<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget RSS Feed</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 AOL Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft details how Xbox One cloud servers will tackle processor-intensive gaming chores]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/24/xbox-cloud-computing-gaming/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/24/xbox-cloud-computing-gaming/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/24/xbox-cloud-computing-gaming/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/24/xbox-cloud-computing-gaming/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Image" data-src-height="341" data-src-width="620" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2013/05/xbox-one-cloud-05-24-13-01.jpg" /></a></p>

<p>One of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/21/xbox-one-video/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Xbox launch's</a> big reveals was that Microsoft <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/21/microsoft-updates-xbox-live-?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">added 300,000 servers</a> to Xbox Live, and now GM Matt Booty has detailed to <em>Ars Technica</em> how that'll improve game play. He said the improved cloud architecture will speed up GPU- or CPU-heavy chores that aren't dependent on latency -- like lighting or cloth dynamics -- by pre-calculating them before applying them to a scene. To make that happen, the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/21/microsoft-unveils-its-next-game-console-the-tktk/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Xbox One</a> server cloud will provide three virtual devices for "every Xbox one available in your living room." It'll be up to game developers to manage transitions between console-only and cloud assisted graphics, though, since the first few seconds of lighting in a new scene will need to be handled by the console before servers can take over. Of course, that means many titles <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/20/simcity-2-0-update-release-info/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">may</a> look better when you're online, but he added that you'll <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/21/xbox-one-always-on-drm-used-games-faq/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">still be able to play</a> if the internet is cut and "the game is going to have to intelligently handle that."</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gaming/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Gaming</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/hd/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">HD</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/microsoft/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Microsoft</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/24/xbox-cloud-computing-gaming/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>

<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a target="_blank" href="http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2013/05/how-the-xbox-one-draws-more-processing-power-from-cloud-computing/">Ars Technica</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>Cloud</category><category>CloudComputing</category><category>hdpostcross</category><category>latency</category><category>microsoft</category><category>Servers</category><category>XboxOne</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Dent]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 02:29:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20582608</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[IBM manufactures light-based 'nanophotonic' chips to let the terabytes flow]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/12/10/ibm-manufactures-light-based-nanophotonic-chips/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/12/10/ibm-manufactures-light-based-nanophotonic-chips/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/12/10/ibm-manufactures-light-based-nanophotonic-chips/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/12/10/ibm-manufactures-light-based-nanophotonic-chips/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="IBM manufactures lightbased 'nanophotonic' chips to let the terrabytes flow" data-src-height="433" data-src-width="620" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/12/ibm-photonics-12-10-12-01.jpg" /></a></p><p> IBM's taken a large step toward computer chips that use photons instead of electrons by manufacturing the first 90nm silicon-based optical processing modules. It did so using the CMOS nanophotonics technology we first saw <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/01/ibm-breakthrough-brings-us-one-step-closer-to-exascale-computing/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">back in 2010</a>, creating tranceivers capable of 25Gbps transfer speeds. By multiplexing a large number of those streams to a single fibre, "terrabytes of data" per second could flow between distant computer systems," according to IBM. The 90 nanometer light circuits should allow data-hungry servers or supercomputers to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/02/ibm-we-must-build-an-exascale-computer-before-2024-video/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">scale up rapidly</a> in speed "for the next decade, and at the desired low cost," according to the researchers. It's now primed for commercial development, meaning we could see an end to bottlenecks in systems "a few centimeters or a few kilometers" apart from each other. Check the PR for the detailed technical skinny.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Misc</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/science/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Science</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/12/10/ibm-manufactures-light-based-nanophotonic-chips/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>datacenters</category><category>fibreoptic</category><category>IBM</category><category>nanophotonics</category><category>research</category><category>servers</category><category>supercomputers</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Dent]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 02:13:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20398233</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[ARM chief tosses Moore's Law out with the trash, says efficiency rules all]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/09/arm-chief-tosses-moores-law-out-with-the-trash-favors-efficiency/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/09/arm-chief-tosses-moores-law-out-with-the-trash-favors-efficiency/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/09/arm-chief-tosses-moores-law-out-with-the-trash-favors-efficiency/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/09/arm-chief-tosses-moores-law-out-with-the-trash-favors-efficiency/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="ARM chief kicks Moore's Law to the curb, says efficiency rules all" data-src-height="380" data-src-width="620" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/11/arm-ceo-warren-east.jpg" /></a></p><p> ARM CEO Warren East already has a tendency to be <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/warreneast?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">more than a bit outspoken</a> on the future of computing, and he just escalated the war of words with an assault on the industry's sacred cow: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/15/engadget-primed-nanometers/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Moore's Law</a>. After some prompting by <em>MIT Technology Review</em> during a chat, East argued that power efficiency is "actually what matters," whether it's a phone or a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/arm,server?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">server farm</a>. Making ever more complex and power-hungry processors to obey Moore's Law just limits how many chips you can fit in a given space, he said. Not that the executive is about to accept Intel's position that ARM <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/13/intel-ceo-paul-otellini-addresses-microsofts-arm-move-in-the-wa/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">isn't meant for performance</a>, as he saw the architecture scaling to high speeds whenever there was a large enough power supply to back it up. East's talk is a bit long on theory and short on practice as of today -- a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/07/samsung-chromebook-review-2012/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Samsung Chromebook</a> isn't going to make Gordon Moore have second thoughts -- but it's food for thought in an era where ARM is <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/05/the-engadget-interview-arms-lead-mobile-strategist-james-bruce/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">growing fast</a>, and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/23/microsoft-surface-rt-review/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">even Microsoft</a> isn't convinced that speed rules everything.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Laptops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/tablets/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Tablets</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/intel/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Intel</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/09/arm-chief-tosses-moores-law-out-with-the-trash-favors-efficiency/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>

