<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget RSS Feed</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 AOL Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[England to mandate dog microchips by 2016]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/07/uk-dog-microchips/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/07/uk-dog-microchips/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/07/uk-dog-microchips/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/07/uk-dog-microchips/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="UK to mandate dog microchips by 2016" data-src-height="360" data-src-width="620" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2013/02/dogchip.jpg" /></a></p><p> Thinking about injecting an identification chip in your pooch? If you live in the southern part of the UK, you won't have a choice. Come 2016, English and Welsh authorities will require all of the country's pups to have <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/13/accident-victim-ided-through-pets-microchip/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">embedded microchips</a>, so they can be returned to their owners if ever they run astray. The United Kingdom's Environment Department says some 60 percent of the country's 8 million dogs already have the tags, but beginning in three years, owners who don't spring for the device could be forced to pay fines of up to &pound;500 (about $780). Cat microchipping will remain optional, since felines are less likely to wander outdoors. And "World's Cutest Dog" fans need not worry about their precious Boo getting the forced implant -- the famed Pomeranian (pictured above) is based in San Francisco, some 5,000 miles from the Queen's needle.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Misc</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/07/uk-dog-microchips/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>

<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a target="_blank" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/06/dog-microchips-in-england_n_2629905.html">AP (Huffington Post)</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>dog</category><category>dogs</category><category>microchip</category><category>microchips</category><category>tracking</category><category>uk</category><category>unitedkingdom</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Honig]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 02:30:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20450445</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Jellyfish-mimicking device could snatch cancer cells right out of the bloodstream]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/14/jellyfish-inspired-microchip-captures-cancer-cells/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/14/jellyfish-inspired-microchip-captures-cancer-cells/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/14/jellyfish-inspired-microchip-captures-cancer-cells/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center; "> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/14/jellyfish-inspired-microchip-captures-cancer-cells/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Jellyfishlike microchip scoops cancer cells right out of the blood stream" data-src-height="470" data-src-width="620" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/11/jellyfish-microchip-tentacles.jpg" /></a></p><p> If you think the picture above looks like droplets of blood being snared in a sticky tentacle, then you have a scarily active -- but in this case accurate -- imagination. It's actually a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/21/scientists-separate-plasma-from-blood-with-working-biochip/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">microfluidic</a> chip that's been coated with long strands of DNA, which dangle down into the bloodstream and bind to any cancerous proteins floating past -- directly imitating the way a jellyfish scoops up grub in the ocean. If required, the chip can release these cells unharmed for later inspection. According to the chip's designers at Boston's Brigham and Women's Hospital, the catch-and-release mechanism can be put to both diagnostic and therapeutic use in the fight against <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/cancer?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Big C</a>, and can also be used to isolate good things, like fetal cells. The next step will be to test the device on humans -- at which point we may owe an even greater <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/23/rat-jellyfish/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">debt of gratitude</a> to our gelatinous friends.</p><p> [Image credit: Rohit Karnik and Suman Bose]</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/science/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Science</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/alt/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Alt</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/14/jellyfish-inspired-microchip-captures-cancer-cells/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Via:</strong> <a target="_blank" href="http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/biomedical/devices/jellyfishinspired-microchip-captures-cancer-cells">IEEE Spectrum</a><!--//--></p>
<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a target="_blank" href="http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2012/11/08/1211234109.abstract">Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</a><!--//-->, <a target="_blank" href="http://news.discovery.com/tech/jellyfish-tentacles-cancer-121112.html">Discovery News</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>brigham and women s hospital</category><category>BrighamAndWomenSHospital</category><category>cancer</category><category>cancer research</category><category>CancerResearch</category><category>jellyfish</category><category>microchip</category><category>microfluidic</category><category>MicrofluidicChip</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deepak Dhingra]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 07:32:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20379421</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[AMD Piledriver CPU pre-order pricing leaks out]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/21/amd-piledriver-cpu-pre-order-pricing-leaks-out/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/21/amd-piledriver-cpu-pre-order-pricing-leaks-out/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/21/amd-piledriver-cpu-pre-order-pricing-leaks-out/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/21/amd-piledriver-cpu-pre-order-pricing-leaks-out/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="AMD Piledriver CPU preorder pricing leaks out" data-src-height="149" data-src-width="620" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/09/amdpreorder.jpg" /></a></p><p> It's always just been a matter of "when" and "how much," but it looks as if PC gamers looking to score a powerplant upgrade can start planning on specific amounts. AMD's impending <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/22/amd-piledriver-cores-will-employ-resonant-clock-mesh/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">FX Piledriver CPUs</a> are now up for pre-order at <i>ShopBLT</i>, an outlet that has proven reliable in the past when it comes to nailing down processor pricing. For those in need of a refresher, these are built using the Vishera design, with the range including between four and eight CPU cores. We're expecting 'em to best the Bulldozer family, and if all goes well, they could be available to the earliest of adopters in October. Presently, the FX-4300 ($131.62), FX-6300 ($175.77), FX-8320 ($242.05) and FX-8350 ($253.06) are listed, but <i>CPU World</i> seems to think launch day quotes will actually be a bit lower. Only one way to find out, right?</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/21/amd-piledriver-cpu-pre-order-pricing-leaks-out/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Via:</strong> <a href="http://www.cpu-world.com/news_2012/2012092001_Pre-order_prices_of_AMD_FX_Piledriver_CPUs.html" target="_blank">CPU World</a><!--//--></p>
<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a href="http://www.shopblt.com/cgi-bin/s.cgi?order_id=%21ORDERID%21&amp;s_max=25&amp;t_all=1&amp;s_all=HKBOX" target="_blank">ShopBLT</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>amd</category><category>amd fx</category><category>amd Piledriver</category><category>AmdFx</category><category>AmdPiledriver</category><category>chip</category><category>cpu</category><category>fx</category><category>microchip</category><category>microprocessor</category><category>on sale</category><category>OnSale</category><category>Piledriver</category><category>pre order</category><category>pre-order</category><category>PreOrder</category><category>price</category><category>prices</category><category>pricing</category><category>processor</category><category>ship</category><category>Vishera</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 18:41:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20330196</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[FDA approves Proteus Digital Health's e-pills for dose monitoring]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/01/fda-approves-ingestible-sensor/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/01/fda-approves-ingestible-sensor/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/01/fda-approves-ingestible-sensor/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/01/fda-approves-ingestible-sensor/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="FDA approves Proteus Digital Health's e-pills for dose monitoring" data-src-height="313" data-src-width="600" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/08/redpillbluepilluse.jpg" style="margin: 4px;" /></a></p><p> An "ingestible sensor" doesn't sound like the tastiest of snacks, but soon it might be just what the doctor ordered. A tiny microchip which activates upon contact with stomach acid has recently been given the green light by the US FDA. When the sensor is <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/21/japanese-researchers-develop-swimming-endoscope-we-suggest-be/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">swallowed</a>, an external patch picks up its signal and shoots a message over to whoever it's supposed to. The technology is aimed at tackling an issue known in the healthcare biz as compliance -- or, following instructions. Correct timing and dose are important for many drugs, and lax schedules can be responsible for treatment failures or the development of nasty drug-resistant <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/bacteria?