<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget RSS Feed</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 AOL Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ming Mecca modules steer whole game worlds through voltage (video)]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/04/ming-mecca/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/04/ming-mecca/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/04/ming-mecca/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/04/ming-mecca/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Ming Mecca modules steer whole game worlds through voltage video " data-src-height="450" data-src-width="619" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2013/05/ming-mecca-1367610896.jpg" /></a></p>

<p>Just about every gamer we know has wanted to alter a game world on the spot, whether it's to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/01/skate-2-enables-red-blue-3d-mode-via-cheat-code/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">cheat</a>, fix game mechanics or experiment. Special Stage Systems' Ming Mecca system is built entirely around that concept -- and will definitely appeal to anyone with a fondness for analog electronics. Knobs and switches on its World Core synthesizer module adjust the game machine's maps, graphics, characters and even physics through voltage tweaks. Players only have to load assets on an SD card if they'd like a different look, and they even have access to the firmware and schematics if they want to go completely off the beaten path. Input is just as unconventional: a Control Core turns <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/04/insert-coin-gamedock-iphone-tv-controller/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">NES-compatible</a> gamepads into signal generators that can be used just as easily for music making as for playing. Ming Mecca isn't expected to ship until summer 2014, and it won't be cheap at an estimated $999 for a World Core and $350 for the Control Core. Even so, we're sorely tempted to splurge -- it's not often that a gadget scratches so many of our nostalgic itches at once.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Misc</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gaming/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Gaming</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/04/ming-mecca/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>

<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a target="_blank" href="http://www.specialstagesystems.com/system-overview/">Special Stage Systems</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>analog</category><category>gaming</category><category>mingmecca</category><category>music</category><category>nes</category><category>patch</category><category>specialstagesystems</category><category>Synthesizer</category><category>video</category><category>VideoGames</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 02:28:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20557773</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Samsung now pushing out more updates to address Exynos security vulnerability]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/17/samsung-exynos-security-updates/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/17/samsung-exynos-security-updates/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/17/samsung-exynos-security-updates/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/17/samsung-exynos-security-updates/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Samsung now pushing out more updates to address Exynos security vulnerability" data-src-height="399" data-src-width="355" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2013/01/samexynos116.jpg" /></a></p><p> About two weeks ago, Samsung <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/03/samsung-exynos-security-update/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">started rolling out</a> a fix to help Galaxy S III owners in the UK with that previously acknowledged <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/12/16/security-exploit-opens-samsung-exynos-devices-to-attack/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Exynos issue</a>. Fast forward to today, and the Korean electronics giant is now delivering an over-the-air update to T-Mobile's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/update/samsung-galaxy-note-ii-usa/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Galaxy Note II</a>, which, according to the changelog, "improves security and provides bug fixes" to the famed handset. Meanwhile, Sprint, too, has pushed out a software update, though this one in particular being for the carrier's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/15/samsung-epic-4g-touch-review/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Galaxy S II Epic Touch 4G</a> -- and it brings security updates that should take care of any existing Exynos vulnerabilities, plus there's also the inclusion of "Sprint Connections Optimizer." Surely, we can expect similar patches for more devices in the days to come, as we're all well aware that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/12/19/samsung-acknowledges-exynos-security-issue/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Samsung's working hard</a> on solving the problem.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/software/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Software</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/mobile/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Mobile</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/samsung/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Samsung</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/17/samsung-exynos-security-updates/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Via:</strong> <a target="_blank" href="http://www.androidcentral.com/updates-start-push-samsung-s-exynos-exploit">Android Central</a><!--//--></p>
<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a target="_blank" href="http://community.sprint.com/baw/thread/110551">Sprint</a><!--//-->, <a target="_blank" href="http://support.t-mobile.com/docs/DOC-4962">T-Mobile</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>Exynos</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>patch</category><category>samsung</category><category>security</category><category>update</category><category>vulnerability</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edgar Alvarez]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 00:12:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20430932</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Next Wii U system update due late December, will improve software loading times (update: PR folks say 'no')]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/12/19/next-wii-u-system-update-due-late-december/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/12/19/next-wii-u-system-update-due-late-december/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/12/19/next-wii-u-system-update-due-late-december/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/12/19/next-wii-u-system-update-due-late-december/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Next Wii U system update due late December, will improve software loading times (update: PR folks say 'no')" data-src-height="412" data-src-width="620" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/11/wiiugamepadhedimg620pxtake2wmed-1354190552.jpg" /></a></p><p> The <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/wiiu/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Wii U</a> launch didn't go quite as smoothly as consumers would've liked, with a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/17/psa-day-one-patch-wii-u/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">major update</a> to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/29/nintendo-iwata-sorry-wii-u-update/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">sit through</a> right after unboxing, and support for various <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/20/hulu-plus-wii-u/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">video</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/21/wii-u-amazon-instant-video/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">streaming</a> services absent on <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/12/08/lovefilm-uk-wii-u/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">day one</a>. Well, head honcho at Nintendo <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/satoruiwata/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Satoru Iwata</a> has taken to YouTube and announced from his cream studio that the next system update is due late December. It's primarily being pushed out to improve the frustratingly slow software loading times on the new console -- an issue we highlighted in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/wii-u-review/nintendo-wii-u-review/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">our review</a>. Iwata only makes a fleeting appearance at the beginning of the video before it moves on to talking up the latest <em><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/31/google-maps-8-bit-version-for-nes-april-fools/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Dragon Quest</a></em> iteration, but if you've got a decent knowledge of Japanese, the embed awaits you below.</p><p> <b>Update:</b> Nintendo's PR people have been in touch and we've had one of our bilingual editors take a look at the video. Unfortunately, something was lost in translation and our source was mistaken -- the update in question is for <i>Dragon Quest X</i>, not the Wii U system. </p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gaming/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Gaming</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/software/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Software</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/nintendo/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Nintendo</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/12/19/next-wii-u-system-update-due-late-december/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>