<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/news/507116/moores-law-is-becoming-irrelevant/" target="_blank">MIT Technology Review</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>arm</category><category>intel</category><category>mobile</category><category>mooreslaw</category><category>processor</category><category>server</category><category>servers</category><category>smartphone</category><category>warreneast</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 20:27:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20375827</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google takes us inside their data centers, shows you where the internet lives (video)]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/17/google-inside-data-centers/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/17/google-inside-data-centers/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/17/google-inside-data-centers/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/17/google-inside-data-centers/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Google takes us inside their data centers, shows you where the internet lives" data-src-height="413" data-src-width="620" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/10/google-datacenter-tech-05-1350479469.jpg" /></a></p><p> Ever fancied a look inside one of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/02/report-data-centers-accounted-for-just-1-to-1-5-percent-of-elec/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Google's</a> cavernous <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/02/googles-data-center-secrets-revealed/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">server farms</a>? Given the security issues, the company isn't likely to just let <em>anyone</em> mooch around -- but understands if you're curious. That's why it's adding a special collection to its Street View data that lets you wander inside without a big trek to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/26/google-bringing-extra-bytes-to-hawkeye-state-with-300-million-d/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Iowa</a>, Belgium or Finland. If you'd like to sample some of the delights, you can check out our gallery or head down past the break to get a video tour of the facility in Lenoir, NC.</p><p> <div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/inside-google-s-data-centers/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Inside Google’s Data Centers</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/inside-google-s-data-centers/5366822?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/10/google-datacenter-tech-01_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/inside-google-s-data-centers/5366823?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/10/google-datacenter-tech-02_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/inside-google-s-data-centers/5366824?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/10/google-datacenter-tech-03_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/inside-google-s-data-centers/5366825?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/10/google-datacenter-tech-04_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/inside-google-s-data-centers/5366826?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/10/google-datacenter-tech-05_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div></p><p> [Image Credit: Connie Zhou / <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/googles-data-centers-inside-look.html">Google</a>]</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/storage/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Storage</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/internet/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/google/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Google</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/17/google-inside-data-centers/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>

<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/googles-data-centers-inside-look.html" target="_blank">Google</a><!--//-->, <a href="http://www.google.com/about/datacenters/gallery/#/" target="_blank">Where The Internet Lives</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>Backup</category><category>Data</category><category>Data Center</category><category>DataCenter</category><category>google</category><category>Google Data Center</category><category>Google Server</category><category>GoogleDataCenter</category><category>GoogleServer</category><category>Infrastructure</category><category>Internet</category><category>Server</category><category>Server farm</category><category>ServerFarm</category><category>Servers</category><category>Storage</category><category>Urs Hölzle</category><category>UrsHölzle</category><category>video</category><category>Where the Internet Lives</category><category>WhereTheInternetLives</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:38:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20352535</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Intel treats servers to mineral oil bath in year-long cooling test]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/05/intel-servers-mineral-oil-cooling/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/05/intel-servers-mineral-oil-cooling/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/05/intel-servers-mineral-oil-cooling/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/05/intel-servers-mineral-oil-cooling/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Intel Oil Cooling" data-src-height="332" data-src-width="470" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/09/intel-oil-09-05-12-01.jpg" style="margin:4px" /></a></p><p> If putting <a _mce_href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/19/corsairs-sandy-bridge-e-compatible-liquid-coolers-get-plumbed-i/" href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/19/corsairs-sandy-bridge-e-compatible-liquid-coolers-get-plumbed-i/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">liquid cooling</a> pumps, hoses and water inside a highly electrified computer case doesn't seem crazy enough, how about just dunking the whole kit and kaboodle <a _mce_href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/hardcore-computer-bringing-oil-submersion-cooling-to-the-masses/" href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/hardcore-computer-bringing-oil-submersion-cooling-to-the-masses/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">into oil</a>? That's what Intel did with a rack full of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/intel,server?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">servers</a>, and if the oil in question is of the non-conducting mineral kind, it's actually a very chill idea. After a year of testing with Green Revolution Cooling, the chip giant saw some of the best power usage efficiency ratings it's seen, with the oil-cooled PCs easily besting identical, air-cooled units. The company believes more adapted <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/17/more-efficient-heat-sinks-could-sport-nanowire-whiskers/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">heat sinks</a> could push the gains even further, and affirmed that the technology was safe and didn't affect hardware reliability. Cost savings could be enormous, as server rooms wouldn't need raised floors, air conditioning units or chillers -- if you don't consider oil spills and ruined clothing, of course.</p><p> [Image credit: Green Revolution]</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/05/intel-servers-mineral-oil-cooling/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Via:</strong> <a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/12/09/04/2249222/intel-embraces-oil-immersion-cooling-for-servers" target="_blank">Slashdot</a><!--//--></p>
<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a href="http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2012/09/04/intel-explores-mineral-oil-cooling/" target="_blank">Data Center Knowledge</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>chillers</category><category>cooling</category><category>green revolution cooling</category><category>GreenRevolutionCooling</category><category>immersion cooling</category><category>ImmersionCooling</category><category>intel</category><category>liquid cooling</category><category>LiquidCooling</category><category>mineral oil</category><category>MineralOil</category><category>motherboard</category><category>oil</category><category>oil cooling</category><category>oil submersion cooling</category><category>OilCooling</category><category>OilSubmersionCooling</category><category>processor</category><category>servers</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Dent]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 07:07:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20316372</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft delivers Windows Server 2012, puts the enterprise on cloud 8]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/04/microsoft-delivers-windows-server-2012/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/04/microsoft-delivers-windows-server-2012/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/04/microsoft-delivers-windows-server-2012/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/04/microsoft-delivers-windows-server-2012/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Microsoft delivers Windows Server 2012, puts the enterprise on cloud 8" data-src-height="449" data-src-width="600" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/09/windows-server-2012-essentials.jpg" style="margin: 4px;" /></a></p><p> Forget Windows 8, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/WindowsServer2012/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Windows Server 2012</a> is where it's at... if you're a corporate IT manager, that is. Microsoft has just posted the finished version of its suit-and-tie OS for immediate sale in download form. Not surprisingly given Microsoft's big cloud push, the emphasis with the upgrade is on improving how well the software scales for internet hosting -- the company wants one common backbone that can handle as little as a small e-mail server to large-scale <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Azure/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Azure</a> deployments and virtualization. Server 2012 is also defined by what you won't find: while the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Metro/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Metro</a>-style interface from the platform's Windows 8 cousin shows its face in the Essentials version, it's noticeably stripped down and goes away in the more advanced tiers. The real shakeup for some might just be the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/05/windows-server-2012-pares-back-to-four-versions/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">new price points</a>, which drop the cost by a large amount for offices that don't need more than a slice of what the all-out Datacenter edition has to offer. We'll admit that most of our attention as end users will be focused on what happens <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/18/microsoft-windows-8-ship-date-october-26-confirmed/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">several weeks from now</a>, but if you're one of those rare server operators that can't wait to start testing a new OS release almost immediately, you've got a head start on most of us.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/internet/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/software/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Software</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/04/microsoft-delivers-windows-server-2012/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Via:</strong> <a href="http://www.zdnet.com/windows-server-2012-launches-as-cornerstone-of-microsofts-cloud-os-7000003690/" target="_blank">ZDNet</a><!--//--></p>