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">bugs</a>. Although the pills have only been used in trials, one pharmaceutical heavyweight has already bagged a license to the technology for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/31/bio-chemical-circuits-may-make-you-a-man-of-a-machine/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">real-world applications</a>. If you don't like the thought of a belly full of microchips, no need to worry -- the harmless sensors pass naturally after completing their mission.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/science/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Science</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/01/fda-approves-ingestible-sensor/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>Chip</category><category>Chips</category><category>Drug</category><category>Drugs</category><category>e-pill</category><category>e-pills</category><category>Electonic pill</category><category>Electonic pills</category><category>ElectonicPill</category><category>ElectonicPills</category><category>FDA</category><category>FDA approval</category><category>FdaApproval</category><category>Food and Drug Administration</category><category>FoodAndDrugAdministration</category><category>Healthcare</category><category>Ingestible sensor</category><category>Ingestible sensors</category><category>IngestibleSensor</category><category>IngestibleSensors</category><category>Medical</category><category>Medicine</category><category>Microchip</category><category>Microchips</category><category>Ostuka</category><category>Pharmaceuticals</category><category>pill</category><category>pills</category><category>Proteus Digital Health</category><category>ProteusDigitalHealth</category><category>Sensor</category><category>Sensors</category><category>US FDA</category><category>US Food and Drug Administration</category><category>UsFda</category><category>UsFoodAndDrugAdministration</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Rigg]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 17:04:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20290913</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[MIT duo successfully tests wireless drug-delivery microchips, more consistent than injections]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/18/mit-wireless-drug-delivery-microchips/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/18/mit-wireless-drug-delivery-microchips/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/18/mit-wireless-drug-delivery-microchips/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/18/mit-wireless-drug-delivery-microchips/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/langer-cima.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div><div> Despise those daily injections of essential medication? Well folks, relief could be on the way. Over a decade ago, two <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/mit/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">MIT</a> professors, Robert Langer and Michael Cima, first considered developing a drug-delivery microchip that could be wirelessly controlled. This past week, researchers in Cambridge -- alongside scientists from MicroCHIPS, Inc. -- announced that they have successfully used the aforementioned chip to give osteoporosis patients their daily allotment of teriparatide. "You can do remote control delivery, you can do pulsatile drug delivery, and you can deliver multiple drugs," Langer noted. Chips used in this particular study housed 20 doses each and results indicated that the delivery showed less variation than administered injections. In theory, microchips like these could be used alongside sensors that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/blood+sugar/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">monitor</a> glucose levels -- creating tech that could adapt to changes in a patient's condition. More info on the trial awaits in the source link below.</div><br />[Thanks, Lydia]

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/18/mit-wireless-drug-delivery-microchips/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>clinical trials</category><category>ClinicalTrials</category><category>dose</category><category>drug delivery</category><category>drug delivery microchips</category><category>DrugDelivery</category><category>DrugDeliveryMicrochips</category><category>microchip</category><category>microchips</category><category>mit</category><category>osteoporosis</category><category>science</category><category>wireless</category><category>wireless drug delivery</category><category>WirelessDrugDelivery</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Billy Steele]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 14:06:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20174332</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google doodle celebrates Robert Noyce; Intel co-founder and 'Mayor of Silicon Valley']]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/12/google-doodle-celebrates-robert-noyce-intel-co-founder-and-may/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/12/google-doodle-celebrates-robert-noyce-intel-co-founder-and-may/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/12/google-doodle-celebrates-robert-noyce-intel-co-founder-and-may/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/12/google-doodle-celebrates-robert-noyce-intel-co-founder-and-may/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/bobdoodle.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
<div>
	The honor of having your own Google Doodle is bestowed upon only a few very special individuals like <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/20/google-doodle-marks-birthday-of-the-pea-meister-gregor-mendel/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Gregor Mendel</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/22/google-celebrates-alexander-calder-and-spinning-things-with-html/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Alexander Calder</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/06/babalu-google-celebrates-lucille-balls-100th-birthday-doodle-s/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Lucille Ball</a>. Today's entrant celebrates the 84th birthday of the late Robert "Bob" Noyce, co-inventor of the microchip. After co-founding Fairchild Semiconductor and Intel, he mentored younger engineers to earn the nickname "the Mayor of Silicon Valley." Surf on over to the Google homepage and you'll see its logo imprinted over a microprocessor, which Bob helped to birth.</div>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/alt/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Alt</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/12/google-doodle-celebrates-robert-noyce-intel-co-founder-and-may/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>Bob Noyce</category><category>BobNoyce</category><category>Fairchild Semiconductor</category><category>FairchildSemiconductor</category><category>Google</category><category>Google Doodle</category><category>GoogleDoodle</category><category>Gordon Moore</category><category>GordonMoore</category><category>Intel</category><category>Jack Kilby</category><category>JackKilby</category><category>Mayor of Silicon Valley</category><category>MayorOfSiliconValley</category><category>Microchip</category><category>Microprocessor</category><category>Robert Noyce</category><category>RobertNoyce</category><category>Semiconductor</category><category>Ted Hoff</category><category>TedHoff</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 05:13:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20125719</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[First molybdenite IC delivers silicon-crushing, chip-shrinking, graphene-blasting action]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/06/first-molybdenite-ic-delivers-silicon-crushing-chip-shrinking/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/06/first-molybdenite-ic-delivers-silicon-crushing-chip-shrinking/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/06/first-molybdenite-ic-delivers-silicon-crushing-chip-shrinking/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/06/first-molybdenite-ic-delivers-silicon-crushing-chip-shrinking/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Molybdenite IC" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/nn-2011-03715c0006.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Never heard of molybdenite? We're not shocked. Its not nearly as hyped as <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/graphene?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">graphene</a> or <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/quantumdots?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">quantum dots</a>, but it could be the key to smaller, bendable microchips. The problem with silicon is that, in layers less than two nanometers thick, it can become unstable, oxidize and quickly deteriorate. Molybdenum disulfide (MoS2), on the other hand, can be laid down in sheets just three atoms thick. The semiconductor also earns bonus points for being an abundant, naturally occurring mineral. Earlier this year researchers at the Laboratory of Nanoscale Electronics and Structures (LANES) demoed the first molybdenite transistor, but the team is moving fast and has already whipped up the first prototype of a complete integrated circuit (we assume with the aid of an all girl army of Kung Fu engineers). Things are looking good for this potential silicon usurper. And best of all, molybdenite is flexible. So, hello bendable computers!

