category><category>Google</category><category>jar</category><category>java</category><category>mobile</category><category>mobilepostmini</category><category>UI</category><category>utility</category><category>video</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohen]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 17:02:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20119790</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[ARM launches Android development kit with focus on power efficiency]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/28/arm-launches-android-development-kit-with-focus-on-power-efficie/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/28/arm-launches-android-development-kit-with-focus-on-power-efficie/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/28/arm-launches-android-development-kit-with-focus-on-power-efficie/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/28/arm-launches-android-development-kit-with-focus-on-power-efficie/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="ARM Development Studio 5 Community Edition" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/11-28-2011armds-5.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px 12px; float: left;" /></a>Everyone and their mother has an Android development kit nowadays. So, it's only natural, being that it's chips power the vast majority of Android devices, that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/arm?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">ARM</a> wants in on the action too. With the release of Development Studio 5 Community Edition, the company has expanded its dev kit's repertoire to include not just Linux, but Google's Linux-based mobile OS. (Really showing its versatility there.) What makes DS-5 special is it's focus on optimizing apps, not just for performance, but for energy efficiency -- provided you're running on ARM chips, of course. It also claims to produce code that is up to four times faster than Java, but we'll have to take the company's word on that one for now. DS-5 even integrates with the standard <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/androidSDK?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Android SDK</a> as well as Eclipse IDE. Check out the PR after the break.
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/mobile/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Mobile</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/28/arm-launches-android-development-kit-with-focus-on-power-efficie/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>android</category><category>android development</category><category>AndroidDevelopment</category><category>ARM</category><category>ARM Development studio</category><category>ARM Development studio 5</category><category>ARM Development studio 5 community edition</category><category>ArmDevelopmentStudio</category><category>ArmDevelopmentStudio5</category><category>ArmDevelopmentStudio5CommunityEdition</category><category>development kit</category><category>Development Studio</category><category>Development studio 5</category><category>Development studio 5 community edition</category><category>DevelopmentKit</category><category>DevelopmentStudio</category><category>DevelopmentStudio5</category><category>DevelopmentStudio5CommunityEdition</category><category>eclipse</category><category>java</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>SDK</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:02:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20115662</dc:identifier>

</item>
</channel></rss>