<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/server-cloud/evaluate/trial-software.aspx" target="_blank">Microsoft</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>azure</category><category>cloud</category><category>data center</category><category>DataCenter</category><category>desktop</category><category>desktops</category><category>enterprise</category><category>essentials</category><category>foundation</category><category>internet</category><category>metro</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft azure</category><category>microsoft windows</category><category>microsoft windows server 2012</category><category>MicrosoftAzure</category><category>MicrosoftWindows</category><category>MicrosoftWindowsServer2012</category><category>server</category><category>servers</category><category>software</category><category>standard</category><category>virtual machine</category><category>virtualization</category><category>VirtualMachine</category><category>windows</category><category>windows server 2012</category><category>WindowsServer2012</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 13:42:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20315844</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[RIM says BlackBerry Enterprise Server 10 users will get legacy device support, IT admins (may) rest easy]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/22/rim-says-blackberry-enterprise-server-10-users-get-legacy-device-support/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/22/rim-says-blackberry-enterprise-server-10-users-get-legacy-device-support/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/22/rim-says-blackberry-enterprise-server-10-users-get-legacy-device-support/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/22/rim-says-blackberry-enterprise-server-10-users-get-legacy-device-support/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="BlackBerry 10 hands-on swipe" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/06/jrv8dsc02862-1340136266.jpg" style="width: 600px; height: 399px;" /></a></p><p> Corporate server managers everywhere were given a jolt this week when rumors emerged that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/RIM/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">RIM</a> might implement a hard cutoff for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/BlackBerryEnterpriseServer/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">BlackBerry Enterprise Server</a> 10: any devices based on BlackBerry 7 and earlier might not connect at all, leaving IT leads with the uncomfortable choice of either running a BlackBerry server platform that's supposedly without a future (BES 5) or having to upgrade both the servers and phones all at once. RIM is putting minds at ease -- more or less. The company's Kim Geiger has confirmed in a statement to the media that BES 10 will support legacy devices when it ships in the first quarter of 2013, and that existing server customers will get an upgrade for smooth sailing around when <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/19/blackberry-10-hands-on-video/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">BlackBerry 10</a> arrives. That's no doubt a comfort, but there are lingering doubts. Rumor source <em>BGR</em> maintains that companies will have to run both the old and new servers side-by-side to address everyone, which could make a truly harmonious environment complex, expensive or both. We've reached out to RIM for a more definitive explanation to hopefully settle the matter. In the meantime, we wouldn't panic; no one is being pushed to adopt BES 10 right away, and those that want to upgrade don't have to give up their legacy hardware.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/mobile/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Mobile</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/22/rim-says-blackberry-enterprise-server-10-users-get-legacy-device-support/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>

<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a target="_blank" href="http://www.phonescoop.com/articles/article.php?a=11006">Phone Scoop</a><!--//-->, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bgr.com/2012/08/22/bes-10-blackberry-7-support/">BGR</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>bes</category><category>bes 10</category><category>bes 5</category><category>Bes10</category><category>Bes5</category><category>blackberry</category><category>blackberry 10</category><category>blackberry 6</category><category>blackberry 7</category><category>blackberry enterprise server</category><category>blackberry enterprise server 10</category><category>blackberry enterprise server 5</category><category>Blackberry10</category><category>Blackberry6</category><category>Blackberry7</category><category>BlackberryEnterpriseServer</category><category>BlackberryEnterpriseServer10</category><category>BlackberryEnterpriseServer5</category><category>cellphone</category><category>cellphones</category><category>e-mail</category><category>email</category><category>enterprise</category><category>mail</category><category>minipost</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>mobilepostmini</category><category>research in motion</category><category>ResearchInMotion</category><category>rim</category><category>server</category><category>servers</category><category>smartphone</category><category>smartphones</category><category>upgrade</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 19:45:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20307128</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Facebook to backup its servers with low-power storage devices at 'Sub-Zero' data center]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/18/facebook-backup-servers-sub-zero-low-power-data-center/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/18/facebook-backup-servers-sub-zero-low-power-data-center/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/18/facebook-backup-servers-sub-zero-low-power-data-center/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/18/facebook-backup-servers-sub-zero-low-power-data-center/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Facebook to backup its servers with low-power storage devices at 'Sub-Zero' data center" data-src-height="400" data-src-width="600" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/08/facebook-prineville-datacenter.jpg" style="margin: 4px;" /></a></p><p> Data backups come in all shapes and sizes. For some, they take the form of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/12/seagate-backup-plus-portable-hard-drive-one-click-backup-with-a/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">external hard drives</a> or a slice of the amorphous <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/14/ask-engadget-best-heavy-duty-cloud-storage-solution/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">cloud</a>. As for Facebook, its upcoming solution is low-power deep-storage hardware contained within a 62,000 square-foot building in Prineville, Oregon near its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/07/facebooks-open-compute-project-shares-plans-for-energy-efficien/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">existing</a> Beaver State data center. Unofficially referred to as "Sub-Zero," the facility will store a copy of the social network's data in case its primary servers need to be restored in an emergency. Rather than continuously power HDDs that are only occasionally used, the new setup can conserve energy by lighting-up drives just when they're needed. One of the company's existing server racks eats up around 4.5 kilowatts, while those at Sub-Zero are each expected to consume approximately 1.5 kilowatts once they're up and running. Tom Furlong, Facebook's vice president of site operations, told <em>Wired</em> that there are hopes to create a similar structure alongside the firm's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/21/facebook-flips-the-swtich-on-its-north-carolina-data-center/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">North Carolina data center</a>. Since the Prineville project is still being planned, Zuckerberg &amp; Co. have roughly six to nine months to suss out all the details before your photos are backed up at the new digs.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/storage/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Storage</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/internet/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Internet</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/18/facebook-backup-servers-sub-zero-low-power-data-center/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>back-up</category><category>back-ups</category><category>backup</category><category>backups</category><category>data center</category><category>DataCenter</category><category>emergency backup</category><category>EmergencyBackup</category><category>energy</category><category>energy efficiency</category><category>energy efficient</category><category>EnergyEfficiency</category><category>EnergyEfficient</category><category>Facebook</category><category>hdd</category><category>hdds</category><category>low power</category><category>low-power</category><category>LowPower</category><category>oregon</category><category>Prineville</category><category>Prineville Oregon</category><category>PrinevilleOregon</category><category>server</category><category>server rack</category><category>server racks</category><category>ServerRack</category><category>ServerRacks</category><category>servers</category><category>social network</category><category>social networking</category><category>social networks</category><category>SocialNetwork</category><category>SocialNetworking</category><category>SocialNetworks</category><category>storage</category><category>Sub Zero</category><category>sub-zero</category><category>SubZero</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexis Santos]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 