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/06/first-molybdenite-ic-delivers-silicon-crushing-chip-shrinking/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>Laboratory of Nanoscale Electronics and Structures</category><category>LaboratoryOfNanoscaleElectronicsAndStructures</category><category>LANES</category><category>microchip</category><category>microchips</category><category>mineral</category><category>minerals</category><category>molybdenite</category><category>molybdenum</category><category>Molybdenum disulfide</category><category>MolybdenumDisulfide</category><category>MoS2</category><category>research</category><category>Semiconductor</category><category>semiconductors</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 12:41:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20121630</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[IBM and 3M join forces to fab 3D microchips, create mini-silicon skyscraper valley]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/07/ibm-and-3m-join-forces-to-fab-3d-microchips-create-mini-silicon/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/07/ibm-and-3m-join-forces-to-fab-3d-microchips-create-mini-silicon/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/07/ibm-and-3m-join-forces-to-fab-3d-microchips-create-mini-silicon/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/07/ibm-and-3m-join-forces-to-fab-3d-microchips-create-mini-silicon/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/ibm-3m.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/3D/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">3D hype</a> is fast wearing out its welcome, but there's at least one area of industry where the buzzed about term could usher in true innovation. Announced today as a joint research project, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/IBM/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">IBM</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/3m?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">3M</a> will work towards the creation of a new breed of microprocessors. Unlike similar <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/04/intel-will-mass-produce-22nm-3d-transistors-for-all-future-cpus/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">three-dimensional semiconductor efforts</a> by Intel, the two newly partnered outfits plan to stack up to 100 layers of chips atop one another resulting in a microchip "brick." Under the agreement, IBM will contribute its expertise on packaging the new processors, while 3M will get to work developing an adhesive that can not only be applied in batches, but'll also allow for heat transfer without crippling logic circuitry. If the companies' boasts are to be believed, these powerhouse computing towers would cram memory and networking into a "computer chip 1,000 times faster than today's fastest microprocessor enabling more powerful smartphones, tablets, computers and gaming devices." That's a heady claim for a tech that doesn't yet exist, but is already taking swings at current faux 3D transistors. Official presser and video await you after the break.

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/07/ibm-and-3m-join-forces-to-fab-3d-microchips-create-mini-silicon/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>3d chips</category><category>3D packaging</category><category>3d transistor</category><category>3D transistors</category><category>3dChips</category><category>3dPackaging</category><category>3dTransistor</category><category>3dTransistors</category><category>3M</category><category>adhesive</category><category>chips</category><category>fabrication</category><category>IBM</category><category>Intel</category><category>microchip</category><category>microchips</category><category>microprocessor</category><category>microprocessors</category><category>partnership</category><category>Semiconductor</category><category>semiconductors</category><category>video</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Volpe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 11:59:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20036660</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[World's biggest CMOS sensor could help doctors detect and treat cancer]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/06/worlds-biggest-cmos-sensor-could-help-doctors-detect-and-treat/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/06/worlds-biggest-cmos-sensor-could-help-doctors-detect-and-treat/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/06/worlds-biggest-cmos-sensor-could-help-doctors-detect-and-treat/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/06/worlds-biggest-cmos-sensor-could-help-doctors-detect-and-treat/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/image-sensor.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/31/canon-develops-worlds-largest-cmos-sensor-shoots-60fps-video-i/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Move over</a>, Canon, because scientists at the University of Lincoln have just seized the crown for world's biggest CMOS image sensor with their new Dynamic range Adjustable for Medical Imaging Technology microchip -- or 'DyNAMITe,' for short. Measuring a hefty 12.8 square cm (or about five square inches), DyNAMITe is roughly 200 times bigger than the chips you'd find in most PCs, making it the largest imager ever made on a wafer of standard, eight-inch diameter. This extra girth allows the active pixel sensor to capture images in high detail, with a 100-micrometer pitch boasting 1280 x 1280p aligned next to a 50-micron layer, carrying 2560 x 2560p. DyNAMITe can also run at up to 90fps and withstand high levels of radiation for several years, making it ideal for medical imaging, including radiotherapy and mammography. Researchers say these enhanced images could help doctors detect cancer in its earliest phases, while allowing them to monitor radiotherapy treatments more closely. No word on when we should expect to see DyNAMITe pop up in hospitals (or a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/hasselblad/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Hasselblad</a> back), but physicists at the Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital are busy looking for other, potentially life-saving applications. Full PR after the break.

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/06/worlds-biggest-cmos-sensor-could-help-doctors-detect-and-treat/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>Big</category><category>cancer</category><category>cmos</category><category>CmosSensor</category><category>doctor</category><category>dynamite</category><category>fps</category><category>frames-per-second</category><category>health</category><category>image sensor</category><category>images</category><category>ImageSensor</category><category>mammography</category><category>medical</category><category>medical imaging</category><category>MedicalImaging</category><category>medicine</category><category>microchip</category><category>pixel</category><category>radiography</category><category>sensor</category><category>treatment</category><category>university of lincoln</category><category>UniversityOfLincoln</category><category>worlds biggest</category><category>worlds largest</category><category>WorldsBiggest</category><category>WorldsLargest</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amar Toor]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 09:26:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19933534</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Bionic eye closer to human trials with invention of implantable microchip]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/04/bionic-eye-closer-to-human-trials-with-invention-of-implantable/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/04/bionic-eye-closer-to-human-trials-with-invention-of-implantable/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/04/bionic-eye-closer-to-human-trials-with-invention-of-implantable/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/04/bionic-eye-closer-to-human-trials-with-invention-of-implantable/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="16" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/04/bioniceyeinside.gif" /></a>We've had our eye -- so to speak -- on <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/01/australian-researchers-unveil-bionic-eye-prototype-implants-com/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Bionic Vision Australia</a> (BVA) for sometime, and with the invention of a new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/26/researchers-debut-one-cubic-millimeter-computer-want-to-stick-i/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">implantable microchip</a> it's coming ever closer to getting the bionic eye working on real-deal humans. The tiny chip measures five square millimeters and packs 98 electrodes that stimulate retinal cells to restore vision. Preliminary tests are already underway, and clinicians are in the process of screening human guinea pigs for sampling the implants -- the first full system is still on track for a 2013 debut. In the interest of future success: here's mud in your eye, BVA! Full PR after the break.