<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a target="_blank" href="http://gonintendo.com/?mode=viewstory&amp;id=193088">GoNintendo</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>dragonquest</category><category>GameConsole</category><category>nintendo</category><category>nintendowiiu</category><category>patch</category><category>SatoruIwata</category><category>SoftwareUpdate</category><category>systemupdate</category><category>video</category><category>wiiu</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Rigg]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 08:28:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20406954</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google plans to fix an Android networking bug... after 2.5 years]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/21/google-plans-to-fix-an-android-networking-bug-after-2-and-a-half-years/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/21/google-plans-to-fix-an-android-networking-bug-after-2-and-a-half-years/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/21/google-plans-to-fix-an-android-networking-bug-after-2-and-a-half-years/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/21/google-plans-to-fix-an-android-networking-bug-after-2-and-a-half-years/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="HTC Desire review conclusion" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/04/htcdesirehed503302010.jpg" /></a></p><p> It's fair to say that some bugs take awhile to fix, and a public schedule isn't always an option; <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/03/htc-acknowledges-wifi-security-flaw-says-it-deliberately-kept-i/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">HTC knows this well</a>. Still, Google may be pushing the limits with the solution for a longstanding Android bug that prevents resolving hostnames on some WiFi networks without using the full domain. The company has officially committed to providing a patch -- 2 years, 6 months and 23 days after the bug was first reported on April 29th, 2010. Google explains that the "next major release" after <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/29/google-bumps-android-to-4-2-keeps-jelly-bean-moniker/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Android 4.2</a> should hold the remedy, and claims that a mix of "prioritization and resources" prevented the team from sorting things out between Android 2.1 and now. We'll take Google's word for it, although the vow won't be much comfort for anyone who's still holding on to that original <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/01/htc-desire-review/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">HTC Desire</a> and can't upgrade. At least the Mountain View team won't have to deal with any <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/05/ancient-dos-bug-gets-squashed/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">17-year-old security flaws</a>.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Networking</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/mobile/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Mobile</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/google/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Google</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/21/google-plans-to-fix-an-android-networking-bug-after-2-and-a-half-years/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Via:</strong> <a href="http://www.androidpolice.com/2012/11/21/google-acknowledges-2-5-year-old-networking-bug-promises-fix-in-next-android-version/" target="_blank">Android Police</a><!--//--></p>
<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a href="http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=8030#c125" target="_blank">Google</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>android</category><category>android2.1</category><category>bug</category><category>google</category><category>minipost</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>mobilepostmini</category><category>networking</category><category>patch</category><category>wifi</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 21:22:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20386410</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[PSA: Nintendo Wii U day-one patch now live, includes entire online infrastructure]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/17/psa-day-one-patch-wii-u/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/17/psa-day-one-patch-wii-u/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/17/psa-day-one-patch-wii-u/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/17/psa-day-one-patch-wii-u/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="PSA Nintendo Wii U day one patch now live, includes TKTK" data-src-height="412" data-src-width="620" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/11/wiiuupdate620pxhedimgwmed-1353204596.jpg" /></a></p><p> It's well past midnight, you're home with your brand new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/wiiu?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Nintendo Wii U</a> -- now what? Well, you've got yourself a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/07/wii-u-day-one-update-online-features/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">hefty firmware update</a> to download should you wish to do anything other than play disc-based Wii U games. Say, for instance, you wanna check out Nintendo's Mii-based social network, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/miiverse?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Miiverse</a>? You're gonna need that update. Or you want to check out the digital storefront, the eShop? Update. Browse the internet? Up ... <em>you get the picture</em>. The file download clocks in at just over an hour (at least on our retail units ahead of launch), and the install takes another five minutes, so we'd suggest you grab it ASAP before the rest of the world is trying to hungrily snap it up as well. Remember: your brand new Wii U can do literally nothing outside of build Miis and play disc-based games before the update, so don't go freaking out when your console seems to be missing a few key functions out of the box.</p><p> And no, this doesn't include <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/nintendotvii?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Nintendo TVii</a>, which Nintendo says won't arrive until <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/16/nintendo-tvii-delayed/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">some time in December</a>. We'll update this post with more specifics as we explore the update further, so keep an eye out!</p><p> <strong>Update:</strong> The update includes, from what we've seen thus far, the entire eShop, Miiverse, an internet browser, and access to Netflix. Hulu Plus, Amazon Instant Video, and YouTube remain conspicuously absent, but should be available "in the coming weeks" (per <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/16/nintendo-tvii-delayed/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Nintendo's update earlier this week</a>). Backwards compatibility is also packed in the update, in form of the entire original Wii menu (which makes us feel like we just downloaded the entire Wii console to our Wii U -- the future!). The Wii U actually fully resets to launch the Wii menu, and can only be navigated using a classic Wii remote control. Kinda bogus, but it sure is nice having a full Wii built in to the Wii U.</p><p> <strong>Update 2:</strong> Netflix is a separate download required (an update) for use.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gaming/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Gaming</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/nintendo/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Nintendo</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/17/psa-day-one-patch-wii-u/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>dayonepatch</category><category>dayoneupdate</category><category>eshop</category><category>nintendo</category><category>nintendowiiu</category><category>online</category><category>patch</category><category>wiiu</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Gilbert]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 21:15:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20382777</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google patches SVG and IPC exploits in Chrome, discoverer banks $60,000 in the process]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/11/google-patches-svg-and-ipc-exploits-in-chrome-discoverer-banks-60k/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/11/google-patches-svg-and-ipc-exploits-in-chrome-discoverer-banks-60k/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/11/google-patches-svg-and-ipc-exploits-in-chrome-discoverer-banks-60k/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/11/google-patches-svg-and-ipc-exploits-in-chrome-discoverer-banks-60k/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Google Chrome logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/08/chrome366664.jpg" style="float: right;" /></a>Google revels in hacking contests as ways of testing <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Chrome,Google/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Chrome's</a> worth. Even if the browser <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/03/googles-paying-20-000-to-hack-chrome-any-takers/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">is compromised</a>, the failure provides a shot at fixing an exploit under much safer circumstances than an in-the-wild attack. No better example exists than the results of Google's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/16/google-teases-hackers-with-2-million-in-prizes-announces-pwniu/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Pwnium 2 challenge</a> in Malaysia: the company has already patched vulnerabilities found in the contest that surround SVG images and IPC (inter-process communication) before they become real problems. Staying one step ahead of truly malicious hackers carries a price, however. Pwnium 2 winner Pinkie Pie -- yes, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/mylittlepony?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Pinkie Pie</a> -- is being paid $60,000 in prize money for catching the exploits. That may be a small price to pay if it reassures a few more Internet Explorer users looking to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/06/google-chrome-leading-global-browser-share-statcounter-data/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">hop the fence</a>.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/software/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Software</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/google/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Google</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/11/google-patches-svg-and-ipc-exploits-in-chrome-discoverer-banks-60k/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>