20:23:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20303887</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[IBM buys Texas Memory Systems to bring on speedy storage]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/16/ibm-buys-texas-memory-systems-to-bring-on-speedy-storage/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/16/ibm-buys-texas-memory-systems-to-bring-on-speedy-storage/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/16/ibm-buys-texas-memory-systems-to-bring-on-speedy-storage/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/16/ibm-buys-texas-memory-systems-to-bring-on-speedy-storage/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="IBM buys Texas Memory Systems to bring on speedy storage" data-src-height="95" data-src-width="600" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/08/tms-ramsan-720.jpg" style="margin: 4px;" /></a></p><p> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/IBM/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">IBM</a> is becoming <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/04/ibm-pushing-system-z-power7-chips-as-high-as-5-5ghz/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">serious about enterprise-grade computing</a> in more ways than one. It just struck a deal to acquire <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/04/ibm-pushing-system-z-power7-chips-as-high-as-5-5ghz/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Texas Memory Systems</a>, best known these days for its extra-quick <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/22/tms-ramsan-70-ssd-packs-2gb-per-second-throughput-up-to-900gb-c/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">RamSan SSD cards</a>. As you'd anticipate, that fast yet lean storage is the focus -- IBM wants servers that aren't limited by their drives, or which just use less power than old-fashioned spinning hard disks and tape machines. Neither side is talking about how much the deal is worth, but TMS' product roster should stay on the market even as it's folded into IBM's Smarter Storage initiative. Expect that database at work to suddenly get faster sometime after the acquisition closes later this year.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/storage/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Storage</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/16/ibm-buys-texas-memory-systems-to-bring-on-speedy-storage/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>acquisition</category><category>agreement</category><category>buyout</category><category>deal</category><category>desktop</category><category>desktops</category><category>enterprise</category><category>ibm</category><category>international business machines</category><category>InternationalBusinessMachines</category><category>merger</category><category>ramsan</category><category>server</category><category>servers</category><category>solid state drive</category><category>solid-state drive</category><category>Solid-stateDrive</category><category>SolidStateDrive</category><category>ssd</category><category>storage</category><category>takeover</category><category>texas memory systems</category><category>TexasMemorySystems</category><category>tms</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:46:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20302464</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Facebook releases its 2011 energy usage report, details your carbon footprint]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/01/facebook-2011-energy-statistics/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/01/facebook-2011-energy-statistics/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/01/facebook-2011-energy-statistics/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/01/facebook-2011-energy-statistics/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Facebook releases its 2011 energy usage report, details your carbon footprint" data-src-height="413" data-src-width="600" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/08/facebookenergy.jpg" style="margin: 4px;" /></a></p><p> More <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/facebook?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Facebook</a> news, but this time we're back to the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/26/facebook-posts-first-earnings-as-a-public-company-1-8-billion/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">numbers</a> instead of reporting on a new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/31/facebook-saving-feature/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">feature</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/30/facebook-improves-photo-viewing/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">improvement</a> or <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/31/bing-search-lets-you-tag-facebook-friends-forces-them-to-google/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">integration</a>. As part of its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/07/facebooks-open-compute-project-shares-plans-for-energy-efficien/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">mission</a> to swap the familiar blue for something of a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/21/facebook-flips-the-swtich-on-its-north-carolina-data-center/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">greener tinge</a>, Facebook released today its carbon footprint and overall <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/26/visualized-ring-around-the-world-of-data-center-power-usage/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">energy usage figures</a> for 2011. Turning bio-babble into easy visualizations, the company points out that for the whole year, an active user occupied roughly the same carbon footprint as one medium latte. Or, if you're a fan of the tipple, a couple of glasses of wine. Impressively, 23 percent of the social giant's energy usage came from clean and renewable sources, which puts it well on the way to its 2015 target of 25 percent or more. If you'd like more info and a complete breakdown of the stats, the full report is available at the source link below.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/internet/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Internet</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/01/facebook-2011-energy-statistics/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>carbon footprint</category><category>CarbonFootprint</category><category>data center</category><category>data centers</category><category>DataCenter</category><category>DataCenters</category><category>energy</category><category>energy efficiency</category><category>energy efficient</category><category>energy usage</category><category>energy use</category><category>EnergyEfficiency</category><category>EnergyEfficient</category><category>EnergyUsage</category><category>EnergyUse</category><category>Facebook</category><category>facebook data center</category><category>FacebookDataCenter</category><category>green energy</category><category>GreenEnergy</category><category>open compute project</category><category>OpenComputeProject</category><category>power</category><category>power usage</category><category>power use</category><category>PowerUsage</category><category>PowerUse</category><category>renewable energy</category><category>RenewableEnergy</category><category>server</category><category>servers</category><category>social</category><category>social networking</category><category>SocialNetworking</category><category>web servers</category><category>WebServers</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Rigg]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 20:58:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20291069</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Intel slips details of Poulson-based Itanium 9500 in advance, teases a big boost to 64-bit servers]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/19/intel-slips-details-of-poulson-based-itanium-9500-in-advance/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/19/intel-slips-details-of-poulson-based-itanium-9500-in-advance/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/19/intel-slips-details-of-poulson-based-itanium-9500-in-advance/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/19/intel-slips-details-of-poulson-based-itanium-9500-in-advance/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Intel slips out Poulsonbased Itanium 9500 details in advance, tease a big boost to 64bit servers" data-src-height="343" data-src-width="600" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/07/intel-itanium-9500-poulson-manual.jpg" style="margin: 4px;" /></a></p><p> If you think Intel took awhile to roll out the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/06/intel-intros-xeon-e5-2600-family/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Xeon E5</a>, imagine the mindset of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Itanium/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Itanium</a> server operators -- they haven't had any kind of update to the IA-64 chip design since February 2010, and they're still waiting. Much to their relief, Intel just dropped a big hint that the next-generation, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/22/intel-talks-up-next-gen-itanium-32nm-8-core-poulson/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Poulson</a>-based Itanium is getting close. Both a reference manual and a Product Change Notification have signaled that the new, 32-nanometer part will get the Itanium 9500 name as well as a heap of extra improvements that haven't been detailed until now. We knew of the eight processing cores, but the inadvertent revelation also confirms about a 50 percent hike in the interconnect speed and a matching increase in the cache size to 32MB. Clock speeds also start where current <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/intel-launching-tukwila-worlds-first-2-billion-transistor-proc/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Tukwila</a>-running Itaniums stop, with four processors between 1.73GHz and 2.53GHz giving the line a much-needed shot of adrenaline. Few of us end users will ever directly benefit when Poulson ships to company server farms later this year; after these increases, though, don't be shocked when the database at work is suddenly much quicker on its toes.