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/04/bionic-eye-closer-to-human-trials-with-invention-of-implantable/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>australia</category><category>bionic</category><category>bionic eye</category><category>bionic vision australia</category><category>BionicEye</category><category>BionicVisionAustralia</category><category>BVA</category><category>eye</category><category>eyes</category><category>eyesight</category><category>implant</category><category>implantable</category><category>implantable microchip</category><category>ImplantableMicrochip</category><category>implants</category><category>microchip</category><category>microchips</category><category>optical</category><category>optical nerve</category><category>OpticalNerve</category><category>research</category><category>test</category><category>testing</category><category>trial</category><category>trials</category><category>university</category><category>university of new south wales</category><category>UniversityOfNewSouthWales</category><category>UNSW</category><category>vision</category><category>vision loss</category><category>VisionLoss</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Trout]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 11:16:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19901363</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Active Book microchip provides hope for exercising paralyzed limbs]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/25/active-book-microchip-provides-hope-for-exercising-paralyzed-lim/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/25/active-book-microchip-provides-hope-for-exercising-paralyzed-lim/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/25/active-book-microchip-provides-hope-for-exercising-paralyzed-lim/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/25/active-book-microchip-provides-hope-for-exercising-paralyzed-lim/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/11/acitve-book-lead-image-enagadget.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Scientists have been experimenting with muscles and technology to solve both <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=muscle+stiumlators&amp;invocationType=wl-gadget?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">human and robotic</a> mobility issues for years. Now it looks as though a team of researchers from University College London, Freiburg University, and the Tyndall Institute in  Cork have made a significant leap forward for paraplegics, thanks to a revolutionary microchip the team has dubbed "Active Book." What's notable about the chip is that it stimulates more muscle groups than <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2005/05/31/the-usb-electrical-muscle-stimulation-mouse/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">existing technology</a> without the need for external connections. This was accomplished via micro-packing and precision laser processing, which allowed tiny electrodes to be cut from platinum foil and rolled into a 3D book shape. These platinum foil "pages" close in around nerve roots, and are micro-welded to a hermetically sealed silicon chip. Once embedded into areas within the spinal canal, the chip can work to stimulate paralyzed muscles, implying patients could even "perform enough movement to carry out controlled exercise such as cycling or rowing." A press release from the Council which sponsored the research says the Active Book will begin trials sometime next year -- we can't wait to see the results.

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/25/active-book-microchip-provides-hope-for-exercising-paralyzed-lim/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>Active Book</category><category>ActiveBook</category><category>Andreas Demosthenous</category><category>AndreasDemosthenous</category><category>Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council</category><category>EngineeringAndPhysicalSciencesResearchCouncil</category><category>EPSRC</category><category>implant</category><category>medical technology</category><category>MedicalTechnology</category><category>micro-packing</category><category>microchip</category><category>microchip implants</category><category>Microchip Technology</category><category>MicrochipImplants</category><category>microchips</category><category>MicrochipTech</category><category>MicrochipTechnology</category><category>mobility</category><category>muscle</category><category>muscle stimulator</category><category>muscles</category><category>MuscleStimulator</category><category>paralysis</category><category>ParalysisTreatment</category><category>paralyzed</category><category>platinum foil</category><category>PlatinumFoil</category><category>silicon chip</category><category>SiliconChip</category><category>spine</category><category>spinel</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Bowers]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 02:15:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19733022</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Powercast and Microchip fire up interest at a distance with wireless power development kit]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/27/powercast-and-microchip-fire-up-interest-at-a-distance-with-wire/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/27/powercast-and-microchip-fire-up-interest-at-a-distance-with-wire/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/27/powercast-and-microchip-fire-up-interest-at-a-distance-with-wire/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/27/powercast-and-microchip-fire-up-interest-at-a-distance-with-wire/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/10/10-26-10-powerchip600.jpg" /></a></div>
We're sure if you asked Powercast nicely it'd tell you a whale of a tale, about how the "more than 100 companies" who allegedly signed up to develop products that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/30/powercast-looking-to-bring-wireless-power-to-reality/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">seemingly pull energy from the ether</a> materialized into <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/29/wirelessly-powered-christmas-tree-when-high-tech-meets-high-chi/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">this light-up Christmas tree</a>. Still, we'd be happy to forgive and forget if meaningful products emerged instead, and that's why we're moderately happy the company's announced a nice big development kit. $1,250 buys your firm or deep-pocketed hobbyist the spread pictured above, with a wireless transmitter to throw three watts and a pair of receiver boards to catch them from over 40 feet away, plus a low-power development board from Microchip equipped with that company's proprietary short-range wireless protocols and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ZigBee/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">ZigBee</a> functionality. We can't wait to see what people build, but we won't be snapping one up ourselves -- we're still holding out for the firm to go open-source and build an <a href="http://three watts">Arduino</a> version. PR after the break.