<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a href="http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2012/10/stable-channel-update_6105.html" target="_blank">Google Chrome Releases</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>challenge</category><category>chrome</category><category>chromium</category><category>contest</category><category>exploit</category><category>fix</category><category>google</category><category>google chrome</category><category>google chromium</category><category>GoogleChrome</category><category>GoogleChromium</category><category>hack</category><category>hack in the box</category><category>hacking</category><category>HackInTheBox</category><category>hacks</category><category>ipc</category><category>malaysia</category><category>my little pony</category><category>MyLittlePony</category><category>patch</category><category>pinkie pie</category><category>PinkiePie</category><category>pwnium 2</category><category>Pwnium2</category><category>security</category><category>software</category><category>svg</category><category>update</category><category>upgrade</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 09:31:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20347422</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft confirms Flash vulnerability fix for Internet Explorer 10 coming soon]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/11/micrsoft-confirms-flash-vulnerability-fix-for-internet-explorer/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/11/micrsoft-confirms-flash-vulnerability-fix-for-internet-explorer/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/11/micrsoft-confirms-flash-vulnerability-fix-for-internet-explorer/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/11/micrsoft-confirms-flash-vulnerability-fix-for-internet-explorer/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Microsoft confirms Flash vulnerability fix for Internet Explorer 10 coming soon " src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/flash-on-windows-8-qualcomm.jpg" /></a></p><p> Microsoft has just announced that it will be providing security patches for the Windows 8 IE10-specific version of Flash, despite the software giant initially suggesting it wouldn't. The patch will be available "shortly," and hints at a return to the update cycles of old. More significantly, as <em>ZDNet </em>points out, unless <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/microsoft,flash?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Microsoft coordinates these releases with Adobe</a>, there could be a constant cycle of IE10 being vulnerable in the future. On a positive note, the fix should be released before Windows 8 goes prime time, but for those who jumped on board early, you might want to keep one eye locked on the update page, and get it when it lands.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/software/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Software</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/11/micrsoft-confirms-flash-vulnerability-fix-for-internet-explorer/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>

<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a href="http://www.zdnet.com/microsoft-to-deliver-flash-update-to-windows-8-users-shortly-7000004039/" target="_blank">ZDNet</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>adobe</category><category>adobe flash</category><category>AdobeFlash</category><category>fix</category><category>flash</category><category>flash update</category><category>FlashUpdate</category><category>microsoft</category><category>patch</category><category>vulnerability</category><category>windows</category><category>windows 8</category><category>Windows8</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Trew]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:27:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20320737</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple posts OS X 10.8.1 update, mends your Mountain Lion]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/23/apple-posts-os-x-10-8-1-update-mends-your-mountain-lion/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/23/apple-posts-os-x-10-8-1-update-mends-your-mountain-lion/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/23/apple-posts-os-x-10-8-1-update-mends-your-mountain-lion/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/23/apple-posts-os-x-10-8-1-update-mends-your-mountain-lion/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Apple posts OS X 108, mends your Mountain Lion" data-src-height="308" data-src-width="600" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/08/mountain-lion-10-8-1-update.jpg" style="margin: 4px;" /></a></p><p> There's a special moment in every operating system's life when it loses its innocent .0 status and grows up. It's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/25/apple-os-x-mountain-lion-10-8-review/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">OS X Mountain Lion's</a> turn to mature, as Apple has just pushed out the 10.8.1 update for early adopters. Most of the fixes are for issues that plague specific use cases, such as audio output from a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ThunderboltDisplay/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Thunderbolt Display</a> or crashes in Migration Assistant.  There are a few remedies that a wider audience might appreciate -- a fix for iMessages that don't send and an improvement to Exchange compatibility in Mail, for example. We don't yet know of any surprises lurking underneath, but it can't hurt to have a smoother-running Mac while we investigate.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Laptops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/software/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Software</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/23/apple-posts-os-x-10-8-1-update-mends-your-mountain-lion/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Via:</strong> <a href="http://9to5mac.com/2012/08/23/mac-os-10-8-1-released-get-downloading/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=twitter&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+9To5Mac-MacAllDay+%289+to+5+Mac+-+Apple+Intelligence%29" target="_blank">9to5 Mac</a><!--//--></p>
<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5418" target="_blank">Apple</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>10.8.1</category><category>apple</category><category>desktop</category><category>desktops</category><category>exchange</category><category>imessage</category><category>laptop</category><category>laptops</category><category>mac os x</category><category>MacOsX</category><category>mail</category><category>migration assistant</category><category>MigrationAssistant</category><category>mountain lion</category><category>MountainLion</category><category>os x</category><category>os x 10.8</category><category>os x 10.8 mountain lion</category><category>OS X Mountain Lion</category><category>OsX</category><category>OsX10.8</category><category>OsX10.8MountainLion</category><category>OsXMountainLion</category><category>patch</category><category>software</category><category>thunderbolt display</category><category>ThunderboltDisplay</category><category>update</category><category>upgrade</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 11:31:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20307653</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Office for Mac 2011 and 2008 ready for OS X Mountain Lion, procrastinators groan]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/26/office-for-mac-2011-and-2008-ancestor-ready-for-mountain-lion/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/26/office-for-mac-2011-and-2008-ancestor-ready-for-mountain-lion/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/26/office-for-mac-2011-and-2008-ancestor-ready-for-mountain-lion/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/26/office-for-mac-2011-and-2008-ancestor-ready-for-mountain-lion/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Office for Mac 2011 fade" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/10/office-mac-top-101.jpg" style="width: 540px; height: 212px;" /></a></p><p> So you updated to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/25/apple-os-x-mountain-lion-10-8-review/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">OS X Mountain Lion</a> and, gosh darn it, you're not sure that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/office2011?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Office for Mac 2011</a> (or Office 2008 for Mac) will be in perfect harmony. Time to put off finishing that accounts receivable spreadsheet until IT sorts it all out, right? Unfortunately for anyone looking to catch a break, Microsoft just certified that the two most recent Mac versions of Office will purr with Apple's latest big cat. About the only hiccup remaining is the inability to manually download and install future updates as long as Gatekeeper is on full lockdown. If you've been spending all day making <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/paper+plane?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">paper planes</a>, it's time to knuckle down and get back to work.