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/19/intel-slips-details-of-poulson-based-itanium-9500-in-advance/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>32 nanometer</category><category>32 nm</category><category>32-nanometer</category><category>32Nanometer</category><category>32Nm</category><category>desktop</category><category>desktops</category><category>High performance computing</category><category>high-performance computing</category><category>High-performanceComputing</category><category>HighPerformanceComputing</category><category>ia 64</category><category>ia-64</category><category>Ia64</category><category>intel</category><category>intel itanium</category><category>intel itanium poulson</category><category>intel poulson</category><category>intel tukwila</category><category>IntelItanium</category><category>IntelItaniumPoulson</category><category>IntelPoulson</category><category>IntelTukwila</category><category>itanium</category><category>poulson</category><category>server</category><category>servers</category><category>tukwila</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 01:33:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20281167</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Calxeda benchmarks claim that its server chips are 15 times more power efficient than Intel's]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/21/calxeda-benchmarks/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/21/calxeda-benchmarks/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/21/calxeda-benchmarks/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/21/calxeda-benchmarks/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Image" height="425" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/06/ecx1000apachebenchmarkjune20121copy.jpg" style="margin:4px" width="566" /></a></p><p> Calxeda may have been given the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/20/project-moonshot-take-two-hps-low-power-gemini-servers-let-go/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">bum's rush</a> by HP's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/02/hp-and-calxedas-moonshot-arm-servers-will-bring-all-the-boys-to/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Project Moonshot</a>, but the company isn't taking it lying down. It's released benchmarks for its ARM-based server technology that claims it's 15 times more power-efficient than the comparable Intel Xeon. Rigging up a 1.1GHz Energycore ECX-1000 with 4GB RAM against a 3.3GHz Xeon E3-1240, the former consumed only 5.26 W compared to the 102 W of Intel's high-spec chip. While it certainly wasn't faster, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/power+efficiency/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">power efficiency</a> is a key concern for data centers looking to keep costs down, and if the trend continues, Santa Clara will come to regret <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/12/amd-arm-hsa-foundation/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">AMD's</a> recently announced <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/13/amd-arm-security/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">love-in</a>.</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/21/calxeda-benchmarks/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>Calxeda</category><category>Calxeda EnergyCore</category><category>CalxedaEnergycore</category><category>E3-1240</category><category>Efficiency</category><category>Energycore ECX-1000</category><category>EnergycoreEcx-1000</category><category>Intel Xeon</category><category>Intel Xeon E3-1240</category><category>IntelXeon</category><category>IntelXeonE3-1240</category><category>Power</category><category>Power Efficiency</category><category>PowerEfficiency</category><category>Server</category><category>Servers</category><category>Wattage</category><category>Watts</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 06:57:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20263113</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Project Moonshot take two: HP's low-power Gemini servers let go of ARM's Calxeda for Intel's Centerton]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/20/project-moonshot-take-two-hps-low-power-gemini-servers-let-go/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/20/project-moonshot-take-two-hps-low-power-gemini-servers-let-go/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/20/project-moonshot-take-two-hps-low-power-gemini-servers-let-go/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/20/project-moonshot-take-two-hps-low-power-gemini-servers-let-go/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Project Moonshot take two HP's lowpower Gemini servers let go of ARM's Calxeda for Intel's Centerton," height="423" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/06/hpredstonedevelopmentplatform1-580x423.jpg" style="margin:4px" width="580" /></a></p><p> Last we'd heard of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/02/hp-and-calxedas-moonshot-arm-servers-will-bring-all-the-boys-to/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">HP's Project Moonshot</a>, that effort to create low-energy servers was set to ride on the back of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/27/hp-to-announce-arm-based-servers-next-month-throw-intel-a-curve/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Calxeda SoC</a>. But for the rollout of its production-ready "Gemini" models, the company's changed tack, replacing the previously announced ARM chips for Intel's Centerton. Why the sudden swap? Well, it seems that new Atom processor delivers the same energy-sipping promise of its predecessor, while also adding 64-bit support, a broader software ecosystem, error correcting code memory and hardware virtualization. That's all well and good, but when you boil it down to layman's terms, HP's really just angling for the ultimate in efficiency and it plans to do that by providing these compact servers in "a [smaller] footprint" than currently available setups. The system's still not quite ready for primetime consumption, given its very recent public outing, however, demo units are in the pipeline, with a planned launch for the end of 2012. If this sort of back-end geekery gets your blood flowing, feel free to hit up the official presser after the break.</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/20/project-moonshot-take-two-hps-low-power-gemini-servers-let-go/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>Hewlett Packard</category><category>HewlettPackard</category><category>HP</category><category>HP Server</category><category>HP Servers</category><category>HpServer</category><category>HpServers</category><category>Server</category><category>Servers</category><category>System on a Chip</category><category>System on Chip</category><category>SystemOnAChip</category><category>SystemOnChip</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Volpe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 18:42:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20262534</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Dell begins test deployment of ARM-based Copper servers]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/29/dell-test-deployment-arm-servers/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/29/dell-test-deployment-arm-servers/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/29/dell-test-deployment-arm-servers/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center; "> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/29/dell-test-deployment-arm-servers/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Dell begins test deployment of ARM-based Copper servers" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/copper.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 238px; " /></a></p><p> Back in February, Dell <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/21/dell-wants-in-on-arm-server-field-says-software-still-has-some/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">revealed its intentions</a> to enter the ARM server field. Today, the company announced that it is shipping ARM-based Copper servers to a limited number of customers. Copper is lower power than x86 servers, and Dell thinks this makes it a good fit for energy-intensive platforms such as Hadoop. In that same vein, the company views Copper as a cost-effective option that can be used for light workloads and for testing performance. In addition to deploying its new servers to select clients, Dell will be looking to the open source community for help in further developing its ARM system (the platform currently runs Linux). No word on when Copper will move beyond the testing phase.</p><p></p><p></p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/29/dell-test-deployment-arm-servers/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>ARM</category><category>arm server</category><category>ARM servers</category><category>ArmServer</category><category>ArmServers</category><category>copper</category><category>Copper server</category><category>CopperServer</category><category>dell</category><category>Dell ARM servers</category><category>Dell Copper server</category><category>Dell server</category><category>Dell servers</category><category>DellArmServers</category><category>DellCopperServer</category><category>DellServer</category><category>DellServers</category><category>hadoop</category><category>server</category><category>servers</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Silbert]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 15:41:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20247031</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[A day in the life of a Gmail email]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/a-day-in-the-life-of-a-gmail-email/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/a-day-in-the-life-of-a-gmail-email/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/a-day-in-the-life-of-a-gmail-email/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/a-day-in-the-life-of-a-gmail-email/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="A day in the life of a Gmail email" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/2012-05-15gmail-the-story-of-send.png" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 344px;" /></a></p><p> Electronic mail, or email to those in the know, has become so ubiquitous and transparent that many take for granted the effort and engineering required to make this near-instant communication medium a reality. In an effort to remind the general public about this digital miracle, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Google?