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/27/powercast-and-microchip-fire-up-interest-at-a-distance-with-wire/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>dev kit</category><category>development</category><category>Development kit</category><category>DevelopmentKit</category><category>DevKit</category><category>electricity</category><category>energy</category><category>microchip</category><category>power</category><category>powercast</category><category>wireless energy</category><category>wireless power</category><category>WirelessEnergy</category><category>WirelessPower</category><category>zigbee</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Hollister]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:39:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19690521</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[NFL mulling microchips in footballs for those life-or-death goal line rulings]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/06/nfl-mulling-microchips-in-footballs-for-those-life-or-death-goal/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/06/nfl-mulling-microchips-in-footballs-for-those-life-or-death-goal/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/06/nfl-mulling-microchips-in-footballs-for-those-life-or-death-goal/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/06/nfl-mulling-microchips-in-footballs-for-those-life-or-death-goal/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/08/10x08060n34899.jpg" /></a></div>
The <a href="http://www.engadget.com/all/nfl?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">NFL</a> is serious business. So serious, in fact, that the idea of refs getting decisions wrong sends chills up and down Roger Goodell's spine. Yeah, we all know they do it habitually, but the League seems to be considering improving accuracy just a little bit with the help of some tech. Cairos Technologies, a German outfit that's been trying to sell its goal line technology to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/29/fifa-to-again-explore-instant-replay-after-blown-world-cup-offic/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">football (as in soccer) bigwigs</a> for a while, has told <em>Reuters</em> that it's in discussions with the NFL about bringing its magnetic field hocus pocus to the gridiron. The idea would be for the ref to be alerted, via a message to his watch, any time the ball does something notable like crossing the goal line or first down marker. It should be a great aid for making difficult calls like whether a touchdown has happened at the bottom of a scrum, and might even help cut down on the number of frightfully dull replay challenges. Win-win, no?<br />
<br />
[Original image courtesy of NFL.com]

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/06/nfl-mulling-microchips-in-footballs-for-those-life-or-death-goal/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>american football</category><category>AmericanFootball</category><category>ball</category><category>balls</category><category>cairos</category><category>cairos technologies</category><category>CairosTechnologies</category><category>chip</category><category>chip-in-ball</category><category>embedded chip</category><category>EmbeddedChip</category><category>football</category><category>germany</category><category>glt</category><category>goal line technology</category><category>GoalLineTechnology</category><category>gridiron</category><category>microchip</category><category>national football league</category><category>NationalFootballLeague</category><category>nfl</category><category>sport</category><category>sports</category><category>video</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 06:09:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19583428</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[VIA reveals 1.6GHz Nano DC processor at Computex, shows it handling 720p (video)]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/via-reveals-1-6ghz-nano-dc-processor-at-computex-shows-it-handl/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/via-reveals-1-6ghz-nano-dc-processor-at-computex-shows-it-handl/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/via-reveals-1-6ghz-nano-dc-processor-at-computex-shows-it-handl/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/via-reveals-1-6ghz-nano-dc-processor-at-computex-shows-it-handl/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/via-nano-dc-lead.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Guess who showed up at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Computex/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Computex</a> with an all-new dual-core processor? Nah, we're not referring to AMD or Intel (though they certainly did) -- we're talking about <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/VIA/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">VIA</a>. The company quietly (re)introduced a dual-core desktop chip here in Taipei, with the codename Nano DC being used to describe it for the time being. The device utilized a VN1000 Digital Media Chipset and fully supported dual-channel DDR3 memory. A Chrome 520 GPU was helping to push out a 720p movie trailer on the demo system, and the innate compatibility with HDMI and DisplayPort should keep home cinema owners happy. The 65nm chip was clocked at 1.6GHz, and we were told that it wouldn't be venturing into mobile machines in its current form. 'Course, this device has been a bit of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/06/vias-dual-core-nano-still-on-track-but-its-not-the-nano-3000/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">unicorn</a> for the past <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/27/dual-core-via-nano-processor-apparently-on-track-for-june-2010/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">couple of years</a>, but company representatives seemed certain that it would finally be ready to ship (using a different process technology, mind you) in around six months. We shall see. Live action video is just past the break.<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/via-1-6ghz-nano-dc-showcased-at-computex-2010/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">VIA 1.6GHz Nano DC showcased at Computex 2010</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/via-1-6ghz-nano-dc-showcased-at-computex-2010/3033986?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/via-nano-dc-computex-20104189_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/via-1-6ghz-nano-dc-showcased-at-computex-2010/3033987?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/via-nano-dc-computex-20104190_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/via-1-6ghz-nano-dc-showcased-at-computex-2010/3033988?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/via-nano-dc-computex-20104191_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/via-1-6ghz-nano-dc-showcased-at-computex-2010/3033989?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/via-nano-dc-computex-20104192_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/via-1-6ghz-nano-dc-showcased-at-computex-2010/3033990?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/via-nano-dc-computex-20104193_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/via-reveals-1-6ghz-nano-dc-processor-at-computex-shows-it-handl/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>chip</category><category>computex</category><category>computex 2010</category><category>Computex2010</category><category>cpu</category><category>ddr3</category><category>dual-core</category><category>engadget video</category><category>EngadgetVideo</category><category>hands-on</category><category>impressions</category><category>microchip</category><category>nano</category><category>Nano DC</category><category>NanoDc</category><category>preview</category><category>processor</category><category>VIA</category><category>via nano</category><category>via nano dc</category><category>ViaNano</category><category>ViaNanoDc</category><category>video</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 09:33:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19499864</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Verayo launches next-generation of 'unclonable' RFID chips, hackers get wide-eyed]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/verayo-launches-next-generation-of-unclonable-rfid-chips-hack/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/verayo-launches-next-generation-of-unclonable-rfid-chips-hack/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/verayo-launches-next-generation-of-unclonable-rfid-chips-hack/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20100302005719&amp;newsLang=en"><img hspace="4" vspace="16" align="left" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/unclonable-rfid-chip.jpg?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" alt="" /></a>If there's one thing a security company should avoid, it's <a href="http://hd.engadget.com/2007/07/10/analyst-claims-bd-is-impenetrable-for-ten-years-hackers-chuckl/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">tempting the hackers</a> to unravel their <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/vulnerability/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">promises</a>. As we've seen time and time again, there are few (if any) completely uncrackable technologies, but Verayo sure seems confident about its next-generation <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/RFID/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">RFID</a> chips. Dubbed "unclonable," this new product family -- which is led by the Vera M4H -- promises to make mass transit tickets, secure IDs and access cards more secure, and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/verayos-unclonable-rfid-uses-physical-characteristics-to-thwa/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">unlike the original</a>, this one touts a "non-networked, unlimited authentication" feature. We also get the impression that the company has worked to drive costs down with this newfangled line, but we're still not sure we'd trust our lives to this thing. Anyone down to really put these claims to the test?