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/software/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Software</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/26/office-for-mac-2011-and-2008-ancestor-ready-for-mountain-lion/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>fix</category><category>fixes</category><category>gatekeeper</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft office</category><category>microsoft office 2008</category><category>microsoft office 2008 for mac</category><category>microsoft office for mac</category><category>microsoft office for mac 2011</category><category>MicrosoftOffice</category><category>MicrosoftOffice2008</category><category>MicrosoftOffice2008ForMac</category><category>MicrosoftOfficeForMac</category><category>MicrosoftOfficeForMac2011</category><category>office</category><category>office 2008</category><category>office 2008 for mac</category><category>office 2011</category><category>office for mac</category><category>office for mac 2011</category><category>Office2008</category><category>Office2008ForMac</category><category>Office2011</category><category>OfficeForMac</category><category>OfficeForMac2011</category><category>patch</category><category>patches</category><category>software</category><category>update</category><category>updates</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 00:32:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20286424</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Developer won't patch XBLA game because Microsoft would charge 'tens of thousands' of dollars]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/19/microsoft-polytron-xbla/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/19/microsoft-polytron-xbla/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/19/microsoft-polytron-xbla/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/19/microsoft-polytron-xbla/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Developer won't patch XBLA game because Microsoft would charge 'tens of thousands' for the privilege" data-src-height="338" data-src-width="600" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/07/fez2.jpg" style="margin: 4px;" /></a></p><p> Seeing as how so much software is moving to online distribution, the significance of this controversy might extend far beyond gaming and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/xbla?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">XBLA</a>. For now, however, the spotlight is firmly on Microsoft and the way it charges developers for testing their games and patches, after a well-known developer made an unusually public complaint. In a post on its official blog, Polytron said it would not patch a rare game-saving bug in its popular title <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/27/indie-game-the-movie-the-worldwide-release-june-12th/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><em>Fez</em></a>, because Microsoft would charge it "tens of thousands of dollars to re-certify the game." It added that "had Fez been released on <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/steam?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Steam</a> instead of XBLA," the problem would have been fixed "right away" and at no cost to the developer, which strongly hints that it'll jump to another platform as soon as its XBLA exclusivity expires. Responses to the story over at our sister site <em>Joystiq</em> are decidedly mixed, with some folks outraged that Microsoft's high maintenance attitude could hold back improvements in this way while others suspect Polytron of blame-shifting.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gaming/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Gaming</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/software/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Software</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/19/microsoft-polytron-xbla/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>app platform</category><category>AppPlatform</category><category>bug</category><category>bug fix</category><category>BugFix</category><category>fez</category><category>game platform</category><category>GamePlatform</category><category>gaming</category><category>microsoft</category><category>patch</category><category>platform</category><category>polytron</category><category>price</category><category>prices</category><category>pricing</category><category>software</category><category>software development</category><category>software platform</category><category>SoftwareDevelopment</category><category>SoftwarePlatform</category><category>xbla</category><category>Xbox Live Arcade</category><category>XboxLiveArcade</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 08:41:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20281460</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft advises nuking Windows Gadgets after security hole discovery, we mourn our stock widgets]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/11/microsoft-advises-nuking-windows-gadgets-after-security-hole/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/11/microsoft-advises-nuking-windows-gadgets-after-security-hole/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/11/microsoft-advises-nuking-windows-gadgets-after-security-hole/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/11/microsoft-advises-nuking-windows-gadgets-after-security-hole/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Windows 7 with Gadgets" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/08/windows-7-screens1-jljkj.jpg" style="width: 600px; height: 375px;" /></a></p><p> Whether you see <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/WindowsVista/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Windows Vista</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/windows-7-review/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Windows 7</a> Gadgets as handy tools or a blight upon a pristine desktop, you might want to shut them off for safety's sake. <span>Mickey Shkatov and Toby Kohlenberg have found that the desktop widgets' web-based code have flaws that would allow malicious Gadgets, or even hijacked legitimate Gadgets, to compromise a </span>PC without having to go through the usual avenues of attack. Microsoft's short-term answer to the vulnerability is a drastic one, though: a stopgap patch disables Gadgets entirely, leaving just a barren desktop in its wake. There's no word on a Gadget-friendly solution arriving before Kohlenberg and Shkatov present at the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/BlackHatConference/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Black Hat Conference</a> on July 26th, but we suspect Microsoft's ultimate answer is to move everyone to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/31/windows-8-release-preview-detailed-impressions/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Windows 8</a>, where Gadgets aren't even an option. We understand the importance of preventing breaches, of course -- we're just disappointed that we'll have to forgo miniature stock tickers and weather forecasts a little sooner <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/09/microsoft-confirms-windows-8-rtm/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">than expected</a>.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/software/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Software</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/11/microsoft-advises-nuking-windows-gadgets-after-security-hole/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>black hat</category><category>black hat conference</category><category>BlackHat</category><category>BlackHatConference</category><category>css</category><category>exploit</category><category>gadget</category><category>gadgets</category><category>html</category><category>javascript</category><category>microsoft</category><category>patch</category><category>security</category><category>software</category><category>vista</category><category>vulnerability</category><category>widget</category><category>widgets</category><category>windows 7</category><category>windows gadgets</category><category>windows vista</category><category>Windows7</category><category>WindowsGadgets</category><category>WindowsVista</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 14:42:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20276138</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Windows updated with better checking for bad digital certs after Flame malware incident]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/14/window-update-digital-certificates-flame/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/14/window-update-digital-certificates-flame/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/14/window-update-digital-certificates-flame/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/14/window-update-digital-certificates-flame/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/05/windows_vista_002-sm.jpg" style="width: 200px; height: 204px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px; float: right;" /></a>Having already <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/11/flame-malware-extinguishes-itself-microsoft-protects-against-fu/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">pushed one patch to servers</a> as part of its response to the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/flame,malware?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">recently discovered Flame trojan</a>, Microsoft is making another adjustment on Windows Vista, Windows 7, and Windows Server 2008 machines. A new update going out lets revoked certificates be published and recognized much faster, which would protect against a vulnerability exploited by Flame to fake its way in as a legitimate update. <i>Informationweek</i> has more information on the old OCSP method used to set revocation status, and also points out another vulnerability in XML Core Services the folks in Redmond is warning people of this week and has already released a "fix it" solution for. Hit the source link to get all the details and grab the update, IT types may want to update their firewalls with the new URLs being put into use for the lists.