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Google</a> (a company that knows a thing or two about the <em>subject</em>) has launched a new mini-site dubbed <em>The Story of Send</em>. The web novella leverages animations and videos to explain what happens to a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Gmail?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Gmail</a> dispatch once it's jettisoned from your mail client of choice. Message transmission, data security and green computing initiatives are just a few of the topics on the menu. Saunter past the break, have a peek at the video primer then make sure to check out the full<em> Story of Send </em>site.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/alt/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Alt</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/a-day-in-the-life-of-a-gmail-email/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>email</category><category>Gmail</category><category>Google</category><category>Message</category><category>Servers</category><category>The Story of Send</category><category>TheStoryOfSend</category><category>Transmission</category><category>video</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Munchbach]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 17:58:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20238239</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Intel launches new Ivy Bridge Xeons, targets microservers]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/intel-launches-new-ivy-bridge-xeons-targets-microservers/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/intel-launches-new-ivy-bridge-xeons-targets-microservers/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/intel-launches-new-ivy-bridge-xeons-targets-microservers/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center; "> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/intel-launches-new-ivy-bridge-xeons-targets-microservers/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Intel launches new Ivy Bridge Xeons, targets microservers" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/intelxeone31200v2v1table.jpg" style="margin-left: 4px; margin-right: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 500px; height: 383px; " /></a></p><p> Intel is pushing out that delicious <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ivybridge?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Ivy Bridge</a> update to server chips and, interestingly, it's not focusing purely on the high end to start. In total, 28 new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/xeon?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Xeon</a> CPUs were introduced today, including the E5-4600 and 2400 families targeted at four and two socket systems, respectively. Those tweaked mainstream processors aren't the interesting part, though. We're more intrigued by the updated E3 series, the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/intel-plans-ivy-bridge-based-xeon-e3s-and-low-power-atom-microservers/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">low-end offerings</a> that are aimed small businesses and light web-hosting duty. In particular the new E3-1220L v2 slashes power consumption to an impressive 17w by going with just two cores and only 3MB of cache. While that 3W advantage over its predecessor may not sound like much, it can make a huge difference in the microserver market and in high-density environments where cooling a room full of servers can become problematic. Even in its stripped down form the extremely low-power processor still supports Turbo Boost, Trusted Execution Technology and PCI-Express 3.0. Considering that last-gen's Atom-based server chip pulled down 15W, we'd consider the 1220L v2 an impressive feat of engineering. Now we've just gotta hope that Intel can carry through on that promised <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/intel-plans-ivy-bridge-based-xeon-e3s-and-low-power-atom-microservers/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">6W Centerton</a> chip. Check out the PR after the break.</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/intel-launches-new-ivy-bridge-xeons-targets-microservers/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>CPUs</category><category>intel</category><category>intel xeon</category><category>IntelXeon</category><category>ivy bridge</category><category>IvyBridge</category><category>server</category><category>servers</category><category>xeon</category><category>Xeon e3</category><category>xeon e3-1200</category><category>Xeon E3-1200 v2</category><category>Xeon E3-1220L v2</category><category>xeon e5</category><category>xeon e5-2400</category><category>xeon e5-4600</category><category>XeonE3</category><category>XeonE3-1200</category><category>XeonE3-1200V2</category><category>XeonE3-1220lV2</category><category>XeonE5</category><category>XeonE5-2400</category><category>XeonE5-4600</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 01:41:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20237828</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Facebook flips the switch on its North Carolina data center, cooled with balmy mountain air]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/21/facebook-flips-the-swtich-on-its-north-carolina-data-center/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/21/facebook-flips-the-swtich-on-its-north-carolina-data-center/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/21/facebook-flips-the-swtich-on-its-north-carolina-data-center/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/21/facebook-flips-the-swtich-on-its-north-carolina-data-center/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Facebook flips the swtich on its North Carolina data center, cooled with balmy mountain air" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/04/facebook-nc-data-center.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 397px;" /></a></p><p> Since breaking ground in Western <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/20/apples-2012-enviromental-report-reveals-giant-solar-array/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">North Carolina</a> some 16 months ago, Facebook has been running at full speed to get its newest data center online. This week, Zuckerberg &amp; Co. flipped the switch. The new facility, located in Forest City, touts the "first major deployment" of the outfit's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/26/facebooks-open-compute-takes-on-data-storage-designs-a-better/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Open Compute Project</a> web servers and will be the first "live test" of the OPC's outdoor air-cooling design. It tends to get pretty warm around those parts and humidity levels are a bit outside of ideal data center conditions. The Carolina facility will mirror the projected power utilization effectiveness (PUE) of FB's Oregon data center at just a smidge above 1 - somewhere between 1.06 and 1.08 to be exact. In other words, this means the ratio of power used by the structure and the actual power sent to the hardware is almost perfect with minimal energy loss. No matter, it'll still be using <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/26/visualized-ring-around-the-world-of-data-center-power-usage/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">plenty of power</a>. A second identical building is slated to open on the site later this year, but for now, hit the source link for a bit more info on the initial launch.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/alt/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Alt</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/21/facebook-flips-the-swtich-on-its-north-carolina-data-center/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>bandwidth</category><category>data center</category><category>DataCenter</category><category>energy efficient</category><category>EnergyEfficient</category><category>facebook</category><category>facebook data center</category><category>FacebookDataCenter</category><category>internet</category><category>nc</category><category>north carolina</category><category>NorthCarolina</category><category>Open Compute Project</category><category>OpenComputeProject</category><category>raise up</category><category>RaiseUp</category><category>servers</category><category>web servers</category><category>WebServers</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Billy Steele]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 03:05:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20220731</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Amazon stores 1,700 human genomes in the cloud]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/31/amazon-stores-human-genomes/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/31/amazon-stores-human-genomes/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/31/amazon-stores-human-genomes/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/31/amazon-stores-human-genomes/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Amazon stores 1,700 human genomes in the cloud" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/amazon-dna2.jpg" style="margin: 4px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; float: right;" /></a>Not content with speeding up <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/28/amazon-silk-mobile-browser-spins-a-faster-mobile-web-courtesy-o/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">web browsing</a> and hosting <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/17/amazon-web-services-govcloud-puts-federal-data-behind-remote-lo/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">federal data</a>, Amazon Web Services are now helping in the fight against disease. Bezos' crew is donating a chunk of free cloud storage to the 1000 Genomes project, which aims to make it easier for scientists to search for genetic variations linked to diseases. These gene-hunters can also use Amazon's Elastic Cloud Compute service to analyze data and discover patterns, although those functions won't come gratis. The DNA sequences of 1,700 mostly anonymous <em>Homo sapiens</em> from around the world have already been logged, but the project has to upload another 1,000 samples before it meets statistical requirements. If it ever needs fresh volunteers, perhaps a free <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/20/minion-usb-stick-decodes-dna/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">USB gene sequencer</a> and a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Amazon+Prime/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Prime</a> subscription might do the trick?