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/verayo-launches-next-generation-of-unclonable-rfid-chips-hack/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>authentication</category><category>chip</category><category>microchip</category><category>RFID</category><category>security</category><category>Unclonable</category><category>Unclonable RFID</category><category>UnclonableRfid</category><category>Vera M4H</category><category>VeraM4h</category><category>Verayo</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 07:08:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19386647</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Intel said to be cooking up DDR3-lovin' Atom N475 and Atom N455 CPUs]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/02/intel-said-to-be-cooking-up-ddr3-lovin-atom-n475-and-atom-n455/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/02/intel-said-to-be-cooking-up-ddr3-lovin-atom-n475-and-atom-n455/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/02/intel-said-to-be-cooking-up-ddr3-lovin-atom-n475-and-atom-n455/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<a href="http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/17502/41/"><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="16" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/intel-atom-penny.jpg?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" alt="" /></a>We've maintained that Intel's range of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/atom,intel?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Atom</a> chips were simply too weak to really love and adore the way a slab of silicon should be, but that's probably because of our infatuation with things like "overclocking" and "Core i7 Extremes." Whatever the case, it's beginning to look a wee bit better for the lineup, as <i>Fudzilla</i> has it that the company will be adding DDR3 memory support to the 1.83GHz N475 and 1.6GHz N455. Both of those chips are expected to maintain their current TDP ratings, and both are expected to launch in Q3 of this year. Nah, DDR3 compatibility won't make your next netbook scream or anything, but when we're talking Atoms, we'll take all the baby steps we can get.

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/02/intel-said-to-be-cooking-up-ddr3-lovin-atom-n475-and-atom-n455/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>Atom</category><category>atom n455</category><category>atom n475</category><category>AtomN455</category><category>AtomN475</category><category>chip</category><category>cpu</category><category>ddr3</category><category>intel</category><category>intel atom</category><category>IntelAtom</category><category>leak</category><category>microchip</category><category>microprocessor</category><category>n455</category><category>n475</category><category>processor</category><category>rumor</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:55:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19341501</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/01/core-i5-arrandale.jpg" /></div>
Whoa, Nelly! Just weeks after Intel came clean with its new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Pine Trial nettop and netbook platform</a>, the company is today cutting loose with a few more. This go 'round, we've got the 32nm <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Arrandale/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Arrandale</a> (which consists of the Core i5 Mobile and Core i3 Mobile) heading for the laptops and the 32nm Clarkdale chips over on the desktop front. Starting with the former, most reviews found the CPU + GPU solution to be faster than rivaling Core 2 Duo + integrated GPU options, with the Core i5 being particularly potent in highly threaded applications. Better still, battery life didn't seem to take a hit even with the extra performance, though high-end, high-res gaming was still a lesson in futility when working without a discrete graphics card. Overall, the chip was a welcome addition to the fold, but we got the feeling that the first wave was priced too high and offered too little of a performance increase on the gaming side to really warrant a wholehearted recommendation. As for the Clarkdale? The Core i5 661 that everyone seemed to snag was found to be blisteringly fast, with most folks deeming it the outright champion in the dual-core realm. Unfortunately, the integrated GPU was -- again -- not awesome for hardcore gaming, and the questionable pricing didn't exactly thrill some critics. Do yourself a favor and dig into the benchmarks below -- we get the feeling we'll be seeing oodles of machines hit the wires this week with these chips within. <br />
<br />
<strong>Update</strong>: Check out the Arrandale in action after the break!<br />
<br />
<u><em>Arrandale reviews</em></u><br />
<a href="http://hothardware.com/Articles/Intel-Arrandale-Core-i5-and-Core-i3-Mobile-Unveiled/?page=1">Read</a> - HotHardware<br />
<a href="http://www.anandtech.com/mobile/showdoc.aspx?i=3705">Read</a> - AnandTech<br />
<a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/mobile-core-i5-arrandale,2522.html">Read</a> - Tom's Hardware<br />
<a href="http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=850">Read</a> - PCPerspective<br />
<a href="http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1169/1/">Read</a> - Legit Reviews<br />
<br />
<u><em>Clarkdale reviews</em></u><br />
<a href="http://www.neoseeker.com/Articles/Hardware/Reviews/intel_core_i5_661/">Read</a> - NeoSeeker<br />
<a href="http://hothardware.com/Articles/Intel-Clarkdale-Core-i5-Desktop-Processor-Debuts/">Read</a> - HotHardware<br />
<a href="http://www.hardocp.com/article/2010/01/03/intel_westmere_32nm_clarkdale_core_i5661_review">Read</a> - HardOCP<br />
<a href="http://www.techspot.com/review/233-intel-core-i5-661/">Read</a> - TechSpot<br />
<a href="http://www.missingremote.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=4489&amp;Itemid=238">Read</a> - MissingRemote<br />
<a href="http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3704">Read</a> - AnandTech<br />
<a href="http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=849">Read</a> - PCPerspective<br />
<a href="http://www.legionhardware.com/document.php?id=874">Read</a> - Legion Hardware<br />
<a href="http://www.overclockersclub.com/reviews/intel_core_i5_661/">Read</a> - Overclockers Club<br />
<a href="http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/cpus/2010/01/04/intel-core-i5-661-core-i3-530-cpu-review/1">Read</a> - Bit-tech

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>32nm</category><category>arrandale</category><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarked</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>chip</category><category>clarkdale</category><category>core i3</category><category>Core i5</category><category>Core i5 Mobile</category><category>Core i5-661</category><category>core i7</category><category>CoreI3</category><category>CoreI5</category><category>CoreI5-661</category><category>CoreI5Mobile</category><category>CoreI7</category><category>cpu</category><category>intel</category><category>microchip</category><category>microprocessor</category><category>nehalem</category><category>processor</category><category>review</category><category>review roundup</category><category>reviewed</category><category>ReviewRoundup</category><category>westmere</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 01:09:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19301268</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[UCLA nanowire discovery could lead to faster, stronger, smaller electronics]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<a href="http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/newly-developed-silicon-germanium-149707.aspx"><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="16" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/12/silicon-nanowires.jpg?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" alt="" /></a>Advancements in silicon-germanium have been going on <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/20/ibm-git-overclock-cpu-to-500ghz/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">for years now</a>, but a team at UCLA is convinced that their discovery really is "the next big thing." For scores now, microchip makers have struggled with miniaturizing transistors as the public at large demands that things get smaller and smaller. Thanks to researchers at the aforesaid university, it's looking like silicon-germanium nanowires could be the key to making the process a whole lot easier. According to study co-author Suneel Kodambaka, the new nanowires could "help speed the development of smaller, faster and more powerful electronics," also noting that they're so small that they can be "placed in virtually anything." Which is great, because the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/AdamoXPS/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Adamo XPS</a> is just <i>entirely</i> too pudgy.