</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/14/window-update-digital-certificates-flame/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>Auto Update</category><category>AutoUpdate</category><category>flame</category><category>malware</category><category>minipost</category><category>patch</category><category>revoked certificate</category><category>RevokedCertificate</category><category>security</category><category>trojan</category><category>update</category><category>windows</category><category>windows 7</category><category>windows server 2008</category><category>Windows Server 2008 R2</category><category>windows update</category><category>windows vista</category><category>Windows7</category><category>WindowsServer2008</category><category>WindowsServer2008R2</category><category>WindowsUpdate</category><category>WindowsVista</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 23:49:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20259068</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple issues Leopard update with Flashback removal tool]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/apple-issues-leopard-update-with-flashback-removal-tool/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/apple-issues-leopard-update-with-flashback-removal-tool/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/apple-issues-leopard-update-with-flashback-removal-tool/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/apple-issues-leopard-update-with-flashback-removal-tool/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Apple issues Leopard update with Flashback removal tool" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/leopard-osx.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 375px; height: 431px;" /></a></p><p> <span>Folks still rocking Apple's Leopard may have been feeling left out after Lion and Snow Leopard both got an update for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/apple-releases-fix-for-flashback-malware/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">addressing that Flashback malware</a>. If you're one of them, you'll be glad to know that Apple has finally issued a Leopard fix that comes with a removal tool for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/10/apple-publishes-support-page-for-flashback-malware-is-working-o/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">the vulnerability</a> afflicting its big cats. In addition to a 1.23MB Flashback update, Apple also released a second 1.11MB </span><span>fix for Leopard that disables versions of Adobe Flash Player that don't have the requisite security updates. Both should <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/18/apple-flashback-virus-infections-update/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">further whittle down</a> the number of Apple computers affected by the Flashback trojan. For the actual updates, feel free to pounce on the source links below.</span></p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/apple-issues-leopard-update-with-flashback-removal-tool/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>10.5</category><category>10.6</category><category>10.7</category><category>adobe flash</category><category>AdobeFlash</category><category>apple</category><category>botnet</category><category>dr. web</category><category>Dr.Web</category><category>flashback</category><category>flashfake</category><category>java</category><category>Java Virtual Machine</category><category>JavaVirtualMachine</category><category>leopard</category><category>lion</category><category>malware</category><category>os x</category><category>OsX</category><category>patch</category><category>security</category><category>snow leopard</category><category>SnowLeopard</category><category>trojan</category><category>update</category><category>virus</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Hidalgo]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 04:01:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20238100</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Adobe changes tune on CS5 updates, won't seek paid CS6 upgrade to patch vulnerabilities]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/12/adobe-cs-vulnerabilities-patch/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/12/adobe-cs-vulnerabilities-patch/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/12/adobe-cs-vulnerabilities-patch/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/12/adobe-cs-vulnerabilities-patch/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Adobe reportedly asking some CS users to upgrade if they want a patch for certain vulnerabilities" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/adobe5-11.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 254px;" /></a></p><p> Things have gotten interesting in the world of CS updates. Recently, <em>Computerworld</em> reported that Adobe had informed folks using an older version of its famed <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/creative+suite/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Creative Suite</a> -- CS5 and CS5.5, to be exact -- they'd have to shell out the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/07/adobe-creative-suite-6-now-available-creative-cloud-may-11/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">CS6</a> upgrade fee in order to get a fix for some recently discovered bugs. Apparently, Adobe took notice to its customers' dissatisfaction and updated its initial blog post with a changed tune, stating, "We are in the process of resolving these vulnerabilities in Adobe Photoshop CS5.x, and will update this Security Bulletin once the patch is available." The same is true for both Illustrator and Flash. This kerfuffle started after <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/adobe/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Adobe</a> handed out warnings for eight "critical" vulnerabilities found in certain versions of the three applications -- some of which are said to be exploitable and could potentially be used to "take control of the affected system." We'll see how it all plays out over the upcoming days, but in the meantime hit the links below to see if you need to take any action.</p><p> <em>James Trew and Joe Pollicino contributed to this post.</em></p><p></p><p></p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/12/adobe-cs-vulnerabilities-patch/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>adobe</category><category>adobe creative suite</category><category>adobe cs</category><category>adobe cs 5.5</category><category>adobe cs5</category><category>adobe cs6</category><category>adobe photoshop</category><category>AdobeCreativeSuite</category><category>AdobeCs</category><category>AdobeCs5</category><category>AdobeCs5.5</category><category>AdobeCs6</category><category>AdobePhotoshop</category><category>bug</category><category>bugs</category><category>creative suite</category><category>Creative Suite 3</category><category>Creative Suite 5</category><category>creative suite 5.5</category><category>Creative Suite 6</category><category>CreativeSuite</category><category>CreativeSuite3</category><category>CreativeSuite5</category><category>CreativeSuite5.5</category><category>CreativeSuite6</category><category>cs6</category><category>malware</category><category>minipost</category><category>patch</category><category>patches</category><category>software patch</category><category>SoftwarePatch</category><category>vulnerabilities</category><category>vulnerability</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edgar Alvarez]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 23:59:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20236827</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Nikon confirms woes with D4 and D800, joins Canon in high-end doghouse]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/nikon-confirms-woes-with-d4-and-d800/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/nikon-confirms-woes-with-d4-and-d800/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/nikon-confirms-woes-with-d4-and-d800/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/nikon-confirms-woes-with-d4-and-d800/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="nikon-confirms-problems-with-D4-D800" height="400" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/nikon-d800-lockup-05-04-12-01.jpg" style="margin:4px" width="535" /></a></p><p> Okay Nikon owners, stop laughing at your 5D Mark III cronies for their <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/02/canon-eos-5d-mark-iii-light-leak-fix-is-black-tape/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">leaky problem</a>. That might be a drip in the pail next to your own worries -- namely, possible "lock-up", focus and viewfinder hitches on your <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/06/nikon-d800-hands-on/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">D800</a> or <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/05/nikon-d4-field-review/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">D4</a>. Nikon verified that a "small number" of units of both DSLRs can lock up and become unresponsive, but until there's a permanent patch you can prevent this by disabling both highlight and RGB histogram displays. The company also verified that a "run" of D800s is suffering from a viewfinder bug, although it has yet to confirm another emerging problem with autofocus in some units, which apparently requires a factory fix. So, if you've noticed any of this with your pricey new D800, or really pricey D4, your best bet might be to reach out to your Nikon repair center post-haste. And don't let the Canon guys see you.