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/alt/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Alt</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/31/amazon-stores-human-genomes/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>1000 genomes</category><category>1000 genomes project</category><category>1000Genomes</category><category>1000GenomesProject</category><category>amazon</category><category>amazon ec2</category><category>amazon elastic compute cloud</category><category>amazon elastic computer cloud</category><category>amazon web services</category><category>AmazonEc2</category><category>AmazonElasticComputeCloud</category><category>AmazonElasticComputerCloud</category><category>AmazonWebServices</category><category>AWS</category><category>Bill Clinton</category><category>BillClinton</category><category>charity</category><category>cloud</category><category>cloud storage</category><category>CloudStorage</category><category>DNA</category><category>DNA sequence</category><category>DnaSequence</category><category>donation</category><category>elastic compute cloud</category><category>ElasticComputeCloud</category><category>gene</category><category>genes</category><category>genetic</category><category>genome</category><category>human</category><category>science</category><category>sequence</category><category>servers</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 09:07:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20205661</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[HP readying competitor for Amazon's cloud computing, plans to launch soon]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/10/hp-cloud-computing/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/10/hp-cloud-computing/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/10/hp-cloud-computing/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/10/hp-cloud-computing/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/hp-logo.jpg" style="width: 423px; height: 400px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin-left: 16px; margin-right: 16px;" /></a></div>We're still waiting to see where HP goes with <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/webos?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">webOS</a>, but according to the <i>New York Times</i> it will officially launch a cloud computing service that competes with <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/AmazonWebServices/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Amazon Web Services</a> in the next couple of months. HP Senior VP and General Manager Zorawar Singh is quoted saying the currently in beta service projects as an alternative to what Amazon has built with a focus on personalized sales and service and additional tools for third party developers, as well as a system of small data centers around the world. Throw in analytics based on technology it's obtained by purchasing Vertica and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/30/autonomy-ceo-talks-about-hps-future-promises-really-stunning/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Autonomy</a>, and maybe Meg Whitman's ship has something here, but we'll wait until the next Netflix is running its operations from this cloud before declaring it on the same level.

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/10/hp-cloud-computing/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>amazon</category><category>amazon web services</category><category>AmazonWebServices</category><category>autonomy</category><category>aws</category><category>cloud</category><category>cloud computing</category><category>CloudComputing</category><category>ecc</category><category>hp</category><category>network</category><category>servers</category><category>vertica</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 21:15:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20190529</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Intel intros Xeon E5-2600 family, finally ushers servers into the Sandy Bridge era]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/06/intel-intros-xeon-e5-2600-family/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/06/intel-intros-xeon-e5-2600-family/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/06/intel-intros-xeon-e5-2600-family/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/06/intel-intros-xeon-e5-2600-family/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Xeon E5-2600" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/3-6-2012xeone5die.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px 12px; float: right;" /></a>On the eve of the release of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ivybridge?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Ivy Bridge</a>, Intel is finally bringing its server chips up to speed by introducing the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/sandybridge?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Sandy Bridge</a>-based E5-2600 family of CPUs. The company claims its latest processors outperform the previous generation of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/xeon?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Xeons</a> by up to 80 percent in raw speed, while improving per-watt performance by 50 percent. The eight-core chips support up to 768GB of RAM, PCI Express 3.0, Hyper-Threading, Turbo Boost, Intel Virtualization -- basically the whole Chipzilla portfolio of tricks. A grand total of 17 different Xeons will be available, ranging in price from $198 to $2,050. For complete details hit up the more coverage link and check out the PR after the break.<br />

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/06/intel-intros-xeon-e5-2600-family/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>cpu</category><category>e5-2600</category><category>intel</category><category>intel xeon</category><category>intel xeon e5-2600</category><category>IntelXeon</category><category>IntelXeonE5-2600</category><category>processor</category><category>sandy bridge</category><category>SandyBridge</category><category>server</category><category>servers</category><category>xeon</category><category>xeon e5-2600</category><category>XeonE5-2600</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 14:47:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20187116</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apache outs version 2.4 of its HTTP server six years after last full release]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/apache-outs-version-2-4-of-its-http-server-six-years-after-last/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/apache-outs-version-2-4-of-its-http-server-six-years-after-last/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/apache-outs-version-2-4-of-its-http-server-six-years-after-last/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/apache-outs-version-2-4-of-its-http-server-six-years-after-last/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Apache outs version 2.4 of its HTTP server six years after last full release" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/sugarhillgang-apache-19811.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px 12px; float: left;" /></a>It's been half a dozen years since Apache last released a new version of its venerable HTTP server, but the day has finally come for version 2.4 to be unveiled to the world. Granted, the old Apache was doing fine -- it's been the most prolific web server in the world since the mid nineties -- but a bit of freshening up couldn't hurt, right? Among the many changes are reduced memory usage, improved performance and efficiency, and more finely-tuned caching support for high-traffic sites. If you want to know more, check out the source link below for an overview and full feature list. Well, what are you waiting for, Tanto... jump on it!

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/apache-outs-version-2-4-of-its-http-server-six-years-after-last/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>apache</category><category>apache 2.4</category><category>apache http server</category><category>apache software foundation</category><category>Apache2.4</category><category>ApacheHttpServer</category><category>ApacheSoftwareFoundation</category><category>internet</category><category>minipost</category><category>server</category><category>servers</category><category>software</category><category>update</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Gorman]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 02:58:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20177402</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Dell wants in on ARM server field, says software still has some maturing to do]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/21/dell-wants-in-on-arm-server-field-says-software-still-has-some/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/21/dell-wants-in-on-arm-server-field-says-software-still-has-some/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/21/dell-wants-in-on-arm-server-field-says-software-still-has-some/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/21/dell-wants-in-on-arm-server-field-says-software-still-has-some/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="ARM" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/arm-logo.jpg" style="width: 240px; height: 200px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px 12px; float: left;" /></a>While the company wouldn't reveal specific plans, Dell did say it's interested in entering the server arena with an ARM-based product. Earlier this year <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/02/hp-and-calxedas-moonshot-arm-servers-will-bring-all-the-boys-to/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">HP</a> debuted its first <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/28/armv8-detailed-64-bit-architecture-appliedmicro-first-in-line/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">ARMv8</a>-powered server, but Dell seems to think the launch was a tad rushed. As it said during the Q&amp;A session of its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/21/dell-falls-short-on-q4-earnings/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">earnings call</a> today, CEO Michael Dell said the company had "been experimenting with making an ARM server for over a year ... but the software stack just isn't mature enough yet." It is, however, intrigued and sees "some interesting opportunities emerging."