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>cpu</category><category>electronics</category><category>germanium</category><category>microchip</category><category>nanotech</category><category>nanotechnology</category><category>nanowire</category><category>nanowires</category><category>processor</category><category>science</category><category>semiconductor</category><category>silicon</category><category>silicon-germanium</category><category>transistors</category><category>UCLA</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:09:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19281628</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[IBM studying 'DNA origami' to build next-gen microchips, paralyze world with fear]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/17/ibm-studying-dna-origami-in-order-to-build-next-gen-microchips/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/17/ibm-studying-dna-origami-in-order-to-build-next-gen-microchips/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/17/ibm-studying-dna-origami-in-order-to-build-next-gen-microchips/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div align="center"><a href="http://tech.yahoo.com/news/nm/20090816/tc_nm/us_ibm_dna"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/08/ibm-chip-dna.jpg?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" /></a><br /></div>
IBM is already making a beeline to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/18/nec-and-toshiba-hop-on-ibms-semiconductor-alliance-train-for-th/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">28nm process technology</a>, but it looks like the train may deviate a bit before it even reaches the bottom. Reportedly, the company responsible for PowerPC, the original business laptop and all sorts of underground things that we'll never comprehend is now looking to use DNA as a model for crafting the world's next great <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/processor/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">processor</a>. DNA origami, as it's so tactfully called, can supposedly provide a cheap framework "on which to build tiny microchips," with IBM research manager Spike Narayan proclaiming that this is "the first demonstration of using biological molecules to help with processing in the semiconductor industry." Sir Spike also noted that "if the DNA origami process scales to production-level, manufacturers could trade hundreds of millions of dollars in complex tools for less than a million dollars of polymers, DNA solutions, and heating implements." The actual process still seems murky from here, but we're told to expect real results within ten years. Which should be just in time for the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/robotapocalypse/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">robot apocalypse</a> to really hit its stride -- awesome.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://hothardware.com/News/IBM-Taps-DNA-Research-To-Design-NextGen-Chips/">HotHardware</a>]
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/science/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Science</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/17/ibm-studying-dna-origami-in-order-to-build-next-gen-microchips/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>chip</category><category>cpu</category><category>dna</category><category>DNA origami</category><category>DnaOrigami</category><category>ibm</category><category>microchip</category><category>processor</category><category>research</category><category>robot apocalypse</category><category>RobotApocalypse</category><category>science</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:51:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19131395</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Nanometer wars heat up, Toshiba and Intel enter unofficial race]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/22/nanometer-wars-heat-up-toshiba-and-intel-enter-unofficial-race/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/22/nanometer-wars-heat-up-toshiba-and-intel-enter-unofficial-race/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/22/nanometer-wars-heat-up-toshiba-and-intel-enter-unofficial-race/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="16" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/06/intel-die-chipset-small.jpg"  alt="" />Think the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/28/megapixel-race-hits-the-mobile-realm/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">megapixel race</a> is bad? Now we've another to worry about, with both Toshiba and Intel hastily approaching 0.01nm technology in order to make chips faster, more nimble and smaller. According to undisclosed sources at <em>Digitimes</em>, Intel has actually canned production plans for its 45nm Havendale processors, which were originally slated to slip into machines later this year. The cause? It's heading straight to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/32nm/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">32nm</a>, reportedly hoping to ship its Clarkdale line in Q1 2010 with entry-level prices ranging from $60 to $190. In related news, Toshiba is joining the likes of IBM, Samsung and Globalfoundries in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/17/ibm-samsung-globalfoundries-and-more-looking-to-beat-intel-to/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">an effort</a> to dish out chips based on 28nm process technology. Needless to say, the move is being made in an effort to "stay relevant in an area dominated by the likes of Intel Corp and Texas Instruments." Now, if only we could get one of these potent, low-power chips inside of a netbook, we'd be pleased as punch.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20090618PD214.html">Read</a> - Intel cans Havendale in move to 32nm<br /><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE55H0GY20090618">Read</a> - Toshiba speeds to 28nm
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/22/nanometer-wars-heat-up-toshiba-and-intel-enter-unofficial-race/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>28nm</category><category>32nm</category><category>45nm</category><category>chip</category><category>Clarkdale</category><category>cpu</category><category>flash memory</category><category>FlashMemory</category><category>Havendale</category><category>IBM</category><category>intel</category><category>memory</category><category>microchip</category><category>NAND</category><category>NAND flash</category><category>NandFlash</category><category>NEC</category><category>toshiba</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:12:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19074107</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[AMD ships six-core 'Istanbul' Opteron CPU ahead of schedule]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/amd-ships-six-core-istanbul-opteron-cpu-ahead-of-schedule/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/amd-ships-six-core-istanbul-opteron-cpu-ahead-of-schedule/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/amd-ships-six-core-istanbul-opteron-cpu-ahead-of-schedule/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.amd.com/us-en/Corporate/VirtualPressRoom/0,,51_104_543_15944~131372,00.html"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/06/amd-istanbul-opteron-cpu.jpg?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Say it ain't so! Despite <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/AMD/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">AMD</a>'s past of announcing more <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/amd-delays-phenom-9700-and-9900-processors-few-notice/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">delays</a> than actual shipping products, the outfit has managed to deliver its six-core 'Istanbul' <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Opteron/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Opteron CPU</a> five months <em>ahead</em> of schedule. Announced today in a company press event, the new chip is shipping today with support for two-, four- and eight-socket servers. If all goes well, they'll be available to order from the likes of Cray, HP, Dell, IBM and Sun later this month, with HE, SE and EE versions of the six-core Opteron planned for the second half of this year. As for performance, users can expect up to 34 percent more performance-per-watt over the previous generation quad-core processors in the same platform, though we wouldn't expect to see these stray too far from traditional server boxes.