</p><p> [Thanks, Thinh]</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/nikon-confirms-woes-with-d4-and-d800/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>autofocus</category><category>autofocus issues</category><category>autofocus problems</category><category>AutofocusIssues</category><category>AutofocusProblems</category><category>bug</category><category>bugs</category><category>camera</category><category>d4</category><category>d800</category><category>freezing</category><category>lock-up</category><category>lockup</category><category>Nikon</category><category>Nikon D4</category><category>nikon d4 autofocus issues</category><category>Nikon D800</category><category>nikon d800 autofocus issues</category><category>NikonD4</category><category>NikonD4AutofocusIssues</category><category>NikonD800</category><category>NikonD800AutofocusIssues</category><category>patch</category><category>problem</category><category>problems</category><category>repair</category><category>unresponsive</category><category>viewfinder</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Dent]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 06:59:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20230722</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple publishes support page for Flashback malware, is working on a fix]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/10/apple-publishes-support-page-for-flashback-malware-is-working-o/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/10/apple-publishes-support-page-for-flashback-malware-is-working-o/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/10/apple-publishes-support-page-for-flashback-malware-is-working-o/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/10/apple-publishes-support-page-for-flashback-malware-is-working-o/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Apple publishes support page for Flashback malware, is working on a fix" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/04/208193442.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 514px; height: 450px;" /></a></div>After the Flashback / Flashfake Mac trojan was exposed by Russian site <em>Dr. Web</em>, Apple has finally responded by publishing a support page about the issue and promising a fix. If you haven't heard by now, the malware exploits a flaw in the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/java?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Java</a> Virtual Machine, which Oracle pushed a fix for back in February, but Apple didn't patch until a botnet consisting of as many as 650,000 Macs was identified on March 4th. Antivirus maker Kaspersky has confirmed the earlier findings, and released a free tool affected users can run to remove the trojan from their computers. Other than the update already delivered for computers running OS 10.6 and 10.7 Apple recommends users on 10.5 and earlier disable Java in their browser preferences. What isn't mentioned however, is when its fix is incoming or any timetable on its efforts with international ISPs to cut off the IP addresses used by the network. This is <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/01/apple-cracks-down-on-macdefender-prevents-malware-downloads-wit/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">not</a> the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/22/iwork-09-trojan-infects-at-least-20-000-machines/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">first time</a> Macs have fallen prey to malware and as their market share grows will likely not be the last, so don't think just opting for OS X is automatically keeping you a step ahead security-wise. Check the links below for more information about what the malware does, and how to get rid of it.

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/10/apple-publishes-support-page-for-flashback-malware-is-working-o/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>10.6</category><category>10.7</category><category>apple</category><category>botnet</category><category>dr. web</category><category>Dr.Web</category><category>flashback</category><category>flashfake</category><category>java</category><category>Java Virtual Machine</category><category>JavaVirtualMachine</category><category>kaspersky</category><category>lion</category><category>malware</category><category>os x</category><category>OsX</category><category>patch</category><category>security</category><category>snow leopard</category><category>SnowLeopard</category><category>trojan</category><category>update</category><category>virus</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:50:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20212858</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google plugs 14 holes, hands out $47k to security researchers]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/07/google-plugs-14-holes-hands-out-47k-to-security-researchers/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/07/google-plugs-14-holes-hands-out-47k-to-security-researchers/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/07/google-plugs-14-holes-hands-out-47k-to-security-researchers/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/07/google-plugs-14-holes-hands-out-47k-to-security-researchers/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Chrome logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/08/googlechromelogodantetktk-1312332448.jpg" style="width: 200px; height: 200px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 8px 12px; float: left;" /></a>Every year Google offers a bounty to those that can dig up security flaws in its browser. This year, the company is putting $1 million on the line at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/CanSecWest?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">CanSecWest</a>. But, before the Mountain View crew can even pack up for the event, it's got to cut checks for $47,000 to four different researchers. The vulnerability bounty hunters found 14 flaws in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/chrome?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Chrome</a> that were patched in a update on March 4th. That big payout included three separate $10,000 bonuses for "sustained, extraordinary" contributions to the browser's security. For full details on the bugs and the price paid for each, hit up the source.

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/07/google-plugs-14-holes-hands-out-47k-to-security-researchers/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>bonus</category><category>bonuses</category><category>chrome</category><category>chrome browser</category><category>ChromeBrowser</category><category>google</category><category>google chrome</category><category>GoogleChrome</category><category>minipost</category><category>patch</category><category>patches</category><category>reward</category><category>rewards</category><category>security</category><category>update</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 07:37:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20187321</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Kodak moves to block Apple's latest patent suit from proceeding in federal district court]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/06/kodak-moves-to-block-apples-latest-patent-suit-from-proceeding/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/06/kodak-moves-to-block-apples-latest-patent-suit-from-proceeding/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/06/kodak-moves-to-block-apples-latest-patent-suit-from-proceeding/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/06/kodak-moves-to-block-apples-latest-patent-suit-from-proceeding/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/kodak.jpg" style="width: 600px; height: 302px;" /></a></div><div> In a move that's sure to surprise no one, Kodak is fighting Apple's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/15/apple-kodak-patent-lawsuit-bankrupt/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">latest round</a> of patent litigation -- a suit that would force Kodak to pause plans to sell up to $2.6 billion in digital imaging patents as a condition of its bankruptcy loan. In documents filed late last week, Kodak argued the dispute should be heard by the same bankruptcy court that's already overseeing its insolvency proceedings. In fact, Kodak's bankruptcy filing back in January caused all pending litigation (from Apple and RIM, among others) to come to a screeching halt, but Apple is nonetheless pushing for a reboot, arguing it's the owner of "a number of valuable patents," including one that could be lost if that planned $2 billion sale goes through. So where might this legal catfight take place? A bankruptcy judge is expected to hear arguments from both sides on Thursday.</div>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/06/kodak-moves-to-block-apples-latest-patent-suit-from-proceeding/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>Apple</category><category>Bankrupt</category><category>bankruptcy</category><category>bankruptcy court</category><category>BankruptcyCourt</category><category>Kodak</category><category>patch</category><category>patent</category><category>patent troll</category><category>Patent Trolls</category><category>patent war</category><category>patents</category><category>PatentTroll</category><category>PatentTrolls</category><category>PatentWar</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dana Wollman]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 10:53:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20186766</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Sony Google TV update rolling out, if you want to root your time is now]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/03/sony-google-tv-update-rolling-out/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/03/sony-google-tv-update-rolling-out/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/03/sony-google-tv-update-rolling-out/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/03/sony-google-tv-update-rolling-out/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/sonygoogletvupdateeng.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>Looking to get some <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/20/gtvhacker-tool-brings-sony-google-tvs-root-access-full-flash-st/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">unblocked Hulu or other Flash streaming action</a> on your Sony <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/googletv?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Google TV</a> hardware? It may be in your best interest to grab the cracked software right away The folks at <i>GTVHacker</i> warned an update blocking the security hole exploited by their downgrader tool would be on the way, and now it has appeared, sporting an ambiguous "operating system stability" reason for existing. Hit the source link to find out everything that can be achieved with a modified kernel and what it will take to get things running on your TV or Blu-ray player.
