<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[WWE readies Smackdown's switch to HD next year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/21/wwe-readies-smackdowns-switch-to-hd-next-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/21/wwe-readies-smackdowns-switch-to-hd-next-year/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/21/wwe-readies-smackdowns-switch-to-hd-next-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.pwinsider.com/ViewArticle.asp?id=27728&amp;p=1"><img vspace="4" hspace="16" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/11/wwe_logo.jpg"  alt="" /></a>Ready for pro wrestling in 1080i? It's getting closer, as the WWE production team just spent time in Florida shooting all new openings specifically for the HDTV broadcasts. SmackDown was projected to make the high definition switch <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/26/cw-network-going-all-hd-next-season-including-wwe-in-january/">in January</a> and it appears to be well on schedule.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.pwmania.com/newsarticle.php?page=197620404">PWMania</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/the-cw/" rel="tag">The CW</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/primetime/" rel="tag">Primetime</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/21/wwe-readies-smackdowns-switch-to-hd-next-year/">WWE readies Smackdown's switch to HD next year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.pwinsider.com/ViewArticle.asp?id=27728&amp;p=1>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/21/wwe-readies-smackdowns-switch-to-hd-next-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1045668/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/21/wwe-readies-smackdowns-switch-to-hd-next-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>hd</category><category>primetime</category><category>smackdown</category><category>the cw</category><category>thecw</category><category>wrestling</category><category>wwe</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:27:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Zune vs. iPod specification smackdown]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/03/zune-vs-ipod-specification-smackdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/03/zune-vs-ipod-specification-smackdown/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/03/zune-vs-ipod-specification-smackdown/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
<div style="text-align: center;"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/10/zune-versus-ipod-440.jpg" alt="" /> <br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">The <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/02/microsofts-new-zunes-officially-in-80-8-and-4gb-sizes/">new Zunes</a> are official so let's get to it: a spec-by-spec scrap between Redmond's new Zunes and Cupertino's formidable iPod foe. Unfortunately, Microsoft failed to mention the all important battery performance of their new gear in addition to a few other minor details. Microsoft fans will tell you that's due to an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/iphone-to-feature-eight-hours-of-talk-new-glass-surface/">iPhone-like surprise</a> close to the November launch while haters will jump to the conclusion that this is a definite sign of trouble. Still even without that morsel, there's plenty of data to masticate for comparison. <br /><br />The Zune 80GB certainly holds its own when pitted against the 80GB iPod classic on a specification table. That's not the case, however, with the iPod touch as long as you're willing to sacrifice the bytes for the touch's bigger display and heftier price tag. It's a tougher call on the flash-based Zune vs. the iPod nano -- just how important is WiFi to you on a 1.8-inch display? None of this, of course, accounts for the oh so important user experience or the ecosystems supporting their respective players. As such, we'll reserve final judgment until we have the new Zunes in-hand. Until then you'd best dig in fanboys, that November release is a long way off. The tables that follow will provide the fuel to fight the flame wars in the weeks to come.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Update</span>: Battery data updated with information found on <span style="font-style: italic;">Amazon.com</span>.<br /> </div>
</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/03/zune-vs-ipod-specification-smackdown/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Zune vs. iPod specification smackdown</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/portableaudio/" rel="tag">Portable Audio</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/portablevideo/" rel="tag">Portable Video</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/03/zune-vs-ipod-specification-smackdown/">Zune vs. iPod specification smackdown</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 03 Oct 2007 07:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/03/zune-vs-ipod-specification-smackdown/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1004155/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/03/zune-vs-ipod-specification-smackdown/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>comparison</category><category>features</category><category>ipod</category><category>microsoft</category><category>portable audio</category><category>portable video</category><category>portableaudio</category><category>portablevideo</category><category>smackdown</category><category>zune</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 07:22:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