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/01/amd-ships-six-core-istanbul-opteron-cpu-ahead-of-schedule/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>AMD</category><category>CPU</category><category>HyperTransport</category><category>Istanbul</category><category>microchip</category><category>Opteron</category><category>processor</category><category>quad-core</category><category>sever</category><category>six-core</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 13:12:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19053775</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Intel shows Larrabee die shot in Germany, speculators go berserk]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/intel-shows-larrabee-die-shot-in-germany-speculators-go-berserk/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/intel-shows-larrabee-die-shot-in-germany-speculators-go-berserk/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/intel-shows-larrabee-die-shot-in-germany-speculators-go-berserk/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.pcgameshardware.com/aid,683947/Detailed-Larrabee-Die-shot-shown-by-Intel/News/"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/05/intel-larrabee-processor-sh.jpg?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" /></a><br /></div>
It's been right around a century since <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Intel/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Intel</a> has provided any sort of hard evidence that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Larrabee/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Larrabee</a> (a next-gen hybrid CPU / GPU) was more than a figment of anyone's imagination, but thanks to a die shot throw up Will Ferrell-style at the Visual Computing Institute of the Saarland University, we'd say the speculation is definitely back on. Intel's Chief Technology Officer, Justin Rattner, was responsible for the demo, but when <em>PC Perspective</em> pinged the company to inquire further, it suggested that the image we see above may not necessarily be indicative of the final shipping product, but that Larrabee was "healthy and in [its] labs right now." Sweet, so how's about a date in which that statement changes to "in shipping machines right now?" Hmm?<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.pcper.com/comments.php?nid=7154">PC Perspective</a>]
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gaming/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Gaming</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/intel-shows-larrabee-die-shot-in-germany-speculators-go-berserk/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>cGPU</category><category>GPGPU</category><category>intel</category><category>Larrabee</category><category>leak</category><category>microchip</category><category>processor</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 15:59:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|1545910</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[eASIC eDV9200 H.264 codec promises HD for all devices]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/12/easic-edv9200-h-264-codec-promises-hd-for-all-devices/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/12/easic-edv9200-h-264-codec-promises-hd-for-all-devices/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/12/easic-edv9200-h-264-codec-promises-hd-for-all-devices/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20090511006200&amp;newsLang=en"><img hspace="4" border="0" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/05/easic-edv9200-h.264-codec.png?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
We've already got <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/hd+scoreboard/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">HD in places</a> that the cast of <em>Step by Step</em> would've sworn was <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/surgery/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">never possible</a> way back when, but eASIC is far from satisfied. To that end, it's introducing a new H.264 codec aimed to bring high-def capabilities to all manners of devices, including (but certainly not limited to) toys, baby monitors, public transportation, wireless video surveillance and wireless webcams. The highly integrated eDV9200 is said to "dramatically lower the cost of entry into the high-definition video market, enabling a new class of low-cost applications to fully leverage the benefits offered by HD technology." Best of all, these guys aren't just blowing smoke, as the chip -- which captures streaming data directly from a CMOS sensor, compresses it, and transfers it to a host system or to a variety of storage devices -- is priced at just $4.99 each in volume. HD oven timers, here we come!
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/other-hardware/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Other hardware</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/hd/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">HD</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/12/easic-edv9200-h-264-codec-promises-hd-for-all-devices/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>ASIC</category><category>chip</category><category>CMOS</category><category>cpu</category><category>eASIC</category><category>eDV9200</category><category>h.264</category><category>hd</category><category>microchip</category><category>other hardware</category><category>otherhardware</category><category>video</category><category>video processing</category><category>VideoProcessing</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 09:16:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|1543535</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[eASIC eDV9200 H.264 codec promises HD for all devices]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/12/easic-edv9200-h-264-codec-promises-hd-for-all-devices/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/12/easic-edv9200-h-264-codec-promises-hd-for-all-devices/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/12/easic-edv9200-h-264-codec-promises-hd-for-all-devices/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20090511006200&amp;newsLang=en"><img hspace="4" border="0" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/05/easic-edv9200-h.264-codec.png?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
We've already got <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/tag/hd+scoreboard/">HD in places</a> that the cast of <em>Step by Step</em> would've sworn was <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/tag/surgery/">never possible</a> way back when, but eASIC is far from satisfied. To that end, it's introducing a new H.264 codec aimed to bring high-def capabilities to all manners of devices, including (but certainly not limited to) toys, baby monitors, public transportation, wireless video surveillance and wireless webcams. The highly integrated eDV9200 is said to "dramatically lower the cost of entry into the high-definition video market, enabling a new class of low-cost applications to fully leverage the benefits offered by HD technology." Best of all, these guys aren't just blowing smoke, as the chip -- which captures streaming data directly from a CMOS sensor, compresses it, and transfers it to a host system or to a variety of storage devices -- is priced at just $4.99 each in volume. HD oven timers, here we come!
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/portablevideo/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Portable Video</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/hd/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">HD</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/12/easic-edv9200-h-264-codec-promises-hd-for-all-devices/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>ASIC</category><category>chip</category><category>CMOS</category><category>cpu</category><category>eASIC</category><category>eDV9200</category><category>h.264</category><category>hd</category><category>microchip</category><category>portable video</category><category>portablevideo</category><category>video</category><category>video processing</category><category>VideoProcessing</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 09:16:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|1543523</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Graphene chip could hit 1,000GHz, make your Core i7 feel totally inadequate]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/26/graphene-chip-could-hit-1-000ghz-make-your-core-i7-feel-totally/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/26/graphene-chip-could-hit-1-000ghz-make-your-core-i7-feel-totally/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/26/graphene-chip-could-hit-1-000ghz-make-your-core-i7-feel-totally/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div align="center"><a href="http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2009/graphene-palacios-0319.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/3-25-09-mit-graphene-chip.jpg?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" /></a><br /></div>
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/24/pentium-4-overclocked-to-8ghz-lets-see-your-fancy-core-2-try-t/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">8GHz</a> (with the help of liquid nitrogen) not quick enough? Leave it to the folks at MIT to make sure your zaniest desires are well taken care of. As research forges ahead on <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/graphene/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">graphene</a>, carbon nanotubes and buckyballs (remember those?), gurus at the university have discovered a breakthrough that could eventually lead to microchips that make existing silicon-based CPUs weep. In fact, the research could lead to practical systems in the 500 to 1,000 gigahertz range. The magic all ties back to advancements on a graphene chip known as a frequency multiplier, and while the nitty-gritty of all this is far too complicated for the layperson to grasp, all you really need to know is this: finally, you can rest assured that you'll one day own a chip capable of handling <em>Duke Nukem Forever</em>.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/hardware/processors/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=216200251&amp;cid=RSSfeed_IWK_All">InformationWeek</a>]
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Misc</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/science/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Science</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/26/graphene-chip-could-hit-1-000ghz-make-your-core-i7-feel-totally/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>buckyballs</category><category>carbon nanotubes</category><category>CarbonNanotubes</category><category>chip</category><category>CPU</category><category>frequency multiplier</category><category>FrequencyMultiplier</category><category>graphene</category><category>microchip</category><category>MIT</category><category>university</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:03:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|1498697</dc:identifier>

</item>
</channel></rss>