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/hd/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">HD</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/03/sony-google-tv-update-rolling-out/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>blu-ray player</category><category>Blu-rayPlayer</category><category>flash</category><category>google tv</category><category>GoogleTv</category><category>hack</category><category>hdpostmini</category><category>kernel</category><category>nsx-46gt1</category><category>NSZ-GT1</category><category>patch</category><category>root</category><category>security</category><category>sony</category><category>streaming</category><category>update</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 10:46:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20185071</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Xbox 360 system update gets its colors in order, makes it mandatory]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/xbox-360-system-update-gets-its-colors-in-order-makes-it-mandat/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/xbox-360-system-update-gets-its-colors-in-order-makes-it-mandat/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/xbox-360-system-update-gets-its-colors-in-order-makes-it-mandat/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/xbox-360-system-update-gets-its-colors-in-order-makes-it-mandat/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/xbox-360.jpg" style="width: 600px; height: 337px;" /></a></div>Remember those <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/19/microsoft-xbox-360-color-space-1080-hdcp-fix/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">color problems</a> experienced by some Xbox 360 users after last year's dashboard update? Microsoft appears to have fixed the issue in its latest system update, although it will take time for the fix to roll out across the associated apps -- we've been told this will happen over the next few months. Its Sony rival also rolled out its own (optional) update for the PS3 yesterday, improving "certain aspects" of the UI. The Xbox team promise that their update will also increase performance, but don't take their word for it; the update is rolling out now -- let us know how it goes.
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/hd/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">HD</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/xbox-360-system-update-gets-its-colors-in-order-makes-it-mandat/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>1080p</category><category>color space</category><category>ColorSpace</category><category>dashboard</category><category>dashboard update</category><category>DashboardUpdate</category><category>firmware</category><category>firmware update</category><category>FirmwareUpdate</category><category>fix</category><category>glitch</category><category>hdcp</category><category>hdmi</category><category>hdpostcross</category><category>major nelson</category><category>MajorNelson</category><category>metro</category><category>microsoft</category><category>patch</category><category>playstation 3</category><category>Playstation3</category><category>PS3</category><category>sony</category><category>update</category><category>video out</category><category>video output</category><category>VideoOut</category><category>VideoOutput</category><category>washed out</category><category>WashedOut</category><category>xbox 360</category><category>Xbox360</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mat Smith]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 05:55:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20173055</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft acknowledges Xbox 360 color space problem in last update, is working on a fix]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/19/microsoft-xbox-360-color-space-1080-hdcp-fix/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/19/microsoft-xbox-360-color-space-1080-hdcp-fix/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/19/microsoft-xbox-360-color-space-1080-hdcp-fix/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/19/microsoft-xbox-360-color-space-1080-hdcp-fix/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/xbox-360.jpg" style="width: 600px; height: 337px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin-left: 16px; margin-right: 16px;" /></a></div>While we <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/05/xbox-360-dashboard-update-fall-2011-review/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">found a lot of things to like in the last Xbox 360 dashboard upgrade</a>, not everyone was happy after it finally <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/06/xbox-360-fall-dashboard-update-slightly-delayed-stay-tuned/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">rolled out in early December</a>. We've received word from multiple owners who saw and reported color output problems since the beta began, and today Director of Programming Larry Hryb aka Major Nelson tweeted that the company is "aware of the color space issue w/ some Xbox video apps &amp; are working on a fix". While that should take care of some issues, more recent reports also indicate problems with the HDMI output having HDCP authentication problems with certain TVs or receivers that blocks video output, as well as reports confirmed by <i>Eurogamer </i>that 1080p output appears to be downscaled to 720p internally. We're waiting for a response from Microsoft about these or any other issues and will let you know when we hear more. Let us know if you've noticed anything else in the new Xbox 360 update that needs tweaking in the comments below.<br /><br />[Thanks, Vinny P, Brad R. and everyone else who sent this in]
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/hd/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">HD</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/19/microsoft-xbox-360-color-space-1080-hdcp-fix/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>1080p</category><category>color space</category><category>ColorSpace</category><category>dashboard</category><category>dashboard update</category><category>DashboardUpdate</category><category>fix</category><category>glitch</category><category>hdcp</category><category>hdmi</category><category>hdpostcross</category><category>major nelson</category><category>MajorNelson</category><category>metro</category><category>microsoft</category><category>patch</category><category>video out</category><category>video output</category><category>VideoOut</category><category>VideoOutput</category><category>washed out</category><category>WashedOut</category><category>xbox 360</category><category>Xbox360</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:10:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20152692</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Adobe releases final Flash Player version for Android, BlackBerry PlayBook, promises future updates]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/11/adobe-releases-final-flash-player-version-for-android-blackberr/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/11/adobe-releases-final-flash-player-version-for-android-blackberr/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/11/adobe-releases-final-flash-player-version-for-android-blackberr/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center; ">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/11/adobe-releases-final-flash-player-version-for-android-blackberr/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/adobe-flash.jpg" style="border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-top-style: solid; border-right-style: solid; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: solid; margin-left: 4px; margin-right: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; " /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left; ">
	<br />
	When Adobe <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/09/adobe-confirms-flash-player-is-dead-for-mobile-devices/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">announced</a> the death of Flash Player on mobile devices earlier this week, it did so while promising to issue a final version for Android devices and the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/13/blackberry-playbook-review/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">BlackBerry PlayBook</a>. Now, that promise has come to fruition, with the release of version 11.1. Like pretty much every Adobe update, this latest refresh promises to patch up a host of security flaws -- 12 "critical" ones, to be exact. More intriguing, however, are Adobe's plans for future security support. In a blog post published Wednesday, company exec Danny Winokur confirmed that Adobe will "continue to provide critical bug fixes and security updates for existing device configurations." This sentiment was echoed in a Twitter post yesterday from Brad Arkin, senior director of product security and privacy: "Adobe will continue to ship security updates for Flash Player mobile after the final feature release." But neither Winokur nor Arkin have specified how long this patch distribution will continue, and the company has yet to offer any sort of timeline for future tablet and smartphone updates. For more information on the latest release, check out the source link below, or hit up the coverage link to grab the Android version for yourself.