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/21/dell-wants-in-on-arm-server-field-says-software-still-has-some/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>arm</category><category>arm server</category><category>ArmServer</category><category>armv8</category><category>dell</category><category>earnings</category><category>earnings call</category><category>EarningsCall</category><category>minipost</category><category>server</category><category>servers</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:58:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20176544</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Intel decides Pentiums are good enough for servers too, at least the low-end ones]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/24/intel-decides-pentiums-are-good-enough-for-servers-too-at-least/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/24/intel-decides-pentiums-are-good-enough-for-servers-too-at-least/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/24/intel-decides-pentiums-are-good-enough-for-servers-too-at-least/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/24/intel-decides-pentiums-are-good-enough-for-servers-too-at-least/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Pentium" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/11-23-2011intelpentiume5700.jpg" style="margin: 24px 12px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; float: right;" /></a>Ah, the venerable <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/pentium?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Pentium</a> CPU. Few chips are as recognizable but, these days, the brand is relegated to the low-end of the desktop and laptop market. Now <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/intel?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Intel</a> is looking to broaden its appeal, by pushing the classic line into servers, though, again targeting the bottom of the spectrum. The Pentium 350 is a 1.2GHz dual-core CPU with 3MB of cache and no integrated GPU, which most servers have no need for -- especially in low-power machines dedicated to file sharing or low-traffic web hosting. While the 15W part is already shipping, we couldn't find any pricing information. Then again, Intel has no intention of selling these to consumers and they're likely only available to OEMs in bulk. Check out the more coverage link for the full specs.

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/24/intel-decides-pentiums-are-good-enough-for-servers-too-at-least/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>intel</category><category>intel pentium</category><category>intel pentium 350</category><category>IntelPentium</category><category>IntelPentium350</category><category>pentium</category><category>pentium 350</category><category>Pentium350</category><category>server</category><category>servers</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 08:02:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20113652</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[AMD ships '16-core' Bulldozer-powered Opteron 6200]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/amd-ships-16-core-bulldozer-powered-opteron-6200/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/amd-ships-16-core-bulldozer-powered-opteron-6200/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/amd-ships-16-core-bulldozer-powered-opteron-6200/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/amd-ships-16-core-bulldozer-powered-opteron-6200/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/amd-opteron.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div><div> We seem to have mislaid our definition of <em>fashionably late</em> -- a fortnight after the promised "October" launch, systems packing AMD's Bulldozer-powered <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/07/amd-ships-16-core-bulldozer-chips-for-servers-makes-consumers-w/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Opteron 6200</a> (formerly Interlagos) will commence shipping to enterprise customers. If you haven't been paying too much attention, you might just believe the claim about it having 16 cores -- Bulldozer's architecture has eight two-core modules rather than 16 independent ones. Despite the short delay and the conspicuous claims, the company reckons it's 84 percent faster, 73 percent more efficient and uses half the power of the <em>equivalent</em> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/intels-xeon-3500-5500-series-officially-unveiled-for-servers-a/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Intel Xeon</a>. At the same time, Sunnyvale firmed up news on the Valencia (Opteron 4200) and announced 2012's Opteron 3000 platform with the new Zurich chip -- designed to run on low-power web hosts. Enterprise customers can read the PR we've got after the break and then begin placing orders; the rest of us will have to keep waiting to see if <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/04/bulldozer-world-record-re-broken-by-andre-yang-with-a-8-58ghz-vi/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Andre Yang</a> can push his FX all the way to 9GHz.</div><br />[Thanks, Khan]

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/amd-ships-16-core-bulldozer-powered-opteron-6200/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>16 Core</category><category>16-Core</category><category>16Core</category><category>8 Core</category><category>8-Core</category><category>8Core</category><category>AMD</category><category>AMD 3000</category><category>AMD Bulldozer</category><category>AMD Interlagos</category><category>AMD Opteron 3000</category><category>AMD Opteron 4200</category><category>AMD Opteron 6200</category><category>AMD Valencia</category><category>AMD Zurich</category><category>Amd3000</category><category>AmdBulldozer</category><category>AmdInterlagos</category><category>AmdOpteron3000</category><category>AmdOpteron4200</category><category>AmdOpteron6200</category><category>AmdValencia</category><category>AmdZurich</category><category>Bulldozer</category><category>Chip</category><category>Chips</category><category>Interlagos</category><category>opteron</category><category>Opteron 3000</category><category>Opteron 4200</category><category>Opteron 6200</category><category>Opteron3000</category><category>Opteron4200</category><category>Opteron6200</category><category>Processor</category><category>Server</category><category>Servers</category><category>Valencia</category><category>Zurich</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:44:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20105687</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[HP and Calxeda's Moonshot ARM servers will bring all the boys to the yard (video)]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/02/hp-and-calxedas-moonshot-arm-servers-will-bring-all-the-boys-to/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/02/hp-and-calxedas-moonshot-arm-servers-will-bring-all-the-boys-to/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/02/hp-and-calxedas-moonshot-arm-servers-will-bring-all-the-boys-to/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/02/hp-and-calxedas-moonshot-arm-servers-will-bring-all-the-boys-to/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/redstoneplatformfull.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
<div>
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/27/hp-will-keep-pc-division-hope-alive/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">HP</a> and Calxeda's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/27/hp-to-announce-arm-based-servers-next-month-throw-intel-a-curve/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">indiscreet partnership</a> has been revealed to the world: Project Moonshot is a new server based around a brand new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/25/arm-doubles-q3-profit-sees-surge-in-revenue-is-understandably/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">ARM</a>-based EnergyCore <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/system-on-chip/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">system-on-chip</a>. These new units are so efficient that a four core version, packing 4GB DRAM, consumes just five watts at full pelt -- for perspective, that's less than your average tablet. The other funky innovation is that all the server nodes now share a single power, cooling, management and storage system rather than carrying it themselves. In terms of space saving, the Redstone four unit chassis you can see in the image above can hold 288 of the little blighters. If you set your alarm clock early to learn more about efficient server architecture, head on past the break for two videos, including a tour of HP's server labs and some press release goodness.</div>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/02/hp-and-calxedas-moonshot-arm-servers-will-bring-all-the-boys-to/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>ARM</category><category>ARM Holdings</category><category>ArmHoldings</category><category>Calxeda</category><category>Calxeda EnergyCore</category><category>CalxedaEnergycore</category><category>EnergyCore</category><category>Enterprise</category><category>Hewlett Packard</category><category>HewlettPackard</category><category>HP</category><category>HP Server</category><category>HP Servers</category><category>HpServer</category><category>HpServers</category><category>Server</category><category>Servers</category><category>System on a Chip</category><category>System on Chip</category><category>SystemOnAChip</category><category>SystemOnChip</category><category>video</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 11:41:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20096415</dc:identifier>

</item>
</channel></rss>