</div>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/mobile/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Mobile</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/11/adobe-releases-final-flash-player-version-for-android-blackberr/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>adobe</category><category>adobe flash</category><category>adobe flash player</category><category>AdobeFlash</category><category>AdobeFlashPlayer</category><category>android</category><category>blackberry</category><category>blackberry playbook</category><category>BlackberryPlaybook</category><category>flash player</category><category>FlashPlayer</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>patch</category><category>research in motion</category><category>ResearchInMotion</category><category>RIM</category><category>security</category><category>security update</category><category>SecurityUpdate</category><category>support</category><category>update</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amar Toor]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 08:25:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20104213</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Netflix patch arrives for rooted Asus Transformers, it's okay to be happy]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/21/netflix-patch-arrives-for-rooted-asus-transformers-its-okay-to/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/21/netflix-patch-arrives-for-rooted-asus-transformers-its-okay-to/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/21/netflix-patch-arrives-for-rooted-asus-transformers-its-okay-to/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/21/netflix-patch-arrives-for-rooted-asus-transformers-its-okay-to/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/07/transformerrooted.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
If you've seen this handsome screen on your <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/18/asus-eee-pad-transformer-uk-edition-review/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Asus Transformer</a>, it means you've finally managed to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/11/transformer-rooted-before-asus-can-get-it-out-the-door/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">root it</a>. Congratulations. And yet, it's all so... anticlimactic. What was the point of it? In fact, what's the point of <em>anything</em>? Hey, don't go down that road. Install Netflix instead, courtesy of a new patch from <em>XDA Developers</em> at the source link below. Then watch <em>Kung Fu Panda</em> one more time and the sense of order in your life will magically return. Like the wise Oogway said: "You may wish for an apple or an orange, but you will get a peach."<br />
<br />
[Thanks everyone who sent this in]

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/21/netflix-patch-arrives-for-rooted-asus-transformers-its-okay-to/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>Android</category><category>Android 3.1</category><category>Android honeycomb</category><category>Android3.1</category><category>AndroidHoneycomb</category><category>asus</category><category>asus transformer</category><category>AsusTransformer</category><category>Google</category><category>Google Android</category><category>GoogleAndroid</category><category>hack</category><category>honeycomb</category><category>kung fu panda</category><category>KungFuPanda</category><category>netflix</category><category>patch</category><category>root</category><category>rooted</category><category>transformer</category><category>xda</category><category>xda developers</category><category>XdaDevelopers</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:41:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19996978</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple releases iOS 4.3.4, sends you back to jail, does not offer $200]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/15/apple-releases-ios-4-3-4-sends-you-back-to-jail-does-not-offer/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/15/apple-releases-ios-4-3-4-sends-you-back-to-jail-does-not-offer/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/15/apple-releases-ios-4-3-4-sends-you-back-to-jail-does-not-offer/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/15/apple-releases-ios-4-3-4-sends-you-back-to-jail-does-not-offer/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Apple releases iOS 4.3.4, sends you back to jail, does not offer $200" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/07/iphone-update-2011-07-15.png" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
<div>
	Apple has just pushed a new version of iOS, 4.3.4 (4.2.9 for the Verizon iPhone), and it looks to have "fixed" the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/07/apple-ios-4-3-4-software-update-may-fix-iphone-hole-block-pdf-j/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">PDF exploit</a> that has been so notoriously exploited of late. In a summary of what's changed, Apple indicates that a fix has been applied that will prevent "arbitrary code execution" when viewing a "maliciously crafted PDF" -- business speak for "we broke your jailbreak, son." And, sure enough, you can see what happens after the break when trying to apply the latest. At this point we're not seeing any other updates or improvements but, really, now that you can view those malicious PDFs without fear on your iPhone or iPad 2, what more do you need?<br />
	<br />
	[Thanks to everyone who sent this in]</div>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/15/apple-releases-ios-4-3-4-sends-you-back-to-jail-does-not-offer/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>apple</category><category>breaking news</category><category>ios</category><category>ios 4.3.4</category><category>Ios4.3.4</category><category>iphone</category><category>ipod</category><category>ipod touch</category><category>IpodTouch</category><category>jailbreak</category><category>patch</category><category>update</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Stevens]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:52:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19992486</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Windows Phone patch comes to Sprint and Orange, beefs up security]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/27/windows-phone-patch-comes-to-sprint-and-orange-beefs-up-securit/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/27/windows-phone-patch-comes-to-sprint-and-orange-beefs-up-securit/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/27/windows-phone-patch-comes-to-sprint-and-orange-beefs-up-securit/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/27/windows-phone-patch-comes-to-sprint-and-orange-beefs-up-securit/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/sprintwp7-update-20110527.jpg" style="border-width: 1px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Windows Phone owners start your engines -- or at least your Zune software. First promised three weeks ago, Microsoft is ready to roll out the "<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/04/microsoft-confirms-wp7-handsets-updated-using-unofficial-mechan/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">7392</a>" post-NoDo update to phones on Sprint in the US and Orange in Europe (with one exception: updates to the Omnia 7 will be meted out in phases). It's not a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/24/microsoft-announces-windows-phone-mango-update-early-and-in/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Mango-sized update</a>, so you'll be sorely disappointed if you're yearning for new features; the 7392 refresh is a security patch that fixes fraudulent third-party certificates that could lead to phishing attacks or content spoofing, and that's it. If you still haven't put <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/nodo/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">NoDo</a> on your phone, however, 7392 will bundle both updates together in one package. On one last note, it looks like phones previously updated using "unofficial mechanisms" are still unable to get the refresh. If that's not a concern, the security patch can be installed through your computer if you're so inclined.
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/mobile/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Mobile</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/27/windows-phone-patch-comes-to-sprint-and-orange-beefs-up-securit/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>7392</category><category>mango</category><category>microsoft</category><category>mobile</category><category>nodo</category><category>omnia 7</category><category>Omnia7</category><category>orange</category><category>patch</category><category>security</category><category>software update</category><category>SoftwareUpdate</category><category>sprint</category><category>windows phone</category><category>windows phone 7</category><category>WindowsPhone</category><category>WindowsPhone7</category><category>wp7</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad Molen]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 15:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19952030</dc:identifier>

</item>
</channel></rss>